Global Coherence Analysis of Discourse in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Associated Cognitive Function

Discourse performance and related cognitive function in mild cognitive impairment and dementia: A preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

This study applied the discourse task and related cognitive items of the Brief Test of Cognitive-Communication Disorders (BCCD) to normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and moderate dementia groups and compared the scores of each area. In addition, the cognitive functions affecting the discourse performance were investigated by group.

PARTICIPANTS

117 normal adults, 38 MCI, and 31 patients with moderate dementia (DEM) conducted BCCD, including discourse and cognitive items.

DESIGN/SETTING

The discourse item included repeating an explanatory discourse, and the total discourse score was calculated by summing the scores for each of the four areas of coherence, cohesion, proposition, and pause. The cognitive areas of BCCD were attention, visuospatial ability, memory, organization, reasoning, problem-solving, and executive function. This study performed a one-way multivariate analysis of covariance to compare the scores of the three groups and multiple regression analysis determined the cognitive functions influencing the total discourse score.

MEASUREMENTS

The discourse scores reporting differences among all groups were the pause and the total discourse scores, with the normal group showing a higher performance than the patient groups in the cohesion score and the DEM group in the propositions score, respectively. In addition, the cognitive functions affecting discourse performance were attention, organization, and problem-solving in the normal group, and organization and problem-solving in the MCI group.

CONCLUSIONS

Organizing information into a series of semantic units related to each other is necessary for coherent and efficient utterances, and the ability to correctly recognize the task and establish a strategy to grasp the core content is necessary for pragmatic language.

Discourse Measures to Differentiate Between Mild Cognitive Impairment and Healthy Aging

Although subtle discourse declines in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have been reported, heterogeneous measures and tasks among the MCI discourse studies have yielded widely varying outcomes. The present study aimed to first, identify discourse measures that aid the differentiation among people with amnestic MCI (aMCI), people with non-amnestic MCI (naMCI), and cognitively healthy control (HC) participants, and second, delineate the cognitive functions related to such discourse measures. Three discourse tasks (an episodic narrative, a planning task, and a picture description) were performed by 30 aMCI, 22 naMCI, and 21 HC participants. Samples were analyzed using six categories of 15 measures, namely coherence, cohesion, proposition, grammaticality, lexicality, and fluency. The statistical analyses included (1) a multivariate analysis of variance for group comparison; (2) binary simple logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for differentiation between two groups; (3) binary multiple logistic regression for being diagnosed with naMCI or aMCI with the minimum number of predictors; and (4) Pearson correlation analysis for identifying the cognitive functions associated with the discourse measures. The proportion of cohesive words and propositional density in aMCI participants were worse than those in naMCI participants. Global coherence, the proportion of cohesive words, and the proportion of dysfluencies and pauses in naMCI participants were lower than those in the HC participants. Global and local coherence and the proportion of cohesive words, cohesive ties per utterances, propositional density, and dysfluencies and pauses in aMCI participants were worse than those in the HC participants. The aforementioned measures were demonstrated to be effective predictors for classifying groups by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. In addition, the proportions of cohesive words and pauses were common discourse measures for differentiation between naMCI and HC participants or between aMCI and HC participants using binary multiple logistic regression. According to the correlation analysis, memory and executive functions are needed for coherent, cohesive, and efficient discourse productions in MCI. The detailed description of discourse performances in this study will aid the characterization of the declined language abilities of MCI participants and also the understanding of the cognitive functions involved in discourse performance in MCI.