Does active surveillance lead to anxiety and stress?

Consensus statement for metastatic surveillance of uveal melanoma in Scotland

Ophthalmic treatments are successful in managing uveal melanomas achieving good local control. However, a large number still metastasise, primarily to the liver, resulting in mortality. There is no consensus across the world on the mode, frequency, duration or utility of regular liver surveillance for metastasis and there are no published protocols. The Scottish Ocular Oncology Service (SOOS) constituted a Scottish Consensus Statement Group (SCSG) which included ocular oncologists, medical oncologists, radiologists and a uveal melanoma patient as a lay member. This group carried out an extensive review of literature followed by discussions to arrive at a consensus regarding surveillance planning for posterior uveal melanoma patients in Scotland. The Consensus Statement would provide a framework to guide each patient's surveillance plan and provide all patients with clarity and transparency on the issue. The SCSG was unable to find adequate evidence on which to base the strategy. The consensus statement recommends a risk-stratified approach to surveillance for these patients dividing them into low to medium-risk and high-risk groups defining the mode and duration of surveillance for each. It supplements the UK-wide Uveal Melanoma National Guidelines and allows a more uniform consensus-based approach to surveillance in Scotland. It has been adopted nationally by all health care providers in Scotland as a guideline and is available to patients on a publicly accessible website.

The Quality of Life among Men Receiving Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: An Integrative Review

Prostate cancer is very common among men in the United States. The current literature on active surveillance (AS) suggests that it is a promising treatment option for men with low-risk prostate cancer. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a thorough integrative review regarding the effects of AS on the quality of life (QoL) of men with prostate cancer. Utilizing a methodological strategy, electronic databases were reviewed for empirical articles during the time frame of January 2006 to December 2016. A total of 37 articles met the inclusion criteria wherein 20 focused on the QoL among men only receiving AS and 16 reported QoL among men undergoing AS and other forms of treatment for prostate cancer. The review highlights the purpose, common instruments, race and ethnicity, and strengths and limitations of each article. The majority of articles indicated low levels of anxiety and depression and decreased incidences of bladder, bowel and sexual functioning among men undergoing AS in comparison to men who received other treatment modalities. The results indicated that additional research is needed to determine the QoL among men receiving AS on a longitudinal basis. The results support previous literature that indicated the positive impact of AS on low-risk prostate cancer.

Qualitative insights into how men with low-risk prostate cancer choosing active surveillance negotiate stress and uncertainty

Background

Active surveillance is a management strategy for men diagnosed with early-stage, low-risk prostate cancer in which their cancer is monitored and treatment is delayed. This study investigated the primary coping mechanisms for men following the active surveillance treatment plan, with a specific focus on how these men interact with their social network as they negotiate the stress and uncertainty of their diagnosis and treatment approach.

Methods

Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews at two academic institutions located in the northeastern US. Participants include 15 men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer following active surveillance.

Results

The decision to follow active surveillance reflects the desire to avoid potentially life-altering side effects associated with active treatment options. Men on active surveillance cope with their prostate cancer diagnosis by both maintaining a sense of control over their daily lives, as well as relying on the support provided them by their social networks and the medical community. Social networks support men on active surveillance by encouraging lifestyle changes and serving as a resource to discuss and ease cancer-related stress.

Conclusions

Support systems for men with low-risk prostate cancer do not always interface directly with the medical community. Spousal and social support play important roles in helping men understand and accept their prostate cancer diagnosis and chosen care plan. It may be beneficial to highlight the role of social support in interventions targeting the psychosocial health of men on active surveillance.