Role of nitric oxide in desmopressin-induced vasodilation of microperfused rabbit afferent arterioles

Desmopressin Stimulates Nitric Oxide Production in Human Lung Microvascular Endothelial Cells

Desmopressin (dDAVP) is the best characterized analogue of vasopressin, the endocrine regulator of water balance endowed with potent vasoconstrictive effects. Despite the use of dDAVP in clinical practice, ranging from the treatment of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus to bleeding disorders, much remains to be understood about the impact of the drug on endothelial phenotype. The aim of this study was, thus, to evaluate the effects of desmopressin on the viability and function of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HLMVECs). The results obtained demonstrate that the vasopressor had no cytotoxic effect on the endothelium; similarly, no sign of endothelial activation was induced by dDAVP, indicated by the lack of effect on the expression of inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules. Conversely, the drug significantly stimulated the production of nitric oxide (NO) and the expression of the inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase, NOS2/iNOS. Since the intracellular level of cAMP also increased, we can hypothesize that NO release is consequent to the activation of the vasopressin receptor 2 (V2R)/guanylate cyclase (Gs)/cAMP axis. Given the multifaceted role of NOS2-deriving NO for many physio-pathological conditions, the meanings of these findings in HLMVECs appears intriguing and deserves to be further addressed.

Renal vasoconstriction by vasopressin V1a receptors is modulated by nitric oxide, prostanoids, and superoxide but not the ADP ribosyl cyclase CD38

Renal blood flow (RBF) responses to arginine vasopressin (AVP) were tested in anesthetized wild-type (WT) and CD38(-/-) mice that lack the major calcium-mobilizing second messenger cyclic ADP ribose. AVP (3-25 ng) injected intravenously produced dose-dependent decreases in RBF, reaching a maximum of 25 ± 2% below basal RBF in WT and 27 ± 2% in CD38(-/-) mice with 25 ng of AVP. Renal vascular resistance (RVR) increased 75 ± 6% and 78 ± 6% in WT and CD38(-/-) mice. Inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) synthase with nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) increased the maximum RVR response to AVP to 308 ± 76% in WT and 388 ± 81% in CD38(-/-) (P < 0.001 for both). Cyclooxygenase inhibition with indomethacin increased the maximum RVR response to 125 ± 15% in WT and 120 ± 14% in CD38(-/-) mice (P < 0.001, <0.05). Superoxide suppression with tempol inhibited the maximum RVR response to AVP by 38% in both strains (P < 0.005) but was ineffective when administered after L-NAME. The rate of RBF recovery (relaxation) after AVP was slowed by L-NAME and indomethacin (P < 0.001, <0.005) but was unchanged by tempol. All vascular responses to AVP were abolished by an AVP V1a receptor antagonist. A V2 receptor agonist or antagonist had no effect on AVP-induced renal vasoconstriction. Taken together, the results indicate that renal vasoconstriction by AVP in the mouse is strongly buffered by vasodilatory actions of NO and prostanoids. The vasoconstriction depends on V1a receptor activation without involvement of CD38 or concomitant vasodilatation by V2 receptors. The role of superoxide is to enhance the contractile response to AVP, most likely by reducing the availability of NO rather than directly stimulating intracellular contraction signaling pathways.

Arginine vasopressin and serum nitrite/nitrate concentrations in advanced vasodilatory shock

BACKGROUND

Arginine-vasopressin (AVP) can successfully stabilize hemodynamics in patients with advanced vasodilatory shock. It has been suggested that inhibition of cytokine-induced nitric oxide production may be an important mechanism underlying AVP-induced vasoconstriction. Therefore, serum concentrations of nitrite/nitrate (NOx), the stable metabolite of nitric oxide, were measured in patients suffering from advanced vasodilatory shock treated with either AVP in combination with norepinephrine (NE) or NE alone.

METHODS

This trial was a separate study arm of a previously published prospective, randomized, controlled study on the effects of AVP in advanced vasodilatory shock. Thirty-eight patients were prospectively randomized to receive a combined infusion of AVP (4 U h(-1)) and NE, or NE infusion alone. Serum NOx concentrations were measured at baseline, 24, and 48 h after randomization. The increase in mean arterial pressure during the first hour after study enrollment was documented in all patients.

RESULTS

No difference in NOx concentrations was found between groups throughout the study period. AVP patients demonstrated a significantly greater increase in mean arterial pressure than NE patients (22 +/- 10 vs. 5 +/- 9 mmHg; P < 0.001). The magnitude of pressure response to AVP was not correlated with NOx concentrations before start of AVP infusion (Pearson's correlation coefficient, -.009; P = 0.971).

CONCLUSION

Cardiovascular effects of AVP infusion in advanced vasodilatory shock are not mediated by a clinically relevant reduction in serum NOx concentrations. Therefore, hemodynamic improvement of patients in advanced vasodilatory shock during continuous infusion of AVP has to be attributed to other mechanisms than inhibition of nitric oxide synthase. In addition, the magnitude of pressure response to AVP is not correlated with baseline concentrations of NOx.