Trends in blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus in Japan

Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in outpatients with essential hypertension in China: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and new detection of DM using fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2 h plasma glucose (2-hPG) in hypertensive outpatients in China.

DESIGN

Multicenter cross-sectional study.

SETTING

46 hospitals in China.

PARTICIPANTS

Study patients were consecutively recruited from June to December 2009 from hypertension outpatient clinics in 46 hospitals in 22 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities in China. At least 100 consecutive patients were recruited in each hospital. FPG was measured for all patients and 2-hPG was measured in those without a history of DM. A total of 4942 hypertensive outpatients aged ≥20 years were included.

RESULTS

Prevalence of DM was 24.3% (which included both previously and newly diagnosed cases). Among the 1202 patients with DM, 417 (34.7%) were newly detected. In patients aged <45 years, 52.6% of cases of DM were newly detected. Of the 417 cases of newly detected diabetes, 54.9% were identified using FPG tests and the remaining 45.1% by 2-hPG tests; 27.1% of patients with newly detected DM had FPG <6.1 mmol/L and 16.5% had FPG <5.6 mmol/L. Among the elderly patients (≥65 years), 32.4% had normal FPG (<6.1 mmol/L) and 24.5% had optimal FPG (<5.6 mmol/L).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed a high prevalence of DM and newly detected DM among Chinese hypertensive outpatients. Application of additional 2-hPG testing to FPG assay can improve the detection rate of DM, especially in elderly patients.

Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of high-dose olmesartan and telmisartan in type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension

We performed a crossover study in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes to compare olmesartan (40 mg/day) with telmisartan (80 mg/day) in terms of their antihypertensive and metabolic effects. The subjects were 36 patients (20 men and 16 women) with type 2 diabetes who did not achieve a blood pressure <130/80 mmHg following treatment with olmesartan at 40 mg/day or telmisartan at 80 mg/day for 8 weeks or more. The primary endpoint was the blood pressure reduction rate, while the secondary endpoints were BMI, parameters of glucose metabolism, HMW-adiponectin, hs-CRP and lipids metabolism. All parameters were measured in Weeks 0, 12, and 24. Treatments were switched in Week 0, and Week 12 and the following results were obtained. There were 1) no significant differences in baseline characteristics; 2) no significant difference of the blood pressure reduction rate; 3) significant reductions of HbA1c (NGSP), FPG and HOMA-IR in olmesartan group; 4) a significant increase of HDL-C in olmesartan group; 5) a decrease of hs-CRP and a increase of HMW-adiponectin in olmesartan group; and 6) a positive correlation between the percent changes of HOMA-IR and hs-CRP in olmesartan group. In conclusion, there was no difference of the blood pressure reduction achieved at the highest dose in olmesartan group and telmisartan group. But improvement of glycemic control and insulin resistance was only observed in olmesartan group. Because there was a correlation between the percent changes of HOMA-IR and hs-CRP, these effects of olmesartan might be mediated by an anti-inflammatory action.

The effect of body mass index and fasting glucose on the relationship between blood pressure and incident diabetes mellitus: a 5-year follow-up study

There is no consensus on the relationship between high blood pressure (BP) and incident diabetes mellitus (DM). Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the independent association between BP and incident DM and identify the metabolic components that influence incident DM in Korean subjects. The current study included 14 054 non-diabetic subjects (mean age of 41 years) at the start of the study who were followed for an average of 5 years. We measured the risk for incident DM according to the subjects' baseline BP. Subjects were separated into three groups as follows: normotensive (<120/80 mm Hg), pre-hypertensive (120/80 mm Hg ⩽BP <140/90 mm Hg) and hypertensive (⩾140/90 mm Hg). The overall incidence of DM was 1.8% (246 subjects), comprising 0.9% of the normotensive group, 1.9% of the pre-hypertensive group and 4.0% of the hypertensive group (P<0.01). Within the hypertensive group, subjects with high body mass index (BMI) and high fasting-glucose levels were 40 times more likely to develop DM compared with those with low BMI and low glucose levels (0.3 vs. 13.2%, P=0.001). The risk for incident DM was significantly higher in the hypertensive group compared with that in the normotensive group (OR 3.41 vs. 1.00, P<0.0001). However, the significance disappeared after making adjustments for the baseline BMI and fasting glucose levels (OR 1.18 vs. 1.00, P=0.83). We found that the significance of high BP in predicting incident DM was influenced by the baseline BMI and fasting glucose levels of the subjects.

Impact of olmesartan on progression of coronary atherosclerosis a serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis from the OLIVUS (impact of OLmesarten on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: evaluation by intravascular ultrasound) trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of olmesartan on progression of coronary atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND

Prior intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) trial results suggest slowing of coronary atheroma progression with some medicines but have not shown convincing evidence of regression with angiotension-II receptor blocking agents.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial-OLIVUS (Impact of OLmesartan on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: evaluation by IntraVascular UltraSound)-was performed in 247 stable angina pectoris patients with native coronary artery disease. When these patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for culprit lesions, IVUS was performed in their nonculprit vessels (without angiographically documented coronary stenosis [<50%]). Patients were randomly assigned to receive 10 to 40 mg of olmesartan or control and treated with a combination of beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, nitrates, glycemic control agents, and/or statins per physician's guidance. Serial IVUS examinations (baseline and 14-month follow-up) were performed to assess coronary atheroma volume. Volumetric IVUS analyses included lumen, plaque, vessel volume, percent atheroma volume (PAV), percent change in total atheroma volume (TAV) and PAV.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics and blood pressure control were identical between the 2 groups. However, follow-up IVUS showed significantly decreased TAV and percent change in PAV in the olmesartan group (5.4% vs. 0.6 % for TAV and 3.1% vs. -0.7% for percent change in PAV, control vs. olmesartan, p < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

These observations suggest a positive role in a potentially lower rate of coronary atheroma progression through the administration of olmesartan, an angiotension-II receptor blocking agent, for patients with stable angina pectoris.

Effects of allisartan, a new AT(1) receptor blocker, on blood pressure and end-organ damage in hypertensive animals

AIM

To investigate the effects of allisartan, a new angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonist, on blood pressure (BP) and end-organ damage (EOD) in hypertensive rats and dogs.

METHODS

First, a single dose of allisartan was given intragastrically to evaluate the BP reduction in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), two kidney-one clip (2K1C) renovascular hypertensive rats and dogs, and Beagle dogs with angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Second, allisartan was mixed in rat chow for long-term treatment. After 4 months of drug administration, rats were instrumented to determine BP and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). Observation of morphologic changes was used to estimate EOD. Third, the acute toxicity of allisartan was compared with that of losartan in mice.

RESULTS

BP was significantly decreased after intragastric administration of allisartan in SHRs, 2K1C rats, 2K1C dogs and Beagle dogs with angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Compared with the control, SHRs that received long-term treatment with allisartan exhibited an improved BRS and organ protective effects. Mice who were administered allisartan experienced less acute toxicity than those treated with losartan.

CONCLUSION

Allisartan is highly effective for BP reduction and organ protection with low toxicity.

Comparison of effects of olmesartan and telmisartan on blood pressure and metabolic parameters in Japanese early-stage type-2 diabetics with hypertension

Angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers (ARBs) are regarded as first-line treatments for type-2 diabetes with hypertension. Despite the availability of various types of ARBs, there are no comparative studies of their effects on patients with diabetes. In this open-label prospective crossover study, we compared the effects of olmesartan (20 mg/day) and telmisartan (40 mg/day). Twenty Japanese early-stage type-2 diabetes patients with hypertension treated with valsartan (80 mg/day) for at least 8 weeks were recruited to this study. At study entry, valsartan was changed to olmesartan (20 mg/day) or telmisartan (40 mg/day) and administered for 8 weeks. The drugs were then switched and treatment was continued for another 8 weeks. We analyzed the blood pressure lowering effects of each drug by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at 0, 8, and 16 weeks. Simultaneously, we measured metabolic parameters and inflammation markers. Olmesartan lowered mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure more significantly than did telmisartan. While there were no differences between the groups in metabolic parameters, including HbA1c and adiponectin, the decreases in serum interleukin-6 and highly sensitive C-reactive protein were more significant by olmesartan treatment. Our results indicate that olmesartan has more potent arterial blood pressure lowering and anti-inflammatory effects than telmisartan.

The current status of home and office blood pressure control among hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus: the Japan Home Versus Office Blood Pressure Measurement Evaluation (J-HOME) study

Although self-measured blood pressure (BP) at home (HBP) has become popular in clinical practice, little information is available regarding the proportion of diabetic patients with properly controlled HBP. We evaluated the status of HBP control in diabetic hypertensives. HBP control status was cross-sectionally evaluated among 3400 essential hypertensives taking antihypertensive treatment. Of these, 466 (14%) had diabetes. Physicians evaluated the subjects' HBP control as "poor", "fairly good", or "excellent" using a self-administered questionnaire. When the HBP threshold in diabetic patients was set tentatively at 130/80 mmHg or 135/85 mmHg, HBP was properly controlled in 18% or 30% of diabetic patients, respectively. The same trend was observed in office BP. The average number of drugs prescribed for diabetic patients was 2.0 drugs. In the majority of diabetic patients with uncontrolled BP, the BP control status in two-thirds of those was evaluated as "excellent" or "fairly good" by their physicians. In Japan, HBP and office BP were not adequately controlled in most diabetic hypertensives. The main reason for this would appear to be a lack of intensive treatment and a lack of recognition by physicians that their patients' BP was insufficiently controlled.

Comparison of the effects of cilnidipine and amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure

Cilnidipine is a novel and unique 1,4-dydropyridine derivative calcium antagonist that exerts potent inhibitory actions not only on L-type but also on N-type voltage-dependent calcium channels. Blockade of the neural N-type calcium channel inhibits the secretion of norepinephrine from peripheral neural terminals and depresses sympathetic nervous system activity. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of cilnidipine and amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure (BP) levels. We performed 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring before and after once-daily use of cilnidipine (n=55) and amlodipine (n=55) in 110 hypertensive patients. Both drugs significantly reduced clinic and 24-h systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) (p < 0.005). However, the reductions of 24-h (-1.19+/-6.78 vs. 1.55+/-6.13 bpm, p=0.03), daytime (-1.58+/-6.72 vs. 1.68+/-7.34 bpm, p=0.02) and nighttime (-1.19+/-5.72 vs. 1.89+/-6.56 bpm, p=0.01) pulse rate (PR) were significantly greater in the cilnidipine group than the amlodipine group. There was no correlation between the degree of daytime SBP change and that of daytime PR change after amlodipine treatment (r=-0.08, n.s.), but there was a significant negative correlation between the degree of daytime SBP change and that of day-time PR change after cilnidipine treatment (r=-0.27, p<0.05). N-type calcium channel blockade by cilnidipine may not cause reflex tachycardia, and may be useful for hypertensive treatment.

Class of Antihypertensive Drugs, Blood Pressure Status, and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Hypertensive Patients: A Case-Control Study in Japan

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of different classes of antihypertensives on the risk of cardiovascular events in a case-control study of hypertensive patients. The subjects consisted of 171 hypertensive patients who had experienced a cardiovascular event and 537 randomly selected hypertensive controls who were matched to the cases by gender, age, and hospital/clinic. Both cases and controls had been under antihypertensive medication for at least 6 months before the onset of the cardiovascular event (cases) or before the enrollment (controls). A total of 134 physicians across the nation recruited cases and controls, and reported details of the prescription of antihypertensives and clinical and behavioral variables of their patients. Although there was no measurable difference in the risk of cardiovascular events according to the class of antihypertensives, statistically significant increases in the risk of cardiovascular events were observed for non-use of calcium antagonists among patients with angina pectoris and for non-use of the renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blockers combined) among patients with diabetes mellitus. Higher levels of blood pressure were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. The findings suggest that appropriate control of blood pressure is more important in the treatment of hypertension than the choice of antihypertensives.

Efficacy of candesartan in the treatment of migraine in hypertensive patients

Triptans are usually administered for migraine, but cannot be given to patients with malfunctioning cardiac or cerebral vascular systems, which commonly accompany hypertension. This article focuses on 8 cases in which treatment with candesartan was successful in reducing both the incidence and severity of headache in hypertensive patients with migraine. The cases reported in this article showed a mean improvement in Migraine Disability Assessment score from 29.4 to 9 points and in blood pressure from 154.9/90.4 to 129.5/81.9mmHg, suggesting that candesartan is an extremely attractive option for the treatment of migraine. Although recent studies have reported the efficacy of candesartan for treating migraine, there has been no description of its potential advantages over other prophylactic drugs. The present study included patients who could not tolerate triptans for whom triptans were contraindicated, several patients for whom other migraine prophylactic drugs showed little or no effect, and one patient for whom candesartan was prescribed initially for hypertension, but was also found to be therapeutic for migraines. Thus candesartan is considered to be a unique, attractive choice of prophylactic agent for migraine complicated by hypertension.