Withdrawal of Combination Immunotherapy in Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease-An International Survey of Practice

OBJECTIVES

To assess current practices around the use of combination immunosuppression in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) with a focus on the subsequent withdrawal process.

METHODS

A web-based, 43-question survey.

RESULTS

Surveys were completed by 70 paediatric gastroenterologists (PGs) from 27 nations across Europe, North America, Oceania and Asia from 62 centres covering approximately 15,000 PIBD patients (median of 200 patients [interquartile range (IQR) 130-300] per centre). Routine use of co-immunosuppression was significantly higher with infliximab (IFX) versus adalimumab (ADL) ([61/70, 87.1%] compared with [23/70, 32.9%]; P < 0.01). Thiopurines (azathioprine [AZA] or 6-mercaptopurine) were the preferred option overall for co-immunosuppression. They were favoured with either IFX or ADL (76% and 77%, respectively) and in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) (84% and 69%) compared with methotrexate (MTX).Immunomodulators were the preferred choice as the initial drug to be withdrawn from the combination therapy rather than anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) therapy (59/67, 88% [P < 0.01]). The most common withdrawal time was after 6-12 months, with this decision usually based on clinical assessment rather than a scheduled withdrawal time (51/67, 76% vs 16/67, 24%). Indicators of mucosal healing and therapeutic drug monitoring results tended to be the most important "clinical factors" in the withdrawal decision (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Most PG's favour initial withdrawal of immunomodulator (usually thiopurines) rather than biologic therapy in the step-down process, usually after 6-12 months based on sustained clinical remission. This survey precedes an in-depth, multicentre study of clinical outcomes of withdrawal of co-immunosuppression in PIBD.

Combination Immunotherapy Use and Withdrawal in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Review of the Evidence

Evidence-based guidelines have been developed outlining the concomitant use of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) agents and immunomodulators including azathioprine (AZA) and methotrexate (MTX) in both adult and pediatric populations. However, there exists a paucity of data guiding evidence-based strategies for their withdrawal in pediatric patients in sustained remission. This narrative review focuses on the available pediatric evidence on this question in the context of what is known from the larger body of evidence available from adult studies. The objective is to provide clarity and practical guidance around who, what, when, and how to step down pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from combination immunotherapy. Outcomes following withdrawal of either of the two most commonly used anti-TNF therapies [infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA)], or immunomodulator therapies, from a combination regimen are examined. Essentially, a judicious approach must be taken to identify a significant minority of patients who would benefit from treatment rationalization. We conclude that step-down to anti-TNF (rather than immunomodulator) monotherapy after at least 6 months of sustained clinical remission is a viable option for a select group of pediatric patients. This group includes those with good indicators of mucosal healing, low or undetectable anti-TNF trough levels, lack of predictors for severe disease, and no prior escalation of anti-TNF therapy. Transmural healing and specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing are some of the emerging targets and tools that may help facilitate improved outcomes in this process. We also propose a simplified evidence-based schema that may assist in this decision-making process. Further pediatric clinical studies are required to develop the evidence base for decision-making in this area.

Optimising IBD patient selection for de-escalation of anti-TNF therapy to immunomodulator maintenance

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasingly managed with the use of biologic therapies. National guidelines (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)) suggest considering cessation after 1 year of therapy but lack detailed criteria for this. We aimed to describe clinical outcomes from the introduction of a biologic review panel (BRP) to implement modified criteria for cessation of antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy and step down to single-agent immunomodulator.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of patient outcomes following BRP implementation.

PATIENTS

All patients on biologic therapy discussed in the BRP within a 5-year period.

SETTING

Single IBD network covering three hospital sites.

INTERVENTIONS

Modified criteria for biologic cessation were based on published evidence; they excluded individuals with no suitable maintenance immunomodulator, previous surgery or evidence of active disease, additional indications for anti-TNF therapy and previous relapse on biologic cessation. All patients with IBD on a biologic were discussed at the BRP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relapse following IBD cessation and relative cost of BRP.

RESULTS

136 patients with IBD were reviewed, with 45 patients meeting the NICE guideline criteria for cessation. The BRP and modified criteria affected decision to withdraw therapy in 38% of these. Therapy was withdrawn in 27 patients, with a 20% 24-month relapse rate. Younger age at cessation was significantly associated with relapse (p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

The BRP approach has proved a safe and effective means of decision making in stopping biologic therapy. Future work to inform exclusion criteria is required.