Improving the management of breathlessness using a clinical effectiveness programme

WITHDRAWN: Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in advanced stages of malignant and non-malignant diseases

This review is now out of date although it is correct as of the date of publication [Issue 2, 2008]. The authors are developing a new protocol which will replace this review. Publication of the protocol is expected in 2014, and serves to update the existing review and incorporate the latest evidence into a new Cochrane Review. The latest version of this review (available in 'Other versions' tab on The Cochrane Library) may still be useful to readers until the new review is published.

In 2016, the replacement review titled 'Non‐pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in advanced stages of malignant and non‐malignant diseases' was deregistered and split into four separate reviews of individual interventions: Respiratory interventions for breathlessness in adults with advanced diseases; Physical interventions for breathlessness in adults with advanced diseases; Cognitive‐emotional interventions for breathlessness in adults with advanced diseases; Multi‐dimensional interventions for breathlessness in adults with advanced diseases.

At September 2020, these replacement titles were deregistered (Multi‐dimensional interventions) or the protocols withdrawn (Cognitive‐emotional interventions; Multi‐dimensional interventions; Respiratory interventions) as they did not meet Cochrane standards or expectations.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness management in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review

The aim is to review the published scientific literature for studies evaluating non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness management in patients with lung cancer. The following selection criteria were used to systematically search the literature: studies were to be published research or systematic reviews; they were to be published in English and from 1990 to 2007; the targeted populations were adult patients with dyspnoea/breathlessness associated with lung cancer; and the study reported on the outcomes from use of non-pharmacological strategies for breathlessness. This review retrieved five studies that met all inclusion criteria. All the studies reported the benefits of non-pharmacological interventions in improving breathlessness regardless of differences in clinical contexts, components of programmes and methods for delivery. Analysis of the available evidence suggests that tailored instructions delivered by nurses with sufficient training and supervision may have some benefits over other delivery approaches. Based on the results, non-pharmacological interventions are recommended as effective adjunctive strategies in managing breathlessness for patients with lung cancer. In order to refine such interventions, future research should seek to explore the core components of such approaches that are critical to achieving optimal outcomes, the contexts in which the interventions are most effective, and to evaluate the relative benefits of different methods for delivering such interventions.

Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in advanced stages of malignant and non-malignant diseases

BACKGROUND

Breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom in the advanced stages of malignant and non-malignant diseases. Appropriate management requires both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-invasive interventions to relieve breathlessness in participants suffering from the five most common conditions causing breathlessness in advanced disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following databases: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, PsycINFO, Science Citation Index Expanded, AMED, The Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Trials Register, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness in June 2007. We also searched various websites and reference lists of relevant articles and textbooks.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled and controlled clinical trials assessing the effects of non-pharmacological and non-invasive interventions to relieve breathlessness in participants described as suffering from breathlessness due to advanced stages of cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease, chronic heart failure or motor neurone disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed relevant studies for inclusion. Data extraction and quality assessment was performed by three review authors and checked by two other review authors. Meta-analysis was not attempted due to heterogeneity of studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were included (2532 participants) and categorised as follows: single component interventions with subcategories of walking aids (n = 7), distractive auditory stimuli (music) (n = 6), chest wall vibration (CWV, n = 5), acupuncture/acupressure (n = 5), relaxation (n = 4), neuro-electrical muscle stimulation (NMES, n = 3) and fan (n = 2). Multi-component interventions were categorised in to counselling and support (n = 5), breathing training (n = 3), counselling and support with breathing-relaxation training (n = 2), case management (n = 2) and psychotherapy (n = 2). There was a high strength of evidence that NMES and CWV could relieve breathlessness and moderate strength for the use of walking aids and breathing training. There is a low strength of evidence that acupuncture/acupressure is helpful. There is not enough data to judge the evidence for distractive auditory stimuli (music), relaxation, fan, counselling and support, counselling and support with breathing-relaxation training, case management and psychotherapy. Most studies have been conducted in COPD patients, only a few studies included participants with other conditions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Breathing training, walking aids, NMES and CWV appear to be effective non-pharmacological interventions for relieving breathlessness in advanced stages of disease.

Perceptions of Dyspnea and Helpful Interventions During the Advanced Stage of Lung Cancer

Dyspnea is a distressful but neglected symptom in oncology practice and research. The aim of this study was to describe the experience of dyspnea and helpful interventions in Chinese patients with advanced lung cancer admitted in the palliative care unit in 1 region in Hong Kong. A qualitative description approach using in-depth interviews was used to guide this study. Eleven participants agreed to be interviewed with age ranging from 51 to 80 years. They have been diagnosed with lung cancer from 1 to 12 months, and all required oxygen therapy from dyspnea. The results of content analysis revealed 4 main themes: (1) characteristics of dyspnea, (2) impact of dyspnea, (3) strategies used to manage dyspnea, and (4) nurses' role in managing dyspnea. Patients in this study found no Chinese words to adequately define and describe dyspnea and relied on sensations they experienced during the dyspnea episode. The impact of dyspnea was multidimensional, and patients used various strategies to manage dyspnea, including avoiding triggers and utilizing traditional Chinese medicine. Healthcare professionals were perceived to play a very inadequate role in assisting patients with dyspnea, and participants suggested that they should take a more active role in educating and supporting patients with dyspnea.

Palliative care for breathless patients in the community

Breathlessness is one of the commonest symptoms experienced by people receiving palliative care. However, misunderstanding of the nature of palliative care may hinder assessment, management and evaluation of care and may contribute to the fear associated with living with breathlessness in the community. Knowledge of related anatomy and physiology of breathlessness is vital in informing nursing care and interventions. Pharmacological interventions have their place, but the focus of nursing care should be on systematic holistic assessment. Using this, nurses should adopt a proactive role in supporting and helping patients to adapt to change by maximizing coping strategies.

Non-pharmacological management of breathlessness: a collaborative nurse--physiotherapist approach

Breathlessness is a common and challenging symptom in palliative care. A simple audit of 470 patients under the St Christopher's Hospice Homecare team found that 43% complained of breathlessness. Research has indicated that non-pharmacological management can be of benefit to terminally ill patients with breathlessness. Knowing that both nurses and physiotherapists each have core skills to offer these patients, the authors aimed to integrate and consolidate their approach to enhance best practice. The supportive care and advice of the clinical nurse specialist was combined with physiotherapy sessions. The aim of this collaborative approach was to reduce patient anxiety, maximize respiratory function and provide information to help patients understand, adapt and regain some control of their breathing. A leaflet containing simple written information for patients was developed and found to be useful. It was found that supportive professional relationships strengthened links between the multiprofessional team. Positive feedback has been received from patients and health-care professionals about the sessions and breathlessness leaflet. By establishing this combined approach the authors have contributed to significant practice development at St Christopher's Hospice.