Efficacy of topical vs intravenous tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and promoting wound healing in bone surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic and topical tranexamic acid administration in aesthetic plastic surgery

INTRODUCTION

Tranexamic acid has been widely used in plastic surgery. However, its efficacy has yet to be fully established. This meta-analysis aimed to determine its effectiveness in aesthetic plastic surgery.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a meta-analysis of prospective randomised clinical trials that compared the effects of topical or systematic administration of tranexamic acid versus the control group in aesthetic plastic surgeries. The study was registered on the International Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and is available online ( www.crd.york.uk/prospero , CRD42023492585).

RESULTS

Eleven studies encompassing 960 patients were included for the synthesis after critical evaluation. Systematic (MD - 18.05, 95% Cl, - 22.01, - 14.09, p < 0.00001) and topical (MD - 74.93, 95% Cl, - 88.79, - 61.07, p < 0.00001) administration of tranexamic acid reduced total blood loss. Topical tranexamic acid reduced drainage output (p < 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

Tranexamic acid reduced blood loss in aesthetic plastic surgery. More strictly defined RCTs, using high-quality methodology, are needed to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of tranexamic acid in aesthetic plastic surgery.

Topical or intravenous administration of tranexamic acid accelerates wound healing

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to investigate the morphological and histological effects of tranexamic acid (TA) on wound healing in a rat wound model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 24 adult male Wistar Albino rats were used in this study. All rats were simple randomly divided into three groups including eight rats in each group. A full-thickness skin defect was created on the back of the rats in all groups. Serum physiological (2 mL) was instilled saline drops after wound formation (control group). Wound was created and topical TA (0.12 to 0.15 mL [30 mg/kg]) was applied (local group). Intravenous TA (0.12 to 0.15 mL [30 mg/kg]) was applied intravenously before the wound was created (intravenous group). The wound diameters of the groups were photographed and measured on Days 0, 3, 7, 10, 14 and, at the end of Day 14, the rats were sacrificed and their histopathological results and wound diameters were compared.

RESULTS

Fibroblast count values of the control group were found to be significantly lower than the local group (p=0.002), and no significant difference was observed between the local and intravenous groups (p>0.05). The collagen density (%) values of the control group were found to be significantly higher than the local and intravenous groups (p=0.016 and p=0.044). Wound diameter values of the control group on Day 10 day were found to be significantly higher than the local and intravenous groups (p=0.001). In addition, the wound diameter values of the control group on Day 14 were found to be significantly higher than the local and intravenous groups (p=0.001 and p=0.0001). The wound diameter changes of the control group on Days 0-10 were found to be significantly lower than the local and intravenous groups (p=0.001). In addition, the wound diameter changes of the control group on Days 0-14 were found to be lower than those of the local and intravenous groups (p=0.001 and p=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The use of local or intravenous TA may have positive effects on the fibroblast count and wound contraction in a rat wound model.

Topical Tranexamic Acid: Risks, Benefits and Novel Complications in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Antifibrinolytics, particularly tranexamic acid (TXA), are agents used to reduce bleeding. TXA is a synthetic reversible competitive inhibitor to the lysine receptor found on plasminogen. By reversibly binding to this site, it leads to plasminogen being unable to bind to fibrin and so prevents fibrinolysis, this stabilizes the clot and thus prevents hemorrhage. (Pekrul in Der Anaesth 70:515-521, 2021) It can be used either intravenously or topically but has never entered mainstream use in plastic surgery. (Pekrul in Der Anaesth 70:515-521, 2021) This is most likely due to understandable fears of thromboembolic events. On the other hand, the tempting benefits are reduced bleeding (perioperatively) decreased bruising and swelling, and thus increased aesthetic, important for obvious reasons. A review of the literature was done to go deeper on this issue, examining topical use in aesthetic surgery. Clear benefit was shown in the literature, it could be postulated that it would not be unwise to consider more research on topical use of TXA in certain cases, the benefits could greatly outweigh the risks. Old fears and conceptions, unsupported by the literature at the time of writing, should not hold back further research, and the benefits shown could even potentially justify the topical use of these agents in the near future. Further studies evaluating the utility of TXA in Panniculectomy and Abdominoplasty surgery should be performed especially, since only one was found which reported no significant benefit. Minor complications were present, such as minor delayed post-auricular skin healing, temporary unilateral marginal mandibular neuropraxia and increased cumulative seroma volume. These were novel findings and could warrant further investigation as well. After performing a review of the literature, it was seen that topical TXA generally adds benefit in aesthetic plastic surgery, with no particularly significant complications. We would like to bring more attention to the issue and support more studies on TXA use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Prophylactic tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss and related morbidities during hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of prophylactic tranexamic acid (TXA) versus a control (placebo or no treatment) during hysterectomy for benign conditions. Six databases were screened from inception to January 23, 2022. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias. Outcomes were summarized as weighted mean differences and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals in a random-effects model. Five studies, comprising six arms and 911 patients were included in the study. Two and three studies had an overall unclear and low risk of bias, respectively. Estimated intraoperative blood loss, requirement for postoperative blood transfusion, and requirement for intraoperative topical hemostatic agents were significantly reduced in a prophylactic TXA group when compared with a control group. Moreover, postoperative hemoglobin level was significantly higher in the prophylactic TXA group than in the control group. Conversely, the frequency of self-limiting nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in the prophylactic TXA group than in the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of surgery duration, hospital stay, and diarrhea rate. All the RCTs reported no incidence of major adverse events in either group, such as mortality, thromboembolic events, visual disturbances, or seizures. There was no publication bias for any outcome, and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses demonstrated stability of the findings. Among patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions, prophylactic TXA appeared largely safe and correlated with substantial reductions in estimated intraoperative blood loss and related morbidities.

Topical use of tranexamic acid: Are there concerns for cytotoxicity?

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has revolutionized modern blood management in orthopaedic surgery, especially in total joint arthroplasty, by significantly reducing blood loss and transfusion rates. It is an antifibrinolytic agent and a synthetic derivative of the amino acid lysine, which can inhibit the activation of plasminogen and the fibrin breakdown process. The administration of TXA can be intravenous (IV), topical, and oral. In patients where the IV administration is contraindicated, topical use is preferred. Topical administration of the drug theoretically increases concentration at the operative site with reduced systemic exposure, reduces cost, and gives the surgeon the control of the administration. According to recent studies, topical administration of TXA is not inferior compared to IV administration, in terms of safety and efficacy. However, there are concerns regarding the possible toxicity in the cartilage tissue with the topical use of TXA mainly in hemiarthroplasty operations of the hip, unilateral knee arthroplasties, total knee arthroplasties where the patella is not resurfaced, and other intraarticular procedures, like anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The purpose of the present review is to present all the recent updates on the use of TXA focusing on the toxicity on chondrocytes and the articular cartilage that may or may not be provoked by the topical use of TXA.