Comparison of minimally invasive and non-invasive systems in lengthening total femoral prostheses

Frequency and reason for reoperation following non-invasive expandable endoprostheses: A systematic review

•

Implant failure is the most common reason for revision of growing prostheses.

•

Maximum prosthesis growth with a residual LLD is the most common mode of failure.

•

Functional outcomes are good, but 1/ 5 patients have a persistent LLD over 2 cm.

Background

Non-invasive expandable endoprostheses (NIEPR) utilize an external electromagnetic field to drive an innate mechanical gearbox. This lengthens the extremity following oncological resections in children with a predicted limb length discrepancy (LLD), facilitating limb-salvage. This review was conducted to assess NIEPR implant survival rates and identify modes of implant failure unique to these prostheses.

Methods

Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for all manuscripts evaluating implant survival of NIEPRs implanted into skeletally immature patients following resection of extremity sarcomas. Minimum follow-up of 12 months or implant failure was required for inclusion. Failures were classified using the latest ISOLS classification and exact implant-specific failure modality was also identified.

Results

19 studies met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 10.0 years (7.7 – 11.4 years). The most common locations for NIEPR implantation were the distal femur (343, 76.7%) and proximal tibia (53, 119%). Mean follow-up was 65.3 months (19.4 – 163 months). The overall implant revision rate was 46.2% (0 – 100%); implant specific revisions included maximal prosthesis lengthening with persistent LLD (10.4%), failed extension mechanism (6.1%), implant fracture (7.7%), hinge fracture (1.4%) and bushing wear (0.9%). Persistent clinically significant (>20 mm) LLD at final follow-up was present in 19.2% (0 – 50%) of patients. The mean MSTS score was 85.1% (66.7–96.3%) at final follow-up.

Conclusion

Implant-related failures are the most common reason for NIEPR revision. Implant reliability appears to be improved with current designs. A sub-classification to the current classification system based on implant-specific failures for NIEPRs is proposed.

Loading comparison of two structures in the moving tube of a non-invasive prosthesis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of adolescent patients with distal femoral cancer has always been a concern. The limb-salvage, regarded as a mainstream treatment, had been developed in recent years, but its application in children still remains challenging. This is because it can lead to potential limb-length discrepancy from the continued normal growth of the contralateral lower body. The extendable prosthesis could solve this problem. The principle is that it can artificially control the length of the prosthesis, making it consistent with the length of the side of the lower limbs. However, this prosthesis has some complications. The extendable prosthesis is classified into invasive and minimally invasive, which extends the prosthesis with each operation.

OBJECTIVE

We designed a new non-invasive prosthesis that can be extended in the body. Based on the non-invasive and extendable characteristics, we need to verify the supporting performance of this prosthesis.

METHODS

We carried out a mechanical testing method and finite element analysis simulation.

CONCLUSION

The support performance and non-invasively extension of this prosthesis were verified.

[Growing prostheses after sarcoma resection in children and adolescents]

BACKGROUND

Growing prostheses are regarded as a valuable alternative to amputation and rotationplasty for the treatment of primary malignant bone and soft-tissue sarcomas in childhood. During the last three decades different devices have been introduced and technically improved from invasively to non-invasively extendable prostheses.

THE CURRENT SITUATION OF STUDIES

Despite the long period, only 21 peer-reviewed publications could be detected containing relevant numbers and results. In these papers, 590 patients with mean follow-up times of 81.1 months were reported who had been fitted with growing prostheses at the age of 12.6 years. Besides satisfactory functional results (78.3 out of 100 MSTS points) there was a high complication rate of 27.3% infections and 22.4% mechanical failure.

COMPLICATIONS

This increasing risk of infection over a long follow-up period, represents the biggest drawback of this method and, therefore, needs to be discussed extensively with the patients and parents when considering this procedure as an alternative to ablative surgery.