Virtual reality: the next step in nursing education?

Group virtual reality simulation in the adult nursing curriculum: student and lecturer experiences

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality (VR) simulation technology was rapidly integrated into pre-registration adult nursing programmes in response to the pandemic and a reduction in clinical placements. The UK's regulatory body for nursing has recognised its value in nursing education by increasing the possible number of simulated practice hours that can replace clinical placements to 600 hours. This article reports on an evaluation study of a novel approach using screen-based VR simulations for groups of students in a classroom setting.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate student and lecturer experiences of screen-based VR with the aim of informing and sharing insights from this approach.

DESIGN

Students and lecturers responded to an evaluation survey comprising both closed- and open-ended questions.

SETTING

A large approved education institute in the East of England.

PARTICIPANTS

Pre-registration adult nursing master's students and adult nursing lecturers who had experience of screen-based VR with groups.

METHODS

Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive methods, and qualitative data using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Student and lecturer experiences of screen-based VR were overwhelmingly positive, overcoming many challenges of simulation documented in the literature. The group-working approach promoted development of non-technical or essential 'soft' skills such as communication, decision-making and teamwork.

CONCLUSIONS

Screen-based VR for classroombased learning offers an effective, engaging and cost-effective method of incorporating VR simulation scenarios in adult nursing education. Thoughtful consideration of pedagogical aspects are key to its successful and effective integration into the pre-registration adult nursing curriculum.

Impact of Virtual Reality Simulation on New Nurses' Assessment of Pediatric Respiratory Distress

BACKGROUND

Children often experience respiratory illnesses requiring bedside nurses skilled in recognizing respiratory decompensation. Historically, recognizing respiratory distress has relied on teaching during direct patient care. Virtual reality simulation may accelerate such recognition among novice nurses.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a virtual reality curriculum improved new nurses' recognition of respiratory distress and impending respiratory failure in pediatric patients based on assessment of physical examination findings and appropriate escalation of care.

METHODS

New nurses (n = 168) were randomly assigned to complete either an immersive virtual reality curriculum on recognition of respiratory distress (intervention) or the usual orientation curriculum (control). Group differences and changes from 3 months to 6 months after the intervention were examined.

RESULTS

Nurses in the intervention group were significantly more likely to correctly recognize impending respiratory failure at both 3 months (23.4% vs 3.0%, P < .001) and 6 months (31.9% vs 2.6%, P < .001), identify respiratory distress without impending respiratory failure at 3 months (57.8% vs 29.6%, P = .002) and 6 months (57.9% vs 17.8%, P < .001), and recognize patients' altered mental status at 3 months (51.4% vs 18.2%, P < .001) and 6 months (46.8% vs 18.4%, P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a virtual reality-based training curriculum was associated with improved recognition of pediatric respiratory distress, impending respiratory failure, and altered mental status at 3 and 6 months compared with standard training approaches. Virtual reality may offer a new approach to nurse orientation to enhance training in pediatrics-specific assessment skills.

Virtual reality simulation for nursing education: effectiveness and feasibility

Virtual Reality simulation (VRS) is an innovative and emerging technology that has the potential to offer increased numbers of pre-registration students authentic learning experiences compared to traditional simulation- based education (SBE) with simulated participants. The aim was to evaluate learner outcomes of SBE compared to 4 fully immersive VRS scenarios, for vocational and higher education nursing students at a training and further education institute in Melbourne, Australia. A mixed methods quasi-experimental design study was conducted over two semesters from 2019 to 2020. Participants were 675 pre-registration nursing students. The intervention group (VRS n = 393) received 4 three-dimensional, immersive VRS modules. The control group (SBE n = 282) received 4 face-to-face large group immersive simulations. In the VRS group 95% of students actively participated, compared to SBE (on average 15%). Knowledge test scores were initially significantly greater (p < 0.01) for VRS versus SBE students, but not maintained post clinical placement. Intervention students found VRS to be realistic and prepared them for clinical practice. Some technical difficulties were identified with VRS. VRS was found to be more cost effective than SBE. VRS fostered critical thinking and provided an efficient and sustainable platform for learning about complex clinical situations.