Primary extra-pancreatic pancreatic-type acinar cell carcinoma in the right perinephric space: A case report and review of literature

Pancreatic mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma with intraductal growth: A case report with radiologic-pathologic correlations

Pancreatic mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare malignant tumors of the pancreas. They are composed histologically of both acinar and neuroendocrine cells. The pancreatic duct is known to be an important site of tumor growth for acinar cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine tumors, and intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms. To the best of our knowledge, there has been only 1 report of a mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma growing into the pancreatic duct and no reports detailing imaging findings with this tumor. We here report a 69-year-old man who presented with worsening glycemic control. Multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a well-circumscribed mass with poor contrast enhancement in the pancreatic tail region of the pancreatic duct. The intraductal mass showed diffusion restriction on magnetic resonance imaging. These imaging findings are consistent with the expansive, smooth-surfaced polypoid tumor of low vascularity and high cellularity that was diagnosed pathologically. Mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinomas should be included in the differential diagnosis of intraductal tumors of the pancreas with poor contrast enhancement and diffusion restriction.

Mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas with positive for microsatellite instability: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) of the pancreas is a rare tumor. We report a case of successful surgical resection of expansively growing MANEC of the pancreas with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was an asymptomatic 65-year-old male. A computed tomography (CT) scan for a follow-up after treatment of pneumonia incidentally revealed a hypoenhancing 12-cm expansively growing tumor in the pancreatic body. An endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the tumor suggested the diagnosis of MANEC. We performed distal pancreatectomy with combined resection of the spleen, left adrenal gland, transverse colon, small bowel, and stomach. The intraoperative findings showed that the tumor was capsular and was in contact with the SMA, SMV, and CA; however, obvious infiltration of these vessels was not observed..Pathological findings indicated MANEC with MSI-high. Among mismatch repair (MMR) gene proteins, PMS2 was lost and MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 were retained. The tumor recurred 5 months after surgery. The patient was treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel followed by pembrolizumab, which did not show objective response.

DISCUSSION

This is the first report investigating MSI and MMR in MANEC. Standard chemotherapy has not been established for MANEC. Detection of MSI-high is essential since PD-1 monoclonal antibodies for MSI-high cases might be one of the good treatment options. Herein, we discuss the various cytomorphologic and clinical features of MANEC and present a brief review of the literatures.

CONCLUSIONS

The accumulation of data from additional cases is necessary to further evaluate this type of carcinoma and provide a standardized optimal therapy for MANEC.

Extra-renal renal cell carcinoma arising in the kidney proximity but without an identifiable renal primary - an intriguing dilemma: Report of three cases and review of the literature

We report three patients with extra-renal renal cell carcinomas (RCC) found in the renal proximity, but unattached to the kidney. None had a history of RCC or an identifiable primary renal neoplasm at the time of the diagnosis and on follow-up. The patients included two males and one female aged 57, 77 and 63 years, respectively. One carcinomas was found in the perirenal tissue adjacent to the adrenal, one involved the adrenal gland, and one was a retroperitoneal mass found within the lymph nodes. Two extra-renal RCCs represented clear cell RCCs and one was an unclassifiable RCC. No patient had evidence of metastases at presentation and disease progression during the follow-up. This report adds to the literature on this unusual clinical scenario and further supports the concept of extra-renal RCC, which is not a well-recognized clinical phenomenon. We also reviewed other similar reports documenting the absence of identifiable renal primaries in the setting of either disseminated metastatic disease or isolated distant metastases of presumed renal origin. Similarly, some carcinomas of apparent renal derivation have been also identified during a work-up of metastatic carcinomas of unknown primary. The aim of this study is to raise further awareness of this unusual and intriguing clinical scenario that currently lacks a definitive explanation and standardized therapy strategies. Establishing a correct diagnosis may allow treatment with specific targeted therapies in selected clinical cases.