Measuring sub-bandage pressure: comparing the use of pressure monitors and pulse oximeters

Postsclerotherapy compression: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Compression after sclerotherapy is commonly used, although the evidence base for this practice is unclear. This study aims to summarize and assess the evidence for compression therapy after sclerotherapy to inform clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines via Medline and EMBASE databases (1946 to December 31, 2019) by two reviewers. Full-text, English-language studies comparing compression type and/or duration in adult chronic venous disease patients undergoing liquid or foam sclerotherapy were included.

RESULTS

Nine studies were identified: five using liquid sclerotherapy, three foam sclerotherapy and one using both. Studies had short follow-up periods (6-24 weeks) and reported on clinical outcomes, quality of life, side effects and complications. In C1 patients undergoing liquid sclerotherapy, any duration of stocking use significantly decreased telangiectasia and reticular vein number and size compared with no compression. No significant difference in clinical symptoms or quality of life was seen when comparing compression duration after liquid or foam sclerotherapy in tributary or truncal veins in C2 to C6 patients. Greater superficial vein resolution was seen with stockings compared with bandages in C2 patients undergoing liquid sclerotherapy to tributary veins. A comparison of stockings vs bandaging revealed differing thrombophlebitis rates but no significant difference in pigmentation. In C2 to C6 patients undergoing foam sclerotherapy, use of 35 mm Hg stockings significantly improved post-treatment symptoms compared with 23 mm Hg stockings. This review was limited by heterogeneity of outcome measurements and the variety of comparisons between compression types and durations.

CONCLUSIONS

Postsclerotherapy compression may have beneficial clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up; however, evidence is lacking regarding its type, class, length, and duration. Further trials are required to guide the optimal management of postsclerotherapy patients.

Controlling compression bandaging pressure in leg ulcer research trials: A summary of the literature

Compression bandaging remains the ‘gold standard’ intervention for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Numerous studies have investigated the effect of a large variety of compression bandaging techniques and materials on venous leg ulcer healing. However, the majority of these studies failed to monitor both actual bandage application pressures and the bandaging competency of participating clinicians. A series of literature searches to explore the methods, practices, recommendations and results of monitoring compression bandaging pressures in leg ulcer research trials were undertaken. This included investigating the reliability and validity of sub-bandage pressure monitors and the degree to which compression bandaging achieves the recommended sub-bandage pressure. The literature revealed inconsistencies regarding the monitoring of sub-bandage pressure and in sub-bandage pressures produced by clinicians. This creates difficulties when comparing study outcomes and attempting to develop evidence-based practice recommendations.

Relative stiffness of 3 bandage/splint constructs for stabilization of equine midmetacarpal fractures

OBJECTIVE

Determine the relative stiffness of 3 bandage/splint constructs intended for emergency fracture stabilization.

DESIGN

Experimental model. A single plane free end deflection model was developed to simulate the forces placed on a bandage/splint construct during stabilization of a complete mid-metacarpal bone fracture. The total deflection of the model in one plane was measured following application of 3 different bandage/splint combinations including a classic, 3 layered Robert Jones Bandage (RJB) with a splint placed on the outside of the bandage (RJB-3), an RJB with splint placed after the first of 3 bandage layers (RJB-1), and a single layer full limb bandage with external splint (SS). Comparisons were made between the deflections of the model with each bandage/splint combinations in an effort to determine the most effective method for field fracture stabilization.

SETTING

Laboratory.

ANIMALS

No animals were utilized in data collection for this study. Two live horses were utilized during the pilot study.

INTERVENTIONS

Application of bandage and splint to a model intended to simulate the bending force on a lower forelimb fracture in a horse

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Deflection was determined by the difference between the height of the model's supported free end before application of a 4.5 kg weight and at the conclusion of the deflection test. There was no significant difference in the amount of deflection between bandage/splint combinations (78 ± 32 mm (RJB-1), 94 ± 44 mm (RJB-3), and 93 ± 33 mm (SS)) CONCLUSIONS: The one-layer bandage with splint was equivalent to either RJB configuration in the mean amount of deflection in the simple model of a fracture.

Letters

We read with interest the recent comments in JWC on a suggested code of conduct for editors of peer-reviewed journals. We support the sentiments expressed, which should enhance the quality of published research, in particular with regard to rigour.