Content Validation of a Novel Screening Tool to Identify Emergency Department Patients With Significant Palliative Care Needs

BACKGROUND

The emergency department (ED) is increasingly used by patients with life-limiting illness. These patients are frequently admitted to the hospital, where they suffer from poorly controlled symptoms and are often subjected to marginally effective therapies. Palliative care (PC) has emerged as the specialty that cares for patients with advanced illness. PC has been shown to reduce symptoms, improve quality of life, and decrease resource utilization. Unfortunately, most patients who could benefit from PC are never identified. At present, there exists no validated screening tool to identify significant unmet PC needs among ED patients with life-limiting illness.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to develop a simple, content-valid screening tool for use by ED providers to identify ED patients with significant PC needs. A positive screen would result in an inpatient PC consultation.

METHODS

An initial screening tool was developed based on a critical review of the literature. Content validity was determined by a two-round modified Delphi technique using a panel of PC experts. The expert panel reviewed the items of the tool for accuracy and necessity using a Likert scale and provided narrative feedback. Expert's responses were aggregated and analyzed to revise the tool until consensus was achieved. Greater than 80% agreement, as well as meeting Lawshe's critical values, was required to achieve consensus.

RESULTS

Fifteen experts completed two rounds of surveys to reach consensus on the content validity of the tool. Three screening items were accepted with minimal revisions. The remaining items were revised, condensed, or eliminated. The final tool contains 13 items divided into three steps: 1) presence of a life-limiting illness, 2) unmet PC needs, and 3) hospital admission. The majority of panelists (86%) endorsed adoption of the final screening tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a modified Delphi technique resulted in the creation of a content-validated screening tool for identification of ED patients with significant unmet PC needs. Further validation testing of the instrument is warranted.

Chronic kidney disease and support provided by home care services: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chronic diseases, such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), are growing in incidence and prevalence, in part due to an aging population. Support provided through home care services may be useful in attaining a more efficient and higher quality care for CKD patients.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify studies examining home care interventions among adult CKD patients incorporating all outcomes. Studies examining home care services as an alternative to acute, post-acute or hospice care and those for long-term maintenance in patients' homes were included. Studies with only a home training intervention and those without an applied research component were excluded.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (10 cohort, 4 non-comparative, 2 cross-sectional, 1 randomized) examined the support provided by home care services in 15,058 CKD patients. Fourteen studies included peritoneal dialysis (PD), two incorporated hemodialysis (HD) and one included both PD and HD patients in their treatment groups. Sixteen studies focused on the dialysis phase of care in their study samples and one study included information from both the dialysis and pre-dialysis phases of care. Study settings included nine single hospital/dialysis centers and three regional/metropolitan areas and five were at the national level. Studies primarily focused on nurse assisted home care patients and mostly examined PD related clinical outcomes. In PD studies with comparators, peritonitis risks and technique survival rates were similar across home care assisted patients and comparators. The risk of mortality, however, was higher for home care assisted PD patients. While most studies adjusted for age and comorbidities, information about multidimensional prognostic indices that take into account physical, psychological, cognitive, functional and social factors among CKD patients was not easily available.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies focused on nurse assisted home care patients on dialysis. The majority were single site studies incorporating small patient populations. There are gaps in the literature regarding the utility of providing home care to CKD patients and the impact this has on healthcare resources.

Palliative care and neurology: time for a paradigm shift

Palliative care is an approach to the care of patients and families facing progressive and chronic illnesses that focuses on the relief of suffering due to physical symptoms, psychosocial issues, and spiritual distress. As neurologists care for patients with chronic, progressive, life-limiting, and disabling conditions, it is important that they understand and learn to apply the principles of palliative medicine. In this article, we aim to provide a practical starting point in palliative medicine for neurologists by answering the following questions: (1) What is palliative care and what is hospice care? (2) What are the palliative care needs of neurology patients? (3) Do neurology patients have unique palliative care needs? and (4) How can palliative care be integrated into neurology practice? We cover several fundamental palliative care skills relevant to neurologists, including communication of bad news, symptom assessment and management, advance care planning, caregiver assessment, and appropriate referral to hospice and other palliative care services. We conclude by suggesting areas for future educational efforts and research.

Patients with cirrhosis and denied liver transplants rarely receive adequate palliative care or appropriate management

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with cirrhosis who are receiving palliative care and are not eligible for liver transplantation (LT) are often hospitalized multiple times, with lack of expectations or understanding of death and dying. We evaluated how frequently these patients received appropriate and palliative care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 102 consecutive adult patients (67% men; mean age, 55 years) who were removed from the list for or declined LT from January 2005 through December 2010 at the University of Alberta, Canada. Patients' medical records were reviewed to determine their access to palliative care and relief of symptoms, the appropriateness of the goals for their care, and their requirements for acute care services.

RESULTS

The patients' median Model for End-stage Liver Disease score was 20, and median time from denial of LT to death was 52 days (range, 10-332 days). The most common reasons that patients were removed from the transplant wait list were noncompliance or substance abuse (26%) and severe illness or organ dysfunction (25%). After patients were removed from the list, 17% received renal replacement therapy, and 48% were subsequently admitted to the intensive care unit. Patients spent a median of 14 days (range, 6-33 days) in the hospital after they were removed from the transplant wait list. On the basis of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, 65% of patients had evidence of pain, 58% had evidence of nausea, 10% had depression, 36% had anxiety, 48% had dyspnea, and 49% had symptoms of anorexia. Twenty-eight percent of all the patients had documentation of do not resuscitate status on their charts, and only 11% were referred for palliative care.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cirrhosis who have been removed from the wait list for LT are infrequently referred for palliative care (∼ 10% of cases), although a high percentage have pain or nausea. Goals of care and do not resuscitate status are rarely discussed. Improved planning of goals of care and access to palliative services are required for these patients.