Effects of the Feldenkrais Method as a Physiotherapy Tool: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The Feldenkrais Method (FM) is based on the learning of alternative movement patterns, carried out in an active and conscious way, which may have therapeutic effects. The objective of this systematic review is to identify the populations and conditions for which the FM can be used in physiotherapy and to determine the intervention modalities. Research in PubMed, Cochrane and PEDro databases was performed. The PEDro scale was employed to assess the methodological quality. Meta-analyses (MA) were performed whenever populations and outcome measures were comparable in at least two studies. Sixteen studies were included. In elderly people, in three of the four selected trials, the FM group significantly improved gait, balance, mobility and quality of life. The MA showed significant differences between interventions in the Timed-Up-and-Go test [Cohen's d = -1.14, 95% CI (-1.78, -0.49), p = 0.0006]. FM significantly improved pain, functional balance, and perceived exertion in three trials performed on subjects with cervical, dorsal, or shoulder pain. FM demonstrated improvements in pain, disability, quality of life and interoceptive awareness in the three trials performed in subjects with chronic low back pain. In multiple sclerosis, an improvement in functional capacity was observed in the two selected studies. The MA showed no significant differences between groups in the Function (p = 0.97) and Control (p = 0.82) dimensions of the Multiple Sclerosis Self-Efficacy Scale. In Parkinson's disease, two studies showed significant effects on quality of life and functional tests. In conclusion, evidence shows that FM has therapeutic effects comparable to other physiotherapy techniques in patients with spine pain. In addition, improvements in mobility and balance were seen in the elderly and people with neurodegenerative diseases.

Decision-making aids for upper limb interventions in neurological rehabilitation: a scoping review

PURPOSE

To summarise the range and nature of decision-making aids that guide upper limb (UL) neurorehabilitation.

METHODS

Our scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's 6-step framework. Electronic databases were systematically searched; grey literature was hand-searched. Included papers were: (1) published in English; (2) related to UL rehabilitation for people with upper motor neuron conditions; and (3) provided a description of, or research on, a decision-making aid that guides therapists when choosing between two or more intervention approaches, techniques, or applications of a technique. Levels of evidence were rated. An expert panel of occupational therapists working in UL neurorehabilitation was consulted.

RESULTS

The 24 included articles described 15 decision-making aids with varying breadth and depth of the assessment process and suggested interventions. Six aids had published research, but lacked high quality evidence. The expert panel identified four key decision-making aids as being clinically useful. Preferred aids either included client-centred goal-setting within a holistic assessment or matched specific intervention options to distinct UL assessment results. Prompts to re-evaluate client performance are desirable.

CONCLUSION

Few decision-making aids guide therapists to holistically assess and make specific intervention decisions across all domains of UL neurorehabilitation. Their usefulness depends on the purpose, setting, and therapist experience.Implications for rehabilitationConsidering the complexity and heterogeneity of upper limb (UL) neurorehabilitation, a selection of evidence-based and purpose-designed decision-making aids may assist therapists across different experience levels and practice settings to choose individualised interventions.Decision-making aids for UL interventions in neurorehabilitation may be more clinically useful if they include a holistic and client-centred information gathering process that focuses on daily life goals.Decision-making aids should illustrate a clear clinical picture based on UL assessment results, with corresponding UL intervention recommendations provided.Inclusion of a cyclic process to re-evaluate client performance and function could also enhance the usefulness of a decision-making aid.

Effectiveness of and User Experience With Web-Based Interventions in Increasing Physical Activity Levels in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Supporting people with multiple sclerosis (MS) to achieve and maintain recommended levels of physical activity is important but challenging. Web-based interventions are increasingly being used to deliver targeted exercise programs and promote physical activity.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to systematically review current evidence regarding the effectiveness and user experience of web-based interventions in increasing physical activity in people with MS.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, PEDro, PsychInfo, Web of Sciences, The Cochrane Library, and gray literature were searched from 1990 to September 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

English language articles reporting the use of web-based interventions to increase physical activity in adults with MS were included. Eligible quantitative studies were of any design and reported a measure of physical activity. Qualitative studies exploring users' experiences in any context were included. Of the 881 articles identified, 9 met the inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data using standardized critical appraisal and data extraction tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Meta-analysis of self-reported physical activity questionnaire data from 4 studies demonstrated a standardized mean difference of 0.67 (95% CI = 0.43-0.92), indicating a positive effect in favor of the web-based interventions. Narrative review of accelerometry data from 3 studies indicated increases in objectively measured physical activity. No qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria.

LIMITATIONS

In the 9 included articles, only 2 different interventions (used with people who were ambulant) were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Web-based interventions had a short-term positive effect on self-reported physical activity in people who had MS and were ambulant. Evidence is not currently available to support or refute their use in the long-term or with people who are not ambulant.