Antimicrobial stewardship in wound care

Antiseptic pyolytics and warming wet compresses improve the prospect of healing chronic wounds

Infection and suppuration of chronic wounds reduce the effectiveness of their treatment with a course of antibiotics and antiseptics combined with frequently renewed dressings. Therefore, daily short-term procedures of cleaning wounds from purulent-necrotic masses by mechanical methods, including the use of cleansing solutions and necrophage fly larvae, are also part of the general practice of chronic wound treatment. But even they do not always provide rapid healing of chronic wounds. In this connection, it is suggested to supplement the treatment of chronic wounds with preparations dissolving dense pus and wound dressings made in the form of warm moist compresses creating a local greenhouse effect in the wounds. Solutions of 3% hydrogen peroxide and 2–10% sodium bicarbonate heated to a temperature of 37°–45°С, possessing alkaline activity at рН 8.4–8.5 and enriched with dissolved carbon dioxide or oxygen gas (due to overpressure of 0.2 atm were suggested as pyolytic drugs. The first results of the use of pyolytics and warm moist dressings-compresses in the treatment of chronic wounds demonstrate a wound-healing effect. It is suggested to consider sanitizing therapy with pyolytics and warm moist wound dressings-compresses as an alternative to the use of modern cleansing solutions and artificial introduction of larvae of the necrophage fly into the purulent masses of chronic wounds to dissolve dense pus and accelerate the healing process.

Considerations for an ideal post-surgical wound dressing aligned with antimicrobial stewardship objectives: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Most surgical wounds heal by primary or secondary intention. Surgical wounds can present specific and unique challenges including wound dehiscence and surgical site infection (SSI), either of which can increase risk of morbidity and mortality. The use of antimicrobials to treat infection in these wounds is prevalent, but there is now an imperative to align treatment with reducing antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). The aim of this review was to explore the published evidence identifying general considerations/criteria for an ideal post-surgical wound dressing in terms of overcoming potential wound healing challenges (including infection) while supporting AMS objectives.

METHOD

A scoping review examining evidence published from 1954-2021, conducted by two authors acting independently. Results were synthesised narratively and have been reported in line with PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews.

RESULTS

A total of 819 articles were initially identified and subsequently filtered to 178 for inclusion in the assessment. The search highlighted six key outcomes of interest associated with post-surgical wound dressings: wound infection; wound healing; physical attributes related to comfort, conformability and flexibility; fluid handling (e.g., blood and exudate); pain; and skin damage.

CONCLUSION

There are several challenges that can be overcome when treating a post-surgical wound with a dressing, not least the prevention and treatment of SSIs. However, it is imperative that the use of antimicrobial wound dressings is aligned with AMS programmes and alternatives to active antimicrobials investigated.

Challenges in the management of chronic wound infections

OBJECTIVES

Chronic wound infections may delay the healing process and are responsible for a significant burden on healthcare systems. Since inappropriate management may commonly occur in the care of these patients, this review aims to provide a practical guide underlining actions to avoid in the management of chronic wound infections.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature available in PubMed in the last 10 years, identifying studies regarding the management of patients with chronic wound infections. A panel of experts discussed the potential malpractices in this area. A list of 'Don'ts', including the main actions to be avoided, was drawn up using the 'Choosing Wisely' methodology.

RESULTS

In this review, we proposed a list of actions to avoid for optimal management of patients with chronic wound infections. Adequate wound bed preparation and wound antisepsis should be combined, as the absence of one of them leads to delayed healing and a higher risk of wound complications. Moreover, avoiding inappropriate use of systemic antibiotics is an important point because of the risk of selection of multidrug-resistant organisms as well as antibiotic-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary team of experts in different fields (surgeon, infectious disease expert, microbiologist, pharmacologist, geriatrician) is required for the optimal management of chronic wound infections. Implementation of this approach may be useful to improve the management of patients with chronic wound infections.