Early elective colostomy following spinal cord injury

Colostomy may offer hope in improving quality of life: a phenomenological qualitative study with patients dependent on a wheelchair

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the perspectives of patients who had spinal cord injuries and were wheelchair-dependent on colostomy surgery, which is among the bowel movement methods.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, which was based on Heidegger's hermeneutical phenomenological approach, the Van Manen method was used to reveal how patients were affected by their experiences. The data of the study were collected by directly interviewing the patients and using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were recorded with a voice recorder device with the permission of the participants. Nine patients who were leading a life dependent on a wheelchair as a result of spinal cord injury made up the sample of the study.

RESULTS

Six of the participants were female. The ages of participants ranged between 32 and 52, and all of them were married. The results of the interviews indicated that the experiences of participants who were dependent on a wheelchair about bowel movement management consisted of three main themes: (a) difficult experiences; (b) coping with difficulties; and (c) colostomy awareness experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed that knowledge of a stoma obtained from different sources was a glimmer of hope for patients but that healthcare professionals did not exhibit a supportive attitude toward this hope.

Colostomy and quality of life after spinal cord injury: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord injury (SCI) has a significant impact on the quality of life (QoL) of affected patients. The aim of this review was to determine whether colostomy formation improves QoL in patients with SCI.

METHODS

The Cochrane Register, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched using medical subject headings. The search was extended to the reference lists of identified studies, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. All clinical trials that included spinal injury and QoL, time spent on bowel care, and patient satisfaction with stoma were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were found (including 488 patients with a stoma), of which 13 were retrospective cross-sectional studies and two were case-control studies, one of which was prospective research. Nine of 11 studies focusing on QoL reported that patients' QoL was improved by the stoma, whereas the remaining two studies found no difference. Time spent on bowel care was significantly reduced in all 13 studies that considered this outcome, with patients reducing the average time spent on bowel care from more than 1 h to less than 15 min per day. All 12 studies assessing patient satisfaction with their stoma reported high patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Stoma formation improves QoL, reduces time spent on bowel care, and increases independence. Stoma is an option that could be discussed and offered to patients with spinal cord injury.

Early Colostomy Formation Can Improve Independence Following Spinal Cord Injury and Increase Acceptability of Bowel Management

Background: Colostomy formation can solve complications of bowel management following spinal cord injury (SCI). Newly injured patients at this spinal unit have chosen colostomy as a preferred option for bowel management. Objectives: To discover the reasons patients choose colostomy formation early following SCI and make comparison with those choosing it later, and to establish whether early colostomy is safe and advisable. Methods: Medical and nursing records of patients with SCI who chose to have a colostomy during the period 2005-2016 were examined retrospectively. Data were gathered concerning reasons for choosing a colostomy, early and later complications, the need for further surgery, and independence with bowel care before and after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: those who chose a colostomy "early" during inpatient rehabilitation and those who chose it "later" as is traditional. Results: Reasons for choosing colostomy differed. Reducing reliance on caregiver and independence were of more importance to the early group; the later group chose colostomy to solve bowel care problems. Early complication rates in both groups were low. Longer term complications were higher in the early group, with the most common complication being rectal discharge. Parastomal hernia rates were low in both groups, as was the need for further surgery. Colostomy formation led to 20.8% of all patients gaining independence with bowel care. Conclusion: This study found colostomy to be a safe and effective option when performed early after SCI and demonstrates colostomy can be a means of gaining independence and making bowel care easier and more acceptable to the newly injured patient.