1
|
Tevik K, Helvik AS, Stensvik GT, Nordberg MS, Nakrem S. Nursing-sensitive quality indicators for quality improvement in Norwegian nursing homes - a modified Delphi study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1068. [PMID: 37803376 PMCID: PMC10557356 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10088-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of nursing-sensitive quality indicators (QIs) is one way to monitor the quality of care in nursing homes (NHs). The aim of this study was to develop a consensus list of nursing-sensitive QIs for Norwegian NHs. METHODS A narrative literature review followed by a non-in-person, two-round, six-step modified Delphi survey was conducted. A five-member project group was established to draw up a list of nursing-sensitive QIs from a preliminary list of 24 QIs selected from Minimum Data Set (2.0) (MDS) and the international Resident Assessment Instrument for Long-Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF). We included scientific experts (researchers), clinical experts (healthcare professionals in NHs), and experts of experience (next-of-kin of NH residents). The experts rated nursing-sensitive QIs in two rounds on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus was based on median value and level of dispersion. Analyses were conducted for four groups: 1) all experts, 2) scientific experts, 3) clinical experts, and 4) experts of experience. RESULTS The project group drew up a list of 20 nursing-sensitive QIs. Nineteen QIs were selected from MDS/interRAI LTCF and one ('systematic medication review') from the Norwegian quality assessment system IPLOS ('Statistics linked to individual needs of care'). In the first and second Delphi round, 44 experts (13 researchers, 17 healthcare professionals, 14 next-of-kin) and 28 experts (8 researchers, 10 healthcare professionals, 10 next-of-kin) participated, respectively. The final consensus list consisted of 16 nursing-sensitive QIs, which were ranked in this order by the 'all expert group': 1) systematic medication review, 2) pressure ulcers, 3) behavioral symptoms, 4) pain, 5) dehydration, 6) oral/dental health problems, 7) urinary tract infection, 8) fecal impaction, 9) depression, 10) use of aids that inhibit freedom of movement, 11) participation in activities of interest, 12) participation in social activities, 13) decline in activities of daily living, 14) weight loss, 15) falls, and 16) hearing loss without the use of hearing aids. CONCLUSIONS Multidisciplinary experts were able to reach consensus on 16 nursing-sensitive QIs. The results from this study can be used to implement QIs in Norwegian NHs, which can improve the quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kjerstin Tevik
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
- The Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
| | - Anne-Sofie Helvik
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- The Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Geir-Tore Stensvik
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marion S Nordberg
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Geriatrics, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sigrid Nakrem
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- National Ageing Research Institute, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 34-54 Poplar Road, Victoria, 3050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Helvik AS, Bergh S, Šaltytė Benth J, Borza T, Husebø B, Tevik K. Pain and quality of life in nursing home residents with dementia after admission - a longitudinal study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1032. [PMID: 37759201 PMCID: PMC10537464 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10041-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain in nursing home (NH) residents with dementia is commonly reported and may affect Quality of Life (QoL) negatively. Few longitudinal studies have explored how pain and QoL develop in NH residents with dementia starting from their admission to the NH. AIM The aim was to explore pain, QoL, and the association between pain and QoL over time in persons with dementia admitted to a NH. METHODS A convenience sample, drawn from 68 non-profit NHs, included a total of 996 Norwegian NH residents with dementia (mean age 84.5 years, SD 7.6, 36.1% men) at NH admission (A1), with annual follow-ups for two years (A2 and A3). Pain and QoL were assessed using the Mobilization-Observation-Behavior-Intensity-Dementia-2 (MOBID-2) Pain Scale and the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia (QUALID) scale, respectively, at all assessments. Severity of dementia, personal level of activities of daily living, general medical health, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and the prescription of psychotropic drugs and analgesics (opioids and/or paracetamol) were also assessed at all assessments. RESULTS Mean (SD) MOBID-2 pain intensity scores were 2.1 (2.1), 2.2 (2.2), and 2.4 (2.1) at A1, A2, and A3, respectively. Participants who were prescribed analgesics had higher pain intensity scores at all assessments than participants not prescribed analgesics. The mean (SD) QUALID scores at each assessment were 19.8 (7.1), 20.8 (7.2), and 22.1 (7.5) at A1, A2, and A3, respectively. In the adjusted linear mixed model, higher pain intensity score, prescription of opioids, and prescription of paracetamol were associated with poorer QoL (higher QUALID total score and higher scores in the QoL dimensions of sadness and tension) when assessed simultaneously. No time trend in QoL was found in these adjusted analyses. CONCLUSION NH residents with dementia who have higher pain intensity scores or are prescribed analgesics are more likely to have poorer QoL. Clinicians, NH administrators, and national healthcare authorities need to look into strategies and actions for pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain treatment to reduce pain intensity while simultaneously avoiding negative side effects of pain treatment that hamper QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-S Helvik
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway, Box 8905, NO-7491 Trondheim.
- Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
| | - Sverre Bergh
- Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
- Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway
| | - Jūratė Šaltytė Benth
- Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tom Borza
- Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway
| | - Bettina Husebø
- Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Neuro-SysMed, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kjerstin Tevik
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway, Box 8905, NO-7491 Trondheim
- Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Musa MK, Akdur G, Brand S, Killett A, Spilsbury K, Peryer G, Burton JK, Gordon AL, Hanratty B, Towers AM, Irvine L, Kelly S, Jones L, Meyer J, Goodman C. The uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes: a realist review. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:33. [PMID: 34996391 PMCID: PMC8739629 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02705-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care homes provide long term care for older people. Countries with standardised approaches to residents' assessment, care planning and review (known as minimum data sets (MDS)) use the aggregate data to guide resource allocation, monitor quality, and for research. Less is known about how an MDS affects how staff assess, provide and review residents' everyday care. The review aimed to develop a theory-driven understanding of how care home staff can effectively implement and use MDS to plan and deliver care for residents. METHODS The realist review was organised according to RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: and Evolving Standards) guidelines. There were three overlapping stages: 1) defining the scope of the review and theory development on the use of minimum data set 2) testing and refining candidate programme theories through iterative literature searches and stakeholders' consultations as well as discussion among the research team; and 3) data synthesis from stages 1 and 2. The following databases were used MEDLINE via OVID, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), ASSIA [Applied Social Sciences Citation Index and Abstracts]) and sources of grey literature. RESULTS Fifty-one papers informed the development of three key interlinked theoretical propositions: motivation (mandates and incentives for Minimum Data Set completion); frontline staff monitoring (when Minimum Data Set completion is built into the working practices of the care home); and embedded recording systems (Minimum Data Set recording system is integral to collecting residents' data). By valuing the contributions of staff and building on existing ways of working, the uptake and use of an MDS could enable all staff to learn with and from each other about what is important for residents' care CONCLUSIONS: Minimum Data Sets provides commissioners service providers and researchers with standardised information useful for commissioning planning and analysis. For it to be equally useful for care home staff it requires key activities that address the staff experiences of care, their work with others and the use of digital technology. REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number CRD42020171323.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massirfufulay Kpehe Musa
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Gizdem Akdur
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Sarah Brand
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, UK
| | - Anne Killett
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Karen Spilsbury
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, Yorkshire and Humber, Leeds, UK
| | - Guy Peryer
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Adam Lee Gordon
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East Midlands (ARC-EM), Leicester, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle, UK
| | - Ann-Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, Surrey and Sussex, Kent, UK
| | - Lisa Irvine
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Sarah Kelly
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Liz Jones
- National Care Forum, Friars House, Manor House Drive, Coventry, UK
| | - Julienne Meyer
- Care for Older People, School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Iduye S, Risling T, McKibbon S, Iduye D. Optimizing the InterRAI Assessment Tool in Care Planning Processes for Long-Term Residents: A Scoping Review. Clin Nurs Res 2021; 31:5-19. [PMID: 34056955 PMCID: PMC8652361 DOI: 10.1177/10547738211020373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this review was to chart and report on existing literature that discusses how the interRAI assessment tool drives care-planning processes for residents in long-term-care settings. This scoping review was informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Relevant studies were obtained from databases search of CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Academic Search Premier (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Database (ProQuest), Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest), and Social Services Abstracts (ProQuest). Of the 17 included studies, five (29.4%) addressed interRAI’s minimum dataset component as a clinical data-collection tool; five (29.4%) addressed interRAI’s assessment scales and its clinical-assessment protocols as viable health-assessment tools; four (23.5%) considered interRAI’s assessment scales in terms of whether this tool is capable of predicting residents’ health risks; one (5.9%) addressed the effects of interRAI’s care plans on residents’ health outcomes; and the remaining two studies (11.8%) used interRAI’s quality-indicator function for both the performance of and improvements in the quality of care. The scoping review finds that there is no substantial evidence that supports the implementation of interRAI care plans for consistent health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Iduye
- University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Tracie Risling
- University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stochitoiu IA, Vadeboncoeur C. Adaptation and Feasibility of the interRAI Family Carer Needs Assessment in a Pediatric Setting. Health Serv Insights 2020; 13:1178632920972655. [PMID: 33281455 PMCID: PMC7686600 DOI: 10.1177/1178632920972655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Family carers of children with serious illness contribute many hours of medical
care in addition to usual daily care. Assessing the needs and supports of family
carers is not routine practice. This study is the first to utilize the interRAI
Family Carer Needs Assessment in carers of children, seeking to evaluate and
improve its ability to capture their needs. This is a prospective pilot study of
family carers of children with serious illness receiving care at a pediatric
hospice. Thirty carers completed the self-assessment form. Additional feedback
was sought inquiring about the appropriateness of questions and missing
information relevant to the pediatric setting. All participants reported the
assessment captured important information across multiple domains. Additional
questions surrounding extra costs, home and school supports, as well as direct
impacts of caregiving activities on pain and relationships were identified as
important adaptations. The most common unmet needs in carers and care recipients
were episodic relief from caregiving (n=17) and housing adaptation (n=17),
respectively. Overall, a comprehensive assessment form is feasible in
identifying the diverse needs of family carers of children. Future research
should focus on using pediatric specific interRAI tools to guide improvements in
policy and practice that can address unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christina Vadeboncoeur
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Palliative Care Program, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and Roger Neilson House, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fraser KD, Sales AE, O'Rourke HM, Schalm C. Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in home care and supportive living. Implement Sci 2012; 7:4. [PMID: 22257782 PMCID: PMC3292450 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2011] [Accepted: 01/18/2012] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although considerable evidence exists about the effectiveness of audit coupled with feedback, very few audit-with-feedback interventions have been done in either home care or supportive living settings to date. With little history of audit and feedback in home care or supportive living there is potential for greater effects, at least initially. This study extends the work of an earlier study designed to assess the effects of an audit-with-feedback intervention. It will be delivered quarterly over a one-year period in seven home care offices and 11 supportive living sites. The research questions are the same as in the first study but in a different environment. They are as follows: 1. What effects do feedback reports have on processes and outcomes over time? 2. How do different provider groups in home care and supportive living sites respond to feedback reports based on quality indicator data? Methods The research team conducting this study includes researchers and decision makers in continuing care in the province of Alberta, Canada. The intervention consists of quarterly feedback reports in 19 home care offices and supportive living sites across Alberta. Data for the feedback reports are based on the Resident Assessment Instrument Home Care tool, a standardized instrument mandated for use in home care and supportive living environments throughout Alberta. The feedback reports consist of one page, printed front and back, presenting both graphic and textual information. Reports are delivered to all employees working in each site. The primary evaluation uses a controlled interrupted time-series design, both adjusted and unadjusted for covariates. The concurrent process evaluation includes observation, focus groups, and self-reports to assess uptake of the feedback reports. The project described in this protocol follows a similar intervention conducted in our previous study, Data for Improvement and Clinical Excellence--Long-Term Care. We will offer dissemination strategies and spread of the feedback report approach in several ways suited to various audiences and stakeholders throughout Alberta. Significance This study will generate knowledge about the effects of an audit with feedback intervention in home care and supportive living settings. Our dissemination activities will focus on supporting sites to continue to use the Resident Assessment Instrument data in their quality improvement activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly D Fraser
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|