1
|
Aldin Z, Diss JK, Mahmood H, Sadik T, Basra H, Ahmed M, Danawi Z, Gul A, Sayed-Noor AS. Long-term effectiveness of transforaminal anterolateral approach CT-guided cervical epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy treatment. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:e775-e783. [PMID: 38369438 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness of computed tomography (CT)-guided transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injection using an anterolateral approach for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy (CR) using well-established robust clinical scoring systems for neck pain and neck disability. Despite its widespread use, evidence to support the long-term benefit of routine cervical epidural steroid injection is currently very limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included 113 patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed CR who underwent a steroid injection at a single cervical level via a unilateral transforaminal anterolateral approach. Pain was assessed quantitatively at pre-injection, 15 minutes post-injection, 1 month, 3 months, and at 1 year. Neck disability was assessed using the Oswestry Neck Disability Index (NDI) at pre-injection, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year time points. RESULTS Eighty patients completed the study. Sixty per cent reported reduced neck pain (mean pain reduction, 55%), which was clinically significant in 45% cases. Furthermore, 66% reported an improvement in neck disability (mean improvement, 51%), which was clinically significant for 56% patients. Clinically significant good outcomes in both neck pain and neck disability were evident from as early as 1-month, and importantly, were independent both of pre-treatment CR characteristics (including severity of pre-injection neck pain or disability) and of findings on pre-injection MRI imaging. CONCLUSION Transforaminal anterolateral approach CT-guided epidural steroid injection resulted in a clinically significant long-term improvement in both neck pain and disability for half of the present cohort of patients with unilateral single-level CR. This improvement was independent of the severity of the initial symptoms and pre-injection MRI findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Aldin
- Radiology Department, Princess Alexandra NHS Trust, Hamstel Road, Harlow, Essex, UK
| | - J K Diss
- Radiology Department, Princess Alexandra NHS Trust, Hamstel Road, Harlow, Essex, UK.
| | - H Mahmood
- Imaging Department, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - T Sadik
- Orthopaedic/Spinal Surgery Department, Princess Alexandra NHS Trust, Hamstel Road, Harlow, Essex, UK
| | - H Basra
- Radiology Department, Princess Alexandra NHS Trust, Hamstel Road, Harlow, Essex, UK
| | - M Ahmed
- Orthopaedic/Spinal Surgery Department, Princess Alexandra NHS Trust, Hamstel Road, Harlow, Essex, UK
| | - Z Danawi
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Southend University Hospital, Southend, Essex, UK
| | - A Gul
- Orthopaedic/Spinal Surgery Department, Princess Alexandra NHS Trust, Hamstel Road, Harlow, Essex, UK
| | - A S Sayed-Noor
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Orthopedics), Sundsvall and Norrland University Hospitals, Umeå University, Stockholm, Sweden; Clinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Andrés Ares J, Eldabe S, Helsen N, Baranidharan G, Barat JL, Bhaskar A, Cassini F, Gillner S, Kallewaard JW, Klessinger S, Mavrocordatos P, Occhigrossi F, Van Zundert J, Huygen F, Stoevelaar H. Radiofrequency for chronic lumbosacral and cervical pain: Results of a consensus study using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Pain Pract 2024. [PMID: 38597223 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the routine use of radiofrequency (RF) for the treatment of chronic pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region, there remains uncertainty on the most appropriate patient selection criteria. This study aimed to develop appropriateness criteria for RF in relation to relevant patient characteristics, considering RF ablation (RFA) for the treatment of chronic axial pain and pulsed RF (PRF) for the treatment of chronic radicular pain. METHODS The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) was used to explore the opinions of a multidisciplinary European panel on the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a variety of clinical scenarios. Depending on the type of pain (axial or radicular), the expert panel rated the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a total of 219 clinical scenarios. RESULTS For axial pain in the lumbosacral or cervical region, appropriateness of RFA was determined by the dominant pain trigger and location of tenderness on palpation with higher appropriateness scores if these variables were suggestive of the diagnosis of facet or sacroiliac joint pain. Although the opinions on the appropriateness of PRF for lumbosacral and cervical radicular pain were fairly dispersed, there was agreement that PRF is an appropriate option for well-selected patients with radicular pain due to herniated disc or foraminal stenosis, particularly in the absence of motor deficits. The panel outcomes were embedded in an educational e-health tool that also covers the psychosocial aspects of chronic pain, providing integrated recommendations on the appropriate use of (P)RF interventions for the treatment of chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region. CONCLUSIONS A multidisciplinary European expert panel established patient-specific recommendations that may support the (pre)selection of patients with chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region for either RFA or PRF (accessible via https://rftool.org). Future studies should validate these recommendations by determining their predictive value for the outcomes of (P)RF interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier de Andrés Ares
- Department of Anesthesiology-Pain Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Nicky Helsen
- Centre for Decision Analysis and Support, Ismar Healthcare, Lier, Belgium
| | | | - Jean-Luc Barat
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital privé Clairval - Ramsay santé, Marseille, France
| | - Arun Bhaskar
- Pain Management Centre, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Fabrizio Cassini
- SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Allesandria, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gillner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jan Willem Kallewaard
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Rijnstate Hospital, Velp, The Netherlands
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Treatment, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jan Van Zundert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Huygen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Herman Stoevelaar
- Centre for Decision Analysis and Support, Ismar Healthcare, Lier, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maus T. The Anatomy, Technique, Safety, and Efficacy of Image-Guided Epidural Access. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:199-215. [PMID: 38272615 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Epidural steroid injections have demonstrable efficacy and safety in treatment of radicular pain syndromes; transforaminal access has greater evidence of efficacy than interlaminar approaches. The interventionalist must understand epidural and foraminal anatomy and imaging to insure delivery of medication to the target, the ventral epidural space at the site of neural compression. This obligates pre-procedural planning. When performed with appropriate risk mitigation strategies, epidural injections by either access are safe. For transforaminal access, the use of dexamethasone as the injectate, and infraneural approaches, provides safety advantages.
Collapse
|
4
|
Peene L, Cohen SP, Brouwer B, James R, Wolff A, Van Boxem K, Van Zundert J. 2. Cervical radicular pain. Pain Pract 2023; 23:800-817. [PMID: 37272250 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cervical radicular pain is pain perceived in the upper limb, caused by irritation or compression of a cervical spine nerve, the roots of the nerve, or both. METHODS The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radicular pain was retrieved and summarized. RESULTS The diagnosis is made by combining elements from the patient's history, physical examination, and supplementary tests. The Spurling and shoulder abduction tests are the two most common examinations used to identify cervical radicular pain. MRI without contrast, CT scanning, and in some cases plain radiography can all be appropriate imaging techniques for nontraumatic cervical radiculopathy. MRI is recommended prior to interventional treatments. Exercise with or without other treatments can be beneficial. There is scant evidence for the use of paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and neuropathic pain medications such as gabapentin, pregabalin, tricyclic antidepressants, and anticonvulsants for the treatment of radicular pain. Acute and subacute cervical radicular pain may respond well to epidural corticosteroid administration, preferentially using an interlaminar approach. By contrast, for chronic cervical radicular pain, the efficacy of epidural corticosteroid administration is limited. In these patients, pulsed radiofrequency treatment adjacent to the dorsal root ganglion may be considered. CONCLUSIONS There is currently no gold standard for the diagnosis of cervical radicular pain. There is scant evidence for the use of medication. Epidural corticosteroid injection and pulsed radiofrequency adjacent to the dorsal root ganglion may be considered. [Correction added on 12 June 2023, after first online publication: The preceding sentence was corrected.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurens Peene
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Belgium
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Pain Medicine Division, Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Brigitte Brouwer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rathmell James
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Leroy D. Vandam Professor of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andre Wolff
- Department of Anesthesiology, UMCG Pain Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Van Boxem
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Belgium
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Van Zundert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Belgium
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Image-Guided Spine Interventions for Pain: Ongoing Controversies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 220:736-745. [PMID: 36541595 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.28643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
An expanding array of image-guided spine interventions have the potential to provide immediate and effective pain relief. Innovations in spine intervention have proceeded rapidly, with clinical adoption of new techniques at times occurring before the development of bodies of evidence to establish efficacy. Although new spine interventions have been evaluated by clinical trials, acceptance of results has been hindered by controversies regarding trial methodology. This article explores controversial aspects of four categories of image-guided interventions for painful conditions: spine interventions for postdural puncture headache resulting from prior lumbar procedures, epidural steroid injections for cervical and lumbar radiculopathy, interventions for facet and sacroiliac joint pain, and vertebral augmentations for compression fractures. For each intervention, we summarize the available literature, with an emphasis on persistent controversies, and discuss how current areas of disagreement and challenge may shape future research and innovation. Despite the ongoing areas of debate regarding various aspects of these procedures, effective treatments continue to emerge and show promise for aiding relief of a range of debilitating conditions.
Collapse
|