Applying the principles of infection control to wound care

Acute wound infections management: the 'Don'ts' from a multidisciplinary expert panel

Introduction: The management of acute wounds may be affected by malpractices leading to poor outcome, prolonged hospital stay and inappropriate use of antibiotic therapy.Areas covered: Acute wound infections are represented by surgical site and post-traumatic infections. The aim of this expert opinion is to identify a list of inadvisable actions and to provide a guide for an optimal management of acute wound infections. A literature search using Pubmed/MEDLINE database was performed. Articles pertaining to areas covered published until December 2019 were selected. We identified the most common malpractices in this setting and, using the Choosing Wisely methodology, we proposed a list of "Don'ts" for an easy use in clinical practice.Expert opinion: Malpractices may occur from the surgical prophylaxis to the discharge of patient. A prolonged surgical prophylaxis, the underestimation of signs and symptoms, the omission of source control, the inappropriate collection of wound swab, the improper use of clinical microbiology and pharmacology, the lack of hygiene measures and the delay of discharge are all factors that may lead to unfavorable outcome. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to optimally manage these patients. The "Don'ts" refer to all professional figures involved in the management of patients with acute wound infections.

Managing a common dermatological problem: incontinence dermatitis

Incontinence dermatitis is an under-recognized and under-researched problem that mostly affects older people who have continence problems. Nurses who are aware of the risk factors can provide care that reduces the risk of this distressing problem. If incontinence dermatitis occurs, evidence-based care can be used to treat the person and reduce the risks of further complications.

Role of the wet-to-dry phase of cleansing in preparing the chronic wound bed for dressing application

The wet-to-dry phase is a method of cleansing that acts as an alternative to rinsing prior to the application of a modern wound dressing. Debris, exudate and pathogens are removed from the wound, reducing itching and inflammation.

Aseptic technique: evidence-based approach for patient safety

The fact that there is a relationship between the standards of aseptic technique performance and the rise in hospital infection rates has been suggested by the Department of Heath's (DoH's, 2004) 'Winning Ways' document. This literature review considers how the aseptic technique is performed in the UK, and examines the nature of ritualistic and evidence-based practice underpinning this skill-based procedure. The findings have identified an emerging glove culture and continuing poor hand-hygiene practices. The alternative 'clean technique' is also adopted widely in clinical practice which confuses the aseptic theory-practice gap. While it is hard to pinpoint an actual time or event that causes infection, it is unlikely nurses will ever become involved in litigation as a result of a poorly performed aseptic technique. However, the review concludes that nurses should not become too complacent. It briefly considers how performance of the aseptic technique can be improved, through creative educational strategy, applied risk assessment and clinical audits of nurses' practices.

Use of gloves in the community: why, when, which and how?

The use of gloves has become routine since the early 1980s. It is recognized that they have an important part to play in the protection of both staff and patient/clients in the prevention of cross-infection. However, as choices relating to glove usage have increased over the years, health-care staff need to adopt a risk assessment approach, considering why, when, which and how gloves should be used. This article outlines the different types of gloves available and when they should be used.