Duration of wrist immobilization is associated with shoulder pain in patients with after wrist immobilization: an observational study

Two-week versus four-week immobilization of stable distal radioulnar joint following surgical fixation of Galeazzi fracture-dislocations: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Postoperative immobilization protocols following surgical fixation of Galeazzi fracture-dislocations (GFD) in adults remain unresolved. This study aimed to compare outcomes of two different immobilization durations (two weeks versus four weeks) in terms of functional outcomes and complications.

Methods

Participants were prospectively and randomly enrolled in two-week versus four-week immobilization after plate fixation of GFD when the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) was reducible and stable postoperatively. Immobilization involved an above-elbow splint with the forearm in full supination. Demographic data, including age, gender, mechanism of injury, fracture characteristics, and treatment approach, were recorded. The primary outcome was the abbreviated version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores at three months post-operation. Secondary outcomes included wrist range of motion, mean grip strength differences between injured and uninjured sides, and complications.

Results

A total of 54 participants were enrolled and randomized into two treatment groups. Demographics were similar between groups, with most participants being male, and the mean age was 35 years (range 18-65). Fractures were generally less than 10 cm. The mean DASH scores were slightly higher in the four-week immobilization group but not statistically significant (1.43 in the two-week immobilization group vs. 2.36 in the four-week immobilization group, p = 0.152). Range of motion and mean grip strength differences were similar between groups. Complication rates were also similar, with recurrent DRUJ dislocation occurring in two participants from each group.

Conclusion

This study found no significant differences in functional outcomes and complications between two-week and four-week immobilization durations after plate fixation of GFD when the DRUJ was reducible and stable postoperatively.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level I.

Effect of Time-To-Surgery on Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

It remains unclear whether time-to-surgery for distal radius fractures affects clinical, functional, or radiographic outcomes or health care costs/use. This systematic review investigated the outcomes of early versus delayed surgery for closed, isolated distal radius fractures in adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases was completed for all original case series, observational studies, and randomized controlled trials reporting clinical outcomes of both early and delayed surgically-treated distal radius fractures from database inception to July 01, 2022. A consistent threshold of two weeks was used to define early versus delayed treatment arms.

RESULTS

Nine studies, including 16 intervention arms and 1,189 patients (858 early, 331 delayed), were included. Mean age was 58 years (range, 33-76). At more than one year, the frequency-weighted mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 4 in the early group (n = 208; range, 1-17) and 21 in the delayed group (n = 181; range, 4-27). Range of motion, grip strength, and radiographic outcomes were comparable. The pooled mean complication rate (7% vs 5%) and revision rate (3.6% vs 1%) were very low in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A delay in time-to-surgery greater than two weeks for distal radius fractures may be associated with inferior patient-reported outcomes. Early surgery was associated with improved long-term Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. On the basis of the available evidence, range of motion, grip strength, and radiographic outcomes are similar. The complication and revision rates were very low in both groups and comparable.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

The impact of shoulder pathology on individuals with distal radius fracture

BACKGROUND

Shoulder pathology can occur concurrently with a distal radius fracture (DRF) but few studies have examined this population.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to expand the understanding of the impact of shoulder pathology on individuals with DRF.

STUDY DESIGN

Mixed Methods Design.

METHODS

A total of 45 participants with a DRF were categorized into a DRF only (n = 29) and shoulder pathology concurrent with DRF (SPCDRF) (n = 16) groups. Quantitative data gathered included demographics, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11, Visual Analog Scale, and Compensatory Mechanism Checklist. Qualitative interviews were performed with 7 participants in the SPCDRF group. Within group correlations were analyzed via the Spearman Rank. The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the two groups. Qualitative analysis was performed to describe the experience of participants in the SPCDRF group. A mixed methods analysis compared quantitative and qualitative data.

RESULTS

Sixteen participants (35.6%) in the sample presented with shoulder pathology; 6 participants (37.5%) presented at initial evaluation due to the fall; 10 participants (62.5%) developed shoulder pathology due to compensation or disuse. Average number of days to develop shoulder pathology after the DRF was 43 days. SPCDRF participants had significantly greater pain levels (p = .02) and more activity avoidance (p = .03) than the DRF only group. Four qualitative themes emerged: It's difficult to perform occupations and changes had to be made; There is fear and uncertainty; The impact of pain; Tried to be normal but could not Mixed methods analysis found that qualitative data further illuminated quantitative findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with shoulder pathology concurrent with a DRF may present with higher pain levels and avoid activity more. In addition, they may describe fearfulness in using their injured upper extremity especially if they have high levels of pain.

STUDY DESIGN

Mixed Methods Design.

Functional Outcomes After Salvage Procedures for Wrist Trauma and Arthritis (Four-Corner Fusion, Proximal Row Carpectomy, Total Wrist Arthroplasty, Total Wrist Fusion, Wrist Denervation): A Review of Literature

Background:

Several salvage procedures for the arthritically destroyed wrist exist. Each of these has advantages as well as disadvantages.

Aims:

The aim of this article is to give practical insights for the clinician on: (1) biomechanical and clinical fundamentals of normal and impaired wrist motion; (2) difficulties in assessment of postoperative outcome between measured motion by the surgeon and self-reported outcome by the patient; (3) indications for each procedure; and (4) differences in functional outcome between partial and complete motion-preserving as well as complete motion-restricting salvage procedures.

Methods:

In trend, Proximal Row Carpectomy (PRC) is slightly superior over four-corner fusion (4CF) in terms of functional outcome, but the methodology-related postoperative motion is decreased for both procedures. Furthermore, PRC is easier to perform, needs lower costs, and has fewer complications than 4CF. Total Wrist Arthroplasty (TWA) has the advantage compared to PRC and 4CF that the preoperative motion values are preserved, but it is limited by decreased load-bearing capacity for the wrist. Total Wrist Fusion (TWF) is associated with a higher load-bearing capacity for the wrist than TWA, but it is limited for carrying out essential activities of daily living. Both PRC and 4CF can be combined primarily by wrist denervation. Wrist denervation alone does not impair the movement of the wrist.

Results and Conclusion:

Salvage procedures for the arthritically destroyed wrist should be detected regarding patients age- and gender-related claims in work and leisure. Not all of them can be successfully re-employed in their original occupations associated with high load-bearing conditions.