Efficacy of candesartan in the treatment of migraine in hypertensive patients

Preventive and Therapeutic Aspects of Migraine for Patient Care: An Insight

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a common neurological condition marked by frequent mild to extreme headaches that last 4 to 72 hours. A migraine headache may cause a pulsing or concentrated throbbing pain in one part of the brain. Nausea, vomiting, excessive sensitivity to light and sound, smell, feeling sick, vomiting, painful headache, and blurred vision are all symptoms of migraine disorder. Females are more affected by migraines in comparison to males.

OBJECTIVE

The present review article summarizes preventive and therapeutic measures, including allopathic and herbal remedies for the treatment of migraine.

RESULTS

This review highlights the current aspects of migraine pathophysiology and covers an understanding of the complex workings of the migraine state. Therapeutic agents that could provide an effective treatment have also been discussed.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that different migraines could be treated based on their type and severity.

Pharmacological treatment of migraine: Drug classes, mechanisms of action, clinical trials and new treatments

Migraine is the sixth most prevalent disease globally, a major cause of disability, and it imposes an enormous personal and socioeconomic burden. Migraine treatment is often limited by insufficient therapy response, leading to the need for individually adjusted treatment approaches. In this review, we analyse historical and current pharmaceutical development approaches in acute and chronic migraine based on a comprehensive and systematic analysis of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs and those under investigation. The development of migraine therapeutics has significantly intensified during the last 3 years, as shown by our analysis of the trends of drug development between 1970 and 2020. The spectrum of drug targets has expanded considerably, which has been accompanied by an increase in the number of specialised clinical trials. This review highlights the mechanistic implications of FDA-approved and currently investigated drugs and discusses current and future therapeutic options based on identified drug classes of interest.

Real world effectiveness and tolerability of candesartan in the treatment of migraine: a retrospective cohort study

To date, two randomized, controlled studies support the use of candesartan for migraine prophylaxis but with limited external validity. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of candesartan in clinical practice and to explore predictors of patient response. Retrospective cohort study including all patients with migraine who received candesartan between April 2008-February 2019. The primary endpoint was the number of monthly headache days during weeks 8-12 of treatment compared to baseline. Additionally, we evaluated the frequency during weeks 20-24. We analysed the percentage of patients with 50% and 75% response rates and the retention rates after three and 6 months of treatment. 120/4121 patients were eligible, aged 45.9 [11.5]; 100 (83.3%) female. Eighty-four patients (70%) had chronic migraine and 53 (42.7%) had medication-overuse headache. The median number of prior prophylactics was 3 (Inter-quartile range 2-5). At baseline, patients had 20.5 ± 8.5 headache days per month, decreasing 4.3 ± 8.4 days by 3 months (weeks 12-16) and by 4.7 ± 8.7 days by 6 months (paired Student's t-test, p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with a 50% response was 32.5% at 3 months and 31.7% at 6 months, while the retention rate was 85.0% and 58.3%. The number of prior treatments (Odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97) and the presence of daily headache (Odds ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.97) were associated with a lower probability of response. Candesartan showed beneficial effects in the preventive treatment of migraine in clinical practice, including patients with chronic migraine, medication-overuse headache and resistance to prior prophylactics.

Candesartan in migraine prevention: results from a retrospective real-world study

Randomized studies have reported a positive effect of candesartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in migraine prevention. The aim of our study was to explore patient subjective efficacy of candesartan in a real-world sample of migraine patients and try to identify predictors of candesartan response. We audited the clinical records of 253 patients who attended the King's College Hospital, London, from February 2015 to December 2017, looking specifically at their response to candesartan. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of headache benefit. Odds ratios (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) 95% were calculated. Eighty-one patients (chronic migraine, n = 68) were included in the final analysis. Thirty-eight patients reported a positive response to candesartan, while 43 patients did not have a meaningful therapeutic effect. The median dose of candesartan was 8 mg and the median treatment period was 6 months. In a univariate logistic regression model, the presence of daily headache was associated with reduced odds of headache benefit (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.96, p = 0.04). In multivariate logistic regression model, younger age (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98, p = 0.006) and longer disease duration (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.12, p = 0.03) were associated with a good response to candesartan, while the presence of daily headache was associated with reduced odds of headache benefit (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.71, p = 0.01). Having failed up to nine preventives in patients did not predict a treatment failure with candesartan as well. Candesartan yields clinical benefits in difficult-to-treat migraine patients, irrespective of previous failed preventives.

Migraine in The Elderly: A Review

Although migraine is less prevalent in older than in younger age groups, the absolute increase in the number of subjects in older age groups may lead to an increase in the total number of migraine patients. Consequently, more elderly migraine patients may seek medical attention. In this review, the epidemiology and clinical aspects of migraine in the age group of ≥60 years are summarized, with special attention to comorbidity. The review will focus on treatment choices in elderly migraine patients. These must be based on knowledge of mechanisms of physiological and pathological ageing.

Role of angiotensin modulation in primary headaches

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a major regulatory system controlling many different homeostatic mechanisms both within the brain and in the periphery. While it is primarily associated with blood pressure and salt/water regulation, increasing evidence points to the involvement of the RAS in both headache disorders specifically and pain regulation in general. Several publications have indicated that drugs blocking various elements of the renin-angiotensin system lead to a reduction in migraine. Additionally, interventions on different angiotensin peptides or their receptors have been shown to both reduce and increase pain in animal models. As such, modulation of the renin-angiotensin system is a promising approach to the treatment of headaches and other pain conditions.

Evidence-based medicine in migraine prevention

Migraine headache is a chronic, painful, disabling and potentially progressive, condition primarily occurring in early and middle adulthood. For many patients, daily activities are impaired by the sudden and unpredictable occurrence of migraine attacks. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the field of migraine treatment. For the acute treatment of migraine attacks, 5-hydroxytryptophan(1B/D) agonists (so called triptans), were the most innovative development, successfully aborting attacks in less than 1 h. The search for innovative drugs usable for migraine prevention, however, was less successful, mainly due to the lack of reliable and predictive animal models. Recently, neuromodulators such as valproic acid and topiramate, initially developed as anticonvulsants, have been shown in large clinical trials to be effective in the prevention of migraine. As for the acute treatment of migraine attacks more than 10 years ago, large clinical trial programs are now setting new standards for evidence-based medicine in migraine prevention. This review summarizes the current options in migraine prevention with special emphasis on clinical trial design and new developments such as topiramate.

A comparative study of candesartan versus propranolol for migraine prophylaxis: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, double cross-over study

Objective

The objective of this article is to see whether the effect of candesartan for migraine prevention, shown in one previous study, could be confirmed in a new study, and if so, whether the effect was comparable to that of propranolol (non-inferiority analysis), and whether adverse events were different.

Methods

In a randomised, triple-blind, double cross-over study, 72 adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine went through three 12-week treatment periods on either candesartan 16 mg, propranolol slow-release 160 mg, or placebo. The main outcome measures were days with migraine headache per four weeks (primary outcome), days with headache, hours with headache, proportion of responders (>50% reduction of migraine days from baseline), and adverse events.

Results

In the modified intention-to treat-analysis, candesartan and propranolol were both superior to placebo: 2.95 (95% confidence interval: 2.35–3.55%) and 2.91 (2.36–3.45%), versus 3.53 (2.98–4.08%) for migraine days per month ( p = 0.02 for both comparisons, Wilcoxon's paired signed rank test, blinded statistical analysis). Candesartan was non-inferior to propranolol (and vice versa). The proportion of responders was significantly higher on candesartan (43%) and propranolol (40%) than on placebo (23%) ( p = 0.025 and <0.050, respectively). There were more adverse events on candesartan ( n = 133%) and propranolol ( n = 143%) than on placebo ( n = 90%), and the adverse event profiles of the active substances differed somewhat.

Conclusion

It is confirmed that candesartan 16 mg is effective for migraine prevention, with an effect size similar to propranolol 160 mg, and with somewhat different adverse events. Trial registration: EUDRACT (2008-002312-7), ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00884663).

Renin angiotensin system: A novel target for migraine prophylaxis

Migraine constitutes 16% of primary headaches affecting 10-20% of general population according to International Headache Society. Till now nonsteroidalanti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), opioids and triptans are the drugs being used for acute attack of migraine. Substances with proven efficacy for prevention include β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antiepileptic drugs and antidepressants. All the already available drugs have certain limitations. Either they are unable to produce complete relief or 30-40% patients are no responders or drugs produce adverse effects. This necessitates the search for more efficacious and well-tolerated drugs. A new class of drugs like angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists have recently been studied for their off label use in prophylaxis of migraine. Studies, done so far, have shown results in favour of their clinical use because of the ability to reduce number of days with headache, number of days with migraine, hours with migraine, headache severity index, level of disability, improved Quality of life and decrease in consumption of specific or nonspecific analgesics. This article reviews the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of these drugs in prophylaxis of migraine and can give physician a direction to use these drugs for chronic migraineurs. Searches of pubmed, Cochrane database, Medscape, Google and clinicaltrial.org were made using terms like ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists and migraine. Relevant journal articles were chosen to provide necessary information.

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists against migraine in pregnancy: fatal outcome

A pregnant young woman with a severe migraine is prescribed candesartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (AT II antagonists). This has a positive effect-except for severe maldevelopment of her fetus. There is an increase in the use of the fetotoxic drugs, AT II antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, as prophylactic treatment of migraines, in addition to their use as hypertensives.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for the Prevention of Migraines

Objective:

To evaluate the literature examining the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for migraine prophylaxis.

Data Sources:

MEDLINE (1966–October 2009) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched using the terms migraine, headache, renina-ngiotensin system, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, aldosterone antagonist, and the individual agents in these classes.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

English-language human clinical trials, case reports, and systematic reviews were evaluated for efficacy and safety data. The references of reviewed articles were examined to identify additional sources.

Data Synthesis:

Preventative trials evaluating ACE inhibitors consist of a case series, 2 open-label trials, and a placebo-controlled trial. Lisinopril reduced headache hours 20%, headache days 17%, and migraine days 21% versus placebo In the controlled trial (p < 0.06). Clinically significant (>50%) reductions in migraine measures were more common (52–66%) in open-label ACE inhibitor trials than in the controlled (32–36%) trial. Preventive trials evaluating ARBs consist of a meta-analysis, an open-label trial, and 2 placebo-controlled trials. Candesartan reduced headache hours 31%, headache days 26%, and migraine days 28% versus placebo in the first controlled trial (p ≤ 0.001). Telmisartan did not reduce any prespecified primary or secondary outcome measures in the second controlled trial. Clinically significant reductions (>50%) in migraine measures were more common (54–88%) in open-label ARB trials than in the controlled (26–38%) trials. A prescription database review found that ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy halved the use of abortive migraine agents compared to diuretic therapy.

Conclusions:

ACE inhibitors and ARBs have migraine prophylaxis activity similar to that of some currently utilized agents. Low-dose lisinopril or candesartan may be reasonable second- or third-line agents, particularly in patients with other indications for ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy. Further controlled clinical trials are needed to delineate the role of these agents in migraine prevention.

New drugs for migraine

After the triptans, a calcitonin gene-related peptide blocker (telcagepant) is the first acute medicine that has been developed primarily for treatment of acute migraine. Otherwise, the new drugs have been developed first for other purposes, like anticonvulsants, antihypertensives and antidepressants used for migraine prophylaxis. For acute attacks, a new way to administer a traditional drug like dihydroergotamine is under way, and documentation of efficacy in migraine has been gained for some commonly used painkillers and anti-inflammatory drugs, and for some herbal extracts. Based on insights into the basic pathophysiological mechanisms of the disorder, some drugs have been developed which seem promising in early phase II studies (NOS inhibitors and 5HT1F-receptor agonists). In the future, development and enhancements of existing medicines must be accompanied by increased efforts to develop truly new migraine drugs based on knowledge of the pathophysiology if one wishes to reduce substantially the great burden migraine poses on patients and society.

Olmesartan: Migraine Prevention

Off-Label Drug Uses — This Hospital Pharmacy feature is extracted from Off-Label DrugFacts, a quarterly publication available from Wolters Kluwer Health. Off-Label DrugFacts is a practitioner-oriented resource for information about specific drug uses that are unapproved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This new guide to the literature will enable the health care professional or clinician to quickly identify published studies on off-label uses and determine if a specific use is rational in a patient care scenario. A summary of the most relevant data is provided, including background, study design, patient population, dosage information, therapy duration, results, safety, and therapeutic considerations. References direct the reader to the full literature for more comprehensive information before patient care decisions are made. Direct questions or comments regarding Off-Label Drug Uses to hospitalpharmacy@wolterskluwer.com .

Topiramate prophylaxis and response to triptan treatment for acute migraine

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of topiramate migraine prophylaxis on subject responsiveness to triptans used for acute symptomatic migraine treatment.

BACKGROUND

Clinical experience suggests that prophylactic migraine treatment may enhance the efficacy of symptomatic medications used to treat acute migraine attacks.

METHODS

This open-label, single-arm multicenter study consisted of a 6-week baseline period followed by a 16-week topiramate treatment period. Subjects meeting International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for migraine with and without aura signed consent and entered the baseline period. Those with 3 to 12 migraine periods per month during baseline received topiramate prophylactic treatment. Only patients who completed at least 12 weeks of topiramate treatment were included in the data analysis.

RESULTS

Of 55 patients screened, 40 subjects entered the topiramate treatment period and 21 subjects received at least 12 weeks of treatment. Mean final dose of topiramate was 124 mg per day (range 50 to 200 mg per day). During the baseline period, the mean percentage of attacks rendered pain-free at 2 hours for the 21 subjects was 46.9% (SD = 31.9), while during the topiramate treatment period it was 44.6% (SD = 32.2) (P= .8). On topiramate, after the first 8 weeks of dosage titration, patients experienced a mean of 3.68 migraine attacks/month, compared to 4.31 during the baseline period (P < .03). Thirteen subjects discontinued because of adverse events. The most commonly reported adverse events were paresthesia, fatigue, anxiety, and dizziness.

CONCLUSION

Although topiramate prophylaxis did reduce migraine attack frequency, in this pilot study topiramate prophylactic migraine treatment did not increase the proportion of patients pain-free 2 hours after symptomatic triptan therapy.

Effects of Candesartan for Middle-Aged and Elderly Women with Hypertension and Menopausal-Like Symptoms

Hypertension in middle-aged or elderly women is often accompanied with various symptoms, which may be related to climacteric. The symptoms of post-menopausal women are suggested to be derived in part from instability of the sympathetic nerve system due to a low estrogen state. An angiotensin-receptor blocker, candesartan cilexetil (candesartan), is known to suppress sympathetic nerve activity by inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system in the brain, suggesting that it may be effective for ameliorating these symptoms. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether candesartan improves menopausal symptoms in hypertensive women. A total of 69 female patients, aged 40 years or older, who had hypertension and various menopausal-like symptoms, were recruited from 39 centers to participate in this study. Patients were prescribed candesartan 4 to 8 mg/day (average dose 7.2 mg/day), alone or in addition to current antihypertensive medications. We interviewed patients in regard to their menopausal symptoms and scored them using the Simplified Menopausal Index (SMI). During the 12-month observation period, significant decreases were seen in both blood pressure (157+/-21/85+/-11 to 141+/-18/77+/-12 mmHg, p<0.001) and SMI (29+/-18 to 18+/-7, p<0.001), although the heart rate did not change. The percentage of decrease in SMI was correlated with that in systolic blood pressure (r=0.43, p<0.001). Candesartan may be an effective antihypertensive agent to relieve menopausal-like symptoms in middle-aged or elderly hypertensive women.