Why not resurface the patella?

Outcomes and Survivorships of Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Resurfaced and Unresurfaced Patellae

BACKGROUND

The decision to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. While there is some consensus that leaving the patella unresurfaced increases risk of reoperation, there is conflicting evidence about patient reported outcomes or indications for resurfacing. This study sought to determine recent rates of patellar resurfacing, examine factors affecting rates of resurfacing, and analyze the associations between patellar resurfacing and both revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

The American Joint Replacement Registry was used to identify primary TKAs performed for osteoarthritis between 2012 and 2021. Cases were classified as resurfaced patella and unresurfaced patella (URP). Outcomes analyzed included trends in patellar resurfacing, factors influencing rate of resurfacing, revision rates, operative time, and 2 PROMs.

RESULTS

Rates of patellar resurfacing decreased and rates of URP increased significantly faster in ambulatory surgery centers and among high volume surgeons. Operative time was significantly lower in URP versus resurfaced patella (88.15 versus 89.90 minutes). The URP were significantly more likely to require revision surgery (odds ratio = 1.206 (1.078, 1.35), P = .0011). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of achieving the minimal clinically important difference in PROMs between resurfaced and nonresurfaced TKAs at 1 year (odds ratio = 1.060 (0.710, 1.581), P = .7755).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in minimal clinically important difference between resurfaced and URPs and no clinically relevant difference in operative time. However, URPs were more likely to require revision surgery. Therefore, the decision not to resurface should be made carefully considering the known risk of revision and the uncertain benefit.

Patellar resurfacing versus retention in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Aims

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the influence of patellar resurfacing following cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the incidence of anterior knee pain, knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and reoperation rates.

Methods

A systematic review of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to search criteria. Search terms used included: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, and patellar retaining. RCTs that compared patellar resurfacing versus unresurfaced in primary TKA were included for further analysis. Studies were evaluated using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network assessment tool for quality and minimization of bias. Data were synthesized and meta-analysis performed.

Results

There were 4,135 TKAs (2,068 resurfaced and 2,027 unresurfaced) identified in 35 separate cohorts from 33 peer-reviewed studies. Anterior knee pain rates were significantly higher in unresurfaced knees overall (odds ratio (OR) 1.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 2.83; p = 0.006) but more specifically associated with CR implants (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.0 to 3.52; p = 0.030). There was a significantly better Knee Society function score (mean difference (MD) -1.98; 95% CI -1.1 to -2.84; p < 0.001) and Oxford Knee Score (MD -2.24; 95% CI -0.07 to -4.41; p = 0.040) for PS implants when patellar resurfacing was performed, but these differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference for these scores. There were no significant differences in complication rates or infection rates according to implant design. There was an overall significantly higher reoperation rate for unresurfaced TKA (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.06); p = 0.030) but there was no difference between PS or CR TKA.

Conclusion

Patellar resurfacing, when performed with CR implants, resulted in lower rates of anterior knee pain and, when used with a PS implant, yielded better knee-specific functional outcomes. Patellar resurfacing was associated with a lower risk of reoperation overall, but implant type did not influence this.

Patellar resurfacing was not associated with a clinically significant advantage when a modern patellar friendly total knee arthroplasty is employed: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) femoral components are designed to provide a more optimal articular surface for the patella whether or not it has been resurfaced. Previous systematic reviews comparing outcomes of patellar resurfacing and no resurfacing combine both historic and modern designs.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of patellar resurfacing in modern "patellar friendly" implants on (1) incidence of anterior knee pain, (2) patient reported outcomes (3) complication rates, and (4) reoperation rates compared with unresurfaced patellae in primary TKA.

METHODS

MEDline, PubMed and google scholar studies were evaluated using SIGN assessment tool and data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.2 on only randomised controlled trials. The search terms were: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, patellar retaining.

RESULTS

Thirty-two randomised controlled studies were identified that reported the type of TKA implant used: 11 used modern "patellar friendly" implants; and 21 older "patellar non-friendly" implants. Among "patellar friendly" TKAs there were no significant differences in anterior knee pain rates between resurfaced and unresurfaced groups. Patellar resurfacing with "patellar friendly" implants had significantly higher clinical (mean difference (MD) -0.77, p = 0.007) and functional (MD -1.87, p < 0.0001) knee society scores (KSS) than unresurfaced counterparts but these did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Resurfacing with "patellar friendly" implants was not associated with a significant (p = 0.59) difference in the Oxford knee score (OKS), in contrast when a "patellar non-friendly" implant was used there was a significant difference (MD 3.3, p = 0.005) in favour of resurfacing. There was an increased risk of reoperation for unresurfaced TKAs with "non-patellar friendly" implants (Odds ratio (OR) 1.68, 95% CI 1.03-2.74, p = 0.04), but not for unresurfaced patellae with "patellar friendly" implants (OR 1.17, CI 0.59-2.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Patellar resurfacing in combination with a modern patellar friendly implant was not associated with a lower rate of anterior knee pain, complications, or reoperations compared to not resurfacing, nor did it give a clinically significant improvement in knee specific function. In contrast patellar resurfacing in combination with a "non-friendly" TKA implant was associated with a significantly better OKS and lower reoperation rate. Implant design should be acknowledged when patellar resurfacing is being considered.

The evolution of patellofemoral prosthetic design in total knee arthroplasty: how far have we come?

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has evolved into a successful, cost-effective treatment for end-stage knee arthrosis.The patellofemoral articulation in TKA has largely been ignored during its development despite being an important determinant of outcome.New technologies still need further development to incorporate the patella in TKA surgical planning and operative technique.Alternative approaches to alignment in TKA will have a secondary impact on patellofemoral mechanics and possibly future implant designs.Technologies that assist with precise implant positioning may alter our understanding and overall practice of TKA. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:503-512. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180094.

Patellar resurfacing versus patellar retention in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses

PURPOSE

The need of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a subject of debate. This systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses aimed to assess and analyze current evidence regarding patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing in TKA.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in March 2017 in PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared TKA with and without patellar resurfacing considering as outcomes re-operations rate, complications, anterior knee pain, functional scores. The quality of meta-analyses was evaluated with AMSTAR score and the most relevant meta-analysis was determined by applying the Jadad algorithm.

RESULTS

Ten meta-analyses, published between 2005 and 2015, were included in the systematic review. Two studies found a significantly increased Knee Society Score in the resurfacing group. According to four meta-analyses, anterior knee pain incidence was lower in resurfacing group. Six of the included studies described a greater risk of re-intervention in the non-resurfacing groups. The overall quality of included studies was moderate. The most relevant meta-analysis reported no differences in functional scores and incidence of anterior knee pain between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparable outcomes were found when comparing patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing in TKA. The higher risk of re-operations after non-resurfacing should be interpreted with caution due to the methodological limitations of the meta-analyses regarding search criteria, heterogeneity and the inherent bias of easier indication to reoperation when the patella is not resurfaced. There is no clear superiority of patellar resurfacing compared to patellar retention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review of meta-analyses.

Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate this technique through an analysis of comparative studies in the current literature.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases using various combinations of the keywords "Knee," "Replacement," "Prosthesis," "Patella," "Resurfacing," and "Arthroplasty." All articles relevant to the subject were retrieved, and their bibliographies were hand searched for further references relevant to primary patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals were included in this systematic review.

RESULTS

The percentage for a reoperation was 1% for the patellar resurfacing group (17/1636) and 6.9% for the non-resurfacing group (118/1699) (odds ratio [OR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.29, P < .00001). The patellar resurfacing group showed a significantly higher postop Knee Society Score (KSS) pain (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.68-2.35, P = .004) and postop Hospital for Special Surgery score (OR 4.35, 95% CI 3.21-5.49, P < .00001), over the non-resurfacing group.

CONCLUSION

Based on the outcome scores of KSS (pain), KSS (function), and Hospital for Special Surgery postop, patellar resurfacing TKAs have performed better than non-resurfaced TKAs. The lower secondary operation and revision rates for patellar resurfaced TKAs also demonstrate that this technique is the more effective option. However, the full impact of patellar resurfacing still needs to be critically evaluated by larger randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up.

Stress distribution of the patellofemoral joint in the anatomic V-shape and curved dome-shape femoral component: a comparison of resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae

PURPOSE

Whether to resurface the patella in knee replacement remains a controversial issue. The geometrical design of the trochlear groove in the femoral component could play an important role in determining the stress distribution on the patellofemoral joint, but this has not been sufficiently reported on. This study attempted to determine the effect of implant design on contact mechanics by means of a finite element method.

METHODS

Two designs, an anatomical V-shape design (VSD) and a dome-shape design (DSD), for the anterior trochlear surface in a contemporary femoral component were chosen for examining the contact characteristics. The use and absence of patella resurfacing was simulated. The stress and strain distribution on the patellar bone and the polyethylene component were calculated for comparison.

RESULTS

Without patellar resurfacing, the maximal compressive strain in the patellar bone in the VSD model was about 20 % lower than the DSD model. On the other hand, with resurfacing, the maximal strain for the VSD model was 13.3 % greater than for DSD. Uneven stress distribution at the bone-implant interface was also noted for the two designs.

CONCLUSION

The femoral component with a V-shape trochlear groove reduced the compressive strain on the unresurfaced patella. If resurfacing the patella, the femoral component with a curved domed-shape design might reduce the strain in the remaining patellar bone. Uneven stress could occur at the bone-implant interface, so design modifications for improving fixation strength and medialization of the patellar button would be helpful in reducing the risk of peg fracture or loosening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Residual knee pain and functional outcome following total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritic patients

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful and safe elective operation in managing patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee. However, the presence of residual knee pain (RKP) post-TKA can adversely affect patient satisfaction and functional outcome. Hence, the aim of this paper is to identify the incidence, progression of knee pain, functional outcome post-TKA and possible predictive factors for the development of RKP post-TKA.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 357 patients was conducted with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Predictive factors reviewed include the patients' demographics, co-morbidities, type of implants and patellar management. For functional outcome, the patient's Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis scores were analysed. To determine presence and severity of RKP, the sub-score for pain in the KSS was utilised.

RESULTS

In total, 31.1 and 28.9% of the patients were found to have RKP at 1 and 2 years, respectively, though their functional outcome scores continued improving from 1 year. Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) patients were more likely to have RKP and poorer functional outcome at 1 year. Males and patients with posterior-stabilised implants were found to have better functional outcome at 1 and 2 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost a third of the patients continued to have RKP at 2 years post-TKA, with factors such as gender, presence of IHD and implant type significantly associated with the development of RKP and/or poorer functional outcome scores. By recognising the incidence and predictive factors for RKP, physicians will be able to better manage their patients' expectations and optimise their pre-morbid status pre-operatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Early PROMs following total knee arthroplasty--functional outcome dependent on patella resurfacing

Patella resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Variation in published results for patella resurfacing may potentially be explained by differences in design between TKA brands. We interrogated NJR-PROMs data to ascertain whether there is an early functional benefit to resurfacing the patella, both overall and for each of the five most popular primary knee designs through use of the Oxford Knee Score. A total of 8103 resurfaced TKAs and 15,290 nonresurfaced TKAs were studied. There was a large variation in the proportion of knees undergoing patella resurfacing by brand (Nexgen=16% versus Triathlon=52%). Patellar resurfacing did not significantly influence the magnitude of improvement in overall knee function or anterior knee-specific function irrespective of TKA brand or for cruciate retaining versus sacrificing designs.

The controversy of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Ibisne in medio tutissimus?

Early arthroplasty designs were associated with a high level of anterior knee pain as they failed to cater for the patello-femoral joint. Patellar resurfacing was heralded as the saviour safeguarding patient satisfaction and success but opinion on its necessity has since deeply divided the scientific community and has become synonymous to topics of religion or politics. Opponents of resurfacing contend that the native patella provides better patellar tracking, improved clinical function, and avoids implant-related complications, whilst proponents argue that patients have less pain, are overall more satisfied, and avert the need for secondary resurfacing. The question remains whether complications associated with patellar resurfacing including those arising from future component revision outweigh the somewhat increased incidence of anterior knee pain recorded in unresurfaced patients. The current scientific literature, which is often affected by methodological limitations and observer bias, remains confusing as it provides evidence in support of both sides of the argument, whilst blinded satisfaction studies comparing resurfaced and non-resurfaced knees generally reveal equivalent results. Even national arthroplasty register data show wide variations in the proportion of patellar resurfacing between countries that cannot be explained by cultural differences alone. Advocates who always resurface or never resurface indiscriminately expose the patella to a random choice. Selective resurfacing offers a compromise by providing a decision algorithm based on a propensity for improved clinical success, whilst avoiding potential complications associated with unnecessary resurfacing. Evidence regarding the validity of selection criteria, however, is missing, and the decision when to resurface is often based on intuitive reasoning. Our lack of understanding why, irrespective of pre-operative symptoms and patellar resurfacing, some patients may suffer pain following TKA and others may not have so far stifled our efforts to make the strategy of selective resurfacing succeed. We should hence devote our efforts in defining predictive criteria and indicators that will enable us to reliably identify those individuals who might benefit from a resurfacing procedure. Level of evidence V.

Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Controversies existing over resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty remain in the literature. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE for published randomised clinical trials relevant to patellar resurfacing. The relative risk of reoperation was significantly lower for the patellar resurfacing group than for the nonresurfacing group (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.84, P =0.004). The overall incidence of postoperative anterior knee pain of the 1,421 knees included was 12.9% in the patellar resurfacing group and 24.1% in the nonresurfacing group. The existing evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing can reduce the risk of reoperation with no improvement in postoperative knee function or patient satisfaction over total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Whether it can decrease the incidence of anterior knee pain remains uncertain.

The outerbridge classification predicts the need for patellar resurfacing in TKA

Patellar resurfacing (PR) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. The Outerbridge classification of cartilage defects in the patella is commonly used in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine if the Outerbridge classification can predict the need for PR as part of total knee arthroplasty. Between 1995 and 2000, we performed a prospective, randomized study of 500 TKAs. We carried out PR depending on the Outerbridge classification of the patella at the time of surgery. Patients with Outerbridge Grades I, II, and III formed Group A, whereas patients with Grade IV formed Group B. Within each group, resurfacing was completed on half of the patients. Group A had 328 patients (164 with PR, 164 without PR). In Group B, there were 172 patients (86 with PR, 86 without PR). An identical prosthetic design was used for both groups. The minimum followup was 5 years (average, 7.8 years) for both Group A and Group B. At the end of followup, we assessed the number of patients in each group that required secondary resurfacing as a result of patellofemoral pain. Patients in Group A required fewer revisions for PF pain. In Group A, only one patient required a secondary PR (0.6% rate), whereas in Group B, 10 patients needed PR (11.6% rate). In Group B, the risk of need of a patellar resurfacing was 21.5 times greater than in Group A. On the basis of these findings, we recommend PR in Outerbridge Grade IV patellae, but not in Grades I, II, and III.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a critical appraisal of the available evidence

A systematic literature search for evidences comparing treatment effect and harm of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty was conducted and yielded five meta-analysis (MA), one systematic review (SR) and six randomized controlled trials not included in previous MAs/SR. The evidence suggests that patellar resurfacing would reduce the risk of anterior knee pain, as well as the risk of patella-related reoperation. Furthermore, patients not undergoing patella resurfacing would experience more knee pain during stair climbing and be less satisfied with surgery. No significant difference in range of motion can be expected with or without patellar resurfacing. Importantly, methodological limitations were observed in all retrieved studies and evidences about potential adverse events related to patellar resurfacing are presently undetermined.

Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

One hundred and eleven total knee replacements without patellar resurfacing were followed-up for a minimum of 48.8 months (range 48.8-108.2 months; average 78.2 months). Evaluation was performed using the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KS-CRS). Preoperatively, the mean knee score was 34.3 points and the mean function score was 42.2 points. Postoperatively, this knee score improved to a mean of 91.1 points and the function score improved to mean of 89.6 points at the most recent follow-up. There were no significant differences among the knees with mild, moderate, or severe degenerative change to the patella with regard to the preoperative (p=0.83) and postoperative (p=0.39) knee pain score. It seems likely that the postoperative knee pain is not related to the severity of degenerative change to the patella in total knee arthroplasties performed without patellar resurfacing, and none of those patients required patellar resurfacing to achieve knee pain relief.

A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty

From individual randomized studies it is unclear whether the patella should be replaced during total knee replacement. We did a meta-analysis to provide quantitative data to compare patellar resurfacing with nonresurfacing during total knee arthroplasty. Only randomized, controlled trials reported between January 1966 and August 2003 comparing patellar replacement with patella retention were included for a total of 12 studies. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data from papers. The outcomes identified were reoperations for patellar problems, anterior knee pain, knee scores, stair climbing, and patient satisfaction. The resurfaced patella performed better, and we found an increased relative risk (defined by the ratio of the risk of the event in the resurfaced group on the risk of the event in the nonresurfaced group) for reoperation, for significant anterior knee pain, and for significant pain during stair climbing when the patella was left unresurfaced. No differences were observed between the two groups for International Knee Society function score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, and for patient satisfaction. Despite these general findings, forming a definitive conclusion is difficult because many confounding factors, such as component design, surgeon experience, and technical aspects of the surgery, might influence the result in a patient.

Effect of femoral component design on unresurfaced patellas in knee arthroplasty

Three total knee designs were evaluated to test the hypothesis that femoral component design affects the clinical and mechanical functions of the unresurfaced patella after total knee arthroplasty. Patients with the Ortholoc II, Advantim, and Profix femoral components were followed up for as many as 14 years and revision rate, anterior knee pain, and generalized knee pain were compared. A laboratory protocol was devised to evaluate pressure in the patellofemoral joint of knees from cadavers with a pressure-sensitive transducer using the same three designs at various degrees of knee flexion. Thirty Ortholoc II knee components were followed up for 14 years. Nineteen patients (63%) had severe anterior knee pain and 15 patients (50%) had reoperation to resurface the patella within 2 years. Two hundred one patients (222 knees) with Advantim components were followed up for 10 years and 305 patients (330 knees) with Profix components were followed up for 5 years. No patients with these two knee designs had severe anterior knee pain or reoperation for patellar resurfacing. A significantly higher rate of mild anterior knee pain was seen in the patients with Advantim components than in the patients with Profix components. No apparent relationship was seen between the severity of patellar wear found at the time of surgery and the incidence of anterior knee pain. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving either the Advantim or Profix knee component performed as well as patients with osteoarthritis when the patella was not resurfaced. Pressure was significantly higher in the patellofemoral joints of the laboratory knee specimens with Ortholoc II components than in the specimens with either the Advantim or Profix components. The specimens with Advantim components had significantly higher pressure than did the specimens with normal knees, and the specimens with Profix components differed little from those with normal knees.

Long-term clinical results and radiographic changes in the nonresurfaced patella after total knee arthroplasty: 78 knees followed for mean 12 years

We evaluated total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing retrospectively in 50 patients (78 knees; 4 men (7 knees) and 46 women (71 knees) having a mean age of 63 (34-78) years and mean weight of 52 (32-72) kg). The preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthrosis in 26 patients (43 knees) and rheumatoid arthritis in 24 (35 knees). The mean follow-up was 12 (9-14) years. Only 3 patients (4 knees) had patellar pain and they all showed patellar subluxation. The latter was found in 13 other knees, all pain-free. We detected no differences between the knees with osteoarthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis concerning the incidence of patellar pain and patellar subluxation. No patient needed revision surgery for patellar problems. We question the need to resurface the patella routinely in total knee arthroplasty if it is congruous and well-aligned.

Computer-assisted decision analysis in orthopedics: resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty as an example

The purpose of the present study was to illustrate the use of computer-assisted decision analysis in making decisions in the field of orthopaedic surgery, using the choice between resurfacing and not resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty as an example. We used a decision analysis technique based on probability theory and on Bayesian logic, with the help of an especially developed computer software. The process involves building a decision tree, searching for probabilities and utilities in the literature, folding back the tree to compute the baseline result, and running sensitivity analyses. Our literature search provided 26 useful articles, only 3 of which were randomized controlled trials. In the baseline analysis, both options were rated similarly, with resurfacing the patella faring slightly better. Sensitivity analyses revealed that not resurfacing becomes the procedure of choice if the probability of postoperative anterior knee pain with an unresurfaced patella falls below 14%, or if the probability of having pain with a resurfaced patella rises above 8% or if the utility of patellar implant failure falls below 80% of the utility of a perfect health state. Computer-assisted decision analysis is a promising, evidence-based tool to assist clinical decision making in orthopaedic surgery. However, its validity is limited by the poor quality of data found in the orthopaedic literature, especially the scarcity of randomized controlled trials.

Contact stresses with an unresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty: the effect of femoral component design

Compressive contact stresses between the patella and the anterior femur were measured with a digital electronic sensor before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in 10 cadaver knee specimens. Contact stresses were measured first in normal knees, then after TKA with the Insall-Burstein Total Condylar, Miller Galante II, Ortholoc II, Porous Coated Anatomic, and Profix knee prostheses implanted without resurfacing the patella. The Insall-Burstein, Miller-Galante II, and Ortholoc II prostheses had significantly higher contact stresses than the normal knee throughout the flexion arc. The Porous Coated Anatomic, which has a smooth patellar groove, maintained contact area as in the normal knee and did not have significantly higher contact stresses at flexion angles <90 degrees. At flexion angles > or =105 degrees, patellofemoral contact occurred in two small areas as the patella encountered the intercondylar notch in all components except the Profix. The Profix maintained full contact and low compressive stresses throughout the full flexion arc because of its posteriorly extended patellar groove. Design features of the patellofemoral portion of TKA components are important factors that affect contact stresses in the patellofemoral joint. These features likely will affect the clinical results of TKA with an unresurfaced patella.

Advantages of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Two-year results of a prospective randomized study

Complications of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty have rekindled the interest of many surgeons in patellar retention. In a prospective study 20 randomly selected patients of 40 underwent patellar resurfacing in combination with their total knee arthroplasty. The other 20 patients were left with an unresurfaced patella. Within 24 months of follow-up, the advantages of patellar resurfacing could be seen according to the Knee Society Score. Especially in advanced osteoarthritis of the knee joint, the patients achieved better scores in climbing stairs and in function. The superior functional results are arguments for patellar resurfacing, at least in knees with advanced osteoarthritis.

Patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty. Effect on contact area and contact stress

Compressive contact stress between the patella and the anterior femur and between the quadriceps tendon and anterior femur was measured before and after total knee arthroplasty in 5 cadaver knee specimens using a digital electronic sensor. Contact stresses were measured in the normal knee and after total knee arthroplasty with an unresurfaced patella, a dome-shaped patella, and a conforming patella. Patellofemoral contact stresses did not change significantly after total knee arthroplasty when the patella was not resurfaced, but they increased significantly after the patella was resurfaced with both the dome-shaped and the conforming components. The conforming patella had the highest contact stresses because it tilted at flexion angles greater than 90 degrees and applied load to a small area on the superior portion of the patellar component. The conforming patella markedly decreased tendofemoral contact force because the thicker superior pole of the patella tented the quadriceps tendon at flexion angles greater than 120 degrees. This further increased patellofemoral contact force in deep knee flexion.

Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Correlation with implant design and patient risk factors

Results of 211 total knee arthroplasty operations were retrospectively evaluated to identify patients with knees at greatest risk for the development of patellofemoral complications and to determine the incidence and type of patellofemoral complications associated with different patellar implants. Patellofemoral complications occurred in 27 knees (12.8%). Osteoarthritis and obesity were associated with an increased incidence of patellofemoral problems. Significantly higher rates of patellofemoral complications were noted with metal-backed patellar implants and with patellar components implanted without cement. The loosening rate with cementless fixation was 13.5%. The lowest rate of patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty was obtained with all-polyethylene domed patellar components implanted with cement.

Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella

The long-term complications related to the patella were retrospectively evaluated for 891 knees (684 patients) that had had a total arthroplasty, with or without resurfacing of the patella, with use of an unconstrained, condylar, posterior-cruciate-preserving prosthesis. The study population comprised two groups of patients who were similar in size, age, sex distribution, and diagnosis. One group (396 knees [303 patients]) had had a total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing and the other group (495 knees [381 patients]) had had the same procedure without resurfacing. The average duration of follow-up was six and one-half years (range, two to fifteen years). The decision to resurface the patella was based on subjective inspection of the articular surface and on assessment of patellar tracking at the time of the operation. Resurfacing was performed if there was loss of cartilage, exposed bone, gross surface irregularities, or tracking abnormalities. Complications occurred an average of three years (range, immediately postoperatively to nine years) after the operation in the group that had had resurfacing and an average of four years (range, immediately post-operatively to ten years) postoperatively in the group that had not had resurfacing. In the group that had had resurfacing, there was loosening of the patellar component in five knees, patellar subluxation in four knees, fracture of the patella in three knees, rupture of the patellar tendon in three knees, and chronic peripatellar pain in one knee. In the group that had not had resurfacing, the complications included patellar subluxation in five knees, rupture of the patellar tendon in two knees, and chronic peripatellar pain in fifty-one knees.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Accurate preparation of the patella during total knee arthroplasty

The development of a resection guide that facilitates accurate preparation of the patella during total knee arthroplasty is reported. Use of the guide prevents tilting of the prosthesis, as well as over or underresection of the patella.

Patellar resurfacing in total condylar knee arthroplasty. Technique and results

One hundred thirty-two total condylar knee arthroplasties with a 3-8-year follow-up period were studied prospectively with particular reference to the patellofemoral joint. All patients had significant patellofemoral disease and underwent primary patellar resurfacing. After operation 96% of patients had little or no pain and 98% had functional improvement. There were seven (5%) complications related to the patellofemoral joint. The importance of careful attention to preparation of the patella, the technique of prosthetic implantation and correct patellar tracking were emphasized. Routine patellar resurfacing proved highly successful with minimal complications.

Nonresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty

Problems attributable to the patellofemoral joint are still the major cause of disability in contemporary knee arthroplasty. Patellar resurfacing does lead to further complications, such as loosening, wear, and malalignment. Two studies have been performed specifically to review experience with the nonresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty. The first study determined that patellofemoral symptoms occurred in 8% of the total group and the majority of these were due to patellar malalignment. The postoperative skyline views at 60 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion obtained routinely identified dynamic patellar maltracking responsible for anterior knee pain. The second study addressed long-term durability of the nonresurfaced patella. The tracking of the patella was maintained with only small shifts of patella position and the tendency to stabilize with time. Stress-induced bone remodelling, particularly of the lateral facet, occurred in 85% of patellae. No preoperative or postoperative radiologic variable was associated with anterior knee pain. The authors strongly recommend that accurate patellofemoral tracking be obtained at the time of knee arthroplasty by staged procedures, with removal of peripheral osteophytes, then proximal iliotibial tract release followed by lateral debulking to a marked degree to obtain neutral tracking. Only then will intracapsular lateral release be performed. The results presented support the use of the nonresurfaced patella, and patellar malalignment remains a major source of disability attributable to the patellofemoral joint following total knee arthroplasty.

The patellofemoral joint in total knee prostheses. Design considerations

Some desirable design features of the patellofemoral joint in a total knee arthroplasty condylar prosthesis are proposed. These are that the femoral element should be grooved, have a high anterior flange, and be circular as viewed from the side. The groove should be about 5 mm deep and have relatively vertical walls. The patellar component should have a saddle-shaped articular surface matching the femur and should be countersunk into the patella. The components should be placed so as to position the joint automatically. Results with such a design are reported; loosening, wear, dislocation, and fracture have been rare. Osteolysis of the patella has not been seen after 9 years, so that the cementless press-fit fixation of an H.D.P. patellar prosthesis to date seems safe and efficacious.

Patellar fractures in total knee arthroplasty

The incidence of patellar fractures following total knee arthroplasty varies from 3% to 21%. This problem has been attributed to avascular necrosis of the patella secondary to the surgical approach, including medial arthrotomy and lateral release, patellar bone resection, thermal necrosis, and anatomic variation. Management of these patellar fractures may be conservative or surgical.

A 5-9-year follow-up study of the Sheehan total knee arthroplasty

Of 83 Sheehan total knee arthroplasties evaluated 5-9 years after surgery, 14 had been revised for mechanical failure and 9 for late sepsis, leaving 60 cases for clinical and radiologic evaluation. Fifty-seven percent of the patients achieved satisfactory pain relief, but only 15% were satisfied with their knees. There was loss of alignment in 48% of cases. Most patients exhibited some degree of varus/valgus instability. These complications are attributed to polyethylene wear, a major problem in this series. Sixty percent of the patients had anterior knee pain and 48% had radiologic evidence of patellar dysfunction. The overall poor results and the high rate of revision have persuaded the authors to abandon this procedure.

Patellofemoral functional results and complications with the posterior stabilized total condylar knee prosthesis

The authors reviewed 73 knee arthoplasties performed with the Posterior Stabilized Total Condylar prosthesis, with an average follow-up period of 5.5 years. The function of the patellofemoral articulation was specifically analyzed. Patients with documented or suspected tibiofemoral problems were excluded. Using the Hospital for Special Surgery knee rating system, 48 knees (66%) had excellent, 20 had good (27%), and 5 (7%) had fair results. Patients with unilateral disease were able to negotiate stairs and transfer normally in 64% and 100% of the cases, respectively. The most frequent patellofemoral problem was impingement (21%), but reoperation was needed in only one patient. Stress fracture of the patella and subluxation were rare. A medial tilt of the patella on the axial view had no apparent ill effect. The patella was lowered 12 mm on average as a consequence of the standard bone resection sequence and insertion of the tibial component. The patella was significantly lower in patients with impingement than in normal joints. Routine complete patellofemoral resurfacing is advised in total knee joint arthroplasty. Complications are infrequent with appropriate prosthetic design and due technical care.

The effect of total knee design on patellar strain

Total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing produces an increase in anterior patellar strain up to three times that observed in controls. This increase is independent of surgical capsulotomy and is prominent at flexion angles greater than 30 degrees. Minor alterations in surgical technique do not affect the observed strain. Peak strains were seen at the extremes of flexion in all prostheses. The highest strains were recorded for the Total Condylar prosthesis throughout the range of motion. Although the difference was not statistically significant, the Insall-Burstein knee consistently produced higher strains than did the Robert Brigham knee throughout the functional range of motion (30-90 degrees). For the Robert Brigham knee, sectioning of the posterior cruciate ligament resulted in no significant change in the measured strains.