Maintenance periodontal therapy after systemic antibiotic and regenerative therapy of generalized aggressive periodontitis. A case report with 10-year follow-up

Antibacterial periodontal ligament stem cells enhance periodontal regeneration and regulate the oral microbiome

BACKGROUND

The transplantation of periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs) has been shown to enhance periodontal regeneration in animal models and clinical trials. However, it is not known whether PDLSCs are antibacterial and whether this affects oral microbiota and periodontal regeneration.

METHODS

We isolated human PDLSCs from periodontal ligament of extracted teeth. Rats' periodontal fenestration defects were prepared, and treated with PDLSC injections (Cell group), using saline injections (Saline group) as the control. The oral microbiota was explored by 16 S rDNA sequencing and compared with that before surgery (PRE group). The antibacterial property of PDLSCs and its underlying mechanism were tested in vitro.

RESULTS

Microbiome analyses reveal a decreased biodiversity, a changed community structure, and downregulated community functions of the oral microbiome in the Saline group. PDLSCs injections enhance periodontal regeneration, reverse the decrease in diversity, and increase the abundance of non-pathogenic bacterial Bifidobacterium sp. and Lactobacillus sp., making the oral microbiome similar to that of the PRE group. In vitro, PDLSCs inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. The main mechanism of action is postulated to involve production of the cationic antimicrobial peptide LL-37.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal that PDLSC injections enhance periodontal regeneration and regulate the oral microbiome to foster an oral cavity microenvironment conducive to symbiotic microbiota associated with health.

Influence of Materials Properties on Bio-Physical Features and Effectiveness of 3D-Scaffolds for Periodontal Regeneration

Periodontal diseases are multifactorial disorders, mainly due to severe infections and inflammation which affect the tissues (i.e., gum and dental bone) that support and surround the teeth. These pathologies are characterized by bleeding gums, pain, bad breath and, in more severe forms, can lead to the detachment of gum from teeth, causing their loss. To date it is estimated that severe periodontal diseases affect around 10% of the population worldwide thus making necessary the development of effective treatments able to both reduce the infections and inflammation in injured sites and improve the regeneration of damaged tissues. In this scenario, the use of 3D scaffolds can play a pivotal role by providing an effective platform for drugs, nanosystems, growth factors, stem cells, etc., improving the effectiveness of therapies and reducing their systemic side effects. The aim of this review is to describe the recent progress in periodontal regeneration, highlighting the influence of materials' properties used to realize three-dimensional (3D)-scaffolds, their bio-physical characteristics and their ability to provide a biocompatible platform able to embed nanosystems.

Periodontal Regeneration with Enamel Matrix Derivative in the Management of Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis: A Case Report with 11-Year Follow-up and Literature Review

Objectives:

Aggressive periodontitis (AgP) represents an uncommon but rapidly advanced inflammatory process, which involves the destruction of periodontal tissues. This study aimed to report a case of generalized AgP (GAgP), where the treatment approach consists of the utilization of the full-mouth disinfection protocol (FMDP) in conjunction with flap curettage and regenerative appliance of enamel matrix derivatives (EMDs). The associated literature was also reviewed.

Materials and Methods:

A 19-year-old female patient was diagnosed with GAgP. The treatment was initiated with FMDP and administration of antibiotics. Afterward, open flap debridement was performed, and EMD was selected as the regenerative material for the reconstruction of the periodontal defects. Over an 11-year period and during all the phases of the treatment, the outcomes were regularly evaluated with clinical measurements and radiographic controls.

Results:

The 11-year results demonstrated no recurrence of disease, and the patient's periodontal health exhibited evident improvement. Overall, the pocket depths presented satisfactory reduction while the clinical attachment loss (CAL) was improved. Both our limited experience and available literature data revealed that the use of EMD in AgP treatment contributes to bone fill of the intrabony defects as well as regeneration of the destructed periodontal apparatus.

Conclusions:

Although the outcomes of this treatment approach have not been widely evaluated, it seems that the use of EMD may be an effective means of periodontal regeneration in patients with GAgP. Additional prospective studies with adequate number of GAgP patients are essential to thoroughly assess the effectiveness of this approach.