Neuroendocrine tumour management: a team approach

Liver Transplant for Nonhepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancy

Liver transplant is now an acceptable and effective treatment for specific nonhepatocellular malignancies. Worldwide, hilar cholangiocarcinoma accounts for 3% of all primary gastrointestinal malignancies and for 10% of primary hepatobiliary malignancies. For patients who have early-stage, unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, liver transplant preceded by neoadjuvant radiotherapy can result in tumor-free margins, accomplish a radical resection, and treat the underlying primary sclerosing cholangitis when present. Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare tumor of vascular origin with a variable malignant potential. Excellent results have been reported with liver transplant for patients with unresectable hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, with 1-year and 10-year survival rates of 96% and 72%. Hepatoblastoma is the most common primary hepatic malignancy in children. The long-term survival rate after transplant ranges from 66% to 77% in patients with unresectable tumors and good response to chemotherapy. Metastatic liver disease is not an indication for liver transplant, with the exception of cases in which the primary tumor is a neuroendocrine tumor. Indication for liver transplant for hepatic metastasis from neuroendocrine tumors is mainly for patients with unresectable tumors and for palliation of medically uncontrollable symptoms. Posttransplant survival in those patients with low tumor activity index is excellent, despite recurrence of the tumor. Some recent data on liver transplant for unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer have reported limited survival benefits compared with previous reports. However, due to the high rate of tumor recurrence in a very short time after liver transplant, especially in the era of organ shortage, this indication has not been favored by the transplant community. The indications for liver transplant for nonhepatocellular carcinoma malignancy and its limitations have evolved dramatically over the past decades and will continue to be redefined through future research and investigations.

Review article: the investigation and management of gastric neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

Gastric carcinoids (GCs) or neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are increasingly identified at endoscopy, and account for 0.6-2% of all gastric polyps identified. The SEER database in the US has demonstrated a rising incidence of gastric NETs amongst all NETs; from 2.2% between 1950 and 1969 to 6.0% between 2000 and 2007.

AIM

To review the literature and assist clinicians in managing patients with GCs.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through MEDLINE using search terms: gastric, carcinoid, neuroendocrine tumour, therapy, endoscopy, mucosal resection, submucosal dissection. Relevant articles were identified through manual review. The reference lists of these articles were reviewed to include further appropriate articles.

RESULTS

There are three types of GCs with important epidemiological, pathophysiological, histological and endoscopic differences that affect prognosis and management. Type 1 and 2 GCs develop in the context of hypergastrinaemia that originates from achlorhydria in atrophic gastritis and a gastrinoma, respectively. Type 3 GCs occur sporadically and independent of gastrin. The histological type, grade and Ki67 index are used to determine prognosis and direct clinical management. Type 1 GCs >1 cm in size and type 2 GCs should be assessed for invasion beyond the submucosa with EUS prior to endoscopic resection with EMR or ESD. Type 3 GCs should be managed as per recommendations for gastric adenocarcinoma. The treatment of advanced disease is multimodal.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with gastric carcinoids should be discussed in a specialist neuroendocrine tumour multidisciplinary meeting to ensure all treatment options are explored in localised and advanced disease. Areas of controversy exist that need further research.

Aggressive surgery improves long-term survival in neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors: an institutional experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate surgical strategies for neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (NEPT) in the light of the new WHO classification from 2004 and to draw conclusions for future surgical concepts.

BACKGROUND

: The extent of surgical resection in primary and recurrent NEPT is unclear.

METHODS

Between 1987 and 2004, 62 patients with sporadic NEPT were treated at our institution and sections from biopsy and resection specimen were histopathologically reclassified. Clinical presentation, surgery, metastases, and pattern of recurrence were related to survival.

RESULTS

Fifteen well-differentiated tumors (WDT, 24%), 39 low-grade carcinomas (LGC, 63%), and 8 high-grade carcinomas (HGC, 13%) were identified. Median observation time was 30.5 months; 48 of 62 patients (78%) were surgically resected, and in 45 patients R0/R1 status was achieved. Overall 2- and 5-year survival in the latter group was 80% and 64%, respectively. Retrospective WHO classification revealed that organ-preserving segmental resections had been performed in 10 LGC and 1 HGC. These patients showed equal outcome as radically resected counterparts (n = 19). Liver and other organ metastases were present in 19 of 62 patients (31%), and resection was accomplished in 7 of 19 patients, which conferred better overall survival (P = 0.026, log-rank test); 21 of 45 R0/R1-resected patients (47%) suffered from recurrence, and reoperation was accomplished in 9 patients, which resulted in better overall survival (P = 0.066).

CONCLUSION

Organ-preserving resections offer sufficient local control in LGC; therefore, radical resections do not seem to be justified. On the other hand, radical resection is indicated even in metastasized patients or in case of loco-regional recurrence. The silent and slow course of the disease facilitates long-term surgical control.