Cost-effective peri-operative pain management: assuring a happy patient after total knee arthroplasty

Cost-effectiveness of the Perioperative Pain Management Bundle a registry-based study

Introduction

The Perioperative Pain Management Bundle was introduced in 10 Serbian PAIN OUT network hospitals to improve the quality of postoperative pain management. The Bundle consists of 4 elements: informing patients about postoperative pain treatment options; administering a full daily dose of 1-2 non-opioid analgesics; administering regional blocks and/or surgical wound infiltration; and assessing pain after surgery. In this study, we aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Bundle during the initial 24 h after surgery.

Materials and methods

The assessment of cost-effectiveness was carried out by comparing patients before and after Bundle implementation and by comparing patients who received all Bundle elements to those with no Bundle element. Costs of postoperative pain management included costs of the analgesic medications, costs of labor for administering these medications, and related disposable materials. A multidimensional Pain Composite Score (PCS), the effectiveness measurement, was obtained by averaging variables from the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire evaluating pain intensity, interference of pain with activities and emotions, and side effects of analgesic medications. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the incremental change in costs divided by the incremental change in PCS and plotted on the cost-effectiveness plane along with the economic preference analysis.

Results

The ICER value calculated when comparing patients before and after Bundle implementation was 181.89 RSD (1.55 EUR) with plotted ICERs located in the northeast and southeast quadrants of the cost-effectiveness plane. However, when comparing patients with no Bundle elements and those with all four Bundle elements, the calculated ICER was -800.63 RSD (-6.82 EUR) with plotted ICERs located in the southeast quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane. ICER values differ across surgical disciplines.

Conclusion

The proposed perioperative pain management Bundle is cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness varies depending on the number of implemented Bundle elements and fluctuates across surgical disciplines.

The effects of continuous catheter adductor canal block for pain management in knee replacement therapy: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Adductor canal block has emerged as a favourable element of multimodal analgesia regimens for total knee arthroplasty, due to the exclusive sensory blockade it provides. However, it is controversial as to whether a single shot or continuous technique adductor canal block is superior. This meta-analysis examined the effect of both these techniques on pain management associated with total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

All randomised controlled trials published on Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE, Scopus, and PsychINFO were systematically searched. The PEDro scale was used to assess the quality of studies. A total of 8 articles, 2 of which were split by subgroup analyses to create 10 studies, with 828 adults were selected for inclusion in the analysis. The mean difference and effect size with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were analysed for the pooled results.

RESULTS

Statistically significant pooled effects of analgesia technique in favour of catheter use were found in the reduction of pain scores and VAS scores, and total rescue analgesia dosage. No significant changes were observed in the hospital stay time. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with BMI 30 or more reported higher pain scores than those with BMI below 30.

CONCLUSION

Based upon studies that are currently available, our meta-analysis appears to demonstrate that continuous administration of analgesia through an adductor canal catheter provides greater pain reduction in total knee arthroplasty than single shot analgesia. Despite these current findings, future studies with larger sample sizes and greater control of study parameters are required to confirm the current findings.

Spinal versus general anaesthesia in contemporary primary total knee arthroplasties

Aims

Spinal anaesthesia has seen increased use in contemporary primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). However, controversy exists about the benefits of spinal in comparison to general anaesthesia in primary TKAs. This study aimed to investigate the pain control, length of stay (LOS), and complications associated with spinal versus general anaesthesia in primary TKAs from a single, high-volume academic centre.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 17,690 primary TKAs (13,297 patients) from 2001 to 2016 using our institutional total joint registry, where 52% had general anaesthesia and 48% had spinal anaesthesia. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts with a mean age of 68 years (SD 10), 58% female (n = 7,669), and mean BMI of 32 kg/m2 (SD 7). Pain was evaluated using oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) and numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) data. Complications including 30- and 90-day readmissions were studied. Data were analyzed using an inverse probability of treatment weighted model based on propensity score that included many patient and surgical factors. Mean follow-up was seven years (2 to 18).

Results

Patients treated with spinal anaesthesia required fewer postoperative OMEs (p < 0.001) and had lower NPRS scores (p < 0.001). Spinal anaesthesia also had fewer cases of altered mental status (AMS; odds ratio (OR) 1.3; p = 0.044), as well as 30-day (OR 1.4; p < 0.001) and 90-day readmissions (OR 1.5; p < 0.001). General anaesthesia was associated with increased risk of any revision (OR 1.2; p = 0.021) and any reoperation (1.3; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In the largest single institutional report to date, we found that spinal anaesthesia was associated with significantly lower OME use, lower risk of AMS, and lower overall 30- and 90-day readmissions following primary TKAs. Additionally, spinal anaesthesia was associated with reduced risk of any revision and any reoperation after accounting for numerous patient and operative factors. When possible and safe, spinal anaesthesia should be considered in primary TKAs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1209–1214.

A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis of Simultaneous Versus Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although studies have compared the claims costs of simultaneous and staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whether a simultaneous procedure is cost-effective to the facility remains unknown. This study aimed to compare facility costs and perioperative outcomes of simultaneous vs staged bilateral THA and TKA.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of 560 bilateral THA (170 staged and 220 simultaneous) and 777 bilateral TKA (163 staged and 451 simultaneous). Itemized facility costs were calculated using time-driven activity-based costing. Ninety-day outcomes were compared. Margin was standardized to unadjusted Medicare Diagnosis Related Group payments (simultaneous, $18,523; staged, $22,386). Multivariate regression was used to determine the independent association between costs/clinical outcomes and treatment strategy (staged vs simultaneous).

RESULTS

Simultaneous bilateral patients had significantly lower personnel, supply, and total facility costs compared with staged patients with no difference in 90-day complications between the groups. Multivariate analyses showed that overall facility costs were $1,210 lower in simultaneous bilateral THA (P < .001) and $704 lower in TKA (P < .001). Despite lower costs, margin for the facility was lower in the simultaneous group ($6,569 vs $9,225 for THA; $6,718 vs $10,067 for TKA; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous bilateral TKA and THA had lower facility costs than staged procedures because of savings associated with a single hospitalization. With the increased Medicare reimbursement for 2 unilateral procedures, however, margin was higher for staged procedures. In the era of value-based care, policymakers should not penalize facilities for performing cost-effective simultaneous bilateral arthroplasty in appropriately selected patients.

Opioid requirement after rotator cuff repair is low with a multimodal approach to pain

BACKGROUND

Current practices may aim to blunt rather than understand postoperative pain. Perhaps the most common serious complication of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is persistence of opiate medication intake. Patients still receive upwards of 80 oxycodone 5 mg pills, or 600 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), leading more than 20% of opioid-naïve subjects to continue to fill opioid prescriptions beyond 180 days after surgery. Developing evidence-based guidelines for narcotic prescription after ARCR presents an opportunity for orthopedic surgeons to address the opioid epidemic.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was (1) to prospectively determine the requirements for opiate medications after ARCR, and (2) to create an evidence-based guideline for postoperative prescription, in contrast to the anecdotal or expert panel recommendations that currently exist. We further investigated whether a liposomal bupivacaine (LB) interscalene never block (ISNB) would reduce pain and opiate consumption compared with standard bupivacaine ISNB (control) for ARCR.

METHODS

The study enrolled 100 patients who underwent primary ARCR surgery. Patients were provided with postoperative "pain journals" to document their daily pain on a numerical rating scale, satisfaction with pain management using the Likert scale, and track their daily oxycodone 5 mg pill consumption during the 14-day postoperative period. Enrolled patients were further randomized to receiving an LB (experimental) or standard bupivacaine (control) ISNB.

RESULTS

A total of 77% of all patients required fewer than 15 pills postoperatively. The LB group consumed an average of 1.7 fewer pills (13.0 MMEs) on postoperative day (POD) 1 (P = .02) and reported statistically lower pain during PODs 1 and 2 (P = .01 and P = .006), as well as cumulatively throughout the study period (P = .03). In addition, LB patients remained opioid-free at a higher rate (44% vs. 15% in controls, P = .03).

CONCLUSION

With a multimodal approach, the majority of patients undergoing ARCR can manage postoperative pain with 15 or fewer oxycodone 5 mg tablets (112.5 MMEs) and maintain a high degree of satisfaction. The addition of an LB ISNB may further reduce the consumption of postoperative narcotics compared with a standard ISNB. This study provides evidence that may be used for surgeon guidelines in the effort to reduce opioid prescriptions after ARCR.

Adductor Canal Block vs Liposomal Bupivacaine Periarticular Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

This study compares postoperative pain scores and functional outcomes between liposomal bupivacaine peri-articular injection (LB-PAI) vs a single-shot adductor canal block (ACB) using bupivacaine HCl in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This is a randomized controlled trial of 56 patients who were treated with TKA for arthritis. Patients were randomized to receive an intraoperative LB-PAI (n = 27) or preoperative ACB using bupivacaine HCl (n = 29). Both groups were otherwise given our institutional standard multimodal pain protocol. Data on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, knee range of motion, postoperative ambulation distance, hospital length of stay, and opioid use were collected. The total cost of each intervention was compared at the conclusion of the study.

RESULTS

Age, gender, or body mass index was similar between groups. Compared to the ACB group, the LB-PAI group trended to lower average VAS pain scores on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2 (average difference [95% confidence interval] = -0.5 [-0.7, 1.7], -1.0 [-0.1, 2.0], -0.2 [-0.8, 1.3]), and identical average VAS pain scores on postoperative days 4 and 7. These differences and all postoperative outcome measures were not statistically significant at any time point. A single 266-milligram vial of liposomal bupivacaine costs $351, and a single-shot ACB costs $893 at our institution.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized controlled trial shows similar postoperative pain control, functional outcomes, and opioid use between LB-PAI and a single-shot ACB in patients undergoing primary TKA. However, the single-shot ACB costs $542 more than the LB-PAI at our institution.

Narcotic requirements after shoulder arthroplasty are low using a multimodal approach to pain

Background

Recent "multimodal" approaches to pain, although understudied, have shown promise in reducing reliance on narcotics in shoulder arthroplasty (SA). Many surgeons report being unsure of how many narcotic pills to prescribe after the surgery. As result, patients are prescribed upwards of 60 oxycodone 5-mg pills for a 6-to-12-week treatment period despite studies showing postoperative pain can be managed without any medication at all.

Purpose

The purpose of this multicenter study was to prospectively determine the number of opiate pills required after SA to develop generalizable, evidence-based prescription guidelines for surgeons. We hypothesized that opioid prescription would be low using a multimodal approach to pain management.

Methods

The study enrolled 63 patients undergoing SA. Subjects received either an interscalene nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine, standard bupivacaine, or a local infiltration standard bupivacaine field block based on preference. All subjects were provided with postoperative "Pain Journals" to document their daily pain on a Numerical Rating Scale and daily opioid consumption during the 14-day postoperative period.

Results

Overall, patients consumed an average of 8.6 oxycodone 5-mg pills (64.5 morphine milligram equivalents) after SA. Seventy-nine percent of patients required 15 or fewer oxycodone 5-mg pills, and 27% successfully managed their postoperative pain with zero opioids. Average pain remained low for patients in all groups.

Conclusion

With a multimodal approach, most patients undergoing SA can manage postoperative pain with 15 or fewer oxycodone 5-mg tablets, or 112.5 morphine milligram equivalents. The addition of a liposomal bupivacaine interscalene nerve block may further reduce the consumption of postoperative narcotics compared with a standard interscalene nerve block. This study provides evidence that may be used for surgeon guidelines in the effort to reduce opioid prescriptions after SA.

Intra-articular Morphine and Ropivacaine Injection Provides Efficacious Analgesia As Compared With Femoral Nerve Block in the First 24 Hours After ACL Reconstruction: Results From a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft in an Adolescent Population

Background:

Opioid consumption and patient satisfaction are influenced by a surgeon’s pain-management protocol as well as the use of adjunctive pain mediators. Two commonly utilized adjunctive pain modifiers for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are femoral nerve blockade and intra-articular injection; however, debate remains regarding the more efficacious methodology.

Hypothesis:

We hypothesized that intra-articular injection with ropivacaine and morphine would be found to be as efficacious as a femoral nerve block for postoperative pain management in the first 24 hours after bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) ACL reconstruction.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Charts were retrospectively reviewed for BTB ACL reconstructions performed by a single pediatric orthopaedic surgeon from 2013 to 2019. Overall, 116 patients were identified: 58 received intra-articular injection, and 58 received single-shot femoral nerve block. All patients were admitted for 24 hours. Pain scores were assessed every 4 hours. Morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) consumed were tabulated for each patient.

Results:

Opioid use was 24.3 MMEs in patients treated with intra-articular injection versus 28.5 MMEs in those with peripheral block (P = .108). Consumption of MMEs was greater in the intra-articular group in the 0- to 4-hour period (7.1 vs 4.6 MMEs; P = .008). There was significantly less MME consumption in patients receiving intra-articular injection versus peripheral block at 16 to 20 hours (3.2 vs 5.6 MMEs; P = .01) and 20 to 24 hours (3.8 vs 6.5 MMEs; P < .001). Mean pain scores were not significantly different over the 24-hour period (peripheral block, 2.7; intra-articular injection, 3.0; P = .19).

Conclusion:

Within the limitations of this study, we could identify no significant difference in MME consumption between the single-shot femoral nerve block group and intra-articular injection group in the first 24 hours postoperatively. While peripheral block is associated with lower opioid consumption in the first 4 hours after surgery, patients receiving intra-articular block require fewer opioids 16 to 24 hours postoperatively. Given these findings, we propose that intra-articular injection is a viable alternative for analgesia in adolescent patients undergoing BTB ACL reconstruction.

The Safety Profile of Liposomal Bupivacaine Use in Septorhinoplasty

Objective: To evaluate the safety profile, including adverse drug reactions and operative complications, of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) use for local anesthesia during functional septorhinoplasty. Study Design: Retrospective review. Subject and Methods: A database query was conducted for patients >18 years of age who underwent septorhinoplasty from January 1, 2019, to August 1, 2020. Adverse drug reactions and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who received locally administered LB and patients who received standard local anesthetic at the completion of the surgery. Results: A total of 95 cases were included in our data analysis. No significant differences were found in adverse reactions overall (6.3% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.51) or complications, including rate of infection (3.2% vs. 3.1%, p = 1), cartilage warping (1.6% vs. 0%, p = 1), graft resorption (0% vs. 0%, p = 1), septal hematoma (0% vs. 0%, p = 1), and need for revision surgery (4.8% vs. 3.1%, p = 1) between LB and control groups. Conclusion: LB demonstrated an acceptable safety profile when compared with standard local anesthetics during septorhinoplasty, with no significant difference in systemic or local adverse drug reactions or postoperative complications.

Diclofenac Versus Ketorolac for Pain Control After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Comparative Analysis

Introduction As total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) transition to outpatient settings, appropriate pain management remains a challenge. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may subvert the need for postoperative opioids. This study evaluated: 1) total opioid consumption; 2) postoperative pain intensity; 3) discharge destination; 4) length of stay (LOS); and 5) THA and TKA patients' satisfaction in receiving adjunctive intravenous (IV) diclofenac or ketorolac. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, patients scheduled to undergo primary THA or TKA by a single surgeon between March 2017 and April 2018 were identified. Patients were stratified based on the receipt of IV diclofenac (THA: n = 25; TKA: n = 51) or IV ketorolac (THA: n = 28; TKA: n = 32) in addition to the standard pain management regimen. Student's t-testing and Chi-square were used to analyze continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results TKA diclofenac patients had lower opioid consumption 12 hours postoperatively (p: 0.037). TKA patients in the diclofenac cohort were discharged to home less often (p: 0.025). Both diclofenac cohorts had greater patient satisfaction than the ketorolac cohorts (p: <0.05). There was no significant difference between groups in postoperative pain intensity at 24 or 48 hours or in the length of stay (p: >0.05 for all). Conclusion This study demonstrated that both TKA and THA patients treated with IV diclofenac had no difference in postoperative pain intensity while THA patients had no difference in opioid consumption relative to those treated with IV ketorolac. Further comparison of IV NSAIDs with other IV pain medications may provide broader insight into the ideal management for postoperative pain for this widening patient population.

Evolution of an Opioid Sparse Pain Management Program for Total Knee Arthroplasty With the Addition of Intravenous Acetaminophen

BACKGROUND

Perioperative pain management for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves patient outcomes and facilitates recovery. In this study, we compared the effects of preoperative oral acetaminophen vs intravenous (IV) acetaminophen administered once intraoperatively and once postoperatively.

METHODS

Two standardized, multimodal analgesia protocols were compared in patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKA. The oral acetaminophen cohort (OA) received doses of oral acetaminophen preoperatively and an as-needed basis postoperatively (n = 698). The IV acetaminophen cohort (IA) received 2 doses of IV acetaminophen, one intraoperative and one 6 hours postoperatively, with no oral acetaminophen given (n = 318). No other variables were significantly changed during the study period.

RESULTS

The IV acetaminophen group demonstrated less narcotic usage on postoperative day 0 (OA: 13.3 mme [morphine mg equivalents], IA: 6.2 mme, P < .001) and overall usage (OA: 66.1 mme, IA: 48.5 mme, P < .001). Pain scores were statistically and clinically significantly decreased in the immediate postoperative (the first 8 hours) for the IA group (OA: patient-reported pain scores of 4.0; IA: patient-reported pain scores of 2.0, P < .001). Both groups progressed and completed their physical therapy similarly for each postoperative day. Length of stay and percent discharge home were slightly improved in the IA group as well, however did not reach statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

An iterative approach to multimodal pain management after TKA led to improvements in narcotic usage, pain scores, and several quality measures. IV acetaminophen is an integral and effective part of our opioid-sparing multimodal pain regimen in TKA.

Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial

This study compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine as a single-administration adductor canal block (ACB) vs periarticular injection (PAI) for pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). From May 2016 to June 2017, a total of 70 unilateral TKA patients were randomized into 2 groups: PAI (extended-release bupivacaine 266 mg [20-mL vial] with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride and normal saline to a total volume of 120 mL) and ACB (subsartorial saphenous nerve using extended-release bupivacaine 266 mg [20-mL vial]). All patents underwent spinal anesthesia with comprehensive preemptive and postoperative multi-modal pain protocol. All opioids administered were converted to morphine equivalents. Pain was recorded at 4 to 12 hours on the day of surgery, and on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. Patients and investigators other than the surgeon and anesthesiologist were blinded to the study. The difference in pain scores between the PAI and ACB groups was not statistically significant during the first 12 hours (day 0) after surgery or on postoperative day 1 (5.31 vs 4.26, P=.091). However, on postoperative day 3, the mean pain score increased in the ACB group and decreased in the PAI group (4.8 vs 1.83, P=.037). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the accumulative daily converted morphine equivalent consumption or total consumption. Although the PAI group demonstrated longer lasting pain relief than the ACB group for the duration of the study, other outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(1):e47-e53.].

Comprehensive Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine with Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Control Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To compare the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis. 11 trials with 2,908 patients were included in this study. The pooled data demonstrated that total morphine consumption equivalents during the hospital stay was significantly increased in FNB group. In addition, LB has significantly better outcome in view of the postoperative functional recovery, such as the odds of fall, the incidences of straight leg rise (SLR), the number of patients who can walk independently in the day of surgery,the ambulation distance at POD1, the number of patients discharged at POD1. Consistent with the faster functional recovery, liposomal bupivacaine shortens the length of hospital stay. However, there was no significant difference between LB and FNB in terms of Visual Analogue Score (VAS) during the hospital stay. All in all, liposomal bupivacaine has significantly better outcome in view of the postoperative functional recovery and the length of hospital stay compared with femoral nerve block following the total knee arthroplasty.

Impact of length of stay on HCAHPS scores following lumbar spine surgery

OBJECTIVE

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys, completed by patients following an inpatient stay, are utilized to assess patient satisfaction and quality of the patient experience. HCAHPS results directly impact hospital and provider reimbursements. While recent work has demonstrated that pre- and postoperative factors can affect HCAHPS results following lumbar spine surgery, little is known about how these results are influenced by hospital length of stay (LOS). Here, the authors examined HCAHPS results in patients with LOSs greater or less than expected following lumbar spine surgery to determine whether LOS influences survey scores after these procedures.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of HCAHPS surveys, patient demographics, and outcomes following lumbar spine surgery at a single institution. A total of 391 patients who had undergone lumbar spine surgery and had completed an HCAHPS survey in the period between 2013 and 2015 were included in this analysis. Patients were divided into those with a hospital LOS equal to or less than the expected (LTE-LOS) and those with a hospital LOS longer than expected (GTE-LOS). Expected LOS was based on the University HealthSystem Consortium benchmarks. Nineteen questions from the HCAHPS survey were examined in relation to patient LOS. The primary outcome measure was a comparison of "top-box" ("9-10" or "always or usually") versus "low-box" ("1-8" and "somewhat or never") scores on the HCAHPS questions. Secondary outcomes of interest were whether the comorbid conditions of cancer, chronic renal failure, diabetes, coronary artery disease, hypertension, stroke, or depression occurred differently with respect to LOS. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test for the 2 × 2 contingency tables and the chi-square test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-seven patients had an LTE-LOS, whereas 134 patients had a GTE-LOS. The only statistically significant difference in preoperative characteristics between the patient groups was hypertension, which correlated to a shorter LOS. A GTE-LOS was associated with a decreased likelihood of a top-box score for the HCAHPS survey items on doctor listening and pain control.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, the authors report a decreased likelihood of top-box responses for some HCAHPS questions following lumbar spine surgery if LOS is prolonged. This study highlights the need to further examine the factors impacting LOS, identify patients at risk for long hospital stays, and improve mechanisms to increase the quality and efficiency of care delivered to this patient population.

The Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Over Traditional Local Anesthetics in Periarticular Infiltration and Regional Anesthesia During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Since its Food and Drug Administration approval in 2011 as a local anesthetic for postsurgical analgesia, liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been incorporated into the periarticular injection (PAI) of many knee surgeons. The slow release of this medication from vesicles should significantly extend the duration of its analgesic effect, but current evidence has not clearly demonstrated this benefit.

METHODS

We systematically searched electronic databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and Scopus, as well as the Journal of Arthroplasty web page for relevant articles. All calculations were made using Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

We identified 42 studies that compared LB to an alternate analgesic modality. Seventeen of these studies were controlled trials that were included in meta-analysis. Significant differences were seen in pain scores with LB over a peripheral nerve block (mean difference = 0.45, P = .02) and LB over a traditional PAI (standard mean difference = -0.08, P = .004).

CONCLUSION

While LB may offer a statistically significant benefit over a traditional PAI, the increase in pain control may not be clinically significant and it does not appear to offer a benefit in reducing opioid consumption. However, there is no standardization among current studies, as they vary greatly in design, infiltration technique, and outcome measurement, which precludes any reliable summarization of their results. Future independent studies using a standardized protocol are needed to provide clear unbiased evidence.

Revision Versus Primary Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Scores in Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) score is a nationally standardized measure of a patient's inpatient experience. This study aims to assess whether HCAHPS scores differ between patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and patients undergoing revision TJA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary or revision total hip or total knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA) and returned a completed HCAHPS survey were included in this study. HCAHPS scores were collected from our institution's Center for Quality and Patient Safety department, which was cross-referenced with our hospital's electronic data warehouse. Patient demographics, surgical factors, and quality outcomes were queried. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed using MatLab 2017a and P-values less than .05 were deemed significant.

RESULTS

In total, 523 primary and 59 revision THA recipients completed HCAHPS surveys at our institution between October 2011 and November 2016. During this same period, 507 primary TKA recipients and 40 revision TKA recipients completed HCAHPS surveys. Compared to revision THA, primary THA patients had a significantly higher top box for overall hospital ratings (58.46% vs 41.38%), felt that nurses listened to them carefully (84.3% vs 72.88%), and felt that they clearly understood the role of each medication (69.48% vs 56.90%). Moreover, 18 of 20 HCAHPS question responses favored primary THA despite not reaching significance for the majority of HCAHPS questions. Patients with revision TKA demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of "top box" choices for quieter rooms and a trend favoring better HCAHPS scores in revision TKA in a further 12 of 20 HCAHPS responses.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing primary THA report higher HCAHPS scores than those undergoing revision THA, while revision TKA demonstrated a general trend toward higher scores when compared to primary TKA patients. This publicly reported quality measurement metric which factors into physician reimbursement may be biased by the patient's health status, the complexity of the surgical procedure, and length of stay in hospital rather than a true reflection of the quality of their hospital experience.

Predicting Inpatient Dissatisfaction Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 3,593 Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey Responses

BACKGROUND

The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey, created by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, is directly tied to hospital reimbursement. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that are predictive HCAHPS survey responses following primary hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Prospectively collected HCAHPS responses from patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty between January 2013 and October 2017 at our institution were analyzed. Patient age, gender, race, marital status, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative pain score, smoking status, alcohol use, illegal drug use, socioeconomic quartile, insurance type, procedure type, hospital type (academic vs community), distance to medical center, length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition were obtained and correlated with HCAHPS inpatient satisfaction scores.

RESULTS

Responses from 3593 patients were obtained: 1546 total hip arthroplasties, 1899 total knee arthroplasties, and 148 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. Mean overall HCAHPS score was 79.2. Women had lower inpatient satisfaction than men (77.6 vs 81.6, P < .001). Alcohol consumers had lower inpatient satisfaction than abstainers (77.7 vs 81.6, P < .001). Inpatient satisfaction varied by socioeconomic quartile (P < .001) with patients in the highest quartile having lower satisfaction than patients in all other quartiles (P < .001). Patients discharged to a facility had lower inpatient satisfaction than those discharged home (71.2 vs 80.2, P < .001). An inverse correlation between inpatient satisfaction and LOS (r = -0.19, P < .001) and a direct correlation between satisfaction and distance to medical center (r = 0.06, P < .001) were seen.

CONCLUSION

Patients more likely to report lower levels of inpatient satisfaction after total joint arthroplasty are female, affluent, and alcohol consumers, who are discharged to postacute care facilities. Inpatient satisfaction was inversely correlated with LOS and positively correlated with distance from patient home to medical center. These findings provide targets for improvements in TJA inpatient care.

A prospective randomized open-label study of single injection versus continuous adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

Aims

Adductor canal block (ACB) has emerged as an alternative to femoral nerve block (FNB) for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal duration of maintenance of the ACB is still questionable. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic benefits and physiotherapy (PT) outcomes of single-shot ACB to two different regimens of infusion of the continuous ACB, 24-hour and 48-hour infusion.

Patients and Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, unblinded study. A total of 159 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III patients scheduled for primary TKA were randomized to one of three study groups. Three patients did not complete the study, leaving 156 patients for final analysis. Group A (n = 53) was the single-shot group (16 female patients and 37 male patients with a mean age of 63.9 years (sd 9.6)), group B (n = 51) was the 24-hour infusion group (22 female patients and 29 male patients with a mean age of 66.5 years (sd 8.5)), and group C (n = 52) was the 48-hour infusion group (18 female patients and 34 male patients with a mean age of 62.2 years (sd 8.7)). Pain scores, opioid requirements, PT test results, and patient-reported outcome instruments were compared between the three groups.

Results

The proportion of patients reporting severe pain, defined as a pain score of between 7 and 10, on postoperative day number 2 (POD 2) were 21% for the single-shot group, 14% for the 24-hour block group, and 12% for the 48-hour block group (p = 0.05). Cumulative opioid requirements after 48 hours were similar between the groups. Functional outcomes were similar in all three groups in POD 1 and POD 2.

Conclusion

There was no clear benefit of the 24-hour or 48-hour infusions over the single-shot ACB for the primary endpoint of the study. Otherwise, there were marginal benefits for keeping the indwelling catheter for 48 hours in terms of reducing the number of patients with moderate pain and improving the quality of pain management. However, all three groups had similar opioid usage, length of hospital stay, and functional outcomes. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:340–347.

Impact of treatment with liposomal bupivacaine on hospital costs, length of stay, and discharge status in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty at high-use institutions

Aims: Post-surgical pain experienced by patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be severe. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs incorporating multimodal analgesic regimens have evolved in an attempt to improve patient care while lowering overall costs. This study examined clinical and economic outcomes in hospitals using liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for pain control following TKA.Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized hospital chargemaster data from the Premier Healthcare Database from January 2011 through April 2017 for the 10 hospitals with the highest number of primary TKA procedures using LB. Within these hospitals, patients undergoing TKA who received LB were propensity-score matched in a 1:1 ratio to a control group not receiving LB. Outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge status, 30-day same-hospital readmissions, total hospitalization costs, and opioid consumption; only patients with Medicare or commercial insurance as the primary payer for TKA were considered.Results: The study population included 20,907 Medicare-insured patients (LB = 10,411; control =10,496) and 12,505 patients with commercial insurance (LB = 6,242; control = 6,263). Overall, LOS was 0.6 days shorter with LB (p < 0.0001), and patients who received LB were 1.6-times more likely to be discharged home (p < 0.0001). Total hospitalization costs for the TKA procedure were lower with LB for patients with both Medicare (-$616; P < 0.0001) and commercial insurance (-$775; p < 0.0001). Opioid consumption was lower with LB in both payer populations (p < 0.0001). No significant differences for 30-day readmissions were found.Limitations: Costs were estimated using Premier charge-to-cost ratios and limited to goods and services recorded in the chargemaster. Findings from these 10 hospitals may not be representative of other US hospitals.Conclusions: In a sub-set of 10 US hospitals with the highest use of LB for TKA, LB use was associated with shorter hospital LOS, increased home discharge, lower total hospitalization costs, and decreased opioid use after TKA.

No Difference in Total Episode-of-Care Cost Between Staged and Simultaneous Bilateral Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Due to concerns about higher complication rates, surgeons debate whether to perform simultaneous bilateral total joint arthroplasty (BTJA), particularly in the higher-risk Medicare population. Advances in pain management and rehabilitation protocols have called into question older studies that found an overall cost benefit for simultaneous procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare 90-day episode-of-care costs between staged and simultaneous BTJA among Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 319 simultaneous primary TJAs and 168 staged TJAs (336 procedures) at our institution between 2015 and 2016. We recorded demographics, comorbidities, readmission rates, and 90-day episode-of-care costs based upon Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims data. To control for confounding variables, we performed a multivariate regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for increased costs.

RESULTS

Simultaneous patients had decreased inpatient facility costs ($19,402 vs $23,025, P < .001), increased post-acute care costs ($13,203 vs $10,115, P < .001), and no difference in total episode-of-care costs ($35,666 vs $37,238, P = .541). Although there was no difference in readmissions (8% vs 9%, P = .961), simultaneous bilateral patients were more likely to experience a thromboembolic event (2% vs 0%, P = .003). When controlling for demographics, procedure, and comorbidities, a simultaneous surgery was not associated with an increase in episode-of-care costs (P = .544). Independent risk factors for increased episode-of-care costs following BTJA included age ($394 per year increase, P < .001), cardiac disease ($4877, P = .025), history of stroke ($14,295, P = .010), and liver disease ($12,515, P = .016).

CONCLUSION

In the Medicare population, there is no difference in 90-day episode-of-care costs between simultaneous and staged BTJA. Surgeons should use caution in performing a simultaneous procedure on older patients or those with a history of stroke, cardiac, or liver disease.