Diagnostic yield of image-guided biopsy in patients with suspected infectious spondylodiscitis : a prospective study from a tuberculosis-endemic country

Laboratory diagnostics for primary spinal infections in pediatric and adult populations: a narrative review

Primary spinal infection (PSI) is a generic term covering a heterogeneous group of infections that can affect the vertebral body, intervertebral disks, the content of the medullary cavity, and adjacent paraspinal tissues. Patients' characteristics can vary significantly, notably according to their age, and some of these characteristics undoubtedly play a primordial role in the occurrence of a PSI and in the type of offending pathogen. Before approaching the subject of laboratory diagnostics, it is essential to define the characteristics of the patient and their infection, which can then guide the physician toward specific diagnostic approaches. This review critically examined the roles and usefulness of traditional and modern laboratory diagnostics in supporting clinicians' decision-making in cases of pediatric and adult primary spinal infection (PSI). It appears impossible to compare PSIs in children and adults, whether from an epidemiological, clinical, bacteriological, or biological perspective. The recipients are really too different, and the responsible germs are closely correlated to their age. Secondly, the interpretation of traditional laboratory blood tests appears to contribute little guidance for clinicians attempting to diagnose a PSI. Biopsy or needle aspiration for bacterial identification remains a controversial subject, as the success rates of these procedures for identifying causative organisms are relatively uncertain in pediatric populations.Using nucleic acid amplification assays (NAAAs) on biopsy samples has been demonstrated to be more sensitive than conventional cultures for diagnosing PSI. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) are particularly interesting for establishing a microbiological diagnosis of a PSI when standard cultures and NAAAs have failed to detect the culprit. We can even imagine that plasma metagenomic NGS using plasma (known as "liquid biopsy") is a diagnostic approach that can detect not only pathogens circulating in the bloodstream but also those causing focal infections, and thus eliminate the need for source sample collection using costly invasive surgical procedures.

A Comparison of Negative Pressure and Conventional Therapy in Spine Infections: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in treating primary spinal infections. Methods: Patients who underwent surgical treatment for primary spinal infection between January 2018 and June 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. They were divided into two groups based on the type of surgery: one that underwent negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and another that underwent conventional surgery (CVSG-Posterior debridement, bone grafting, fusion, and internal fixation in one stage). The two groups were compared in terms of the total operation time, total blood loss, total postoperative drainage, postoperative pain score, time for the postoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to return to normal, postoperative complications, treatment time, and recurrence rate. Results: A total of 43 cases of spinal infection were evaluated, with 19 in the NPWT group and 24 in the CVSG group. The NPWT group had a superior postoperative drainage volume, antibiotic use time, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and CRP recovery times, VAS score at 3 months after the operation, and cure rate at 3 months after operation compared with the CVSG group. There were no significant variations in the total hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. Conclusions: This study supports the use of negative pressure in the treatment of a primary spinal infection and indicates that it has a notably better short-term clinical effect than conventional surgery. Additionally, its mid-term cure rate and recurrence rate are more desirable than those of conventional treatments.

Diagnostic efficiency of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for suspected spinal tuberculosis in China: A multicenter prospective study

Background

The pathogens of suspected spinal tuberculosis (TB) include TB and non-TB bacteria. A rapid and effective diagnostic method that can detect TB and non-TB pathogens simultaneously remains lacking. Here, we used metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to detect the pathogens in patients with suspected spinal TB.

Methods

The enrolled patients with suspected spinal TB were regrouped three times into patients with spinal infection and controls, patients with spinal TB and controls, and patients with non-TB spinal infection and controls. We tested the three groups separately by using mNGS and conventional detection methods.

Results

Ultimately, 100 patients were included in this study. Pathogens were detected in 82 patients. Among the 82 patients, 37 had TB and 45 were infected with other bacteria. In patients with spinal infection, the sensitivity of the mNGS assay was higher than that of culture and pathological examination (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). The specificity of the mNGS assay was not statistically different from that of culture and pathological examination (p = 1.000, p = 1.000). In patients with spinal TB, no statistical difference was found between the sensitivity of the mNGS assay and that of Xpert and T-SPOT.TB (p = 1.000, p = 0.430). The sensitivity of the mNGS assay was higher than that of MGIT 960 culture and pathological examination (p < 0.001, p = 0.006). The specificities of the mNGS assay, Xpert, MGIT 960 culture, and pathological examination were all 100%. The specificity of T-SPOT.TB (78.3%) was lower than that of the mNGS assay (100%; p < 0.001). In patients with non-TB spinal infection, the sensitivity of the mNGS assay was higher than that of bacterial culture and pathological examination (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). The specificity of the mNGS assay was not statistically different from that of bacterial culture and pathological examination (p = 1.000, p = 1.000).

Conclusion

Data presented here demonstrated that mNGS can detect TB and non-TB bacteria simultaneously, with high sensitivity, specificity and short detection time. Compared with conventional detection methods, mNGS is a more rapid and effective diagnostic tool for suspected spinal TB.