Abstract
A unique challenge posed by advancing scientific knowledge about the biology of human behavior is how to integrate that understanding with the desire to hold ourselves--and one another--morally accountable. As human beings, we are something more than just passive agents whose behavior is the sum product of biologic determinism. Because of the existence of the mind, we are also active agents with the capacity to influence, at least to some extent, our own destinies. Behavior may be determined, but it is not predetermined. We are one of its determinants. Misconduct by a person of sound mind should not be attributed improperly to brain pathology. On the other hand, suffering, legitimate mental disorder, and associated impairments should not be trivialized. Historically, persons who once were labeled "lazy" are often more appropriately understood by modern standards as clinically depressed. Frequently they are more in need of pharmacologic treatments that alter brain chemistry than "a kick in the behind." Gluttony, one of the original cardinal sins, is often more properly understood as morbid obesity, a condition that deserves appropriate medical care. Persons who have alcoholism, once judged morally as "bums in the gutter," are more frequently referred to treatment facilities, such as The Betty Ford Clinic. One should not approach the issue of human sexual behavior without at least some appreciation of moral values and scientific research. Although clearly some persons choose to act in a sexually selfish and self-indulgent fashion with wanton disregard, others seem to be more genuinely burdened and struggle to integrate their sexual desires into an otherwise healthy and fully responsible lifestyle. When a person, whether male or female, seems to be so driven that it becomes difficult to master erotic desires and he or she experiences difficulty serving his or her own best longterm interests, the concept of sexual compulsivity seems to be relevant. Ultimately, a better understanding of any associated neuropathologies may help to facilitate future treatments and public acceptance. The possibility exists, at least in some instances, that a sexually compulsive individual is less an example of a bad person deserving of punishment than a "broken mind" in need of repair. In time, increased knowledge about the precise workings of the brain in reciprocally initiating and sustaining the sexual interests of the mind may facilitate a much clearer appreciation of the issues at hand.
Collapse