Biomarker-guided antibiotic cessation in sepsis: evidence and future challenges

biomArker-guided Duration of Antibiotic treatment in hospitalised Patients with suspecTed Sepsis (ADAPT-Sepsis): A protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Aim

To describe the protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to determine whether treatment protocols monitoring daily CRP (C-reactive protein) or PCT (procalcitonin) safely allow a reduction in duration of antibiotic therapy in hospitalised adult patients with sepsis.

Design

Multicentre three-arm randomised controlled trial.

Setting

UK NHS hospitals.

Target population

Hospitalised critically ill adults who have been commenced on intravenous antibiotics for sepsis.

Health technology

Three protocols for guiding antibiotic discontinuation will be compared: (a) standard care; (b) standard care + daily CRP monitoring; (c) standard care + daily PCT monitoring. Standard care will be based on routine sepsis management and antibiotic stewardship. Measurement of outcomes and costs. Outcomes will be assessed to 28 days. The primary outcomes are total duration of antibiotics and safety outcome of all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include: escalation of care/re-admission; infection re-lapse/recurrence; antibiotic dose; length and level of critical care stay and length of hospital stay. Ninety-day all-cause mortality rates will also be collected. An assessment of cost effectiveness will be performed.

Conclusion

In the setting of routine NHS care, if this trial finds that a treatment protocol based on monitoring CRP or PCT safely allows a reduction in duration of antibiotic therapy, and is cost effective, then this has the potential to change clinical practice for critically ill patients with sepsis. Moreover, if a biomarker-guided protocol is not found to be effective, then it will be important to avoid its use in sepsis and prevent ineffective technology becoming widely adopted in clinical practice.

Correlation of procalcitonin to positive blood culture results in a sample of South African trauma ICU patients between 2016 and 2017

PURPOSE

This study sought to investigate the screening accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) for bacteremia, as defined by a positive blood culture, in a South African trauma ICU.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review study involving 149 patients who were admitted to the ICU of a level-1 trauma center in South Africa between 2016 and 2017. Median PCT levels in patients with and without positive blood cultures were compared. The screening accuracy of PCT for a positive blood culture was summarized as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Two PCT cut-points were investigated: a general cut-point in the South African context (> 2.0 ng/mL), and a trauma ICU-specific cut-point (prioritizing specificity while optimizing sensitivity) which was determined from a receiver-operator-characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Bacteremic patients had higher median PCT levels when compared with non-bacteremic patients (30.5 ng/mL versus 6.6 ng/mL, p = 0.002). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of PCT > 2.0 ng/mL was 86% (95% confidence interval-CI 71-94%), 29% (CI 22-38%), 28% (CI 20-37%), and 87% (CI 73-94%), respectively. The unit-specific cut-point was PCT > 31.0 ng/mL, which had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 50% (CI 34-66%), 80% (CI 71-86%), 44% (CI 30-59%), and 83% (CI 75-89%), respectively. Unlike PCT > 2.0 ng/mL, PCT > 31.0 ng/mL demonstrated fair-to-good test specificity in a sub-analysis of patients who underwent recent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased PCT levels were associated with bacteremia in this study. PCT > 31.0 ng/mL may be used to rule in suspected bacteremia in this trauma ICU setting.