1
|
Collin S, Lamothe L. [The difficult steering of health system reform: the case of New Brunswick (Canada)]. SANTE PUBLIQUE 2020; 32:211-219. [PMID: 32989950 DOI: 10.3917/spub.202.0211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In many developed countries, reforms of public healthcare systems are ongoing but do not always achieve desired results. In this article, we present the history of the healthcare system reform in the Canadian province of New Brunswick with the objective of analyzing its difficult steering by the state, in light of the dynamics between the actors involved. METHOD Qualitative methods were chosen. Data collection includes semi-structured interviews (N = 39) with representatives of the State, such as health ministers, and other relevant stakeholders, such as managers, citizens or health professionals. RESULTS The stakeholders were compelled by various aspects of the reform, for example francophone health care services, that had consequences on the trajectory of change. To stay on target, the State must adapt to the dynamic interactions of the actors involved. CONCLUSION Reforms take place over a long period of time and their programming by the State can be very difficult, as it requires the mobilization of different types of instruments at its disposal. In order to influence the behaviour of the actors concerned, the State must define a goal whose general orientations are agreed upon, succeed in forging bonds of trust and managing resistance, and finally, use standardized data in order to provide a normative framework and evaluate the progress of the reform project.
Collapse
|
2
|
Fleet R, Turgeon-Pelchat C, Smithman MA, Alami H, Fortin JP, Poitras J, Ouellet J, Gravel J, Renaud MP, Dupuis G, Légaré F. Improving delivery of care in rural emergency departments: a qualitative pilot study mobilizing health professionals, decision-makers and citizens in Baie-Saint-Paul and the Magdalen Islands, Québec, Canada. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:62. [PMID: 31996193 PMCID: PMC6988199 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-4916-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Emergency departments (EDs) in rural and remote areas face challenges in delivering accessible, high quality and efficient services. The objective of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and relevance of the selected approach and to explore challenges and solutions to improve delivery of care in selected EDs. Methods We conducted an exploratory multiple case study in two rural EDs in Québec, Canada. A survey filled out by the head nurse for each ED provided a descriptive statistical portrait. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ED health professionals, decision-makers and citizens (n = 68) and analyzed inductively and thematically. Results The two EDs differed with regards to number of annual visits, inter-facility transfers and wait time. Stakeholders stressed the influence of context on ED challenges and solutions, related to: 1) governance and management (e.g. lack of representation, poor efficiency, ill-adapted standards); 2) health services organization (e.g. limited access to primary healthcare and long-term care, challenges with transfers); 3) resources (e.g. lack of infrastructure, limited access to specialists, difficult staff recruitment/retention); 4) and professional practice (e.g. isolation, large scope, maintaining competencies with low case volumes, need for continuing education, teamwork and protocols). There was a general agreement between stakeholder groups. Conclusions Our findings show the feasibility and relevance of mobilizing stakeholders to identify context-specific challenges and solutions. It confirms the importance of undertaking a larger study to improve the delivery of care in rural EDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Fleet
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, 143 Rue Wolfe, Lévis Québec, Québec, G6V 3Z1, Canada. .,Centre de recherche du CISSS Chaudière-Appalaches, Chaire de Recherche en Médecine D'urgence ULaval - CISSS Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, Canada. .,Centre de Recherche sur les Soins et Services de Première Ligne, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
| | - Catherine Turgeon-Pelchat
- Centre de recherche du CISSS Chaudière-Appalaches, Chaire de Recherche en Médecine D'urgence ULaval - CISSS Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, Canada
| | - Mélanie Ann Smithman
- Centre de Recherche Charles-Le Moyne-Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean-sur-les-Innovations-en-Santé, Longueuil, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada
| | - Hassane Alami
- Institute of Public Health Research of the University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada.,Institut National D'excellence en Santé et Services Sociaux, Montréal, Canada
| | - Jean-Paul Fortin
- Centre de Recherche sur les Soins et Services de Première Ligne, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.,Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Jean Ouellet
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, 143 Rue Wolfe, Lévis Québec, Québec, G6V 3Z1, Canada
| | - Jocelyn Gravel
- Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Marie-Pierre Renaud
- Centre de recherche du CISSS Chaudière-Appalaches, Chaire de Recherche en Médecine D'urgence ULaval - CISSS Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, Canada
| | - Gilles Dupuis
- Department of psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, 143 Rue Wolfe, Lévis Québec, Québec, G6V 3Z1, Canada.,Centre de Recherche sur les Soins et Services de Première Ligne, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Multiple Perspectives Analysis of the Implementation of an Integrated Care Model for Older Adults in Quebec. Int J Integr Care 2019; 19:6. [PMID: 31798357 PMCID: PMC6857522 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Integrated care models for older adults are increasingly utilised in healthcare systems to overcome fragmentations. Several groups of stakeholders are involved in the implementation of integrated care. The aim of this study is to identify the main concerns, convergences and divergences in perspectives of stakeholders involved in the implementation of a centralised system-wide integrated care model for older adults in Quebec. Theory and methods: Qualitative multiple-case study. Semi-structured interviews of key stakeholders: policymakers (n = 11), providers (n = 29), managers (n = 34), older adult patients (n = 14) and caregivers (n = 9), including document analysis. Thematic analysis of the views of stakeholders along the lines of the six dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Results: While patients/caregivers were mostly concerned by their unmet individual needs, policymakers, managers and providers were concerned by structural barriers to integrating care. Stakeholders’ diverse perspectives indicated implementation gaps in a top-down implementation context. Conclusion: Mandated system-wide integration appears to have structural, organizational, functional, and normative transformations, but its clinical changes are more uncertain in view of the observed divergent perspectives of actors. It will be interesting to explore if the systemic changes are precursors of clinical changes or, on the contrary, explains the lack of clinical changes.
Collapse
|
4
|
The Mixed-Method 5W2D Approach for Health System Stakeholders Analysis in Quality of Care: An Application to the Moroccan Context. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16162899. [PMID: 31412655 PMCID: PMC6719162 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16162899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: Quality of care (QC) is not only about satisfying patients, but also about satisfying the various health system stakeholders (HSS). This makes it a complex and difficult objective to achieve. This study aims at proposing a methodological framework for identifying HSS, prioritizing them in QC, and analyzing their interrelationships. (2) Methods: The proposed framework is the mixed-method 5W2D approach, which uses a combination of three basic methods: the 5W questioning technique (What, Who, Why, Where, and When), the Delphi method, and the Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique. It consists of three interdependent phases. First of all, a preliminary list of HSS is established based on a systematic literature review, which is then projected and adapted to the national context using the 5W questioning technique. Secondly, the identified HSS are classified in order according to their influence and impact on QC by employing Delphi method. Thirdly, the interrelationships between HSS are determined and analyzed by applying DEMATEL technique. An application of 5W2D is conducted in the Moroccan context as its health system involves a wide range of stakeholders. (3) Results: Results defined 17 groups of HSS, whose prioritization led to three groups that are at the core of the health system: patients and their families, health personnel, and government. Roles and expectations of these groups regarding QC are divergent and contradictory, which require making trade-offs. The findings of this study intend to guide the development of inclusive strategies and policies that involve key stakeholders for QC assessment and improvement.
Collapse
|