High volumes of recent surgical admissions, time to surgery, and 60-day mortality

How do busy hospital circumstances affect mortality and readmission within 60 days: A cohort study of 680 000 acute admissions in Norway

OBJECTIVE

To study mortality and readmissions for older patients admitted during more and less busy hospital circumstances.

DESIGN

Cohort study where we identified patients that were admitted to the same hospital, during the same month and day of the week. We estimated effects of inflow of acute patients and the number of concurrent acute inpatients. Mortality and readmissions were analysed using stratified Cox-regression.

SETTING

All people 80 years and older acutely admitted to Norwegian hospitals between 2008 and 2016.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality and readmissions within 60 days from admission.

RESULTS

Among 294 653 patients with 685 197 admissions, mean age was 86 years (standard deviation 5). Overall, 13% died within 60 days. An interquartile range difference in inflow of acute patients was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.99, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.98 to 1.00). There was little evidence of differences in readmissions, but a 7% higher risk (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.09) of being discharged outside ordinary daytime working hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients admitted during busier circumstances had similar mortality and readmissions to those admitted during less busy periods. Yet, they showed a higher risk of discharge outside daytime working hours. Despite limited effects of busyness on a hospital level, there could still be harmful effects of local situations.

Waiting time for hip fracture surgery: hospital variation, causes, and effects on postoperative mortality : data on 37,708 operations reported to the Norwegian Hip fracture Register from 2014 to 2018

Aims

This study aimed to describe preoperative waiting times for surgery in hip fracture patients in Norway, and analyze factors affecting waiting time and potential negative consequences of prolonged waiting time.

Methods

Overall, 37,708 hip fractures in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from January 2014 to December 2018 were linked with data in the Norwegian Patient Registry. Hospitals treating hip fractures were characterized according to their hip fracture care. Waiting time (hours from admission to start of surgery), surgery within regular working hours, and surgery on the day of or on the day after admission, i.e. ‘expedited surgery’ were estimated.

Results

Mean waiting time was 22.6 hours (SD 20.7); 36,652 patients (97.2%) waited less than three days (< 72 hours), and 27,527 of the patients (73%) were operated within regular working hours (08:00 to 16:00). Expedited surgery was given to 31,675 of patients (84%), and of these, 19,985 (53%) were treated during regular working hours. Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes 4 and 5 were more likely to have surgery within regular working hours (odds ratio (OR) 1.59; p < 0.001), and less likely to receive expedited surgery than ASA 1 patients (OR 0.29; p < 0.001). Low-volume hospitals treated a larger proportion of patients during regular working hours than high volume hospitals (OR 1.26; p < 0.001). High-volume hospitals had less expedited surgery and significantly longer waiting times than low and intermediate-low volume hospitals. Higher ASA classes and Charlson Comorbidity Index increased waiting time. Patients not receiving expedited surgery had higher 30-day and one-year mortality rates (OR 1.19; p < 0.001) and OR 1.13; p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion

There is inequality in waiting time for hip fracture treatment in Norway. Variations in waiting time from admission to hip fracture surgery depended on both patient and hospital factors. Not receiving expedited surgery was associated with increased 30-day and one-year mortality rates.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):710–720.