Holding on by a thread: the continuing story of rotator cuff tears

Editorial Commentary: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for rotator cuff repair improves re-tear rate but clinical impact is yet to be seen

Rotator cuff tendon repair has a high failure rate due to the inferior quality of tendon material. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is considered a potential solution, though its clinical impact is uncertain. Recent literature indicates that while PRP may reduce re-tear rates radiologically, it does not significantly improve clinical outcomes such as pain and function. Early animal studies showed potential benefits, but initial clinical trials were inconclusive due to small sample sizes and varied PRP methods. Larger, recent studies suggest a possible benefit, yet definitive clinical advantages remain elusive. Advancing PRP research requires a dual approach: deeper understanding of tendon and PRP biology, and larger clinical trials focusing on specific PRP preparations and delivery methods. While current evidence is limited, PRP holds promise for improving rotator cuff repair outcomes, and ongoing research may eventually translate into significant clinical benefits.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Lowers Retear Rates and Improves Short-Term Postoperative Functional Outcome Scores: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review of meta-analyses of rotator cuff repair using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to identify whether PRP improves clinical function and rate of tendon retears. We will (1) conduct a systematic review of the current meta-analyses of rotator cuff repair using platelet-rich plasma available in the literature, (2) evaluate the quality of these meta-analyses using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) methodology, (3) identify whether PRP improves clinical function and rate of tendon retears, and develop guidance to improve future studies in this area.

Methods

We carried out a systematic review of previous meta-analyses published on the clinical outcomes of PRP used in the treatment of rotator cuff tears. We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Embase databases, using various combinations of the commercial names of each PRP preparation and “rotator cuff” (with its associated terms), looking specifically at human meta-analysis studies involving the repair of the rotator cuff tendon surgically in the English language. Data validity was assessed and collected on clinical outcomes. Following this, a meta-analysis was undertaken.

Results

Thirteen meta-analyses met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All were considered of similar quality with Oxman-Guyatt index of 9 and PRISMA score of more than 24. A total of 1,800 patients with an average follow up of 12 to 36 months. The use of PRP for arthroscopic rotator cuff tear, when compared with controls, leads to a lower number of retears, improved short-term postoperative scores, and functional outcome. The following postoperative scores were reported: Constant: 12, Simple Shoulder Test: 10, ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons): 9, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) 11, SANE (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation) 1, VAS (visual analog scale): 6, and Retears: 13. Subgroup analysis showed that leukocyte content and gel application make no difference in the effectiveness of PRP. VAS score subgroup analysis showed short-term pain relief.

Conclusions

Our study shows that PRP is effective in reducing retears after rotator cuff repair and improving functional outcome scores and reducing short-term pain.

Level of Evidence

Level III, systematic review of Level I-III studies.