T.I.M.E. to improve patient outcomes: use of a clinical decision support tool to optimise wound care

Whole versus hole: enabling community nurses to implement holistic wound care

OBJECTIVE

To improve wound-related quality of life (QoL) in clients with hard-to-heal wounds in their lower limbs and to increase referrals to multidisciplinary teams in the management of care for these clients.

METHOD

This was a quality improvement project with a two-group pretest-posttest interventional evaluation design. We implemented a package of interventions including the WounDS app, education related to wound care, and client engagement through a QoL self-assessment. Wound-related QoL was measured using the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule and referrals to the multidisciplinary team were tracked through chart audits. We explored nurses' experiences with the interventions through semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

Clients' average ratings for 'wellbeing', 'physical symptoms and daily living', and 'overall QoL' improved by 27%, 38% and 54%, respectively. The number of referrals increased by 78% post intervention. Nurses described the interventions as effective strategies that motivated them to implement a holistic approach to care.

CONCLUSION

The project was successful in creating a culture shift to practice holistic wound care. This package of interventions (WounDS app, education and client self-assessment of QoL) led to improvements in the QoL of clients with hard-to-heal wounds. Further studies are needed to generalise the findings. Strategies for sustainability include forming a champion group and providing the education and decision supports based on nurses' educational needs assessment.

Sub-epidermal moisture assessment as an adjunct to visual assessment in the reduction of pressure ulcer incidence

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of sub-epidermal moisture (SEM) assessment technology as an adjunct to visual assessment to reduce pressure ulcer (PU) incidence alongside standard PU care pathways.

METHOD

Data were obtained from wards located within 28 institutions in the UK, Canada, Belgium, Spain and Ireland. At each ward, the proportion of patients scanned who were observed to have one or more PUs of Category 2 or above during a pre-Pressure Ulcer Reduction Programme (PURP) implementation period starting between November 2017 and July 2018 was recorded. The proportion of patients scanned who were observed to have one or more PUs of Category 2 or above during a post-PURP implementation period starting between November 2018 and July 2019 was also recorded. A meta-analysis was conducted on the data using wards as the unit of analysis, to facilitate overall estimate of the PURP. A sensitivity study was also conducted to assess the sensitivity of results to data from specific institutions.

RESULTS

A synthesised estimate of the overall relative risk (RR) was calculated to be 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.56). Hence the risk of PU in the post-PURP cohort was about one-third that of the corresponding risk in the pre-PURP cohort. The sensitivity analysis revealed no evidence that any individual ward exerted excessive influence on the findings.

CONCLUSION

The analysis has revealed strong evidence that implementation of the PURP was associated with reduction in incidence of Category 2 or above PUs across a wide range of clinical settings.

Outcomes of wound care nurses' practice in patients with pressure ulcers: An integrative review

BACKGROUND

Wound care nurses are recognised as a key element for improving health outcomes. However, there is still fragmented knowledge of the outcomes associated with their practice in individuals with pressure ulcers.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To identify, summarise and map all available evidence related to the outcomes of wound care nurses' practice in individuals with pressure ulcers.

DESIGN

Integrative literature review.

REVIEW METHOD

To report the review, we followed the modified version of Cooper's five-step methodology, and the PRISMA guidelines.

METHODS

The search was carried out on CINAHL, PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Scopus, with a time frame ranging from each database inception to December 21, 2019. We included observational or experimental studies of adult individuals affected by (or at risk of) developing pressure ulcers who were also cared for by wound care nurses.

RESULTS

Of the 439 peer-reviewed publications, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most frequent outcomes were pressure ulcer incidence, healing rate and time taken for complete healing. Less frequent outcomes were changes in pressure ulcers' stage, number of completely healed wounds, treatment costs and physical discomfort. No patient-reported outcomes were assessed.

CONCLUSION

This review indicates that clinical-related outcomes were by far the most reported. Future studies should broaden the spectrum of outcomes to include more subjective parameters (e.g. pain, quality of life, stress, etc.), in order to gain a better understanding of the global impact of wound care practice on patients with pressure ulcers.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

There is promising evidence of a positive impact of wound care nurses' practice on health and economic outcomes. Nonetheless, more robust and rigorous research is needed to provide stronger evidence in the field and support investment in these practitioners.

Is Moulage effective in improving clinical skills of nursing students for the assessment of pressure injury?

BACKGROUND

In wound care simulations, the practice can be performed on 3D-wounds formed by moulage. Moulage helps the student to perceive the etiology, physiology, and healing processes of the wound, and it can also be used to improve the students' wound assessment skills.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of moulage in the improvement of pressure injury assessment skills of nursing students.

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental study.

SETTINGS

A nursing faculty at a public university.

PARTICIPANTS

All fourth-year students (n = 73) who take the simulation elective course were invited to participate.

METHODS

Fall semester students (n = 38) constituted the control group and spring semester students (n = 35) formed the intervention group. The coin-flipping method was used to match the education period and student groups. The intervention group simulation was performed using moulage, and the control group simulation was performed using a pressure ulcer visuals. The same simulation scenarios were used for both groups. The data were collected using the Simulation Design Scale, Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Scale, and student identification form, knowledge test, performance checklist and feedback form developed by the researchers.

RESULTS

Students' knowledge scores for pressure injury assessment have improved significantly in both the intervention group (pre-test:61.71 ± 9.77 and post-test 70.57 ± 12.53, t = -4.27, p < 0.001) and the control group (pre-test: 66.81 ± 13.47 and post-test 73.06 ± 15.50, t = -2.34, p = 0.02). Laboratory and clinical pressure injury assessment skill scores of the intervention group students were significantly higher than the control group. Besides, the correct staging percentages of the intervention group students are higher than the control group students during the clinical practice (χ2 = 5.05, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

It can be concluded that the simulation with moulage was effective in improving the skills of nursing students who received training for pressure injury assessment and in transferring what they learned to the clinical setting.