Qualitative Methodology in Translational Health Research: Current Practices and Future Directions

Translational health research is an interdisciplinary field aimed at bridging the gap between basic science studies, preventative studies, and clinical practice to improve health-related outcomes. Qualitative research methods provide a unique perspective on the emotional, social, cultural, and contextual factors that influence health and healthcare and thus are recognized as valuable tools for translational health research. This approach can be embedded within a mixed method design which complements the quantitative findings. This methodological paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the fundamental concepts and methodologies used in qualitative research, emphasizing their utilization and significance in translational health research. Several approaches to qualitative research methodology are discussed in this review, including ethnography, phenomenology, grounded theory, case study, and action research. Theoretical frameworks such as the social-ecological model, intersectionality, and participatory action research are also examined to provide a structure for understanding and interpreting complex health issues. This methodological paper also reviews commonly used sampling techniques such as purposive, snowball, convenience, theoretical, and maximum variation sampling, along with data collection methods such as in-depth interviews, focus groups, observation, document analysis, and participatory methods. Moreover, data analysis techniques such as thematic analysis, grounded theory, content analysis, narrative analysis, and reflexive analysis, are discussed in the context of translational health. Overall, this review highlights the challenges and opportunities of using qualitative methods in current practice, while also discussing future directions and providing valuable guidance and insights to researchers interested in conducting qualitative research in translational health.

The paradox of project success despite lack of the "My Pathway" telehealth platform usage

The article investigates the paradoxical success of a Danish telehealth project introducing the "My Pathway" platform to reduce the length of patient stays while maintaining patient satisfaction. These goals were achieved in the project, which was considered successful despite the lack of actual platform usage. Based on a qualitative, longitudinal case study we investigate this paradox by showing how barriers and facilitators have influenced telehealth adoption and use in the post-implementation process, affecting the overall success of the project. The study makes two contributions. First, it describes dynamics of adoption barriers, that is, that barriers are interrelated and influence adoption to varying degrees over time. Adoption barriers resulted in the telehealth platform not being used and it consequently only influenced the actual project success and goal achievement indirectly. Second, it highlights information management as a critical facilitator in telehealth adoption and use. Information management facilitated achievement of project goals despite the lack of actual use of "My Pathway," which explains the paradoxical project success. Based on these interpretations, we point to information management as a critical facilitator of the success of telehealth initiatives and provide recommendations for research and practice.