Demographic influences on Lithuanian physicians' attitudes toward medical assistance in dying: a cross-sectional study

Background

The topic of end-of-life decisions is important due to aging populations and the rising number of terminal illnesses like cancer. As more people experience suffering, the ethical, medical, and legal debates of these decisions become significant to healthcare policy. Understanding medical professionals' attitudes is critical for shaping responsible practices and legislation surrounding end-of-life care.

Methods

This cross-sectional study explores the attitudes of Lithuanian physicians toward medical assistance in dying (MAID), including euthanasia and assisted suicide (E/PAS), as well as other end-of-life decisions such as Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders and Living Wills, including decisions involving patients diagnosed with mental illnesses. A survey of 361 physicians in Lithuanian hospitals was conducted between October 2022 and July 2024, using hospital intranets and on-site distribution to guarantee representative sample. The survey included demographic factors such as age, gender, religious beliefs, and professional experience. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0 and R software. Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, and logistic regression models were made to determine relationships, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

The analysis showed that 61.2% of physicians supported assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, while only 19.1% supported it for patients with drug-resistant mental illness. Similarly, 61.5% supported euthanasia for terminal illness. Age, religious beliefs, and professional experience were significant determinants of support, with younger and non-religious physicians more likely to endorse E/PAS. Additionally, 92.2% of respondents supported DNR orders with patient consent, though this dropped to 63.1% without patient consent.

Conclusions

Lithuanian physicians' attitudes toward E/PAS and other end-of-life decisions are strongly influenced by ethical, religious, and professional considerations. Significantly lower acceptance for psychiatric patients indicates higher sensitivity regarding mental competency and the ethics of E/PAS in such cases. These findings provide important insights for policymakers and healthcare providers in crafting informed and ethical E/PAS guidelines.

Nurses' attitude toward futile treatment and its relationship with missed care at the end of life

BACKGROUND

Avoiding futile treatment for patients at the end of life is among one of the care challenges of nurses in intensive care units (ICUs).

AIMS

This study aimed to determine the attitude of intensive care unit nurses toward futile treatment and its relationship with missed care for patients at the end of life.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 307 ICU nurses. Eleven teaching hospitals were selected from three Iranian provinces, Zanjan Province, East Azerbaijan and West Azerbaijan, in 2021. The data were collected using The Attitudes Toward Futile Treatment Scale (ATFTS) and The Missed Nursing Care Survey (MISSCARE Survey) as self-reports.

RESULTS

According to the obtained results, 94.8% of the nurses agreed that futile treatment should not be performed. However, 97.7% of the nurses reported that missed care occurs less for patients at the end of life. The correlation between the MISSCARE Survey's total scale and the ATFTS's total scale was positive and statistically significant (r =.11).

CONCLUSION

This research contributes to understanding nurses' attitudes toward futile treatment. Nurses oppose futile treatment, so obstacles to avoiding it should be eliminated. This attitude does not have a significant impact on nursing care quality or missed care for patients at the end of life, but it can lead to enduring distress for nurses. It is recommended to study the reasons for futile treatment, and its link to nurses' mental and physical health.

Nurses' opinions on euthanasia in Spain: an evaluation using a new version of the EAS

BACKGROUND

Bioethical dilemmas at the end of life have led to regularization processes for the provision of medical assistance in dying patients in different countries. Since the regulation of euthanasia in Spain in 2021, the euthanasia act has been included as one of the benefits of the health system, which has undergone uneven development and implementation in different autonomous communities. The aim of this study was to review the Spanish version of the Euthanasia Attitude Scale following the partial modification of four items.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with a non-probabilistic sample of Spanish health workers from Islas Baleares. A self-reported sociodemographic questionnaire and the Euthanasia Attitude Scale were used for data collection. The psychometric properties of the scale were assessed, including reliability and validity, using a confirmatory factor analysis and a parallel analysis.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha of the EAS was α = 0.892, which implies good internal consistency. According to the confirmatory factor analysis, a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin-value of 0.938 was obtained, and the result of Bartlett's test of sphericity was < 0.001. The questionnaire included four loading factors, which explained up to 56.99% of the variance. The parallel analysis revealed three significant factors and a fourth, less interpretative factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The EAS-ES-R is a valid instrument for assessing the attitudes toward euthanasia of both trainees and practicing health professionals. It may also be of vital importance in detecting training, support and implementation needs for laws regulating euthanasia in Spain.

Odnos medicinskih sester do evtanazije

Uvod: Evtanazija je pojem, o katerem se mora razpravljati z vidika medicinskih, zdravstvenih in družboslovnih strok. Medicinske sestre so sestavni del zdravstvenih timov, zato je potrebno njihovo vključevanje v etične razprave o evtanaziji. Namen pregleda literature je predstaviti vidik evtanazije v povezavi z zdravstveno nego.Metode: Uporabljen je bil pregled literature, izveden v podatkovnih bazah COBIB.SI, CIHAHL in PubMed od 1. 11. 2020 do 1. 12. 2020. Iskanje je potekalo z uporabo ključnih besed: »evtanazija«, »zdravstvena nega«, v angleškem jeziku s kombinacijo ključnih besed: »attitudes«, »euthanasia« in »nursing«. Potek pregleda literature je prikazan z diagramom PRISMA. Kakovost virov, vključenih v končno analizo, je bila ocenjena s pomočjo hierarhije dokazov. Rezultati so bili sintetizirani z uporabo tematske analize.Rezultati: Izmed 138 virov je bilo v končno analizo vključenih enaindvajsetih člankov. Medicinske sestre so navajale naklonjen, kot tudi nenaklonjen odnos ter prisotnost etičnih dilem v povezavi z evtanazijo. Naklonjen odnos medicinskih sester do evtanazije se kaže v primerih neobvladljivih bolečin, neznosnega trpljenja in neozdravljivih bolezni, nenaklonjen pa v povezavi z nekaterimi demografskimi in kulturnimi značilnostmi medicinskih sester, upoštevanjem načel sočutne oskrbe in spoštovanjem vrednosti človekovega življenja.Diskusija in zaključek: Ugotovitve raziskave prispevajo prepoznati odnos medicinskih sester do evtanazije ter nekatere etične dileme v povezavi z evtanazijo. Potrebno bi bilo izvesti podrobne preglede etičnih dilem in moralnih stisk, ki se pojavljajo v povezavi z evtanazijo in zdravstveno nego.

The Attitude of Iranian Critical Care Nurses Toward Euthanasia: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Study

Today, one of the major ethical challenges facing the world's health care system, and in particular nurses in the intensive care unit, is euthanasia or death out of pity. The aim of this study was to investigate the attitude of Iranian nurses in the intensive care unit toward euthanasia. This was an analytical cross-sectional study using census sampling. The data collection tool was the Euthanasia Attitude Scale. A total of 206 nurses working in the intensive care unit in 4 hospitals in the Mazandaran province of Iran were included in this study. The mean of total Euthanasia Attitude Scale score in intensive care unit nurses was 2.96. The mean euthanasia dimensions were ethical consideration, practical considerations, treasuring life, and naturalistic beliefs, 3.03, 2.92, 2.98, and 2.99, respectively. There was significant but low negative correlation between age and total Euthanasia Attitude Scale score, ethical considerations, and practical considerations. Male nurses exhibited significantly higher Euthanasia Attitude Scale scores, specifically in regard to ethical and practical considerations compared with female nurses. The most Iranian nurses in the intensive care unit had a negative attitude toward euthanasia for patients in the later stages of the disease. However, this opposition was less than similar studies in Iran in the past.

Comparison of attitude of nurses and nursing students toward euthanasia

BACKGROUND

Euthanasia is a controversial issue in many countries. However, there is little evidence about attitudes of nurses and nursing students toward euthanasia.

RESEARCH AIMS

The present study aimed to compare nurses and nursing students' attitudes toward euthanasia.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

Using census sampling, 390 nurses and 125 nursing students were enrolled in this study.

METHODS

Data were collected using a socio-demographic questionnaire and Euthanasia Attitude Scale that included 20 items that sought to record participants' level of agreement with euthanasia based on a Likert-type scale.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Objectives of the study were stated for all samples, and emphasized the confidentiality of their specifics and responses, and informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

FINDINGS

The mean score of nurses and nursing students' attitudes about euthanasia was 3.14 ± 0.26 and 3.22 ± 0.24 out of 5, respectively. The majority of nurses (n = 250, 65.78%) and nursing students (n = 97, 80.83%) had a positive attitude toward euthanasia. There was a significant statistical difference between the attitudes of nurses and nursing students to euthanasia (p = .005).

DISCUSSION

The results indicated that the majority of students and nurses had a positive attitude regarding euthanasia.

CONCLUSION

It was recommended to conduct more studies on euthanasia in Iran.

Attitudes of Indian Medical and Nursing Students Towards Euthanasia: A Cross-Sectional Survey

This cross-sectional survey was carried out among medical internees (n = 92) and nursing students (n = 228) to investigate their attitudes towards euthanasia. The data was collected by administering a Euthanasia Attitude questionnaire. The findings revealed that a majority (61%) of the participants were in support of euthanasia. Yet ethical dilemmas prevail among students about active and passive euthanasia and legalization of euthanasia. Further, age, gender, religion, education and exposure to patients who require euthanasia were significantly differed with euthanasia attitudes (p < 0.05). Therefore, it is strongly recommended that health care students should receive ethics education to prepare them in dealing with euthanasia related issues in their professional practice.

The Islamic perspective on physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia

Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia can be debated from ethical and legal perspectives, and there are a variety of views regarding their acceptability and usefulness. Religion is considered an important factor in determining attitudes towards such practices. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the Islamic perspective on PAS and euthanasia and explore the Islamic approach in addressing the related issues. The PubMed database was searched to retrieve relevant articles, then the references listed in the selected articles were checked for additional relevant publications. Additionally, religious books (Quran and hadith) and legal codes of selected countries were also consulted from appropriate websites. The Islamic code of law discusses many issues regarding life and death, as it considers any act of taking one's life to be forbidden. Islam sanctifies life and depicts it as a gift from God (Allah). It consistently emphasises the importance of preserving life and well-being. Therefore Muslims, the followers of Islam, have no right to end their life. All Islamic doctrines consider PAS and euthanasia to be forbidden. However, if the patient has an imminently fatal illness, withholding or withdrawing a futile medical treatment is considered permissible. From a legal perspective, Islamic countries have not legalised PAS and euthanasia. Such practices are therefore considered suicides when patients consent to the procedure, and homicides when physicians execute the procedure.

Spanish Version of the Attitude Towards Euthanasia Scale

Euthanasia is undoubtedly the protagonist of many of the debates around the end of life both among health staff and in the general population. Considering that nurses provide care for terminally ill patients and support families and patients in their final days, it is essential to know their attitudes towards euthanasia. The aims of the study were to adapt and validate the Attitude Towards Euthanasia scale to a Spanish context, to test the dimensionality and to estimate the reliability of the scale. A cross-sectional study was conducted with a non-probabilistic sample of Spanish health-workers of 201 in a University Hospital in Ciudad Real. A self-reported socio-demographic questionnaire and the Euthanasia Attitude Scale were used for data collection. The psychometric properties of the scale were assessed, including reliability and validity using an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha of the Attitude Towards Euthanasia scale was α = 0.827 and McDonald's Omega = 0.903. The range of items of homogeneity was from 0.205 to 0.685. For the different exploratory factor analyses carried out, the Bartlett's test of sphericity was p < 0.001 and the sample index value of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was over 0.802. in all cases. We present the factorial weights for three models: The first one assumes a unidimensional solution, the second model was composed by three factors and the third model was composed by four factors. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the three models presented an acceptable fit index. The Attitude Towards Euthanasia scale adaptation to a sample of Spanish health workers has shown, with some limitations, appropriate psychometric properties. There have been several differences between the original factorial solution. It would be necessary to replicate the study to reinforce the findings about the number of factors of the scale.