Promoting skin safety within the community

Incidence and Influencing Factors of Medical Adhesive-Related Skin Injury in Critically Ill Patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and influencing factors of medical adhesive-related skin injury (MARSI) among ICU patients.

METHODS

Study authors enrolled patients admitted to two ICUs at a class 3, grade A hospital in Beijing between January and June 2018 in this prospective cohort study. A data collection sheet was designed, and the data were collected by querying the electronic medical record and via direct assessment. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors that independently influenced MARSI incidence. The STROBE checklist was used.

RESULTS

In total, 39 of 356 patients (27 men and 12 women with an average age of 61.51 ± 17.49 years) developed MARSI, an incidence of 10.96%. The median time from admission to MARSI occurrence was 26 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the ICU length of stay, Braden Scale score, and mechanical ventilation all independently influenced incidence. The Braden Scale score (odds ratio [OR], 0.758; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.636-0.904; P < .05) was a protective factor against MARSI, with higher scores indicating lower risk. The ICU length of stay (OR, 1.098; 95% CI, 1.061-1.136; P < .05) and mechanical ventilation (OR, 3.373; 95% CI, 0.889-12.795; P < .05) were independent risk factors for MARSI.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of MARSI in ICU patients was relatively high. Awareness of MARSI should be increased among medical staff, and proper skin care should be provided to prevent and treat MARSI effectively.

Heel Pressure Injuries: Consensus-Based Recommendations for Assessment and Management

Significance: A systematic approach to develop experts-based recommendations could have a favorable impact on clinical problems characterized by scarce and low-quality evidence as heel pressure ulcers. Recent Advances: A systematic approach was used to conduce a formal consensus initiative. A multidisciplinary panel of experts identified relevant clinical questions, performed a systematic search of the literature, and created a list of statements. GRADE Working Group guidelines were followed. An independent international jury reviewed and voted recommendations for clinical practice. Consent was developed according to Delphi rules and GRADE method was used to attribute grade of strength. Critical Issues: The extensive search of the literature retrieved 42 pertinent articles (26 clinical studies, 7 systematic reviews or meta-analysis, 5 other reviews, 2 consensus-based articles, and 2 in vitro studies). Thirty-five recommendations and statements were created. Only 1 of 35, concerning ankle-brachial pressure index reliability in diabetic patients, was rejected by the panel. No sufficient agreement was achieved on toe brachial index test to rule out the orphan heel syndrome, removing dry eschar in adult patients without vascular impairment, and using an antimicrobial dressing in children with infected heel pressure injuries. Eleven recommendations were approved with a weak grade of strength. Experts strongly endorsed 20 recommendations. Offloading, stages I and II pressure injuries, and referral criteria were areas characterized by higher level of agreement. Future Directions: We believe that the results of our effort could improve practice, especially in areas where clear and shared opinions emerged. Barriers and limits that could hinder implementation are also discussed in the article.