Value of elastography point quantification in improving the diagnostic accuracy of early diabetic kidney disease

Shear wave elastography in chronic kidney disease - the physics and clinical application

Chronic kidney disease is a leading public health problem worldwide. The global prevalence of chronic kidney disease is nearly five hundred million people, with almost one million deaths worldwide. Estimated glomerular filtration rate, imaging such as conventional ultrasound, and histopathological findings are necessary as each technique provides specific information which, when taken together, may help to detect and arrest the development of chronic kidney disease, besides managing its adverse outcomes. However, estimated glomerular filtration rate measurements are hampered by substantial error margins while conventional ultrasound involves subjective assessment. Although histopathological assessment is the best tool for evaluating the severity of the renal pathology, it may lead to renal insufficiency and haemorrhage if complications occurred. Ultrasound shear wave elastography, an emerging imaging that quantifies tissue stiffness non-invasively has gained interest recently. This method applies acoustic force pulses to generate shear wave within the tissue that propagate perpendicular to the main ultrasound beam. By measuring the speed of shear wave propagation, the tissue stiffness is estimated. This paper reviews the literature and presents our combined experience and knowledge in renal shear wave elastography research. It discusses and highlights the confounding factors on shear wave elastography, current and future possibilities in ultrasound renal imaging and is not limited to new sophisticated techniques.

Ultrasound elastography in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ultrasound elastography (USE) is a noninvasive technique for assessing tissue elasticity, and its application in nephrology has aroused growing interest in recent years. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the clinical application of USE in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including native and transplanted kidneys, and quantitatively investigate differences in elasticity values between healthy individuals and CKD patients. Furthermore, we provide a qualitative analysis of the studies included, discussing the potential interplay between renal stiffness, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and fibrosis. In January 2022, a systematic search was carried out on the MEDLINE (PubMed) database, concerning studies on the application of USE in patients with CKD, including patients with transplanted kidneys. The results of the included studies were extracted by two independent researchers and presented mainly through a formal narrative summary. A meta-analysis of nine study parts from six studies was performed. A total of 647 studies were screened for eligibility and, after applying the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 69 studies were included, for a total of 6728 patients. The studies proved very heterogeneous in terms of design and results. The shear wave velocity difference of - 0.82 m/s (95% CI: - 1.72-0.07) between CKD patients and controls was not significant. This result agrees with the qualitative evaluation of included studies that found controversial results for the relationship between renal stiffness and glomerular filtration rate. On the contrary, a clear relationship seems to emerge between USE values and the degree of fibrosis. At present, due to the heterogeneity of results and technical challenges, large-scale application in the monitoring of CKD patients remains controversial.

Shear wave elastography in early diabetic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to analyze the kidneys among the subjects with early stages of type 2 diabetic kidney disease by shear wave elastography quantitatively.

METHODS:

A total of 108 patients with type 2 diabetic kidney disease and 17 control subjects were enrolled. According to the estimated glomerular filtration rate and urinary albumin-to-urinary creatinine ratio, patients were classified into stages 1 to 3 diabetic kidney disease. Grayscale ultrasound andshear wave elastography were performed. The sizes, depths, and shear wave elastography values were recorded. These parameters were compared between the diabetic kidney disease and the control subjects.

RESULTS:

The mean shear wave elastography values were significantly higher in the diabetic kidney disease group (10.156±1.75 kPa vs. 8.241±1.4 kPa; p<0.001). We obtained statistically significantly higher shear wave elastography values in stages 2 and 3 diabetic kidney disease subjects than control subjects and in patients with stage 3 diabetic kidney disease compared to those with stage 1 diabetic kidney disease (p<0.05 for all). We obtained a cutoff value of 9.23 kPa for predicting diabetic kidney disease in early stages, with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 82%.

CONCLUSION:

Shear wave elastography may be used as a noninvasive, simple, and quantitative method to provide diagnostic information as a part of routine management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, especially in the early stages of diabetic kidney disease.

Are the Currently Available Elastography Methods Useful in the Assessment of Chronic Kidney Disease? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Background: We require an quantitative imaging technique for the diagnosis and assessment of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renal elastography has been widely used in recent years in different studies; however, the results across them are not consistent and, as a result, we conducted a meta-analysis of the published literature on this topic. Methods: The databases of PubMed, Medscape, Medline were searched for all studies published in English from 2010 until November 2021 that evaluated kidney shear wave speed (SWS) by elastography in patients with CKD. Trial design, methodological information, patient characteristics, interventions, results, and outcome data were all collected from each study according to a set protocol. Results: We found 37 publications, yet only 18 studies that utilized point shear wave elastography (Virtual Touch Quantification—VTQ system) were compared because the values achieved using different types of elastography are not evaluable. Finally, 1995 attendees (1241 patients with CKD versus 781 healthy subjects as the control group) were included. When comparing mean values of kidney SWS between studies we found increased heterogeneity Q = 513.133; DF = 10; p < 0001, I2 (inconsistency) = 98.12% (95% CI for I2 97.52–98.57%). With a standardized mean difference of −0.216, patients with CKD have a lower kidney SWS than healthy controls. A positive association between kidney SWS and eGFR was also discovered across the presented studies, with a pooled correlation coefficient of 0.38 (Z = 10.3, p < 0.001), Q = 73.3, DF = 5, p < 000.1, I2 = 93.18% (95% CI for I2 87.86 to 96.18). The pooled area under the ROC curve for kidney SWS to predict chronic kidney disease was 0.831 (95% CI, p < 0.001), Q = 28.32, DF = 6, p = 0.0001, I2 = 78.8% (95% CI for I2 56.37 to 89.72). In the four articles that used the Elast-PQ method, the data presented were insufficient for statistical analysis: area under the curve (AUC) values are used to compare distinct characteristics (differentiating kidney SWS between mildly and moderately impaired kidneys, between non-diabetic/prediabetic/diabetic patients, or kidney SWS between the CKD and control group), therefore not being suitable for further evaluation. Conclusions: The results show that patients with CKD have a lower kidney SWS than healthy controls. However, the number of studies involving renal elastography that have been published is limited and show an increased heterogeneity. Further research is needed to determine which factors actually influence kidney SWS in CKD patients and, as a result, to specify the role and indication of renal elastography in clinical practice.