Clinical and design factors influence the survivorship of custom flange acetabular components

Monoflange custom-made partial pelvis replacements offer a viable solution in extensive Paprosky III defects

Aims

Custom-made partial pelvis replacements (PPRs) are increasingly used in the reconstruction of large acetabular defects and have mainly been designed using a triflange approach, requiring extensive soft-tissue dissection. The monoflange design, where primary intramedullary fixation within the ilium combined with a monoflange for rotational stability, was anticipated to overcome this obstacle. The aim of this study was to evaluate the design with regard to functional outcome, complications, and acetabular reconstruction.

Methods

Between 2014 and 2023, 79 patients with a mean follow-up of 33 months (SD 22; 9 to 103) were included. Functional outcome was measured using the Harris Hip Score and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). PPR revisions were defined as an endpoint, and subgroups were analyzed to determine risk factors.

Results

Implantation was possible in all cases with a 2D centre of rotation deviation of 10 mm (SD 5.8; 1 to 29). PPR revision was necessary in eight (10%) patients. HHS increased significantly from 33 to 72 postoperatively, with a mean increase of 39 points (p < 0.001). Postoperative EQ-5D score was 0.7 (SD 0.3; -0.3 to 1). Risk factor analysis showed significant revision rates for septic indications (p ≤ 0.001) as well as femoral defect size (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Since large acetabular defects are being treated surgically more often, custom-made PPR should be integrated as an option in treatment algorithms. Monoflange PPR, with primary iliac fixation, offers a viable treatment option for Paprosky III defects with promising functional results, while requiring less soft-tissue exposure and allowing immediate full weightbearing.

Hip joint center lateralization minimally affects the biomechanics of patient-specific flanged acetabular components: A computational model

Patient-specific flanged acetabular components are utilized to treat failed total hip arthroplasties with large acetabular defects. Previous clinical studies from our institution showed that these implants tend to lateralize the acetabular center of rotation. However, the clinical impact of lateralization on implant survivorship is debated. Our goal was to develop a finite element model to quantify how lateralization of the native hip center affects periprosthetic strain and implant-bone micromotion distributions in a static level gait loading condition. To build the model, we computationally created a superomedial acetabular defect in a computed tomography 3D reconstruction of a native pelvis and designed a flanged acetabular implant to address this simulated bone defect. We modeled two implants, one with ~1 cm and a second with ~2 cm of hip center lateralization. We applied the maximum hip contact force and corresponding abductor force observed during level gait. The resulting strains were compared to bone fatigue strength (0.3% strain) and the micromotions were compared to the threshold for bone ingrowth (20 µm). Overall, the model demonstrated that the additional lateralization only slightly increased the area of bone at risk of failure and decreased the areas compatible with bone ingrowth. This computational study of patient-specific acetabular implants establishes the utility of our modeling approach. Further refinement will yield a model that can explore a multitude of variables and could be used to develop a biomechanically-based acetabular bone loss classification system to guide the development of patient-specific implants in the treatment of large acetabular bone defects.

Beyond type III Paprosky acetabular defects: are partial pelvic replacements with iliosacral fixation successful?

PURPOSE

Supra-acetabular bone loss close beyond the sciatic notch is one of the most challenging defect types for stable anatomical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. Using reconstruction strategies from tumour orthopaedic surgery, we adapted tricortical trans-iliosacral fixation options for custom-made implants in revision arthroplasty. The aim of the present study was to present the clinical and radiological results of this extraordinary pelvic defect reconstruction.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2021, 10 patients with a custom-made pelvic construct using tricortical iliosacral fixation (see Fig. 1) were included in the study. Follow-up was 34 (SD 10; range 15-49) months. Postoperatively CT scans evaluating the implant position were performed. Functional outcome and the clinical results were recorded.

RESULTS

Implantation was possible as planned in all cases in 236 (SD 64: range 170-378) min. Correct centre of rotation (COR) reconstruction was possible in nine cases. One sacrum screw crossed a neuroforamen in one case without clinical symptoms. During the follow-up period, four further operations were required in two patients. There were no individual implant revisions or aseptic loosening recorded. The Harris Hip Score increased significantly from 27 Pts. to 67 Pts. with a mean improvement of 37 (p < 0.005). EQ-5D developed from 0.562 to 0.725 (p = 0.038) as a clear improvement in quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Custom-made partial pelvis replacement with iliosacral fixation offers a safe solution in "beyond Paprosky type III defects" for hip revision arthroplasty. Due to meticulous planning, precise implantation with good clinical outcome can be achieved. Furthermore, the functional outcome and patient satisfaction increased significantly showing promising early results with a relatively low complication rate.

Advanced quantitative 3D imaging improves the reliability of the classification of acetabular defects

INTRODUCTION

Classifying complex acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) by means of conventional radiographs comes with significant limitations. Statistical shape modelling allows the virtual reconstruction of the native pelvic morphology, hereby enabling an analytic acetabular defect assessment. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of advanced imaging augmented with analytic representations of the defect on (1) intra- and inter-rater reliability, and (2) up- or downscaling of classification scores when evaluating acetabular defects in patients undergoing revision THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The acetabular defects of 50 patients undergoing revision THA were evaluated by three independent, fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. Defects were classified according to the acetabular defect classification (ADC) using four different imaging-based representations, namely, standard radiographs, CT imaging, a virtual three-dimensional (3D) model and a quantitative analytic representation of the defect based on a statistical shape model reconstruction. Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were quantified using Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa scores, respectively. Up- and downscaling of classification scores were compared for each of the imaging-based representations and differences were tested.

RESULTS

Overall inter-rater agreement across all imaging-based representations for the classification was fair (κ 0.29 95% CI 0.28-0.30). Inter-rater agreement was lowest for radiographs (κ 0.21 95% CI 0.19-0.22) and increased for other representations with agreement being highest when using analytic defect models (κ 0.46 95% CI 0.43-0.48). Overall intra-rater agreement was moderate (κ 0.51 95% CI 0.42-0.60). Intra-rater agreement was lowest for radiographs (κ 0.40 95% CI 0.23-0.57), and highest for ratings including analytic defect models (κ 0.64:95% CI 0.46-0.82). Virtual 3D models with quantitative analytic defect representations upscaled acetabular defect scores in comparison to standard radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

Using 3D CT imaging with statistical shape models doubles the intra- and inter-rater reliability and results in upscaling of acetabular defect classification when compared to standard radiographs. This method of evaluating defects will aid in planning surgical reconstruction and stimulate the development of new classification systems based on advanced imaging techniques.

Ischial screw fixation can prevent cup migration in 3D-printed custom acetabular components for complex hip reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Custom acetabular components have become an established method of treating massive acetabular bone defects in hip arthroplasty. Complication rates, however, remain high and migration of the cup is still reported. Ischial screw fixation (IF) has been demonstrated to improve mechanical stability for non-custom, revision arthroplasty cup fixation. We hypothesize that ischial fixation through the flange of a custom acetabular component aids in anti-rotational stability and prevention of cup migration.

METHODS

Electronic patient records were used to identify a consecutive series of 49 custom implants in 46 patients from 2016 to 2022 in a unit specializing in complex joint reconstruction. IF was defined as a minimum of one screw inserted into the ischium passing through a hole in a flange on the custom cup. The mean follow-up time was 30 months. IF was used in 36 cups. There was no IF in 13 cups. No difference was found between groups in age (68.9 vs. 66.3, P = 0.48), BMI (32.3 vs. 28.2, P = 0.11) or number of consecutively implanted cups (3.2 vs. 3.6, P = 0.43). Aseptic loosening with massive bone loss was the primary indication for revision. There existed no difference in Paprosky grade between the groups (P = 0.1). 14.2% of hips underwent revision and 22.4% had at least one dislocation event.

RESULTS

No ischial fixation was associated with a higher risk of cup migration (6/13 vs. 2/36, X² = 11.5, P = 0.0007). Cup migration was associated with an increased risk for all cause revision (4/8 vs. 3/38, X² = 9.96, P = 0.0016, but not with dislocation (3/8 vs. 8/41, X² = 1.2, P = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that failure to achieve adequate ischial fixation, with screws passing through the flange of the custom component into the ischium, increases the risk of cup migration, which, in turn, is a risk factor for revision.

Extended Ischiopubic Fixation Using Porous Metal Augments in Cementless Acetabular Reconstruction during Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objectives

The aims of this study were to introduce the definition, indication, and surgical technique of extended ischiopubic fixation (EIF) and to investigate the early clinical, radiographic results and complications of hips revised with EIF.

Methods

Patients who underwent revision THA utilizing the technique of EIF which was defined as securing the porous metal augment >5 mm deep into the ischium and/or pubic ramus to gain adequate mechanical support and fresh host bone for bony ingrowth in a single institution from February 2015 to February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 30 hips (28 patients) were eligible for the study and were enrolled. Four patients were lost to follow‐up postoperatively. The data of the remaining 24 patients (26 hips) were analyzed. The patients' clinical results were assessed using of the Harris Hip Score and any complications including postoperative periprosthetic joint infection, intraoperative fracture, postoperative periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, nerve palsy, hematoma or wound complication were documented. The radiographic results were assessed with the construct stability, the position of the center of rotation, and cup orientation.

Results

The median age of these 25 patients was 62.00 (interquartile: 54.25–68.25) years, with a median body mass index (BMI) of 22.60 kg/m² (interquartile: 21.49–25.12 kg/m²). A total of 12 (48%) patients were female. At a median duration of follow‐up of 49.16 months, 20 (80%) patients rated their satisfaction level as “very satisfied,” five (20%) were “satisfied.” The median HHS improved from 36.00 (interquartile range: 31.25–49.75) preoperatively to 81.00 (interquartile range: 74.75–88.25) at the most recent follow‐up (p < 0.001). No complications such as periprosthetic joint infection, intraoperative fracture, periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, nerve palsy, hematoma, or wound complication were identified. All constructs were considered to have obtained stable fixation. The median vertical and horizontal distance between the latest postoperative centers of rotation to the anatomic center of rotation improved from 13.62 and 8.68 mm preoperatively to 4.42 and 4.19 mm at final follow‐up (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Early follow‐up of patients reconstructed with porous metal augments using the EIF technique demonstrated satisfactory clinical results with no particular complications, stable fixation, and restoration of the center of rotation.

The modern Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for the treatment of acetabular defects: is it still an option? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

A number of papers have been published about the clinical performance of modern rough-blasted titanium Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cages (BS-APCs) for the treatment of acetabular bone defects. However, no systematic review of the literature has been published to date.

METHODS

The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried for publications using keywords pertinent to Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage, revision THA, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

8 articles were found to be suitable for inclusion in the present study in which 374 cases (370 patients) had been treated with modern BS-APCs. Most acetabular bone defects were type 3 according to the Paprosky classification (type 2C: 18.1%, 3A: 51%, and 3B: 28.9%). The overall re-revision rate for the 374 acetabular reconstructions with modern BS-APCs was 11.5% (43 cases). The short-term survival rate of the modern BS-APC construct was 90.6% (339 out of 374 cases), while the mid-term survival rate was 85.6% (320 out of 374 cases), and the long-term survival rate 62% (54 out of 87 cases). The most common reasons for revision were aseptic loosening (5.6%), periprosthetic joint infection (3.8%), dislocation (2.7%), and acetabular periprosthetic fracture (1.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was moderate quality evidence to show that the use of modern rough blasted titanium BS-APCs in cases of acetabular bone loss has an unacceptably high failure rate (38%). Given that antiprotrusio cages do not provide any biological fixation, we would not recommend the routine use of modern BS-APCs in complex revision THA cases. By contrast, the satisfactory short- to mid-term outcome of modern BS-APCs in combination with their low cost compared to highly porous acetabular implants, make us feel that BS-APCs might still be used in selected elderly or low-demand patients without severe superomedial acetabular bone loss.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium

Despite growing evidence supporting the evaluation, classification, and treatment of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement, advancements have not been systematically incorporated into a single document, and therefore, a comprehensive review of the treatment of severe acetabular bone loss is needed. The Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center at Hospital for Special Surgery held an Acetabular Bone Loss Symposium on June 21, 2019, to answer the following questions: What are the trends, emerging technologies, and areas of future research related to the evaluation and management of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement? What constitutes the optimal workup and management strategies for acetabular bone loss? The 36 international experts convened were divided into groups, each assigned to discuss 1 of 4 topics: (1) preoperative planning and postoperative assessment; (2) implant selection, management of osteolysis, and management of massive bone loss; (3) the treatment challenges of pelvic discontinuity, periprosthetic joint infection, instability, and poor bone biology; and (4) the principles of reconstruction and classification of acetabular bone loss. Each group came to consensus, when possible, based on an extensive literature review. This document provides an overview of these 4 areas, the consensus each group arrived at, and directions for future research.

A novel revision system for complex pelvic defects utilizing 3D-printed custom prosthesis

Background

Thus far, the hip revision surgery has been widely used and promoted, and the technology has been constantly innovated, such as tissue engineering, 3D printing prosthesis, etc. However, traditional standardized prosthesis, allograft, autograft, bone cement and reinforcing ring are still the main treatment methods in the mainstream pelvic defects classification systems for hip revision. In addition, the mainstream classification systems are still mainly focus on the peri-acetabulum, but less on the large-scale complex pelvic defects that widely affecting the regions far away from the acetabulum, which also have a significant impact on the holistic biomechanical properties of pelvis.

Methods

After integrating the design experience of custom prostheses and the understanding of biomechanical properties of pelvis, an innovative pelvic defects classification for custom revision was preliminarily proposed, and was practiced in surgeries. Some typical cases were chosen for elucidation in this study, and two observers each evaluated their CT data independently twice. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement were calculated using the kappa statistic to evaluate the reliability. The pelvis defects were classified into five types and two subtypes. The corresponding reconstruction principles, as the main basis to support the classification, were also described in detail. Prosthesis position examination and Harris hip score were utilized to evaluate the clinical outcome.

Results

The installed prostheses resulted in high concordance with preoperative position planning, significantly improved Harris score, low postoperative complication rate and no re-revision case. In addition, The interobserver and intraobserver agreement were both excellent.

Conclusion

The presenting revision system for complex pelvic defects utilizing 3D-printed custom prosthesis and corresponding classification of pelvic defects can preliminarily guide patients’ grouping and prosthesis design, and may potentially provide an innovative, feasible, and efficient basis for complex total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision.

Translational potential statement

This study provides a novel method for prosthetic revision of peri-acetabular pelvic defects, and is expected to systematically improve the efficiency of prosthesis design and surgery in clinical practice.

[Custom-made acetabular implants in revision total hip arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

Management of acetabular bone loss is a demanding problem in revision total hip arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review is to introduce and discuss the results and the advantages and disadvantages of custom-made implants as a treatment option for severe acetabular bone defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A selective review of the existing literature of custom made acetabular implants was performed on PubMed.

RESULTS

Studies showed good clinical and radiological outcomes of custom made acetabular implants and a survival rate of more than 90%.

CONCLUSION

Custom-made acetabular implants are a reliable treatment option for severe acetabular defects and allow the reconstruction of the centre of rotation of the hip. The costs of these implants are high and planning is time consuming.

Monoflanged Custom-Made Acetabular Components Promote Biomechanical Restoration of Severe Acetabular Bone Defects by Metallic Defect Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Custom-made acetabular components (CMAC) are one established method to address severe acetabular bone defects. Monoflanged CMAC may represent an advantageous alternative to establish triflanged CMAC as they promote better primary stability through metallic defect reconstruction and thus anatomic restoration of the center of rotation (COR).

METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive (21 triflanged and 37 monoflanged) CMAC were evaluated for overall survival, reasons for revision, radiological restoration of COR, and clinical outcome parameters.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between both design types regarding overall survival, revision rates, Harris Hip Score, or visual analog scale (pain) score at latest follow-up (mean, 56.3 ± 28.7 months). Triflanged CMAC showed a significant lateralization (P ≤ .001) and cranialization (P = .003) of the COR compared to the contralateral side. Monoflanged CMAC restored the anatomic COR. Reasons for revision surgery and explantation were periprosthetic joint infection (n = 12) and aseptic loosening (n = 2) without significant differences between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Monoflanged CMAC demonstrate similar clinical outcome parameters and survival rates as triflanged CMAC but superior biomechanical features and represent therefore a solid alternative treatment option and implant design.

Mid-term results after revision total hip arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss

INTRODUCTION

Severe acetabular bone loss, both with or without pelvic discontinuity, remains a challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). The goal of our study was to evaluate the mid-term results for consecutive patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss with or without pelvic discontinuity who needed RTHA with custom-made acetabular implants and to compare the results to those of other studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-eight (68) patients with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky Type IIIa and IIIb), who required RTHA, were included in our study. All prostheses were constructed on the basis of thin-layer computed tomography (CT) scans of the pelvis. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Harrison hip score (HHS), and clinical and radiographic follow-up assessments were used to evaluate the outcome.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was 43 months (range 1-120 months). Implant survival at last follow-up was 75% (51 of 68). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with explantation as the endpoint, revealed survival rates of 82.7% (3 years) and 77% (5 years). Patients with revision of the acetabular component only had a significant higher survival rate (p 0.012). Overall revision rate was 36.7%. Reinfection rate was 34.4%. Complications included 15 (22%) periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), 7 dislocations (10.2%), and 2 aseptic loosenings (2.9%). Mean VAS at last follow-up was 1.45 compared to 3.2 preoperatively, while mean HHS improved from 21.1 points preoperatively to 61 at last follow-up. The change in both scores was thus significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Defect reconstruction with custom-made modular acetabular implants can be a good, nevertheless expensive, treatment option with clinically and radiologically satisfying results in comparison to recent studies in the literature. Nevertheless, high postoperative complication rates, especially in terms of PJI, remain a challenge.