Baseline characteristics of infected foot ulcers in patients with diabetes at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan

Early intervention and care for Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Low and Middle Income Countries: Addressing challenges and exploring future strategies: A narrative review

Background and Aims

Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs) are a significant health concern, particularly in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). This review explores key strategies for managing DFUs in LMICs, including integrating podiatry, endocrinology, and wound care services, educating patients, promoting self-care, and preventive measures to reduce amputation rates.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies conducted in Low and Middle Income Countries to facilitate a qualitative analysis. The review examined the aetiology and risk factors to developing DFUs, clinical presentation, multidisciplinary management and evidence based interventions, challenges to the provision of care and future directions, all pertaining to DFUs in low and middle income countries.

Results

The aetiology and risk factors contributing to the development of DFUs are complex and multifaceted. Factors such as limited access to health care, inadequate diabetes management, and socioeconomic disparities significantly influence the incidence of DFUs. Clinical presentation varies, with patients often presenting at advanced stages of the disease due to delayed or missed diagnoses. Multidisciplinary management, incorporating podiatry, endocrinology, and wound care services, has exhibited substantial promise in enhancing patient outcomes. Evidence-based interventions, including offloading techniques, wound debridement, and the use of advanced wound dressings, have proven effective in promoting ulcer healing.

Conclusion

The burden of DFUs in LMICs requires comprehensive strategies. Integrating podiatry, endocrinology, and wound care services, along with patient education and self-care practices, is essential for reducing amputations and improving patients' quality of life. Regular follow-up and early detection are vital for effective DFU management, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and investment in LMIC health care infrastructure. Embracing these multidisciplinary, patient-centered approaches can effectively address the challenge of DFUs in LMICs, leading to better patient outcomes and improved quality of life.

Metagenomic analysis reveals antibiotic resistance profiles in tissue samples from patients with diabetic foot infections

OBJECTIVES

Treating patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) is challenging because of high rates of antibiotic resistance. Therefore, to administer a suitable antibiotic treatment, it is necessary to know the antibiotic resistance patterns in DFIs.

METHODS

To explore this question, we selected metagenomic data of 36 tissue samples from patients with DFI in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive database.

RESULTS

A total of 229 antibiotic-resistant gene (ARG) subtypes belonging to 20 ARG types were detected. The antibiotic resistome of 229 different genes in the tissue samples of patients with DFI comprised 24 core and 205 accessory resistance genes. Among the core antibiotic resistome, multidrug, tetracycline, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin, and beta-lactam resistance genes were the dominant categories. Procrustes analysis indicated that both the microbial community composition and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) were determinants of the ARGs. In the network analysis, 29 species were speculated to be potential hosts of 28 ARGs based on the co-occurrence results. Plasmids and transposons were the most common elements that co-occurred with ARGs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provided detailed information about antibiotic resistance patterns in DFI, which has practical implications for suggesting a more specific antibiotic choice.

Diabetic foot ulcer-a systematic review on relevant microbial etiology and antibiotic resistance in Asian countries

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most common but uncontrolled health issues of diabetic patients that needs more therapeutic considerations. This systematic review aims to study the current status of the etiological agents responsible for DFU, their frequency in some of the most occurring Asian countries, and their antibiotic resistance pattern based on available studies.

METHODS

Here, the literature survey was conducted on all the DFU studies with the records of etiological agents and conventional therapeutic treatment published until March 2021 using Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database.

RESULTS

Overall, in our study, a total of 73 studies representing 12 Asian countries worldwide have been included. We found that the highest number of studies were reported from India (45%) followed by Pakistan (11%), China, Iran and others. 71% of recent studies reported DFU being attributed to poly-microbial infections while the dominant position was significantly secured by Gram- negative bacteria (77%, p = 0.34). Staphylococcus aureus was found to be the most prevalent isolate followed by Pseudomonas and then Escherichia coli (mean value - 22%, 17%, and 15% respectively). Antibiotic sensitivity pattern was determined based on availability in terms of median resistance (MR) and interquartile range (IQR) which showed the growing resistance developed by both Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates. Gram positive pathogens were still reported as susceptible to vancomycin (MR 0%, IQR 0-22.8%), linezolid (MR 0%, IQR 0-15.53%) and imipenem (MR 11%, IQR 0-23.53%). Carbapenem genera, colistin, and amikacin were the most effective drugs against Gram-negative pathogens.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study highly recommend searching for alternative and complementary therapeutic regimens instead of prescribing conventional drugs blindly without investigating the progression of the stages of the ulcer, which may help reduce the medical and economic burden of this disease.

A Comparative Analysis of Antibiotic Usage in Diabetic Foot Infections Against Healing Time

The study aimed to analyze bacterial flora in diabetic foot infection, empiric and targeted antibiotic therapy, and factors influencing wound healing duration. The study we undertook a review analysis of data in 118 cases of diabetic foot among 98 patients who reported to the Wound Care Clinic in Warsaw, Poland between 01/2014 and 12/2018. Collected data included sociodemographic data, wounds information, used treatment, results of the microbiological examination, and empiric and targeted antibiotic therapy. For purposes of identifying the empirical and targeted antibiotic compatibility, the patients were divided into subgroups: ETA+ (compatibility of empiric-targeted antibiotic), ETA- (non-compatibility of empiric-targeted antibiotic), NEA (no empiric antibiotic), and NTA (no targeted antibiotic). The study group consisted of men, N = 71 (72.4%) and women, N = 27 (27.6%). Twenty patients (20.4%) were diagnosed as obese according to the body mass index classification. Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis were identified in most cases [N = 53 (24.4%), and N = 41 (18.9%), respectively]. Sixteen patients (13.6%) received gentamycin locally. Amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, clindamycin, and levofloxacin were the most frequently used antibiotics as empiric therapy; meanwhile, in targeted therapy, amoxicillin with clavulanic acid and levofloxacin were most frequently used. Empiric and targeted antibiotic therapies were compatible in 65 (55.1%) cases. The duration of healing did not differ between selected subgroups, and was longer in obese patients (p = .001). Other variables did not influence the healing time. The use of empiric antibiotic therapy before targeted therapy and the topical use of gentamycin did not reduce the healing time of diabetic foot infection. The healing time of diabetic foot infection was longer in obese patients than in nonobese patients.

Prevalence and interrelationships of foot ulcer, risk-factors and antibiotic resistance in foot ulcers in diabetic populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is the prime health concern globally. It accounts for the major burden related to disease mortality and morbidity and economic cost. The timely and early recognition of the DFU can help present its occurrence and improve clinical outcomes.

AIM

To evaluate interrelationships between foot ulcers, risk factors, and antibiotic resistance among diabetic patients having ulcers in their foot.

METHODS

The databases such as PubMed, ERIC, Medline, and Google Scholar were extensively used for the extraction of studies. The selected studies were published within the time-period of 2014-2018. Ten studies were selected, which were found to be completely relevant to the current study.

RESULTS

The prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers among the population was evaluated, and the associated risk factors with its prevalence. Moreover, few studies also reported on the bacteria that are found to be most prevailing among diabetic patients. A narrative discussion was drawn through this analysis, which was used to highlight the specific area of research through selected studies, extraction of the significant information that matched with the topic of research, and analysis of problem through the findings of the selected articles. The results helped in assessing significant knowledge regarding the risk factors of diabetic foot ulcers and the role of antimicrobial resistant in its treatment.

CONCLUSION

The gram-negative bacteria were found to be the most common reason for diabetic foot ulcers. The study only included 10 studies that are not sufficient to produce generalized results, and no information was reported on the tests required to analyze antimicrobial susceptibility that can guide clinicians to propose better and sound treatment plans. It is evident that most study results depicted that the most common risk factors were found to be hypertension and neuropathy.