2020 John N. Insall Award: Removal of total knee arthroplasty from the inpatient-only list adversely affects bundled payment programmes

The Removal of Total Knee Arthroplasty From the Inpatient-Only List has Improved Patient Optimization

INTRODUCTION

On January 1, 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the inpatient-only (IPO) list, expanding outpatient TKA (oTKA) to include patients with insurance coverage through their programs. These regulatory changes reinforced the need for preoperative optimization to ensure a safe and timely discharge after surgery. This study compared modifiable preoperative optimization metrics in patients who underwent oTKA pre-IPO and post-IPO removal. The authors hypothesized that patients post-IPO removal would demonstrate improvement in the selected categories.

METHODS

Outpatient TKA in a national database was identified and stratified by surgical year (2015 to 2017 versus 2018 to 2020). Preoperative optimization thresholds were established for the following modifiable risk factors: albumin, hematocrit, sodium, smoking, and body mass index. The percentage of patients who did not meet thresholds pre-IPO and post-IPO removal were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 2,074 patients underwent oTKA from 2015 to 2017 compared with 46,480 from 2018 to 2020. Patients undergoing oTKA after IPO removal were significantly older (67.0 versus 64.4 years; P < 0.01). A lower percentage of patients in the post-IPO cohort fell outside the threshold for all modifiable risk factors. Results were significant for preoperative sodium (10.7% versus 8.8%; P < 0.01), body mass index (12.4% versus 11.0% P = 0.05), and smoking history (9.9% versus 6.6%; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Outpatient TKA has increased considerably post-IPO removal. As this regulatory change has allowed older patients with increased comorbidities to undergo oTKA, the need for appropriate preoperative optimization has increased. The current data set demonstrates that surgeons have improved preoperative optimization efforts for select modifiable risk factors.

Increasing the Volume of Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty Procedures: An Evaluation of a Novel Rapid Recovery Pathway Program Within an Academic Medical Center

Background

There has been a national trend toward shifting joint arthroplasty procedures to the outpatient setting. These cases are often performed in freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), which are often not accessible to surgeons within academic practices.

Purposes

We sought to investigate a novel rapid recovery program used to transition arthroplasty patients to an outpatient-based care system within an academic medical center.

Methods

All patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty between November 2019 and April 2021 were retrospectively evaluated for their eligibility for a rapid recovery pathway through the Extended Stay Unit (ESU) based on clinical and social criteria. Once admitted, patients were evaluated for whether they were discharged from the unit or if hospital admission was necessary.

Results

Out of the 444 patients deemed candidates for the rapid recovery program, 188 patients were admitted to the ESU (42.3%); 18 (9.6%) required inpatient hospital admission, with the majority of these due to failing physical therapy (16; 88.9%). Of the ESU patients who were successfully discharged home, 55 (32.4%) were discharged on postoperative day (POD) 0 and 115 (67.6%) on POD 1 (<23 hours).

Conclusion

As total joint arthroplasties shift toward the outpatient setting, surgeons in academic institutions must employ strategies to increase their volume of patient candidates for outpatient procedures. Our retrospective study of prospectively collected data suggests the feasibility of creating a separate rapid recovery unit within the hospital that can be an effective method by which to eventually transition to the ASC setting.

Identifying Modifiable Cost Drivers of Outpatient Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty With Machine Learning

BACKGROUND

Implementing tools that identify cost-saving opportunities for ambulatory orthopaedic surgeries can improve access to value-based care. We developed and internally validated a machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict cost drivers of total charges after ambulatory unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

We queried the New York State Ambulatory Surgery and Services database to identify patients who underwent ambulatory, defined as <24 hours of care before discharge, elective UKA between 2014 and 2016. A total of 1,311 patients were included. The median costs after ambulatory UKA were $14,710. Patient demographics and intraoperative parameters were entered into 4 candidate ML algorithms. The most predictive model was selected following internal validation of candidate models, with conventional linear regression as a benchmark. Global variable importance and partial dependence curves were constructed to determine the impact of each input parameter on total charges.

RESULTS

The gradient-boosted ensemble model outperformed all candidate algorithms and conventional linear regression. The major differential cost drivers of UKA identified (in decreasing order of magnitude) were increased operating room time, length of stay, use of regional and adjunctive periarticular analgesia, utilization of computer-assisted navigation, and routinely sending resected tissue to pathology.

CONCLUSION

We developed and internally validated a supervised ML algorithm that identified operating room time, length of stay, use of computer-assisted navigation, regional primary anesthesia, adjunct periarticular analgesia, and routine surgical pathology as essential cost drivers of UKA. Following external validation, this tool may enable surgeons and health insurance providers optimize the delivery of value-based care to patients receiving outpatient UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Patient Designation Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty: How Can Preoperative Variables Impact Postoperative Status?

BACKGROUND

Removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the inpatient only list has led to a greater focus on outpatient (OP) procedures. However, the impact of OP-centered models in at-risk patients is unclear. Therefore, the current analysis investigated the effect of conversion from OP to inpatient (IP) status on postoperative outcomes and determined which factors put patients at risk for status change postoperatively.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent a primary TKA at our institution between January 2, 2018, and April 26, 2022. All patients included were originally scheduled for OP surgery and were separated based on conversion to IP status postoperatively. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine the significance of all perioperative variables. Modeling via binary logistic regressions was used to determine factors predictive of status conversion.

RESULTS

Of the 2,313 patients originally designated for OP TKA, 627 (27.1%) required a stay of 2 midnights or longer. Patients in the IP group had significantly higher facility discharge rates (P < .001) compared to the OP group. Factors predictive of conversion included age of 65 years and older (P < .001), women (P < .001), arriving at the postanesthesia care unit after 12 pm (P < .001), body mass index greater than 30 (P = .004), and Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4 and higher (P = .004). Being the first case of the day (P < .001) and being married (P < .001) were both protective against conversion.

CONCLUSION

Certain intrinsic patient factors may predispose a patient to an IP stay, and an understanding of predisposing factors which could lead to IP conversion may improve perioperative planning moving forward.

The removal of total hip arthroplasty from the inpatient-only list has improved patient selection and expanded optimization efforts

INTRODUCTION

On January 1, 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the Inpatient-Only (IPO) list. This study evaluated patient demographics and comorbidities, pre-operative optimization efforts, and 30-day outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient THA pre- and post- IPO-removal. The authors hypothesized that patients undergoing THA post-IPO removal would have improved optimization of modifiable risk factors and equivalent 30-day outcomes.

METHODS

There were 17,063 outpatient THA in a national database stratified by surgery performed pre- (2015 to 2019: 5,239 patients) and post-IPO (2020: 11,824 patients) removal. Demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day outcomes were compared with univariable and multivariable analyses. Pre-operative optimization thresholds were established for the following modifiable risk factors: albumin, creatinine, hematocrit, smoking history, and body mass index. The percentage of patients who fell outside the thresholds in each cohort were compared.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing outpatient THA post-IPO removal were significantly older; mean age 65 years (range, 18 to 92) vs 62 (range, 18 to 90) years (P<0.01), with a higher percentage of American Society of Anesthesiologists scores 3 and 4 (P<0.01). There was no difference in 30-day readmissions (P=0.57) or reoperations (P=1.00). A significantly lower percentage of patients fell outside the established threshold for albumin (P<0.01) post-IPO removal, and trended towards lower percentages for hematocrit and smoking status.

CONCLUSION

The removal of THA from the IPO list expanded patient selection for outpatient arthroplasty. Pre-operative optimization is critical to minimize post-operative complications, and the current study demonstrates that 30-day outcomes have not worsened post-IPO removal.

Are Patients Being Appropriately Selected for Same-Day Discharge Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Decreased cost associated with same-day discharge (SDD) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to an increased interest in this topic. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there is a population of TKA patients in which SDD has similar rates of 30-day complications compared to patients discharged on postoperative day 1 or 2.

METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2018, 6,327 TKA patients who had a SDD (length of stay [LOS] = 0) were matched to TKA patients who had an LOS of 1 or 2 days. All SDD patients were successfully matched 1:1 using the morbidity probability variable (a composite variable of demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory values). Patients were divided into quartiles based on their morbidity probability. Bivariate logistic regressions were then used to compare any complication and major complication rates in the SDD quartiles to the corresponding quartiles with an LOS of 1 or 2 days.

RESULTS

When comparing the 1st quartiles (healthiest), there was no difference between the cohorts in any complication (odds ratio [OR] = 0.960, 95% CI 0.552-1.670, P = .866) and major complications (OR = 0.999, 95% CI = 0.448-2.231, P = .999). The same was observed in quartile 2 (any complications: OR = 1.161, 95% CI = 0.720-1.874, P = .540). Comparing the third quartiles, there was an increase in all complications with SDD (OR = 1.784, 95% CI = 1.125-2.829, P = .014), but no difference in major complications (OR = 1.635, 95% CI = 0.874-3.061, P = .124). Comparing the fourth quartiles (least healthy), there was an increase in all complications (OR = 1.384, 95% CI = 1.013-1.892, P = .042) and major complications (OR = 1.711, 95% CI = 1.048-2.793, P = .032) with SDD.

CONCLUSION

The unhealthiest 50% of patients in this study who underwent SDD TKA were at an increased risk of having any complication, calling into question the current state of patient selection for SDD TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Bundled Care in Elective Total Joint Replacement: Payment Models in Sweden, Canada, and the United States: A Critical Analysis Review

➢

Rising health-care expenditures and payer dissatisfaction with traditional models of reimbursement have driven an interest in alternative payment model initiatives.

➢

Bundled payments, an alternative payment model, have been introduced for total joint replacement in Sweden, the United States, and Canada to help to curb costs, with varying degrees of success.

➢

Outpatient total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty are becoming increasingly common and provide value for patients and payers, but have negatively impacted providers participating in bundled payment models due to considerable losses and decreased reimbursement.

➢

A fine balance exists between achieving cost savings for payers and enticing participation by providers in bundled payment models.

➢

The design of each model is key to payer, provider, and patient satisfaction and should feature comprehensive coverage for a full cycle of care whether it is in the inpatient or outpatient setting, is linked to quality and patient-reported outcomes, features appropriate risk adjustment, and sets limits on responsibility for unrelated complications and extreme outlier events.

Ambulatory total hip arthroplasty: Causes for failure to launch and associated risk factors

Aims

The volume of ambulatory total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures is increasing due to the emphasis on value-based care. The purpose of the study is to identify the causes for failed same-day discharge (SDD) and perioperative factors leading to failed SDD.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study followed pre-selected patients for SDD THA from 1 August 2018 to 31 December 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing unilateral THA with appropriate social support, age 18 to 75 years, and BMI < 37 kg/m². Patients with opioid dependence, coronary artery disease, and valvular heart disease were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative data were collected from the electronic medical records. Possible risk factors for failed SDD were identified using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

In all, 278 patients were identified with a mean age of 57.1 years (SD 8.1) and a mean BMI of 27.3 kg/m² (SD 4.5). A total of 96 patients failed SDD, with the most common reasons being failure to clear physical therapy (26%), dizziness (22%), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (11%). Risk factors associated with failed SDD included smokers (odds ratio (OR) 6.24; p = 0.009), a maximum postoperative pain score > 8 (OR 4.76; p = 0.004), and procedures starting after 11 am (OR 2.28; p = 0.015). A higher postoperative tolerable pain goal (numerical rating scale 4 to 10) was found to be associated with successful SDD (OR 2.7; p = 0.001). Age, BMI, surgical approach, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and anaesthesia type were not associated with failed SDD.

Conclusion

SDD is a safe and viable option for pre-selected patients interested in rapid recovery THA. The most common causes for failure to launch were failing to clear physical thereapy and patient symptomatology. Risk factors associated with failed SSD highlight the importance of preoperative counselling regarding smoking cessation and postoperative pain to set reasonable expectations. Future interventions should aim to improve patient postoperative mobilization, pain control, and decrease symptomatology.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):684–691.

Increased Patient-Level Payment After Removal of Total Knee Arthroplasty From the Inpatient-Only List

BACKGROUND

In January 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Inpatient Only (IPO) list. This study aimed to compare patient-level payments in TKA cases with a length of stay (LOS) <2 midnights before and after removal of TKA from IPO list.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, all Medicare patients who received a primary elective TKA from 2016-2019 with a LOS <2 midnights at an academic tertiary center were identified. Total and itemized charges and patient-level payments were compared between eligible TKA cases performed in 2016-2017 and those in 2018-2019. There were 351 eligible TKA cases identified: 151 in 2016-2017 and 200 in 2018-2019.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients making any out-of-pocket payment increased in 2018-2019 from 2016-2017 (51.0% versus 10.6%), as did median patient-level payment ($7.30 [range, $0.00-$3,389] versus $0.00 [range, $0.00-$1,248], P < .001 for both). A greater proportion of patients in 2018-2019 paid $1-$50 than in 2016-2017 (37.5% versus 1.3%, P < .001) with no change in the proportion of patients who made payments >$50. Total charges were less in 2018-2019 than in 2016-2017 (P = .001). Charges for drugs, laboratory tests, admissions/floor, and therapies decreased in 2018-2019, whereas charges for the operating room and radiology increased (P < .001 for all).

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving outpatient TKA in 2018-2019 were more likely to have out-of-pocket payments than patients with comparable hospital stay who were designated as inpatients, although most of these payments were less than $50.

Total Hip and Knee Revisions are Really Outpatient Procedures? Implications of the Removal From the Inpatient Only List

BACKGROUND

In 2021, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) removed over 200 procedures from the Inpatient Only (IPO) list including revision total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasties (TKA). The purpose of this study is to determine if some revision TKA and THA procedures may be appropriate for outpatient status.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of 1026 revision THA and TKA patients at our tertiary academic institution from 2015 to 2020. An outpatient procedure was defined as a length of stay of <2 midnights. We queried our prospectively collected arthroplasty database and compared demographics, comorbidities, surgical indication, type of procedure, discharge disposition, readmissions, and complications between the outpatient and inpatient groups.

RESULTS

There were only 166 revision patients (16%) who met outpatient criteria. Revision THA outpatients were more likely to have a head and liner exchange (49% vs 25%, P < .001) and an indication of instability (93% vs 44%, P < .001). Revision TKA outpatients were more likely to have an isolated liner exchange (34% vs 14%, P < .001) and have an indication of instability (67% vs 25%, P < .001). Patients undergoing a revision for infection and aseptic loosening were more likely to require an inpatient stay than other revision indication (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of revision TKA and THA patients met CMS inpatient criteria. In addition to a projected decrease in facility reimbursement, concerns exist for the safety of early discharge and access to care for these complex patients if CMS removes all revisions from the Inpatient Only list.

Identifying and Creating Value for Employed Arthroplasty Surgeons in an Era of Decreasing Reimbursement

Recent regulatory changes made by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will result in a 9% decrease in reimbursement for hip and knee replacements by the end of 2022. Combining this with CMS's recent removal of total knee and total hip arthroplasty from the inpatient-only list has begun to take effect on the bottom line for hospital systems, which now employ around 50% of the arthroplasty community. Employed joint replacement surgeons should continue to innovate and be leaders within their hospital systems in the outpatient and ambulatory surgery space to recoup lost value, increase autonomy, and should be compensated for this work. Employed arthroplasty surgeon leaders can better align goals with and control the narrative in the C-suite to redefine their value as the most consistent, dependable, and transparent department within a larger health system or corporate medical group.

How the Shift in Arthroplasty Surgery Location Impacts the Relationship of Private Surgeons, Hospitals, and Ambulatory Surgery Centers

The recent removal of total hip and knee arthroplasty from the Medicare inpatient-only list, COVID-19 pandemic, decreasing reimbursements, and bundled payment programs have all had tremendous impact on the practice of arthroplasty. Surgeons and practices must adapt to these challenges to achieve the ideal triad of quality patient care, low cost to payors, and sustainable financial margins for stakeholders. Here, we review institutional data and present our experience with the changing arthroplasty practice landscape. With the principle of demand matching, arthroplasty surgeons and practices can risk-stratify and shuttle patients in the appropriate operative and rehabilitation setting to optimize quality and efficiency.

Mepivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia for Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Mepivacaine is an intermediate acting amide local anesthetic that can be used for neuraxial anesthesia in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with a shorter duration of action (1.5-2 hours) compared to the more commonly used local anesthetic bupivacaine. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing bupivacaine and mepivacaine spinal anesthesia during elective TJA and the surgical outcomes of the time to full neurologic motor return, pain, mobility, length of stay (LOS), and complications including transient neurologic symptoms and urinary function.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid Embase were screened for "arthroplasty, spinal anesthesia, bupivacaine, and mepivacaine," in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 159 studies were screened and 5 studies were evaluated. Data were compared regarding motor function return, mobility (distance ambulated), pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), LOS, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Full-text screening yielded 5 studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 2 retrospective cohort studies), with a total of 1,550 patients. Mepivacaine spinals had an earlier return to motor function (154 minutes vs 170 minutes, 95% CI: [-31.6, -0.9], P = .04), shorter LOS (25.95 hours vs 29.96 hours, 95% CI: [-6.8, -1.2], P = .01), and decreased urinary retention (7.15% vs 10.58%, 95% CI: [-6.3%, -0.6%], P = .02) with no differences in pain (VAS 3.57 vs 3.68, 95% CI: [-2.1, 1.9], P = .90) or distance ambulated (94.2 ft vs 89.1 ft, 95% CI: [-15, 25.2], P = .60) compared to bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

The method of anesthesia administration has been an increasing area of focus for quicker and safer recovery to allow for early ambulation and facility discharge. The rapid recovery facilitated by mepivacaine may further enable outpatient TJA and enhance patient recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Life After BPCI: High Quality Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Care Can Still Exist Outside of a Bundled Payment Program

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding target price methodology and financial penalties have led to withdrawal from Medicare bundled payment programs for total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA), despite its early successful results. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any difference in patient comorbidities and outcomes following our institution's exit from the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement - Advanced (BPCI-A).

METHODS

We reviewed consecutive 2,737 primary TKA and 2,009 primary THA patients following our withdraw from BPCI-A January 1, 2020-March 30, 2021 and compared them to 1,203 TKA and 1,088 THA patients from October 1, 2018-August 2, 2019 enrolled in BPCI-A. We compared patient demographics, comorbidities, discharge disposition, complications, and 90-day readmissions. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify if bundle participation was associated with complications or readmissions.

RESULTS

Post-bundle TKA had shorter length of stay (1.4 vs 1.8 days, P < .001). Both TKA and THA patients were significantly less likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility (5.6% vs 19.2%, P < .001 and 6.0% vs 10.0%, P < .001, respectively). Controlling for confounders, post-bundle TKA had lower complications (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.98, P = .037) but no difference in 90-day readmission (OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.55-1.16, P = .224).

CONCLUSIONS

Since leaving BPCI-A, we have maintained high quality THA care and improved TKA care with reduced complications and length of stay under a fee-for-service model. Furthermore, we have lowered rehabilitation discharge for both TKA and THA patients. CMS should consider partnering with high performing institutions to develop new models for risk sharing.

Same-Day Outpatient Lower-Extremity Joint Replacement: A Critical Analysis Review

➢ The economics of transitioning total joint arthroplasty (TJA) to standalone ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) should not be capitalized on at the expense of patient safety in the absence of established superior patient outcomes. ➢ Proper patient selection is essential to maximizing safety and avoiding complications resulting in readmission. ➢ Ambulatory TJA programs should focus on reducing complications frequently associated with delays in discharge. ➢ The transition from hospital-based TJA to ASC-based TJA has substantial financial implications for the hospital, payer, patient, and surgeon.

Despite Equivalent Medicare Reimbursement, Facility Costs for Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty Are Higher Than Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

With the recent removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Inpatient Only list, facility reimbursement for outpatient TKA now falls under the Outpatient Prospective Payment System at the same rate as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study was to compare true facility costs of patients undergoing outpatient TKA with those undergoing UKA.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of 2310 outpatient TKA and 231 UKA patients from 2018 to 2019. Outpatient status was defined as a hospital stay of less than 2 midnights. Facility costs were calculated using a time-driven, activity-based costing algorithm. Implants, supplies, medications, and personnel costs were compared between outpatient TKA and UKA patients. A multivariate analysis was performed to control for confounding medical and demographic variables.

RESULTS

When compared with patients undergoing UKA, outpatient TKA patients had higher implant costs ($3403 vs $3081; P < .001) and overall hospital costs ($6350 vs $5594; P < .001). Outpatient TKA patients had a greater length of stay (1.2 vs 0.5 days; P < .001) and greater postoperative personnel costs ($783 vs $166; P < .001) than UKA patients. When controlling for comorbidities, outpatient TKA was associated with a $803 (P < .001) increase in overall facility costs compared with UKA.

CONCLUSION

Despite equivalent reimbursement from CMS as UKA, outpatient TKA has increased facility costs to the hospital. Although implant costs can vary greatly by institution, CMS should consider appropriately reimbursing outpatient TKA for the additional personnel costs when compared with UKA.

Medicare bundles for arthroplasty : a journey back to fee for service?

AIMS

There is concern that aggressive target pricing in the new Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A) penalizes high-performing groups that had achieved low costs through prior experience in bundled payments. We hypothesize that this methodology incorporates unsustainable downward trends on Target Prices and will lead to groups opting out of BPCI Advanced in favour of a traditional fee for service.

METHODS

Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data, we compared the Target Price factors for hospitals and physician groups that participated in both BPCI Classic and BPCI Advanced (legacy groups), with groups that only participated in BPCI Advanced (non-legacy). With rebasing of Target Prices in 2020 and opportunity for participants to drop out, we compared retention rates of hospitals and physician groups enrolled at the onset of BPCI Advanced with current enrolment in 2020.

RESULTS

At its peak in July 2015, 342 acute care hospitals and physician groups participated in Lower Extremity Joint Replacement (LEJR) in BPCI Classic. At its peak in March 2019, 534 acute care hospitals and physician groups participated in LEJR in BPCI Advanced. In January 2020, only 14.5% of legacy hospitals and physician groups opted to stay in BPCI Advanced for LEJR. Analysis of Target Price factors by legacy hospitals during both programmes demonstrates that participants in BPCI Classic received larger negative adjustments on the Target Price than non-legacy hospitals.

CONCLUSION

BPCI Advanced provides little opportunity for a reduction in cost to offset a reduced Target Price for efficient providers, as made evident by the 85.5% withdrawal rate for BPCI Advanced. Efficient providers in BPCI Advanced are challenged by the programme's application of trend and efficiency factors that presumes their cost reduction can continue to decline at the same rate as non-efficient providers. It remains to be seen if reverting back to Medicare fee for service will support the same level of care and quality achieved in historical bundled payment programmes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):119-125.

The introduction of day-case total knee arthroplasty in a national healthcare system: A review of the literature and development of a hospital pathway

INTRODUCTION

As we now drive to reinitiate our full capacity elective services in an attempt to tackle an ever-growing demand for lower limb arthroplasty, this pandemic has presented rare opportunities to revise and re-engage elective arthroplasty pathways aimed at improving patient care and healthcare efficiency.

AIMS

We present the development of an evidence-based multidisciplinary perioperative care pathway for day-case total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) institution, in conjunction with a review of the literature upon which the protocol is founded.

METHODOLOGY

We performed a review of the literature reporting complication or readmission rates at ≥30 day postoperative following day-case TKA. Electronic searches were performed using four databases from the date of inception to November 2020. Relevant studies were identified, data extracted, and qualitative synthesis performed.

RESULTS

13 manuscripts with a total of 3370 day-case TKAs, defined as discharged on the same-calendar-day of surgery, were included in analysis. Mean 90-day complication rates (8.31% [range, 0-16.3%] vs 9.49% [range, 0-13.1%], respectively) and readmission rates (2.71% [range, 0-10.0%] vs 3.41% [range, 0-9.9%], respectively) were equivocal between day-case and inpatient TKA. The overall rate of successful same-calendar-day discharge was 95.8%. Our evaluation and critique of the evidence-based literature identifies day-case TKA to be safe, effective and economical, benefitting both patients and healthcare systems alike.

CONCLUSION

We further validate the introduction of our institutional Elective Day Surgery Arthroplasty Pathway (EDSAP) based on the evidence presented. Careful patient selection paralleled with well-defined care pathways are essential for successful introduction of day-case TKA into the NHS.

Day-case total hip arthroplasty: a literature review and development of a hospital pathway

Aims

We present the development of a day-case total hip arthroplasty (THA) pathway in a UK National Health Service institution in conjunction with an extensive evidence-based summary of the interventions used to achieve successful day-case THA to which the protocol is founded upon.

Methods

We performed a prospective audit of day-case THA in our institution as we reinitiate our full capacity elective services. In parallel, we performed a review of the literature reporting complication or readmission rates at ≥ 30-day postoperative following day-case THA. Electronic searches were performed using four databases from the date of inception to November 2020. Relevant studies were identified, data extracted, and qualitative synthesis performed.

Results

Our evaluation and critique of the evidence-based literature identifies day-case THA to be safe, effective, and economical, benefiting both patients and healthcare systems alike. We further validate this with our institutional elective day surgery arthroplasty pathway (EDSAP) and report a small cohort of successful day-case THA cases as an example in the early stages of this practice in our unit.

Conclusion

Careful patient selection and education, adequate perioperative considerations, including multimodal analgesia, surgical technique and blood loss management protocols and appropriate postoperative pathways comprising reliable discharge criteria are essential for successful day-case THA.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):93–102.

Are We at the Bottom? BPCI Programs Now Disincentivize Providers Who Maintain Quality Despite Caring for Increasingly Complex Patients

BACKGROUND

The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative has been successful at reducing Medicare costs after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Target pricing is based on each institution's historical performance and is periodically reset. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of our BPCI program accounting for patient complexity, quality, and resource utilization.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of 9195 Medicare patients undergoing primary TJA from 2015 to 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, and readmissions by year were compared. We then examined 90-day episode-of-care costs, changes in target price, and financial margins during the duration of the BPCI program using Medicare claims data.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing TJA in 2018 had a higher prevalence of diabetes and cardiac disease (all P < .001) as compared with those in 2015. From 2015 to 2018, there was a decrease in the rate of discharge to rehabilitation facilities (23% vs 14%, P < .001) and length of stay (2.1 vs 1.7 days, P < .001) with no difference in readmissions (6% vs 6%, P = .945). There was a reduction in postacute care costs ($6076 vs $4,890, P < .001) and 90-day episode-of-care costs ($19,954 vs $18,449, P < .001). However, the target price also decreased ($22,280 vs $18,971, P < .001), and the per-patient margin diminished ($2683 vs $522, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Surgeons have maintained quality of care at a reduced cost despite increasing patient complexity. The target price adjustments resulted in declining margins during the course of our BPCI experience. Policy makers should consider changes to target price methodology to encourage participation in these successful cost-saving programs.

Is the New Outpatient Prospective Payment System Classification for Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty Appropriate?

BACKGROUND

In 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the inpatient-only list, resulting in payment through the Outpatient Prospective Payment System with an average $3157 reduction. The purpose of this study is to determine if the reimbursement is justified by comparing the difference in facility costs between inpatient and outpatient TKAs.

METHODS

We identified 4496 consecutive primary TKA procedures performed at 2 hospitals from 2015 to 2019. Itemized facility costs were calculated using a time-driven activity-based costing algorithm. Outpatient procedures were defined as those with a length of stay of less than 2 midnights (3851, 86%). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and itemized costs were compared between groups. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the independent effect of outpatient status on true facility costs.

RESULTS

Outpatient TKA patients had lower mean postoperative personnel costs ($1809 vs $947, P < .001), supply costs ($4347 vs $4229, P < .001), and overall total facility costs ($7371 vs $6937, P < .001) than inpatient TKA patients. Controlling for a younger patient cohort with fewer medical comorbidities, outpatient status was associated with a reduction in total facility costs of $972 (95% confidence interval $883-$1060, P < .001) compared to inpatient TKA.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient TKA costs hospitals nearly $1000 per patient less than inpatient TKA, yet the average difference in Medicare reimbursement for an outpatient procedure is $3157 less per patient. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should reconsider the Outpatient Prospective Payment System classification of TKA to better incentivize surgeons to perform TKA as a lower cost outpatient procedure when safe and appropriate.