Cost-effective screening using a two-antibody panel for detecting mismatch repair deficiency in sporadic colorectal cancer

Keratin 6A Is Expressed at the Invasive Front and Enhances the Progression of Colorectal Cancer

Keratins (KRTs) are intermediate filament proteins in epithelial cells, and they are important for cytoskeletal organization. KRT6A, classified as a type II KRT, is normally expressed in stratified squamous epithelium and squamous cell carcinomas. Little is known about the expression and role of KRT6A in adenocarcinomas. We investigated the clinicopathologic and molecular biological significance of KRT6A in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Immunostaining of colorectal adenocarcinoma cases treated at our institution demonstrated that KRT6A showed significantly stronger expression at the invasive front than that at the tumor center (P < .0001). The high KRT6A-expression cases (n = 47) tended to have a high budding grade associated with significantly worse prognoses. A multivariate analysis revealed that the KRT6A expression status was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = .0004), disease-specific survival (P = .0097), and progression-free survival (P = .0033). The correlation between KRT6A and patient prognoses was also validated in an external cohort from a published data set. To determine the function of KRT6A in vitro, KRT6A was overexpressed in 3 colon cancer cell lines: DLD-1, SW620, and HCT 116. KRT6A overexpression increased migration and invasion in DLD-1 but did not in SW620 and HCT116. In 3-dimensional sphere-forming culture, KRT6A expression enhanced the irregular protrusion around the spheroid in DLD-1. Our findings in this study indicated that KRT6A expression is a valuable prognostic marker of colorectal cancer and KRT6A may be involved the molecular mechanism in the progression of invasive areas of colorectal cancer.

Mismatch repair deficiency: how reliable is the two-antibody approach? A national real-life study

AIMS

Traditionally, mismatch repair (MMR) status is determined by a panel of four antibodies (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6). If all proteins are retained, cases are MMR proficient (pMMR), while loss of one or more proteins is indicative of MMR deficiency (dMMR). This approach has been challenged in favour of a two-antibody approach, using PMS2 and MSH6 as a first screening. Their retainment is deemed sufficient to declare cases pMMR. In this study we aim to verify the validity of the two-antibody approach.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a nationwide study in colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosed between 2016 and 2023, including 47,657 patients to evaluate the two-antibody approach. In 0.17% and 0.4% of cases of CRC and EC, respectively, dMMR cases would be missed with the two-antibody approach. Subgroup analyses pointed towards slightly increased miss rates in younger patients (under the age of 50 years) in both groups and identified special subtypes (signet ring cell carcinoma, medullary carcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma in CRC and clear cell carcinoma in EC) with increased miss rates. For these specific subgroups, a low threshold should be used for further testing. In case of ambiguous or heterogeneous staining patterns, four antibodies should be used.

CONCLUSION

In general, the application of a two-antibody MMR testing strategy does not lead to considerable failure of dMMR identification and saves costs.

Immunohistochemical phenotype of colorectal carcinoma in patients with KRAS mutation and mismatch repair status

INTRODUCTION

Aberrant expression of CK7/CK20/CDX2 is reported in percentage of colorectal carcinomas (CRC).