Dignity therapy interventions for young people in palliative care: a rapid structured evidence review

Dignity in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Children are a uniquely vulnerable patient population with restricted abilities for self-advocacy and autonomy, risking infringement upon their dignity. Yet the concept of dignity in pediatrics remains underexplored relative to the adult literature and other outcome measures.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize how dignity is defined, evaluated, and/or measured in pediatrics.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines across the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, PsycINFO, Global Health, Social Science Premium Collection, and Dissertation and Theses. We included publications from database inception through April 2023, in English, involving children aged 0-18 years, and prioritizing dignity as a central theme with a focus on defining, evaluating, or measuring dignity. Study descriptions and pertinent characteristics were extracted and synthesized using a predefined form.

RESULTS

Forty-four articles met inclusion criteria; fewer than half comprised original research (20/44, 45%). Most studies (38/44, 86%) included description of the meaning of dignity, with emergence of salient themes around respect, communication, agency/autonomy, and privacy. Less than half (19/44, 43%) included a measurement or evaluation of dignity; approximately one-third described dignity therapy. More than one-third of publications focused on dignity at end of life (17/44, 39%) and included discussions of palliative medicine and hospice (15/44, 34%).

CONCLUSION

Relatively few published studies describe dignity in pediatrics. Opportunities exist to broaden scholarship on this topic in partnership with patients, families, and clinicians, with the goal of assessing and strengthening dignity-centered care across the illness course and at the end of life.

Development of the pediatric family-based dignity therapy protocol for terminally ill children (ages 7-18) and their families: A mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVES

Dignity therapy (DT) is well-established in adults, and it might potentially benefit the younger population. This study aims to develop a pediatric family-based dignity therapy (P-FBDT) protocol for terminally ill children and their families.

METHODS

A parallel mixed-methods design was used. The P-FBDT protocol was developed based on the adult DT, and meanwhile by taking children-specific dignity characteristics and Chinese family-oriented culture into consideration. The protocol was then evaluated and modified based on the quantitative and qualitative feedback from 2-round surveys of 14 pediatric oncology or pediatric palliative care experts.

RESULTS

The P-FBDT involves terminally ill children and their families in meaningful interactions including a series of conversations and creative activities, which will be recorded and then edited into a document-based generativity entity. The P-FBDT protocol was recognized as highly reasonable and the P-FBDT interview guide was endorsed as important, acceptable, clear, comprehensive, and suitable to be used in pediatric palliative care practice in Chinese culture (>90%). Potential benefits, possible challenges, and practical considerations of the P-FBDT were also proposed.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The P-FBDT was perceived to be potentially beneficial to terminally ill children and their families by engaging in a series of meaningful family interactions and creating a lasting memento to be preserved. The protocol needs to be pilot tested among terminally ill children and families for feasibility and potential efficacy in practice.

Effectiveness of dignity therapy on well-being among patients under palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dignity therapy is a psychotherapeutic intervention that is potentially effective in improving the well-being of patients receiving palliative care. However, the effects of dignity therapy are not well-understood.

OBJECTIVE

We attempted to determine the effectiveness of dignity therapy in palliative patients to provide evidence that dignity therapy could be used in their care.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

PARTICIPANTS

The number of participants from all the studies was 1202 (intervention group, 619 patients; control group, 583 patients).

METHODS

The review was reported according to the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020. Relevant studies were collected with database searching of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ProQuest Health & Medical Complete, CINAHL, and Psych Info databases from the inception of dignity therapy in 2002 to 2022. Literature was selected to identify trials of dignity therapy in patients with palliative care needs including cancer and non-cancer condition. Critical appraisal was performed independently by two reviewers to assess the relevance, reliability, and quality of the included studies. Two independent reviewers extracted data from all the studies. Data were synthesized using Review Manager version 4.5.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies involving 1202 participants were included. Most studies were rated as medium quality (n = 10, 62.5 %). The results showed a significant difference between the dignity and control groups in dignity-related distress (MD = -3.54, 95 % CI: [-4.66, -2.42], p < 0.00001), hope (MD = 2.27, 95 % CI: [1.32, 3.22], p < 0.0001), and quality of life (SMD = 0.45, 95 % CI: [0.15, 1.14], p = 0.00). However, no significant difference was observed in depression (MD = -0.44, 95 % CI: [-1.09, 0.20], p = 0.18); anxiety (MD = -0.21, 95 % CI: [-1.68, 1.27], p = 0.78), and spiritual well-being (MD = 2.41, 95 % CI: [-0.82, 5.64], p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Dignity therapy was effective in improving dignity-related distress, quality of life, and levels of hope. A meta-analysis found no significant differences in patients' psychological or spiritual well-being. Differences in the providers of dignity therapy in the included studies may be the cause of the different findings regarding the varying effects of dignity therapy. Professional health workers need to be trained as dignity therapists to enhance the visibility of dignity therapy for patients.

REGISTRATION

CRD42022375319.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Dignity therapy is an effective and promising intervention in palliative care.

Experiences of dignity: Age at onset of serious illness matters

BACKGROUND

Preserving persons' dignity is integral to nursing. More research is needed to explore how a diversity of patients, particularly those that experience illness from a young age, experience dignity.

AIM

Describe the characteristics of dignity for persons living with serious illness.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Using a secondary data set of twenty audio-recorded interviews, a thematic content analysis was conducted to identify characteristics of dignity. The research team employed van Gennip et al.'s, 2013 "Model of Dignity in Illness" (1) to create a codebook, which the authors utilized to independently code twenty narrative interview transcripts.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

Twenty persons living with serious illness of heart failure and/or dialysis-dependent renal failure who were admitted in an acute care hospital.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

This study was approved on August 26, 2019, by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) IRB Protocol #19-1874.

FINDINGS

Early-onset participants expressed markedly different dignity concerns than late-onset participants. In the individual domain, early-onset participants felt that their illness was "normal"; they did not experience the "healthy person to patient" transition described by older onset participants. In the relational domain, early-onset participants expressed that their relationships had already integrated their illness while late-onset participants felt that their illness harmed many of their relationships. In the societal domain, early-onset participants described dignity concerns related to how society impacted their ability to financially support themselves during their illness.

DISCUSSION

Differences in the dignity experience of early-onset and late-onset participants are informed by Erikson's "Model of Development" and by Aranda and Jones feminist critique of dignity in healthcare.

CONCLUSIONS

Persons with early-onset illness experience dignity differently. Awareness of the importance of work and financial independence to the experience of dignity for seriously ill patients may enhance persons' dignity experience.

The dignity of terminally ill children in pediatric palliative care: perspectives of parents and healthcare providers

BACKGROUND

The Chochinov Dignity Model was developed based on a cohort of adult patients with advanced cancer, but its role among dying children is not clear. This study aims to develop a model of dignity for children receiving pediatric palliative care based on the Chochinov Dignity Model.

METHODS

This is a descriptive qualitative study. Participants included a total of 11 parents and 14 healthcare providers who were recruited from a tertiary children's hospital in Beijing and the Pediatric Palliative Care Subspecialty Group of the Pediatrics Society of the Chinese Medical Association using purposive sampling. Thematic framework analysis was used to analyze data.

RESULTS

The themes of the empirical Dignity Model were broadly supported in this study, but some themes were interpreted differently in the child population. Compared with the original model, some child-specific themes were identified including acknowledging regret, a sense of security, the company of important loved ones, realizing unfinished wishes, decent and dignified death, resolving family disputes, and fairness.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study on Dignity Model for terminal children. Knowledge of children's dignity can promote reflection of healthcare providers and caregivers regarding the values underlying their performance in pediatric palliative care, and develop certain practical interventions to strengthen children and their families' sense of dignity at end of life.

The European Portuguese Posthumous Dignity Therapy Schedule of Questions: Initial development and validation

OBJECTIVE

Dignity therapy (DT) is a brief psychotherapeutic intervention with beneficial effects in the end-of-life experience. Since it provides a continuing bond between the bereaved and their loved ones, we speculated that it could be offered as a novel bereavement intervention following the patient's death. We aimed to develop, translate, and validate the Posthumous DT Schedule of Questions (p-DT-SQ), for administration with bereaved relatives or friends.

METHOD

The original DT-SQ was adapted for application with bereaved relatives or friends. It was translated and back-translated to European Portuguese and revised by an expert committee. Content validity was assessed by the Content Validity Coefficient (CVC). The instrument was tested in a sample of 50 individuals from a large Senior Residence in Lisbon (10 elderly people and 40 healthcare professionals), who assessed face validity.

RESULTS

The p-DT-SQ showed very good CVC (0.94) and face validity: it was considered clear, easy to understand, reasonable in length, and not difficult to answer. Participants felt comfortable answering the p-DT-SQ and felt it could positively affect the way themselves or others would remember their loved ones, allowing an understanding of the deceased's concerns, interests, and values.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

We created and validated an adapted version of the DT-SQ to be used posthumously by bereaved family and friends. The European Portuguese version of the p-DT-SQ is clear, comprehensible, and aligned with the fundamentals of DT. While our data suggest its beneficial effects for those who are bereft, future research is needed to examine the impact of p-DT-SQ for those who are grieving.

How dignity-related distress interact with quality of life in young adult patients with cancer during the active treatment stage: A network analysis

OBJECTIVE

Young adult patients with cancer are a growing concern. By means of network analysis, this study aimed to explore the interplay between dignity-related distress and quality of life (QoL) in young adult patients with cancer when they undergo active treatments.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 309 young adults aged 18-39 and diagnosed with malignant tumors were recruited from an oncology center in China between September 2020 and August 2021. Participants completed the Patient Dignity Inventory and SF-36 questionnaires. Network analysis was applied to examine the network structure.

RESULTS

Overall, the core facets of dignity-related distress were negatively related to QoL and its corresponding domains, either directly or indirectly. Developmental distress played a central role among estimated networks and strongly interplayed with most QoL domains, especially the mental domains. Symptom distress was the only facet consistently interplayed with the physical domains of QoL (i.e., physical function and bodily pain). The social aspects were also revealed in the association between limited social support and vitality.

CONCLUSIONS

Early attention must be paid to guarantee the need of preserving dignity and enhancing QoL for young adult patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Quality of Life for Older Cancer Patients: Relation of Psychospiritual Distress to Meaning-Making During Dignity Therapy

BACKGROUND

Nearly 500,000 older Americans die a cancer-related death annually. Best practices for seriously ill patients include palliative care that aids in promoting personal dignity. Dignity Therapy is an internationally recognized therapeutic intervention designed to enhance dignity for the seriously ill. Theoretically, Dignity Therapy provides opportunity for patients to make meaning by contextualizing their illness within their larger life story. The extent to which Dignity Therapy actually elicits meaning-making from patients, however, has not been tested.

AIM

The current study examines (i) extent of patient meaning-making during Dignity Therapy, and (ii) whether baseline psychospiritual distress relates to subsequent meaning-making during Dignity Therapy.

DESIGN

Participants completed baseline self-report measures of psychospiritual distress (i.e., dignity-related distress, spiritual distress, quality of life), before participating in Dignity Therapy. Narrative analysis identified the extent of meaning-making during Dignity Therapy sessions.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five outpatients (M age = 63, SD = 5.72) with late-stage cancer and moderate cancer-related symptoms were recruited.

RESULTS

Narrative analysis revealed all patients made meaning during Dignity Therapy but there was wide variation (i.e., 1-12 occurrences). Patients who made greater meaning were those who, at baseline, reported significantly higher psychospiritual distress, including greater dignity-related distress (r = .46), greater spiritual distress (r = .44), and lower quality of life (r = -.56).

CONCLUSION

Meaning-making was found to be a central component of Dignity Therapy. Particularly, patients experiencing greater distress in facing their illness use the Dignity Therapy session to express how they have made meaning in their lives.

Legacy perceptions and interventions for adults and children receiving palliative care: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Legacy has been invoked as a means for strengthening human attachments, continuing bonds, and ensuring that individuals will be remembered; however, little is known about the spectrum of approaches to, outcomes associated with, and best practices for legacy interventions.

AIM

To systematically review research on legacy perceptions and interventions in pediatric and adult palliative care recipients.

DESIGN

A systematic mixed studies review synthesizing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods study findings using PRISMA guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases were searched on October 1, 2020. GRADE criteria were used to assess quality of quantitative reports, and the Johns Hopkins Evidence Level and Quality Guide was used to rate qualitative, mixed methods, and review articles. Data were synthesized using integrative thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The 67 studies reviewed describe a variety of legacy perceptions and interventions with adult and pediatric patients receiving palliative care. Statistically significant improvements in various dimensions of wellbeing are documented, with significant reduction in incidence and symptoms of depression in adults. Studies highlight the utility, feasibility, and perceived benefits of legacy interventions according to adult patients and their caregivers, and parents/caregivers of pediatric patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Though future research with high-quality, experimental designs is needed, the positive outcomes associated with legacy interventions are documented in adult patient populations; additionally, the application of legacy interventions for children with serious illnesses receiving palliative care is reasonable based on the existing body of evidence. A consistent and operational concept of legacy is still needed for future research and practice.

Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Rapid reviews were first mentioned in the literature in 1997, when Best et al. described the rapid health technology assessment program in the south and west regions of England but did not provide a formal definition. More recently, the only consensus around a rapid review definition is that a formal definition does not exist. The primary aim of this work is to create a repository of existing definitions and to identify key themes, which may help the knowledge synthesis community in defining rapid review products.

METHODS

A systematic scoping review was performed to identify definitions used in journal-published rapid reviews written in English between 2017 and January 2019. We searched Medline, Embase Classic + Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science on December 21, 2018. Two reviewers performed study selection and data extraction using a priori-defined methods published in a protocol. Definitions from rapid review methods articles (published from 1997 onward) identified in another scoping review were added to the results, and all definitions were thematically analyzed using NVivo. A quantitative analysis was also performed around studies cited.

RESULTS

Definitions from 216 rapid reviews and 90 rapid review methods articles were included in the thematic analysis. Eight key themes were identified: accelerated/rapid process or approach, variation in methods shortcuts, focus/depth/breadth of scope, compare and contrast to a full traditional systematic review, stakeholder rationale, resource efficiency rationale, systematic approach, bias/limitations. Secondary referencing was a common occurrence.

CONCLUSION

Thematic analysis performed in this systematic scoping review has allowed for the creation of a suggested definition for rapid reviews that can be used to inform the systematic review community.

Adapting the Portuguese dignity question framework for adolescents: ages 10–18

Objective

Dignity therapy (DT) is well established in adult populations, and it is likely that it could benefit younger people. This study aimed to adapt the adult Portuguese DT question framework for adolescents (DT-QF-Adol) (ages 10–18).

Method

Five stages were followed: (1) the Portuguese DT-QF for adults was adapted for adolescents with the original author's collaboration, (2) an expert committee provided feedback on the adapted version, (3) an initial consensus version of the DT-QF-Adol was created, (4) expert committee consult affirmed final consensus, and (5) validation stage with a sample of 17 adolescents followed in ambulatory psychology clinic.

Results

DT's original author endorsed the final Portuguese DT-QF-Adol, reinforcing that it captures the fundamental dimensions of DT. There was 100% agreement on the final consensus version and defined age group (10–18 years old). Twenty adolescents were invited to participate, and 17 were included after informed consent was obtained; 53% were female. The average age was 12.7 years. The interviewed adolescents reported that the DT-QF-Adol was clear, and they did not identify any ambiguity or difficulty in answering any of the questions. They assumed that this information could positively affect the way parents and friends see and cared for them, permitting others to understand their concerns and preferences. Participants felt that the DT-QF-Adol could be a good starting point for a conversation with their loved ones. Although they did not consider vital for health professionals to access their answers, they strongly felt that the DT-QF-Adol might be essential to sick adolescents and they would recommend it to others.

Significance of results

We developed a DT-QF of nine questions for Portuguese adolescents (DT-QF-Adol), coined Protocolo de Perguntas da Terapia da Dignidade para Adolescentes — 10–18 anos. This tool can potentially be considered a good addition for pediatric palliative care.

Meaning making And Generativity In Children and Young people with Life limiting conditions (MAGICYL)

EBN engages readers through a range of Online social media activities to debate issues important to nurses and nursing. EBN Opinion papers highlight and expand on these debates.