Role of carbon nanotracers in lymph node dissection of advanced gastric cancer and the selection of preoperative labeling time

Impact of tumor stage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in fluorescence-guided lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched study in a western center

BACKGROUND

The use of indocyanine green fluorescence has been shown to be a safe and effective method for improving lymph node retrieval in patients with gastric cancer. However, previous studies have focused on early-stage tumors and/or the Asian population and excluded patients who received neoadjuvant treatment.

METHODS

In this study, 142 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy at a Spanish hospital between January 2017 and December 2022. Of these, 42 patients received preoperative indocyanine green injection to guide lymphadenectomy. Their outcomes were compared to a retrospective cohort of 42 patients after 1:1 propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The feasibility of indocyanine green lymphatic mapping was 95.5%. No complications associated with indocyanine green injection were observed. The indocyanine green group had a significantly higher number of retrieved lymph nodes than the non-indocyanine green group (32.67 vs 25.14; P = .013). This statistically significant difference was maintained across subgroups of neoadjuvant treatment, non-obese patients, pT0 to 2 stage, and pN0 stage. In 47.6% of patients from the indocyanine green group, lymphadenectomy was extended outside the standard D2 dissection area based on indocyanine green uptake, but none of the retrieved lymph nodes were metastatic. There were no differences in postoperative complications and length of hospital stay between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Indocyanine green-guided lymphadenectomy is safe and feasible and increases the number of retrieved lymph nodes compared to conventional lymphatic dissection, as well as in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The use of indocyanine green should be routine if available for guiding lymph node dissection in gastric cancer, regardless of tumor stage or previous neoadjuvant treatment. However, further studies are needed to determine the impact of this technique on disease-free and overall survival.

Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Nanoparticle-Labeled Lymph Node Dissection in Radical Resection of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: In this meta-analysis, we investigated the safety and efficacy of carbon nanoparticle (CNP) trace-guided lymph node (LN) dissection during radical gastrectomy. Methods: Literature on CNP tracing compared with non-CNP tracing in radical gastric cancer (GC) surgery was searched from PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid platform), Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from the establishment of the library until October 2022. This meta-analysis was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. Available data regarding the number of LNs dissected, number of metastatic LNs dissected, other surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed in a pooled manner. Stata software (version 12.0) was used for the present meta-analysis. Results: This analysis included 7 studies with a total of 1827 GC patients (551 and 1276 in the CNP and non-CNP groups, respectively). The results of the meta-analysis showed that the CNP group had more intraoperative LNs detected [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 6.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.71-9.62], more LN metastases (WMD = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.09-3.12), and less intraoperative bleeding (WMD = 11.33, 95% CI: 6.30-16.37) than the non-CNP group, all with statistically significant differences (P < .05). For postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.52-1.48) and operative time (WMD = -11.60, 95% CI: -40.53-17.34), there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: CNP was a significant tracer for the LNs of GC. It increased the number of LNs harvested while reducing intraoperative blood loss, without increasing the operative time or postoperative complications. CNP tracer-guided lymphadenectomy is considered safe and effective for gastrectomy.

Tracers in Gastric Cancer Surgery

The treatment of gastric cancer mainly depends on radical gastrectomy. Determination of appropriate surgical margins and adequate lymph node (LN) resection are two major surgical steps that directly correlate with prognosis in gastric cancer. Due to the expanding use of minimally invasive procedures, it is no longer possible to locate tumors and LNs through touch. As an alternative, tracers have begun to enter the field due to their capacities for intraoperative visualization. Herein, we summarize the application of contemporary tracers in gastric cancer surgery, including isosulfan blue, methylene blue, patent blue, indocyanine green, carbon particles, and radioactive tracers. Their mechanisms, administration methods, detection efficiency, and challenges, as well as perspectives on them, are also outlined.

Comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic gastrectomy guided by carbon nanoparticle suspension injection in gastric cancer

Background

The clinical application of robotic-assisted gastrectomy remains controversial, especially as clinical studies of this operation navigated by carbon nanoparticle suspension injection (CNSI) have not been conducted. This study aims to assess the perioperative safety and efficacy of CNSI-guided robotic-assisted gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer by focusing on short-term outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent CNSI-guided laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gastrectomy with a pathological diagnosis of gastric cancer was conducted. Data on demographics, surgical management, clinical-pathological results and short-term outcomes were compared among the groups.

Results

A total of 126 eligible patients were separated into the robotic-assisted gastrectomy (RAG) group (n = 16) and the laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) group (n = 110) in total. The operation time of the RAG group is longer than the LG group (p = 0.0000). When it comes to perioperative and short-term complications, there exists no statistical difference between the two groups.

Conclusion

The time required for CNSI-guided robotic-assisted gastrectomy is longer than that for CNSI-guided laparoscopic gastrectomy. CNSI-guided robotic-assisted gastrectomy is safe and effective.