Reconstruction of infected trunk wounds with pedicled rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps: a retrospective case series

Effect of unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas on skin defects and reconstructive procedures

Unplanned excision (UE) is defined as a procedure wherein a surgeon operates a tumor resection without appropriate preoperative diagnostic modalities and without the intent to achieve tumor-free margins. Generally, the reconstruction rate after UE is higher than that after planned excision (PE). The present study aimed to investigate how the reconstructive procedure and size of skin defect could be influenced. We reviewed the cases of 442 patients who underwent the resection of soft tissue sarcoma. Patients were stratified into two groups (UE vs. PE). We compared the histologic grade, skin defect, reconstructive procedures, depth of the reconstruction layer. For superficial reconstructions, we also compared procedures involving skin graft-only or flap. 105 cases (23.8%) were UE. Histologic grade in PE was significantly higher (p = .024). The reconstruction rate and size of skin defect in UE was significantly higher (76.2% vs. 27.3%, p < .001) and larger (124.5 cm² vs. 65.7 cm², p < .001). The rate of deep layer reconstruction was significantly higher in PE (7.5% vs. 26.1%, p = .001). In superficial reconstructions, 18 (24.3%) skin graft-only procedures were performed in UE and 15 (22.1%) in PE, all other superficial reconstructive procedures involved flap, and there was no significant difference (p = .45). Skin defects were 1.9 times larger after UE than PE. UE did not affect the superficial reconstructive procedure.

Incisions and reconstruction approaches for large sarcomas

Large intraabdominal, retroperitoneal, and abdominal wall sarcomas provide unique challenges in treatment due to their variable histology, potential considerable size at the time of diagnosis, and the ability to invade into critical structures. Historically, some of these tumors were considered inoperable if surgical access was limited or the consequential defect was unable to be closed primarily as reconstructive options were limited. Over time, there has been a greater understanding of the abdominal wall anatomy and mechanics, which has resulted in the development of new techniques to allow for sound oncologic resections and viable, durable options for abdominal wall reconstruction. Currently, intra-operative positioning and employment of a variety of abdominal and posterior trunk incisions have made more intraabdominal and retroperitoneal tumors accessible. Primary involvement or direct invasion of tumor into the abdominal wall is no longer prohibitive as utilization of advanced hernia repair techniques along with the application of vascularized tissue transfer have been shown to have the ability to repair large area defects involving multiple quadrants of the abdominal wall. Both local and distant free tissue transfer may be incorporated, depending on the size and location of the area needing reconstruction and what residual structures are remaining surrounding the resection bed. There is an emphasis on selecting the techniques that will be associated with the least amount of morbidity yet will restore and provide the appropriate structure and function necessary for the trunk. This review article summarizes both initial surgical incisional planning for the oncologic resection and a variety of repair options for the abdominal wall spanning the reconstructive ladder.