Shewhart Charts and Two-Monthly Screening Interval to Monitor Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B Virus Infections in Two-Year Prospective Cohort Study of Hemodialysis Patients in Vietnam

Prevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infections in hemodialysis patients in Vietnam: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aim

Chronic hemodialysis patients are at high risk of contracting hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) virus infections. In Vietnam, the seroprevalence of HBV and HCV infections is approximately 10 and 4%, respectively. Although the chronic hemodialysis population is increasing, relatively little epidemiology is available for HBV and HCV infections in this population. To address this, we reviewed the current literature on the magnitude of these infections in the hemodialysis population in Vietnam.

Methods

Four databases were used to search for publications containing the prevalence of HBV and/or HCV infections in hemodialysis patients in Vietnam. Grey literature search was utilized to identify local publications. Prevalence and 95% confidence interval were used or calculated, and a meta‐analysis was conducted on HBV and HCV prevalence for comparison.

Results

Sixteen studies were included in the review. The search identified knowledge gaps in the current literature. Available data show that HBV and HCV infections remain prevalent in the hemodialysis population. HBV prevalence is not different between the north and the south of Vietnam. The pattern of HCV prevalence is different, with recent reports of lower prevalence in the south than in the north, while HCV prevalence varies between hemodialysis units in the same regions.

Conclusions

A national prevalence survey of hemodialysis patients would improve the reliability and generalizability of the findings. However, the review confirmed that both HBV and HCV were prevalent in hemodialysis patients. The findings support a reinforcement of infection prevention to minimize the risk of HBV and HCV transmission in hemodialysis facilities.

Screening haemodialysis patients for hepatitis C in Vietnam: The inconsistency between common hepatitis C virus serological and virological tests

Selecting the appropriate screening method and interval for the early detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in low-resourced haemodialysis settings is a challenge. The challenge occurs when patients are classified as HCV-RNA positive but negative to HCV-core antigen (HCV-coreAg), anti-HCV and genotyping tests. We aim to clarify the inconsistency between HCV-RNA, HCV-coreAg, anti-HCV and HCV genotyping tests in haemodialysis patients and determine the reliability of HCV-coreAg as a routine two-monthly screening strategy. Haemodialysis patients were tested every 2 months between 2012 and 2014 at the largest district haemodialysis unit in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, for aminotransferases, anti-HCV antibodies, HCV-coreAg, HCV-RNA and HCV genotype. HCV-coreAg and anti-HCV results were tested against HCV-RNA for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). All 201 patients participated in the study. The HCV-coreAg test performed better than the anti-HCV test for sensitivity (100% vs 31%), NPV (100% vs 90%) and accuracy (100% vs 90%). The HCV-coreAg and anti-HCV tests performed no differently for specificity (100% and 98%, respectively) or PPV (100% and 73%, respectively). Kappa values for HCV-coreAg and anti-HCV tests were 1 and 0.39, respectively. Early detection of HCV for the purpose of infection prevention requires a high level of sensitivity and HCV-coreAg performed better in our chronic haemodialysis population as a two-monthly screening method than routine anti-HCV testing. HCV-coreAg test is less labour-intensive with a higher level of accuracy in patients with low viral loads making it cost effective for low-resourced settings. Repeating genotyping may be required in HCV-coreAg positive patients with a low viral load.