Health-related quality of life in patients 40 years after diagnosis of an idiopathic scoliosis

Health technology assessment in musculoskeletal radiology: the case study of EOSedge™

OBJECTIVES

Health technology assessment (HTA) is a systematic process used to evaluate the properties and effects of healthcare technologies within their intended use context. This paper describes the adoption of HTA process to assess the adoption of the EOSedge™ system in clinical practice.

METHODS

The EOSedge™ system is a digital radiography system that delivers whole-body, high-quality 2D/3D biplanar images covering the complete set of musculoskeletal and orthopedic exams. Full HTA model was chosen using the EUnetHTA Core Model® version 3.0. The HTA Core Model organizes the information into nine domains. Information was researched and obtained by consulting the manufacturers' user manuals, scientific literature, and institutional sites for regulatory aspects.

RESULTS

All nine domains of the EUnetHTA Core Model® helped conduct the HTA of the EOSedge, including (1) description and technical characteristics of the technology; (2) health problem and current clinical practice; (3) safety; (4) clinical effectiveness; (5) organizational aspects; (6) economic evaluation; (7) impact on the patient; (8) ethical aspects; and (9) legal aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

EOS technologies may be a viable alternative to conventional radiographs. EOSedge has the same intended use and similar indications for use, technological characteristics, and operation principles as the EOS System and provides significant dose reduction factors for whole spine imaging compared to the EOS System without compromising image quality. Regarding the impact of EOS imaging on patient outcomes, most studies aim to establish technical ability without evaluating their ability to improve patient outcomes; thus, more studies on this aspect are warranted.

Effectiveness of bracing to achieve curve regression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Aims

To systematically evaluate whether bracing can effectively achieve curve regression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and to identify any predictors of curve regression after bracing.

Methods

Two independent reviewers performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to obtain all published information about the effectiveness of bracing in achieving curve regression in AIS patients. Search terms included "brace treatment" or "bracing," "idiopathic scoliosis," and "curve regression" or "curve reduction." Inclusion criteria were studies recruiting patients with AIS undergoing brace treatment and one of the study outcomes must be curve regression or reduction, defined as > 5° reduction in coronal Cobb angle of a major curve upon bracing completion. Exclusion criteria were studies including non-AIS patients, studies not reporting p-value or confidence interval, animal studies, case reports, case series, and systematic reviews. The GRADE approach to assessing quality of evidence was used to evaluate each publication.

Results

After abstract and full-text screening, 205 out of 216 articles were excluded. The 11 included studies all reported occurrence of curve regression among AIS patients who were braced. Regression rate ranged from 16.7% to 100%. We found evidence that bracing is effective in achieving curve regression among compliant AIS patients eligible for bracing, i.e. curves of 25° to 40°. A similar effect was also found in patients with major curve sizes ranging from 40° to 60° when combined with scoliosis-specific exercises. There was also evidence showing that a low apical vertebral body height ratio, in-brace correction, smaller pre-brace Cobb angle, and daily pattern of brace-wear compliance predict curve regression after bracing.

Conclusion

Bracing provides a corrective effect on scoliotic curves of AIS patients to achieve curve regression, given there is high compliance rate and the incorporation of exercises.

The Whole-Exome Sequencing of a Cohort of 19 Families with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): Candidate Pathways

A significant genetic involvement has been known for decades to exist in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), a spine deformity affecting 1-3% of the world population. However, though biomechanical and endocrinological theories have emerged, no clear pathophysiological explanation has been found. Data from the whole-exome sequencing performed on 113 individuals in 19 multi-generational families with AIS have been filtered and analyzed via interaction pathways and functional category analysis (Varaft, Bingo and Panther). The subsequent list of 2566 variants has been compared to the variants already described in the literature, with an 18% match rate. The familial analysis in two families reveals mutations in the BICD2 gene, supporting the involvement of the muscular system in AIS etiology. The cellular component analysis revealed significant enrichment in myosin-related and neuronal activity-related categories. All together, these results reinforce the suspected role of the neuronal and muscular systems, highlighting the calmodulin pathway and suggesting a role of DNA-binding activities in AIS physiopathology.

Influence of age and severity of Lenke 5 or 6 idiopathic scoliosis on postoperative quality of life in adult patients

INTRODUCTION

Thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis can continue to progress beyond skeletal maturity. Ideal timing of surgery remains undefined. Earlier intervention, with shorter instrumentation, incurs early partial loss of lumbar motion. Waiting for progression incurs a greater risk of extensive arthrodesis. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality-of-life impact of age and scoliosis severity at surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with Lenke 5 or 6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, aged 16-45years, were analyzed based on a prospective clinical registry. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores were collected preoperatively and at 6months, 1year and 2years. Coronal and sagittal alignments were measured on full-spine radiographs, and curve flexibility was assessed on bending radiographs. A mixed linear model was used to assess the impact of age, Cobb angle and flexibility on quality of life.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included. Mean ODI was 20.5% preoperatively and 13.8% at 2years (p=0.017). Mean SRS-22 was 3.2 preoperatively and 3.9 at 2years (p<0.001). Mean Cobb angle was 56.6° preoperatively and 23.2° at 2years (p<0.001), with mean preoperative reducibility of 68.1%. Age and ODI correlated preoperatively (r=0.6; p<0.001) and at 6months (r=0.5; p=0.002), as did age and SRS-22 (r=-0.6; p<0.001 and r=-0.6; p<0.001, respectively). Linear regression found a significant negative correlation between thoracolumbar Cobb angle and change in SRS-22 at 6months.

DISCUSSION

In 16-45 year-olds with Lenke 5 or 6 idiopathic scoliosis, age influenced SRS-22 score. Younger patients had better quality of life both pre- and post-operatively. Curve magnitude influenced postoperative score. The present study suggests that early surgical correction in younger patients, where instrumentation can be shorter, does not impair quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; prospective registry study.

SRS-22r Self-Image After Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis at 10-year Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To examine SRS-Self Image scores at up to 10 years after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Self-image is complex with implications for surgical and patient-reported outcomes after AIS surgery. Surgically modifiable factors that impact self-image are inconsistently reported in the literature with few longer-term reports. We examined the rate and durability of self-image improvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An AIS registry was queried for patients with up to 10 years of follow-up after AIS surgery. A mixed effects model estimated change in SRS-22 Self Image from baseline to 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years. All enrolled patients contributed data to the mixed effects models. A sub-analysis of patients with 1-year and 10-year follow-up evaluated worsening/static/improved SRS-22 Self Image scores examined stability of scores over that timeline. Baseline demographic data and 1-year deformity magnitude data were compared between groups using parametric and nonparametric tests as appropriate.

RESULTS

Data from 4608 patients contributed data to the longitudinal model; 162 had 1-year and 10-year data. Mean SRS-Self Image improvement at 10-year follow-up was 1.0 (95% CI: 0.9-1.1) point. No significant changes in Self-Image domain scores were estimated from 1-year to 10-year (all P >0.05) postoperative. Forty (25%) patients had SRS-Self Image worsening from 1 year to 10 years, 36 (22%) improved, and 86 (53%) were unchanged. Patients who worsened over 10 years had lower SRS-Self Image at baseline than those unchanged at enrollment (3.3 vs. 3.7, P =0.007). Neither radiographic parameters nor SRS-Mental Health were different at baseline for the enrolled patients.

CONCLUSION

Ten years after surgery, 75% of patients reported similar or better SRS-Self Image scores than one year after surgery. Nearly 25% of patients reported worsening self-image at 10 years. Patients who worsened had lower baseline SRS-Self Image scores, without radiographic or mental health differences at baseline or follow-up.