Clinical and radiological assessment of hemiplegic shoulder pain in stroke patients

Background

Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is one of the most common complications of stroke. This work aimed to evaluate and analyze the clinical and radiological features of painful shoulder in hemiplegic stroke patients with evaluating the diagnostic role of shoulder ultrasound and shoulder MR imaging in assessment of the causes of shoulder pain.

Methods

210 stroke patients with shoulder affection within 3 years of stroke development were enrolled. Clinical assessment including Medical Research Council scoring, The Brunnström motor recovery and Ashworth Scale. Shoulder ultrasound and MR imaging were done for 74 patients with painful hemiplegic shoulder.

Results

The prevalence of HSP was 35.2% with statistically significantly higher proportion of shorter disease duration, lower muscle power, lower BMR stage with higher proportion of bicipital tendinitis and complex regional pain syndrome in major versus moderate dependence (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.011 and P = 0.001 respectively). On multivariate analysis only short disease duration was statistically significant independent predictor. Participants with disease duration ≤ 2 months have 21.9 times higher odds to exhibit major rather than moderate dependence. By imaging there was high prevalence of joint effusion (47.3%), bicipital tendinitis (44.6%), bursitis (31%) and adhesive capsulitis (29.7%) in painful hemiplegic shoulder with a very good agreement between MRI and US in diagnosis.

Conclusion

HSP has a high prevalence in stroke patient with increased morbidity due to various factors and US can be used as an alternative or a complementary to MRI for diagnosis of hemiplegic shoulder pain.

Incidence, Time Course and Predictors of Impairments Relating to Caring for the Profoundly Affected arm After Stroke: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A significant number of stroke survivors will not recover the use of their affected arm. A proportion will experience pain, stiffness and difficulty with basic care activities. The purpose of the review was to identify predictors of difficulty caring for the profoundly affected arm and establish the incidence and time-course of the related impairments of pain, spasticity and contracture.

METHOD

Data sources: Databases (PubMED, MEDLINE, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) were searched from inception to December 2013. Additional studies were identified from citation tracking.

REVIEW METHODS

Independent reviewers used pre-defined criteria to identify eligible studies. Quality assessment and risk of bias were assessed using the McMasters Assessment Tool. A narrative evidence synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine articles reporting 34 studies were included. No studies formally measured difficulty caring for the arm, but related impairments were common. Incidence of spasticity in those with weakness ranged from 33% to 78%, shoulder pain affected 22% to 90% and contracture was present in at least 50%. Spasticity and pain appear within 1 week of stroke, and contracture within two weeks. Impairments continued to develop over at least 3-6 months. The most frequent predictors of spasticity and contracture were weakness and reduced motor control, and the risk of pain is most commonly predicted by reduced sensation, shoulder subluxation, weakness and stroke severity.

DISCUSSION

There is no published evidence on predicting the likelihood of difficulty caring for the arm following stroke. However, the related impairments of spasticity, pain and contracture are common. Given the time-course of development, clinicians may need not only to intervene early but also be prepared to act over a longer time period. Further research is needed to examine difficulty caring for the arm and the relationship with associated impairments to enable researchers and clinicians to develop targeted interventions. © 2015 The Authors. Physiotheraphy Research International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

The prevalence and characteristics of shoulder pain after traumatic brain injury

Objective: To determine the prevalence and characteristics of shoulder pain in people with traumatic brain injury participating in inpatient rehabilitation and to compare the clinical presentation with that of people with stroke.

Design: A prospective comparative study.

Setting: Six metropolitan rehabilitation units.

Subjects: Eighty-seven people with traumatic brain injury and 52 people with stroke took part in the study.

Main measures: Assessment of shoulder pain, range of motion, strength and function was conducted on admission and, for the subjects with traumatic brain injury, at discharge if rehabilitation exceeded two weeks.

Results: The prevalence of shoulder pain in people with traumatic brain injury was 62%, which was comparable with the 69% of subjects with stroke that experienced shoulder pain (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.34 -1.5). Fracture in the shoulder complex and passive shoulder external rotation range of motion were the best predictors for shoulder pain after traumatic brain injury. This was different from the subjects with stroke for which the best predictors were passive shoulder flexion range of motion and length of acute hospital stay.

Conclusion: There is a relatively high prevalence of shoulder pain after traumatic brain injury. Trauma to the shoulder complex contributes to shoulder pain after traumatic brain injury, making clinical presentation different from people with stroke. The findings support the need for greater attention in the management of shoulder pain after traumatic brain injury.

Underlying pathology and associated factors of hemiplegic shoulder pain

The prevalence of hemiplegic shoulder pain is approximately 22%-23% in the general population of stroke survivors and approximately 54%-55% among stroke patients in rehabilitation settings. Hemiplegic shoulder pain causes a reduced quality-of-life, poor functional recovery, depression, disturbed sleep, and prolonged hospitalization. Herein, we attempted to understand, based on a literature review and experts' opinion, the pathologic processes underlying hemiplegic shoulder pain and the major associated factors contributing to its development. The systematization of underlying pathologies was proposed, which might eventually enable a more constructive clinical approach in evaluating and treating patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain.

Shoulder pain after stroke: a review of the evidence base to inform the development of an integrated care pathway

BACKGROUND

Shoulder pain is a common complication of stroke. It can impede rehabilitation and has been associated with poorer outcomes and prolonged hospital stay. This systematic review was undertaken to inform the development of an evidence-based integrated care pathway (ICP) for the management of hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP).

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

1) To provide a background understanding of the functional anatomy of the shoulder and its changes following stroke. 2) To review the literature describing incidence and causation of HSP and the evidence for factors contributing to its development. 3) To appraise the evidence for effectiveness of different interventions for HSP.

METHODS

Data sources comprised a computer-aided search of published studies on shoulder pain in stroke or hemiplegia and references to literature used in reviews (total references = 121).

MAIN FINDINGS

Although a complex variety of physical changes are associated with HSP, these broadly divide into 'flaccid' and 'spastic' presentations. Management should vary accordingly; each presentation requiring different approaches to handling, support and intervention. (1) In the flaccid stage, the shoulder is prone to inferior subluxation and vulnerable to soft-tissue damage. The arm should be supported at all times and functional electrical stimulation may reduce subluxation and enhance return of muscle activity. (2) In the spastic stage, movement is often severely limited. Relieving spasticity and maintaining range requires expert handling; overhead exercise pulleys should never be used. Local steroid injections should be avoided unless there is clear evidence of an inflammatory lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

HSP requires co-ordinated multidisciplinary management to minimize interference with rehabilitation and optimize outcome. Further research is needed to determine effective prophylaxis and document the therapeutic effect of different modalities in the various presentations. Development of an integrated care pathway provides a reasoned approach to management of this complex condition, thus providing a sound basis for prospective evaluation of different interventions in the future.