Vasopressors in obstetric anesthesia: A current perspective

Background factors for intra-operative hypotension during hip fracture repair surgery in the elderly under spinal anesthesia managed by orthopedic surgeons: A retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

Spinal anesthesia is used for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery, but frequently induces hypotension and the causative factors remain unclear. We examined background factors for the use of an intraoperative vasopressor in elderly patients receiving spinal anesthesia for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 203 patients >75 years (mean age, 87.9 years) with femoral trochanteric fractures who underwent short nail fixation under orthopedically managed spinal anesthesia at our hospital between April 2020 and July 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (intraoperative vasopressor) and group B (no vasopressor). The following data were compared: age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, antihypertensive medication, years of experience as a primary surgeon, bupivacaine dose, puncture level, anesthesia time, operation time, hemoglobin level and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio on the day of surgery, brain natriuretic peptide level, left ventricular ejection fraction, and percentage of patients operated on the day of transport.

RESULTS

There were 65 patients in group A and 138 in group B. The average dose of bupivacaine was 11.7 mg. In a univariate analysis, group A was slightly younger (87.0 vs. 88.3 years), had a higher blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (27.1 vs. 24.5), more frequently received β-blockers (14.1% vs. 5.8 %) and diuretic medications (21.9% vs. 11.6 %), and had a higher puncture level. A logistic regression analysis identified younger age (p = 0.02) and diuretic medication (p = 0.001) as independent risk factors in group A. Vasopressor use was more frequent at a higher puncture level in group A (57 % for L2/3, 33 % for L3/4, 15 % for L4/5, 0 % for L5/S).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension is attributed to volume deficit or extensive sympathetic blockade and may be prevented by avoiding high puncture levels and increasing preoperative fluid supplementation in patients on diuretics. There is currently no consensus on anesthetic dosages.

Comparative dose-response study on the infusion of norepinephrine combined with intravenous ondansetron versus placebo for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Ondansetron has been reported to attenuate the incidence of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) and norepinephrine requirement during caesarean section. However, no quantitative study has evaluated the extent of this effect. This study aimed to determine the dose-response of prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine to prevent SAIH in parturients who received intravenous ondansetron or placebo before spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. The median effective dose (ED 50 ) and 90% effective dose (ED 90 ) were compared to evaluate the effect of ondansetron versus placebo on the norepinephrine requirement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty parturients undergoing caesarean section were randomized to receive either 0.1 mg/kg ondansetron (group O) or saline control (group C) 10 min before spinal anaesthesia. The parturients were randomly assigned to one of five different norepinephrine infusion groups: 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08 or 0.10 µg/kg/min. An effective infusion dose of norepinephrine was defined as non-occurrence of hypotension during the study period. The values for ED 50 and ED 90 of norepinephrine infusion were determined using probit regression. Differences between the two groups were evaluated by comparing the relative median potency with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The ED 50 values were 0.033 (95% CIs, 0.024-0.043) µg/kg/min in group C and 0.021 (95% CIs, 0.013-0.029) µg/kg/min in group O. The ED 90 values were 0.091 (95% CIs 0.068-0.147) µg/kg/min in group C and 0.059 (95% CIs 0.044-0.089) µg/kg/min in group O, respectively. The estimate of the relative median potency for norepinephrine in group C versus group O was 0.643 (95% CIs, 0.363-0.956). The incidence of side effects was comparable between groups. No significant difference in neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous ondansetron 0.1 mg/kg before spinal anaesthesia significantly reduced the dose requirement of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion in parturients undergoing elective caesarean section. This finding is potentially useful for clinical practice and further research.

Comparison of Intravenous Granisetron and Ondansetron on Hemodynamics and Sensory Motor Block After Spinal Anaesthesia With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Study

BACKGROUND

Bezold Jarisch reflex (BJR) is mediated by peripheral serotonin receptor 5-HT₃ type. BJR and sympathetic blockade are important causes of hypotension and bradycardia after spinal anaesthesia. Premedication with serotonin receptor antagonists has a role in the attenuation of hemodynamic disturbances.

AIM

To compare the effect of intravenous granisetron and ondansetron on the hemodynamic and sensory-motor block after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective surgery.

METHODOLOGY

Ninety patients posted for elective surgery under spinal anaesthesia were randomly divided into three groups of 30 each. Group A patients received ondansetron 4mg, group B received granisetron 1mg, and group C received normal saline intravenously. Hemodynamic variables such as heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation, were recorded at baseline and then 2 minutes intervals for 20 minutes and thereafter every 5 minutes till the end of the surgery. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block were recorded at baseline and then every 2 minutes till the complete block was achieved.

RESULT

No patient was excluded from our study. During the intergroup comparison, heart rate and mean arterial pressure remained stable in group A compared to groups B and C. Time to reach peak sensory block level T4 was faster in group A compared to group B and group C. The rate of sensory block regression to two segments (T4 to T6) and thereafter up to T10, T12, and S1 was faster in group B compared to groups A and C. The attainment of complete motor block, Modified Bromage Score (MBS)=4 was faster in group A compared to group B and group C. The rate of motor block regression to MBS=3 and MBS=0 was faster in group B compared to group A and group C.

CONCLUSION

Premedication with ondansetron 4mg and granisetron 1mg intravenously significantly reduces ephedrine use. Ondansetron provides better hemodynamic stability, earlier onset of the sensory and motor blocks as well as prolonged duration of sensory and motor blocks, and duration of analgesia compared to granisetron.

Consensus on the Southeast Asian management of hypotension using vasopressors and adjunct modalities during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This consensus statement presents a comprehensive and evidence-based set of guidelines that modify the general European or US guidelines for hypotension management with vasopressors during cesarean delivery. It is tailored to the Southeast Asian context in terms of local human and medical resources, health system capacity, and local values and preferences.

METHODS AND RESULTS

These guidelines were prepared using a methodological approach. Two principal sources were used to obtain the evidence: scientific evidence and opinion-based evidence. A team of five anesthesia experts from Vietnam, the Philippines, and Thailand came together to define relevant clinical questions; search for literature-based evidence using the MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane libraries; evaluate existing guidelines; and contextualize recommendations for the Southeast Asian region. Furthermore, a survey was developed and distributed among 183 practitioners in the captioned countries to gather representative opinions of the medical community and identify best practices for the management of hypotension with vasopressors during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus statement advocates proactive management of maternal hypotension during cesarean section after spinal anesthesia, which can be detrimental for both the mother and fetus, supports the choice of phenylephrine as a first-line vasopressor and offers a perspective on the use of prefilled syringes in the Southeast Asian region, where factors such as healthcare features, availability, patient safety, and cost should be considered.

Effect of Crystalloid or Colloid Fluid Loading and Vasopressor Pre-Treatment on the Timing of Hypotension in Cesarean Section with Subarachnoid Block

BACKGROUND: Cesarean section (C-section) is the most frequently performed surgery in obstetrics, generally using subarachnoid block (SAB) or epidural block for anesthesia. The previous studies have shown the effectiveness of fluid loading and vasopressor pretreatment in preventing maternal hypotension (decreased blood pressure), the most common side effect of SAB. However, the timing of hypotension in response to these treatments has not been analyzed. AIM: This study therefore aimed to compare the effects of crystalloid or colloid fluid loading and vasopressor pre-treatment on the timing of hypotension in cases of C-section under SAB anesthesia. METHODS: The study was a single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial with three treatment groups: Group I, 10 mL/kgBW crystalloid solution (Ringer’s lactate) loading 10 min before SAB; Group II, 5 mL/kgBW colloid fluid (gelatin) loading 10 min before SAB; and Group III, pretreatment with 0.1 mg/kgBW vasopressor (ephedrine) intravenous bolus just before SAB. RESULTS: Significant differences in mean blood pressure between groups were observed between the second and 8th min (p < 0.05). Hypotension was observed in the crystalloid group within the first 5 min, while average blood pressure was relatively stable all groups after the first 10 min. In addition, hypotension occurred more frequently in the crystalloid group (nine subjects, 45%), compared with the colloid and vasopressor groups (two subjects per group, 10%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Hypotension occurred more rapidly and more frequently when crystalloid loading was utilized, compared with colloid loading or vasopressor pretreatment. Administration of colloid fluid loading and vasopressor pretreatment has been shown to prevent hypotension in SAB anesthesia.

Comparative Dose–Response Study on the Infusion of Norepinephrine Combined with Crystalloid Coload versus Colloid Coload for Preventing Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

Background

Although the optimal infusion dose of norepinephrine combined with crystalloid coload for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) for cesarean delivery has been established, the infusion regimen of norepinephrine combined with colloid coload has not been fully quantified. The objective of this study was to compare and determine the median effective dose (ED₅₀) and 90% effective dose (ED₉₀) of norepinephrine infusion combined with crystalloid coload versus colloid coload for preventing SAIH during cesarean delivery.

Methods

Two hundred parturients were randomly assigned to receive norepinephrine infusion at 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, or 0.10 µg/kg/min in combination with 10 mL/kg crystalloid coload or colloid coload to prevent SAIH. The study period was defined as the interval from the commencement of intrathecal injection to delivery of the neonate. The primary outcome was non-occurrence of hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 80% of the baseline before delivery. The ED₅₀ and ED₉₀ of norepinephrine infusion dose were determined using probit regression analysis. By calculating the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of relative median potency to determine whether the prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine requirement was different between the two groups.

Results

The derived ED₅₀ and ED₉₀ of norepinephrine infusion combined with crystalloid coload were 0.030 (95% CIs 0.020 to 0.038) and 0.097 (95% CIs 0.072 to 0.157) µg/kg/min, respectively. The ED₅₀ and ED₉₀ of norepinephrine infusion combined with colloid coload were 0.021 (95% CIs 0.013 to 0.029) and 0.070 (95% CIs 0.053 to 0.107) µg/kg/min, respectively. The estimate of relative median potency for norepinephrine between the two groups was 1.37 (95% CIs 0.94 to 2.23).

Conclusion

Under the conditions of this study, 10 mL/kg colloid coload reduced the dose of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion by approximately 30% in parturients during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery compared with the crystalloid coload.

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Bolus Doses of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine for the Treatment of Spinal Induced Hypotension in Cesarean Section

Background: Spinal anesthetic-induced hypotension is the most worrisome complication for patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The present study compares norepinephrine and phenylephrine bolus for the treatment of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Methods: One hundred twenty- six women aged between 22 and 40 years with singleton pregnancy classified to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical class I and II posted for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups of 63 each. Group I patients received phenylephrine 50 mcg (microgram) as an intravenous bolus, and Group II received 4 mcg of norepinephrine as an intravenous bolus to treat spinal hypotension.

Results: On comparing the demographic data of the patients in terms of age, weight, height, ASA Grade, level of block and surgery time no significant differences were found between the groups. Similarly, the fetal parameters were found to be not significantly different between the groups. However, the number of bolus doses of vasopressors required for the treatment of spinal-induced hypotension was significantly reduced in Group II (p=0.02). The frequency of bradycardia was found to be higher in patients who were given phenylephrine as compared to patients administered noradrenaline boluses (p=0.03). Five (7.93%) patients had shivering in Group I, while similar episodes were observed in 10 (15.87%) patients (p=0.05). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in comparing the heart rate and mean arterial pressure between the groups.

Conclusion: Intermittent boluses of norepinephrine are found to be effective in the management of spinal‑induced hypotension during caesarean section.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Intraoperative Hypotension in Cesarean Section and Poor Prognosis of Neonates

Objective

To analyze the risk factors of intraoperative hypotension in cesarean section women and poor prognosis of neonates.

Methods

The clinical data of 1071 cesarean section women admitted to The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into hypotension group (n = 472) and normal control group (n = 599) according to whether there was hypotension during operation. The correlations between the clinical data of cesarean section and the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension and poor prognosis of neonates were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating curve (ROC) was drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

Results

Logistic regression analysis results showed that BMI ≥30 kg/m2, infant weight ≥3500 g, spinal anesthesia, puncture site L2-3, bupivacaine dose>10 mg, ropivacaine dose>50 mg, and perfusion index≥4 were the risk factor for intraoperative hypotension in cesarean section (p < 0.01) and BMI ≥30 kg/m2, umbilical cord around neck, spinal anesthesia, and perfusion index≥4 were risk factors for poor prognosis of neonates (p < 0.01). The AUC of ROC for BMI to diagnose intraoperative hypotension in cesarean section women was 0.6240 (95% CI: 0.59-0.66, p < 0.01), the sensitivity was only 30.20% (95% CI: 26.73%-35.02%), and the specificity was 87.65% (84.77%-90.04%), and the AUC of BMI for the diagnosis of poor prognosis of neonates was 0.5647 (95% CI: 0.5013-0.6280, p = 0.049), and the sensitivity was 51.19% (95% CI: 40.69%-61.59%), and the specificity was 64.34% (61.30%-67.26%). The AUC of perfusion index for the diagnosis of intraoperative hypotension in cesarean section women was 0.8333 (95% CI: 0.8081-0.8584, p < 0.01), the sensitivity was 94.49% (95% CI: 92.05%-96.21%), and the specificity was 73.12% (69.43%-76.52%); the AUC of perfusion index for the diagnosis of ROC with poor prognosis of neonates was 0.6164 (95% CI: 0.5538-0.6791, p < 0.01), the sensitivity was 70.24% (95% CI: 59.75%-78.96%), and the specificity was 50.86% (47.75%-53.97%).

Conclusion

The prediction model established by BMI, infant weight, anesthesia method, puncture site, anesthetic drug dose, and perfusion index has guiding value for clinical prediction of cesarean section maternal hypotension. The prediction model established by BMI, umbilical cord around neck, anesthesia method, and perfusion index has guiding value for clinical prediction of poor prognosis of neonates.

Comparison of prophylactic phenylephrine and norepinephrine infusion on umbilical arterial pH and maternal blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery

Background and Aims

Spinal anaesthesia induced maternal hypotension in parturients undergoing caesarean delivery may lead to neonatal acidosis and fall in umbilical artery pH. The aim of this study was to compare low dose norepinephrine infusion with phenylephrine to see the effect on umbilical arterial pH and maternal blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery.

Methods

In a randomised, double-blind study, 60 parturients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists grade II, age 18-35 years with singleton term pregnancy were divided into the phenylephrine group and norepinephrine group. Participants received prophylactic phenylephrine and norepinephrine infusion after spinal anaesthesia till the delivery of the baby at a fixed rate of 50 μg/min and 2.5 μg/min, respectively. The primary outcome was umbilical artery pH. Neonatal Apgar score, incidence of bradycardia and hypotension, number of boluses of vasopressor required and reactive hypertension were also compared.

Results

The umbilical arterial pH was comparable between the groups (p = 0.38). Apgar scores were comparable (p = 0.17). Incidence of bradycardia was higher in phenylephrine group without reaching statistical significance (43.3% vs. 20%, P = 0.052). Incidence of hypotension was more but not significant in norepinephrine group compared to phenylephrine group (16.7% vs. 10%, P = 0.44). Number of vasopressor boluses and reactive hypertension episodes were comparable between both groups (p = 0.09).

Conclusion

Low dose (2.5 μg/min) intravenous infusion of norepinephrine is a suitable alternative to phenylephrine in the maintenance of umbilical arterial pH and maternal blood pressure.

Acute Intracranial Hypertension During Pregnancy: Special Considerations and Management Adjustments

Pregnancy is associated with a number of pathophysiological changes (including modification of vascular resistance, increased vascular permeability, and coagulative disorders) that can lead to specific (eclampsia, preeclampsia) or not specific (intracranial hemorrhage) neurological complications. In addition to these disorders, pregnancy can affect numerous preexisting neurologic conditions, including epilepsy, brain tumors, and intracerebral bleeding from cerebral aneurysm or arteriovenous malformations. Intracranial complications related to pregnancy can expose patients to a high risk of intracranial hypertension (IHT). Unfortunately, at present, the therapeutic measures that are generally adopted for the control of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in the general population have not been examined in pregnant patients, and their efficacy and safety for the mother and the fetus is still unknown. In addition, no specific guidelines for the application of the staircase approach, including escalating treatments with increasing intensity of level, for the management of IHT exist for this population. Although some of basic measures can be considered safe even in pregnant patients (management of stable hemodynamic and respiratory function, optimization of systemic physiology), some other interventions, such as hyperventilation, osmotic therapy, hypothermia, barbiturates, and decompressive craniectomy, can lead to specific concerns for the safety of both mother and fetus. The aim of this review is to summarize the neurological pathophysiological changes occurring during pregnancy and explore the effects of the possible therapeutic interventions applied to the general population for the management of IHT during pregnancy, taking into consideration ethical and clinical concerns as well as the decision for the timing of treatment and delivery.

A randomised dose-response study of prophylactic Methoxamine infusion for preventing spinal-induced hypotension during Cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

α-receptor agonists have been reported to be safe and effective for treating or preventing spinal-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery. As a pure α₁ adrenergic agonist, methoxamine has potential advantages of reducing myocardial oxygen consumption and protecting the heart in obstetric patients compared to phenylephrine. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal prophylactic methoxamine infusion dose that would be effective for preventing spinal-induced hypotension in 50% (ED₅₀) and 95% (ED₉₅) of parturients.

METHODS

Eighty parturients with a singleton pregnancy scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were randomly allocated to receive prophylactic methoxamine infusion at one of four different fixed-rates: 1 μg/kg/min (group M1), 2 μg/kg/min (group M2), 3 μg/kg/min (group M3), or 4 μg/kg/min (group M4). An adequate response was defined as absence of hypotension (maternal SBP < 80% of baseline or SBP < 90 mmHg). The values for ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ of prophylactic methoxamine infusion were determined by probit regression model. The outcomes of maternal hemodynamics and fetal status were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

The calculated ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ (95% confidence interval) of prophylactic methoxamine infusion dose were 2.178 (95% CI 1.564 to 2.680) μg/kg/min and 4.821 (95% CI 3.951 to 7.017) μg/kg/min, respectively. The incidence of hypotension decreased with increasing methoxamine infusion dose (15/20, 11/20, 7/20 and 2/20 in group M1, M2, M3 and M4 respectively, P <  0.001). 1-min Apgar scores and umbilical arterial PaO2 were lower but umbilical arterial PaCO2 was higher in Group M1. No difference was found in the other incidence of adverse effects and neonatal outcomes among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the conditions of this study, when prophylactic methoxamine infusion was given at a fixed-rate based on body weight for preventing spinal-induced hypotension in obstetric patients, the values for ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ were 2.178 μg/kg/min and 4.821 μg/kg/min respectively.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), registry number of clinical trial: ChiCTR-1,800,018,988 , date of registration: October 20, 2018.

Comparison of norepinephrine and phenylephrine boluses for the treatment of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section - A randomised controlled trial

Background and Aims:

Hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section is common in spite of adequate fluid loading. Phenylephrine is the recommended drug to treat spinal hypotension during caesarean section. Recently, norepinephrine boluses are being suggested as an alternative to phenylephrine boluses. The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of bolus doses of norepinephrine with phenylephrine to treat spinal hypotension during caesarean section.

Methods:

Fifty patients undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomly assigned into two groups. Group P patients received phenylephrine 50 μg as an intravenous bolus and group N received 4 μg of norepinephrine as intravenous bolus to treat spinal hypotension. The primary objective of our study was to compare the number of bolus doses of norepinephrine or phenylephrine required to treat spinal hypotension. The secondary objectives were to compare the incidence of bradycardia, hypertension, nausea and vomiting in mother and foetal outcomes.

Results:

The number of boluses of vasopressors required to treat hypotension was significantly lower in group N (1.40 ± 0.577 vs. 2.28 ± 1.061, P = 0.001). The frequency of bradycardia was high in group P, but this difference was not statistically significant (4%vs. 20%, P = 0.192). Maternal complications such as nausea and vomiting and shivering were comparable between the groups. The foetal parameters were also comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion:

Intermittent boluses of norepinephrine are effective in the management of spinal-induced hypotension during caesarean section. The neonatal outcomes were similar in both the groups. Norepinephrine boluses can be considered as an alternative to phenylephrine boluses.

Diminished 25-OH vitamin D3 levels and vitamin D receptor variants are associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes with coronary artery diseases

Background

Role of plasma vitamin D and genetic variants of its receptor (VDR) in susceptibility to different diseases has been documented. Various studies in different populations have been highlighted strong associations with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Vitamin D deficiency has been linked with the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the onset of coronary artery diseases (CAD). However, the role of vitamin D in predisposition to CAD in patients with T2D is ill‐defined.

Materials and Methods

We enrolled 674 Chinese T2D patients, and based on clinical phenotype, patients were further categorized into patients with (n = 138) or without coronary artery disease (n = 536). Five hundred twenty‐one healthy subjects from similar geographical areas, free from diabetic or coronary disorders, were enrolled as controls. Serum levels of 25‐OH vitamin D were quantified by ELISA. Common VDR (FokI, TaqI, BsmI, and ApaI) polymorphisms were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR‐RFLP).

Results

Patients with T2D displayed lower levels of 25‐OH vitamin D compared with healthy controls. Furthermore, T2D patients with CAD clinical phenotype had the lowest levels of vitamin D. Prevalence of FokI and TaqI mutants was significantly higher in diabetic patients when compared to controls. Interestingly, Tt genotype was more frequent in the artery disease group in comparison with T2D patients without heart involvement. Combined analysis of VDR polymorphisms and serum levels of vitamin D revealed a significant role in predisposition to T2D with or without CAD.

Conclusions

Lower vitamin D levels and variants of VDR polymorphisms (FokI and TaqI) are associated with susceptibility to T2D and clinical manifestation.

Norepinephrine intravenous prophylactic bolus versus rescue bolus to prevent and treat maternal hypotension after combined spinal and epidural anesthesia during cesarean delivery: a sequential dose-finding study

Background

As a relatively new drug in obstetrical anesthesia, norepinephrine is less likely to induce bradycardia and decrease cardiac output, which makes it a potential alternative to phenylephrine. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal norepinephrine bolus dose needed to either prevent or reverse hypotension after the use of combined spinal and epidural (CSE) anesthesia in 90% of women during elective cesarean delivery (CD).

Methods

Eighty women undergoing elective CD were randomly allocated into either a prophylactic group or a rescue group in this dose finding study. If the women's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was maintained above 80% of their baseline, the next patient had an 8/9^th chance of receiving the same dose or a 1/9^th chance of receiving a lower dose. If the patient's SBP was not maintained, a higher dose was used for next patient. The primary outcome was the successful use of the norepinephrine bolus dose to maintain SBP above 80% of the baseline until after delivery. Secondary outcomes included nausea, vomiting, breathlessness, dizziness, hypertension, bradycardia due to hypotension and supplemental use of atropine and norepinephrine, upper sensory level of anesthesia, umbilical vein (UV) blood gases, and 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores. The 90% effective dose (ED₉₀) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using isotonic regression methods.

Results

The estimated ED₉₀ of the norepinephrine prophylactic bolus was 10.85 µg (95% CI, 9.20-11.67 µg) and that of the norepinephrine rescue bolus was 12.3 µg (95% CI, 10.0-12.8 µg) using isotonic regression methods.

Conclusions

For norepinephrine, either a prophylactic bolus dose of 11 µg or a rescue bolus dose of 12 µg was recommended for clinical practices.

Dissecting genetic factors affecting phenylephrine infusion rates during anesthesia: a genome-wide association study employing EHR data

BACKGROUND

The alpha-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine is often used to treat hypotension during anesthesia. In clinical situations, low blood pressure may require prompt intervention by intravenous bolus or infusion. Differences in responsiveness to phenylephrine treatment are commonly observed in clinical practice. Candidate gene studies indicate genetic variants may contribute to this variable response.

METHODS

Pharmacological and physiological data were retrospectively extracted from routine clinical anesthetic records. Response to phenylephrine boluses could not be reliably assessed, so infusion rates were used for analysis. Unsupervised k-means clustering was conducted on clean data containing 4130 patients based on phenylephrine infusion rate and blood pressure parameters, to identify potential phenotypic subtypes. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed against average infusion rates in two cohorts: phase I (n = 1205) and phase II (n = 329). Top genetic variants identified from the meta-analysis were further examined to see if they could differentiate subgroups identified by k-means clustering.

RESULTS

Three subgroups of patients with different response to phenylephrine were clustered and characterized: resistant (high infusion rate yet low mean systolic blood pressure (SBP)), intermediate (low infusion rate and low SBP), and sensitive (low infusion rate with high SBP). Differences among clusters were tabulated to assess for possible confounding influences. Comorbidity hierarchical clustering showed the resistant group had a higher prevalence of confounding factors than the intermediate and sensitive groups although overall prevalence is below 6%. Three loci with P < 1 × 10^-6 were associated with phenylephrine infusion rate. Only rs11572377 with P = 6.09 × 10^-7, a 3'UTR variant of EDN2, encoding a secretory vasoconstricting peptide, could significantly differentiate resistant from sensitive groups (P = 0.015 and 0.018 for phase I and phase II) or resistant from pooled sensitive and intermediate groups (P = 0.047 and 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Retrospective analysis of electronic anesthetic records data coupled with the genetic data identified genetic variants contributing to variable sensitivity to phenylephrine infusion during anesthesia. Although the identified top gene, EDN2, has robust biological relevance to vasoconstriction by binding to endothelin type A (ET_A) receptors on arterial smooth muscle cells, further functional as well as replication studies are necessary to confirm this association.

Sepsis in Pregnancy: Recognition and Resuscitation

The normal physiologic changes of pregnancy complicate evaluation for sepsis and subsequent management. Previous sepsis studies have specifically excluded pregnant patients. This narrative review evaluates the presentation, scoring systems for risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of sepsis in pregnancy. Sepsis is potentially fatal, but literature for the evaluation and treatment of this condition in pregnancy is scarce. While the definition and considerations of sepsis have changed with large, randomized controlled trials, pregnancy has consistently been among the exclusion criteria. The two pregnancy-specific sepsis scoring systems, the modified obstetric early warning scoring system (MOEWS) and Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS), present a number of limitations for application in the emergency department (ED) setting. Methods of generation and subsequently limited validation leave significant gaps in identification of septic pregnant patients. Management requires consideration of a variety of sources in the septic pregnant patient. The underlying physiologic nature of pregnancy also highlights the need to individualize resuscitation and critical care efforts in this unique patient population. Pregnant septic patients require specific considerations and treatment goals to provide optimal care for this particular population. Guidelines and scoring systems currently exist, but further studies are required.

THE COMPLICATIONS OF SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN OBSTETRIC AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES

Background: The proper use of spinal anesthesia in surgical procedures will minimize patient’s referral. The objectives of the study were to determine the immediate and late complications of spinal anesthesia in obstetric and gynecological surgical procedures in our population. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Moulvi Ameer Shah Memorial Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan from January 2014 to December 2014. Sample size was 790, selected through consecutive sampling technique. All routine and emergency obstetrical and gynecological cases were included. The exclusion criteria were those having hypotension, shock, coagulopathy, prolonged surgeries, patient’s refusal and local spinal disease. The demographic variables were; number of attempts, failure of anesthesia, vomiting, hypotension, respiratory problems, pain, Puncture site pain, and post dural puncture headache. All variables being categorical were analyzed by frequency and percentages using SPSS Version 16.0. Results: Out of 790 obstetrics and gynecology patients undergoing spinal anesthesia, there were 752 (95.2%) patients anaesthetized on first attempt whereas 38 (4.8%) required >1 attempts. Spinal anesthesia failed in 17 (2.1%) cases, partially failed in 15(1.9%). Post-operative mild hypotension was observed in 25 (3.1%) patients and severe hypotension in 4 (0.5%) cases. Respiratory problems were noted among 12 (1.9%). Patient’s Post-operative pain was observed in 28 (3.5%) patients. Nausea and vomiting were noted in 68 patients (8.6%).Late complications include post-operative mild to moderate pain in 65 (8.2%), severe in 15 (1.9%). Puncture site pain was observed in 8 (1.0%) of patients. Severe post dural puncture headache was noted in 3 (.38%). Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia in obstetric and gynecological surgical patients is easy to administer, safer and effective.

Metaraminol use during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

During caesarean section, the use of a vasopressor is often required to achieve haemodynamic stability of the parturient. Metaraminol is a vasopressor used in this context in some countries. However, the differences between metaraminol and other vasopressors remain unclear.

METHODS

A search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases was performed to identify randomised controlled trials comparing the use of metaraminol with other vasopressors during spinal anaesthesia at caesarean section. The selected studies were subjected to meta-analysis and risk-of-bias assessment.

RESULTS

Four randomised, controlled trials met the selection criteria and 409 parturients who underwent an elective caesarean section were included in this meta-analysis. The quality of these trials was good. Metaraminol was associated with higher umbilical arterial pH (standardised mean difference [SMD] 0.82, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.62, P=0.05); a lower incidence of fetal acidosis (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.63, P=0.02); and a lower incidence of nausea or vomiting (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.57, P=0.0005) than was ephedrine. Metaraminol resulted in higher umbilical arterial pH (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.68, P=0.002) but a higher incidence of reactive hypertension (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.46, P=0.0002) than did phenylephrine.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that for spinal anaesthesia at elective caesarean section, metaraminol may be a more suitable vasopressor than ephedrine and its effects are at least not inferior to those of phenylephrine.

Correlation of Symphysiofundal Height and Abdominal Girth with the Incidence of Hypotension in Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia using Bupivacaine with Fentanyl as Adjuvant: A Clinical Study

Background and Aims:

A decreased lumbosacral subarachnoid space volume is a major factor in cephalad intrathecal spread of local anesthetic in term parturients due to compressive effect of the gravid uterus. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of symphysiofundal height (SFH) and abdominal girth (AG) with the incidence of hypotension and the highest level of sensory blockade.

Settings and Design:

This study was a prospective observational study.

Materials and Methods:

Ninety parturients under the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class II within the age range of 20–30 years, weighing between 60 and 65 kg, and height between 150 and 155 cm were studied, and the SFH and AG of all parturients had been measured just before spinal anesthesia. Hyperbaric bupivacaine 9 mg with 12.5 μg intrathecal fentanyl was administered for subarachnoid block. The incidence of hypotension and the highest level of sensory block were assessed.

Statistical Analysis:

Correlation analysis (Spearman's rank test) was applied to analyze the data, and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results:

The incidence of hypotension was higher with increasing SFH (16.9% with SFH of 30–35 cm, 78.37% with SFH of 36–40 cm; correlation coefficient ρ =0.338) and with increasing AG (5.3% with AG between 85 and 89 cm, 35.7% with AG 90–94 cm, 62.8% with AG 95–99 cm; ρ =0.341), and both were statistically significant (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant correlation between increasing SFH and maximum sensory block achieved (ρ =0.157, P < 0.001). There was increased level of sensory blockade with increased AG but was not statistically significant (ρ =0.011, P = 0.32).

Conclusion:

In term parturients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, the SFH has a significant positive correlation with the incidence of hypotension and ascent of spinal anesthesia. AG also has a positive correlation with the incidence of hypotension but is not significant with the ascent of spinal anesthesia.

The Efficacy and Safety of Norepinephrine and Its Feasibility as a Replacement for Phenylephrine to Manage Maternal Hypotension during Elective Cesarean Delivery under Spinal Anesthesia

Maternal hypotension commonly occurs during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, with a decrease of systemic vascular resistance recognized as a significant contributor. Accordingly, counteracting this effect with a vasopressor that constricts arterial vessels is appropriate, and the pure α-adrenergic receptor agonist phenylephrine is the current gold standard for treatment. However, phenylephrine is associated with dose-dependent reflex bradycardia and decreased cardiac output, which can endanger the mother and fetus in certain circumstances. In recent years, the older, traditional vasopressor norepinephrine has attracted increasing attention owing to its mild β-adrenergic effects in addition to its α-adrenergic effects. We search available literature for papers directly related to norepinephrine application in spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Nine reports were found for norepinephrine use either alone or compared to phenylephrine. Results show that norepinephrine efficacy in rescuing maternal hypotension is similar to that of phenylephrine without obvious maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes, and with a lower incidence of bradycardia and greater cardiac output. In addition, either computer-controlled closed loop feedback infusion or manually-controlled variable-rate infusion of norepinephrine provides more precise blood pressure management than equipotent phenylephrine infusion or norepinephrine bolus. Thus, based on the limited available literature, norepinephrine appears to be a promising alternative to phenylephrine; however, before routine application begins, more favorable high-quality studies are warranted.

Crystalloid coloading vs. colloid coloading in elective Caesarean section: postspinal hypotension and vasopressor consumption, a prospective, observational clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Maternal hypotension is a common side effect of spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. The combination of colloid coloading and vasopressors was considered our standard for its prevention and treatment. As the safety of hydroxyethyl starch is under debate, we replaced colloid with crystalloid coloading.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize that the mean blood pressure drop is greater when coloading with crystalloids.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational clinical trial.

SETTING

Two-centre study conducted in Berlin, Germany.

PATIENTS

Parturients scheduled for a Caesarean section were screened for eligibility.

INTERVENTION

The study protocol and patient monitoring were based on the standard operating procedure for Caesarean section in both centres. The data from the crystalloid group were prospectively collected between November 2014 and July 2015.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was the median drop in mean blood pressure after induction of spinal anaesthesia. Secondary endpoints were incidence of hypotension (drop > 20% of baseline systolic pressure /drop < 100 mmHg), vasopressor and additional fluid requirements (mL), incidence of bradycardia (heart rate < 60 beats per minute), blood loss, Apgar score, and umbilical artery pH. In case of hypotension, patients received phenylephrine or cafedrine/theodrenaline according to their heart rate. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

345 prospectively enrolled patients (n = 193 crystalloid group vs. n = 152 colloid group) were analysed. The median drop in mean blood pressure was greater in the crystalloid group [34 mmHg (25; 42 mmHg) vs. 21 mmHg (13; 29 mmHg), p < 0.001]. Incidences of hypotension [93.3% vs. 83.6%, p: 0.004] and bradycardia [19.7% vs. 9.9%, p: 0.012] were also significantly greater in the crystalloid group. Vasopressor requirements, blood loss and neonatal outcome were not different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Crystalloid coloading was associated with a greater drop in mean blood pressure and a higher incidence of hypotension when compared with colloid coloading. Neonatal outcome was, however, unaffected by the type of fluid.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00006783 ( http://www.drks.de ).

Phenylephrine vs ephedrine in cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the past 20 years, many studies compared phenylephrine with ephedrine to prevent or treat hypotension in elective or emergency cesarean delivery and parturients with pre-eclampsia. A meta-analysis of the abovementioned trials is needed.

METHODS

Several databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to April 2018 for trials comparing phenylephrine with ephedrine in cesarean delivery. The primary outcome is the incidence of maternal hypotension.

RESULTS

Thirty-six trials (2439 patients) with elective cesarean delivery, three trials (400 patients) with emergency cesarean delivery and three trials (192 patients) with parturients with pre-eclampsia were included and analyzed. The incidence of hypotension did not differ in the elective surgery group (relative risk 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.05), emergency surgery group (relative risk 1.02, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.19) and pre-eclamptic parturients group (relative risk 0.93, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.37). The phenylephrine group had a higher incidence of bradycardia and lower incidences of tachycardia and nausea or vomiting in all three patient groups. The phenylephrine group also had lower fetal acidosis rate, higher umbilical artery and vein pH values and less base excess in the elective surgery. The abovementioned outcomes were similar in the emergency surgery group and the pre-eclampsia group. Publication bias for hypotension was detected. However, the trim and fill method demonstrated that the publication bias had little impact on hypotension. Trial sequential analysis of hypotension in elective surgery showed that this meta-analysis lacked a sufficient cumulative sample size and that further studies should be included.

CONCLUSION

Phenylephrine and ephedrine were both effective in maintaining hemodynamic balance. Newborns benefited more from phenylephrine in elective cesarean delivery, but not in emergency cesarean delivery or in parturients with pre-eclampsia. More trials should be included to achieve more conclusive results.

Hyperinflation of Vasopressors (Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, Ephedrine, etc)

PURPOSE

Hyperinflation refers to the increasing cost of drugs which occurs due to continued drug shortages and rebranding. Hyperinflation has significant implications in increasing overall healthcare costs with reduced reimbursement, increased patient acuity, and an aging population, but published strategies to reduce costs and minimize waste are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the hyperinflation and cost mitigation strategies of three vasopressor medications, vasopressin, epinephrine, and ephedrine.

CONCLUSION

The steep increase in medications is expected to continue, and mitigation strategies to reduce waste and select the most cost effective therapy to offset the price increase is crucial for healthcare systems.

Impedance cardiography as tool for continuous hemodynamic monitoring during cesarean section: randomized, prospective double blind study

BACKGROUND

Impedance Cardiography (ICG) is a non-invasive tool for continuous hemodynamic monitoring. Aims of our study were to assess the utility of ICG to evaluate the hemodynamic impact of 6 mg (GL6) vs 8 mg (GL8) levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl in healthy patients undergoing elective cesarean section; secondary, to compare the duration and quality of analgesia and anesthesia.

METHODS

Sixty-two women receiving combined spinal-epidural (CSE) for elective cesarean delivery were randomly allocated to GL6 or GL8 groups. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), heart rate (HR), stroke volume index (SVI) were recorded from Tbaseline to 31 min after CSE by ICG. Sensory and motor blocks, patients and surgeons satisfaction, neonatal data were also recorded.

RESULTS

Fifteen of 32 patients in GL6 and 15 of 30 patients in GL8 experienced hypotension at T2 vs Tbaseline (P < .001) and SVRI reduction (P = .035 and P < .001 respectively). MAP, CI and SVRI were always slightly higher in GL6 vs GL8. HR and SVI remained stable until the end of surgery in all patients. Total ephedrine requirements was higher in GL8 (P = .010). The onset and offset time of sensory and motor block were similar in both groups, but the number of patients with motor block was lower in GL6 vs GL8 (P = .001). Patients and surgeon satisfaction scores, the number of patients needed systemic rescue doses, neonatal data were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ICG is a useful noninvasive tool to monitor continuously hemodynamics during cesarean section. The hemodynamic stability, the satisfying sensory block and rapid mobilization provided by low levobupivacaine dose may be particularly advantageous in obstetric patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03170427 . Retrospectively Registered (Date of registration: May 2017).

Prophylactic Phenylephrine Infusions to Reduce Severe Spinal Anesthesia Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery in a Resource-Constrained Environment

Phenylephrine infusions are considered as standard management for obstetric spinal hypotension, but there remains reluctance to implement them in resource-limited contexts. This prospective, alternating intervention study of patients undergoing elective or urgent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia compared a vasopressor bolus strategy to fixed-rate, low-dose prophylactic phenylephrine infusion with supplemental boluses. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe hypotension (mean arterial pressure <70% baseline or systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg). Fewer patients receiving prophylactic phenylephrine infusions had severe hypotension (47.4% [n = 120/253] vs 62.1% [n = 157/253], P = .001, estimated relative risk 0.84, 95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.02), with no significant difference in the rate of hypertension (15% [n = 39/253] vs 11% [n = 27/253], P = .11, estimated relative risk 1.39, confidence interval 0.87-2.20). Guidelines for resource-constrained settings should consider a fixed, low-dose phenylephrine infusion in combination with rescue vasopressor bolus therapy.

Comparing the Hemodynamic Effects of Spinal Anesthesia in Preeclamptic and Healthy Parturients During Cesarean Section

BACKGROUND

Despite controversies about the safest anesthetic technique for cesarean delivery in severely preeclamptic women, there is evidence that supports the use of spinal anesthesia in this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

This prospective randomized clinical trial was designed to determine the hemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal bupivacaine and the incidence of spinal anesthesia-associated hypotension in severely preeclamptic and healthy parturients undergoing cesarean sections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Spinal anesthesia was performed with 10 mg (= 2 mL) hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine plus 2.5 µg sufentanil in two groups of patients after they received 500 mL of IV lactated Ringer's solution. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded before spinal anesthesia and at two minutes intervals for 15 minutes after the block, and then every five minutes until the end of the surgery. Hypotension was defined as more than 25% of decline in the mean arterial blood pressure compared to the baseline in both groups (or systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg in healthy parturients) and was treated with 5 mg IV ephedrine. The total amounts of intravenous administered fluid and the total doses of ephedrine were recorded for each patient as well.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of hypotension among the preeclamptic patients was lower than that of the healthy parturients, despite the former group receiving smaller volumes of intravenous fluids (P < 0.05). The total doses of IV ephedrine for treating hypotension were significantly lower among the preeclamptic patients (3.2 mg in preeclamptic patients versus 7.6 mg in normotensive patients) (P = 0.02). The one-minute Apgar score was significantly lower for the preeclamptic parturients (8.4 ± 0.7 versus 7.2 ± 1.5) (P = 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the five-minute Apgar scores between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm that low-dose bupivacaine spinal anesthesia is associated with a lower risk of hypotension than previously believed, and it can therefore be safely used in severe preeclamptic women undergoing cesarean delivery.

Randomized double-blind comparison of ephedrine and phenylephrine for management of post-spinal hypotension in potential fetal compromise

BACKGROUND

Most studies comparing phenylephrine and ephedrine have been conducted during elective caesarean sections in healthy mothers with no fetal compromise. The effect of vasopressors on fetal outcome may differ between healthy and compromised fetuses. There has been little research into the effect of phenylephrine and ephedrine, when used for management of post-spinal hypotension in the presence of potential fetal compromise.

METHODS

Healthy women with a singleton pregnancy undergoing emergency caesarean section for fetal compromise under spinal anaesthesia were studied. One-hundred-and-six consecutive subjects, who developed hypotension after spinal anaesthesia, were randomly allocated to two groups of 53 each, to receive either phenylephrine (Group P) or ephedrine (Group E). For every systolic blood pressure reading <100mmHg patients received phenylephrine 100μg or ephedrine 8mg depending on group allocation. Umbilical blood gas parameters and Apgar scores were recorded.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in umbilical arterial pH (P=0.79), umbilical venous pH (P=0.98), other blood gas parameters, incidence of fetal acidosis (P=1.00) and Apgar scores. The number of hypotensive episodes, vasopressor doses for treatment of the first hypotensive episode and the total number of doses used during the study period were comparable. The median [IQR] total number of doses of phenylephrine and ephedrine used before delivery were 2 [1-2] and 2 [1-2], respectively (P=0.67). More patients receiving ephedrine (24.5%) developed tachycardia than those receiving phenylephrine (3.8%) (P=0.004). Bradycardia was more common with phenylephrine, with 39.6% of patients in Group P as compared to only 1.9% of patients in Group E developing a heart rate <60beats/min after vasopressor administration (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both phenylephrine 100μg and ephedrine 8mg boluses are equally efficacious when treating post-spinal hypotension in the presence of potential fetal compromise. However, phenylephrine may be a better choice in the presence of maternal tachycardia.

Evaluation of antihypotensive techniques for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: Rapid crystalloid hydration versus intravenous ephedrine

Background:

Spinal anesthesia is a preferred technique over general anesthesia for cesarean delivery. It avoids maternal airway related complications, aspiration and neonatal depression. However hypotension following spinal anesthesia can lead to decrease in uterine blood flow and neonatal hypoxia.

Aims:

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 15 mL.kg- 1of crystalloid preloading versus prophylactic intravenous bolus of 10 mg ephedrine as an antihypotensive measure for cesarean section.

Methods:

A prospective randomized double blind study was conducted in hundred ASA grade I/II parturient undergoing cesarean section, allocated to group P (n=50) who received preloading with ringer lactate 15 mL.kg- 1 over 20 minutes before spinal anesthesia and group E (n=50) received intravenous bolus of 10mg ephedrine within one minute of spinal anesthesia with 10mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% at L2-3/L3-4 level. They were monitored for incidences of hypotension, need of rescue doses of ephedrine, Apgar score and adverse events. Appropriate statistical tests were applied and P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Results:

Incidence of hypotension within 20 minutes of spinal anesthesia was significantly less in group E (28%) as compared to group P (58%) and need of rescue doses were more in group P. Adverse events like nausea vomiting and shivering were less in group E. Apgar score were better in group E than in group P delivered babies.

Conclusion:

Prophylactic intravenous bolus of 10mg ephedrine with spinal injection is more effective in maintaining maternal hemodynamic stability and better neonatal outcome as compared to crystalloid preloading during cesarean delivery.

Ventricular tachycardia observed during cesarean section in a patient without structural cardiac disease

A 32-year-old gravida 2, para 1 woman without structural cardiac disease was scheduled for her second cesarean section under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA). She had stable hemodynamics after delivery; however, 16 min after the application of uterotonics, ventricular tachycardia (VT) with a heart rate (HR) of 150 bpm appeared. VT lasted for <30 s, and her hemodynamics remained stable. Ventricular arrhythmia frequently appeared for 3 min, and the HR at sinus rhythm was approximately 90 bpm. After the discontinuation of oxytocin, VT did not reappear. A postoperative 12-lead electrocardiogram showed first-degree atrioventricular block, but echocardiography performed 2 days later did not reveal any structural abnormalities. Autonomic nervous imbalance induced by CSEA, ephedrine, and oxytocin, as well as ergometrine may cause intraoperative VT during cesarean section in patients without structural cardiac disease.