A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence

Background

Venous insufficiency of the lower extremity affects up to 40–60% of general adult population in the Western population, of which around 25% has varicose veins mostly treated by ablation of the incompetent great saphenous vein. Although endovenous options are available, the majority is still treated with stripping of the great saphenous vein for which there is no consensus regarding postoperative compressive therapy. The objective of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to evaluate 4 h compared to 72 h of leg compression after great saphenous vein stripping.

Method

Patients in the Zuyderland Medical Centre with an indication for stripping of the great saphenous vein were eligible for inclusion in this study. Patients were randomised to 4 or 72 h of leg compression (standard elastic bandaging) after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome was change in leg volume after 14 days. Secondary outcomes were post-operative pain scores, complications and time to full recovery.

Results

A total of 78 patients were randomised, 36 patients enrolled the intervention (4 h) group and 42 patients the control group (72 h). The intervention group (4 h) showed a 57 mL reduction in leg volume after 14 days, compared to 6 mL of the control group (72 h) ( p = 0.11). Post-operative pain, complications and time to full recovery did not statistically differ.

Conclusion

Wearing leg compression four hours after stripping is non-inferior in preventing leg oedema compared with 72 h compression therapy. No statistically significant difference in pain and time to full recovery was shown.

A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after radiofrequency ablation for primary great saphenous vein incompetence

BACKGROUND

Optimal duration of leg compression after venous ablation remains unclear. This randomised controlled trial evaluates 4 h compared to 72 h of leg compression.

METHODS

Patients were randomised to 4 or 72 h of leg compression after radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome was change in leg volume after 14 days. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, complications and time to full recovery.

RESULTS

Patients wearing compression stockings for 4 h after treatment had a 64 mL (95%CI: - 23 to + 193) reduction in leg volume, compared to an increase of 21 mL (95%CI: 8.33-34.5) in patients wearing compression stockings for 72 h (P = 0.12). Patients wearing compression stockings for 4 h experienced fewer complications (16% vs. 33%, P = 0.05). Postoperative pain and time to full recovery did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

Wearing compression stockings for 4 h is non-inferior in preventing leg oedema as wearing compression stockings for 72 h.

The optimal duration of compression therapy following varicose vein surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The optimal duration of compression therapy following varicose vein surgery of the great saphenous vein (GSV) remains controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate different durations of compression therapy after varicose vein surgery and their outcomes.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Outcomes from short-duration (3-10 d) and long-duration (3-6 wk) compression therapy after GSV stripping and phlebectomies were evaluated. Pain was assessed post surgery using a visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included leg volume, complications, and the duration of absenteeism from work.

RESULTS

We identified 4 RCTs published between 1991 and 2009 that evaluated 686 patients. We observed non-significant differences in postoperative pain scores between the long-duration and short-duration groups, with a weighted mean difference of -0.03 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.53 to 0.47) at 4 weeks, and -0.01 (95% CI: -0.31 to 0.33) at 6 weeks, postoperatively. We also observed non-significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications (risk ratio: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.60-1.18), and changes in leg volume, 4 weeks postoperatively (P = .18) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study results indicate that there are no benefits to long-term compression therapy after varicose vein surgery of the GSV regarding postoperative pain, leg volume, incidence of complications, and duration of absenteeism from work.