Uncontrolled central hyperthermia by standard dose of bromocriptine: A case report

Clinical experience with bromocriptine for central hyperthermia after brain insult

INTRODUCTION

Bromocriptine is a dopamine receptor agonist used for central hyperthermia with limited data. We describe our single-center experience utilizing bromocriptine for central hyperthermia, including the population treated, most common dosing regimens, adverse events, and discontinuation reasons.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted screening patients who were admitted to intensive care units for acute neurological insults and administered bromocriptine for central hyperthermia between April 2016 and September 2022. Baseline characteristics, disease severity markers, and bromocriptine doses were collected. Body temperatures prior to the first dose of bromocriptine, at the time of dose, and after each dose were recorded. Co-administration of additional hyperthermia management therapies was noted.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included. The most common diagnosis was traumatic brain injury (TBI) (N = 14). The most common reason for discontinuation was resolution of indication (N = 14). Discontinuation due to mild adverse effects occurred in four patients; hepatotoxicity was the most common. There was a paired mean difference of -0.37°C (p = 0.005) between temperatures before and after bromocriptine initiation.

CONCLUSION

Bromocriptine is a potential therapy for the management of central hyperthermia in patients with severe acute neurologic insults who have failed other therapies. Bromocriptine was well tolerated and associated with a low incidence of adverse events.

Adverse Effect of Neurogenic, Infective, and Inflammatory Fever on Acutely Injured Human Spinal Cord

This study aims to determine the effect of neurogenic, inflammatory, and infective fevers on acutely injured human spinal cord. In 86 patients with acute, severe traumatic spinal cord injuries (TSCIs; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), grades A-C) we monitored (starting within 72 h of injury, for up to 1 week) axillary temperature as well as injury site cord pressure, microdialysis (MD), and oxygen. High fever (temperature ≥38°C) was classified as neurogenic, infective, or inflammatory. The effect of these three fever types on injury-site physiology, metabolism, and inflammation was studied by analyzing 2864 h of intraspinal pressure (ISP), 1887 h of MD, and 840 h of tissue oxygen data. High fever occurred in 76.7% of the patients. The data show that temperature was higher in neurogenic than non-neurogenic fever. Neurogenic fever only occurred with injuries rostral to vertebral level T4. Compared with normothermia, fever was associated with reduced tissue glucose (all fevers), increased tissue lactate to pyruvate ratio (all fevers), reduced tissue oxygen (neurogenic + infective fevers), and elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines (infective fever). Spinal cord metabolic derangement preceded the onset of infective but not neurogenic or inflammatory fever. By considering five clinical characteristics (level of injury, axillary temperature, leukocyte count, C-reactive protein [CRP], and serum procalcitonin [PCT]), it was possible to confidently distinguish neurogenic from non-neurogenic high fever in 59.3% of cases. We conclude that neurogenic, infective, and inflammatory fevers occur commonly after acute, severe TSCI and are detrimental to the injured spinal cord with infective fever being the most injurious. Further studies are required to determine whether treating fever improves outcome. Accurately diagnosing neurogenic fever, as described, may reduce unnecessary septic screens and overuse of antibiotics in these patients.

Antipyretic Efficacy of Bromocriptine in Central Fever: an Exploratory Analysis

BACKGROUND

'Central' fevers are thought to result from disruption of hypothalamic thermoregulatory pathways following severe brain injuries. Bromocriptine, due to its central dopamine receptor agonism, has been hypothesized to have antipyretic effect in this setting. However, clinical evidence for this off-label use is limited to a few case reports. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the effect of bromocriptine administration on body temperature in acute brain injury patients with suspected central fever.

METHODS

We screened a cohort of adult patients that received bromocriptine in the neurologic-intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital between January 2018 and December 2021. Indication of central fever was ascertained by review of clinical documentation. A generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) was used to model temperature as a function of time relative to bromocriptine initiation. We adjusted for potential confounding due to the following covariates: temperature recording method (invasive vs surface), concurrent antipyretic administration within 8 h, and surface cooling device use within 4 h of temperature measurement. Temperature-time function was modeled using a cubic spline with k = 10 knots.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were included in the analysis (14 women; mean age: 50 y, standard deviation 14 y). Median dose of bromocriptine was 7.5 mg (range 2.5-40) for a median of 13 d (range 5-160). Age and sex did not impact the function of temperature over time. Predicted temperatures were significantly (p < 0.05) higher by 0.4 °C with invasive compared to surface recording methods, lower by 0.2 °C in the presence of cooling device use and lower by 0.1 °C with concurrent antipyretic use. On adjusted analysis with the GAMM, there was decline (p < 0.05) in temperature following bromocriptine initiation by - 0.3 °C at 24 h, - 0.5 °C at 48 h, and - 0.7 °C at 72 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Bromocriptine use was associated with modest but statistically significant decline in temperature, with nadir at 72 h post initiation. The findings provide a data driven basis for prospective evaluation.