Results of open arthrolysis for the treatment of stiffness after total knee replacement

Knee Arthroscopy Prior to Revision TKA Is Associated with Increased Re-Revision for Stiffness

This is an experimental study. As knee arthroscopy may be used as a suitable temporizing alternative prior to revision surgery, knee arthroscopy potentially may be a risk factor for subsequent adverse outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of prior knee arthroscopy on outcomes of subsequent TKA revision surgery. We identified 1,689 consecutive patients who underwent revision TKA: (1) patients with no prior knee arthroscopy (n = 1,549) and (2) patients with knee arthroscopy prior to revision TKA (n = 140). A control group of matched revision TKA patients who did not undergo prior knee arthroscopy was identified (700 patients), using one-to-five matching. Matched patients with prior knee arthroscopy demonstrated an increased likelihood of requiring re-revision (odds ratio [OR], 2.06, p < 0.001), particularly for stiffness (OR, 2.72, p < 0.02) compared with patients who underwent revision TKA without prior knee arthroscopy. Knee arthroscopy demonstrated a time-dependent impact on revision TKA outcomes, with an increased likelihood of requiring re-revision for patients who underwent knee arthroscopy within 6 months prior to revision TKA compared with patients who underwent knee arthroscopy within 6 to 12 months prior to revision TKA (OR, 3.16, p < 0.04). This cohort matched study shows that patients who had prior knee arthroscopy demonstrated a significantly higher likelihood of requiring re-revision compared with patients who underwent revision TKA without prior knee arthroscopy. Additionally, there was a significant increased likelihood in requiring re-revision for patients who had prior knee arthroscopy within 6 months. This provides clinically useful information for counseling of patients who are considering temporizing their symptoms with knee arthroscopy prior to revision TKA.

Can adjunctive perioperative radiation improve range of motion after total knee revision for arthrofibrosis?

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty revision (TKRev) can be performed to treat chronic arthrofibrosis. Low-dose irradiation may decrease fibro-osseous proliferation of soft tissue; therefore, it may be effective at increasing range of motion (ROM) after TKRev. Our hypothesis is that low-dose radiation administered in the immediate postoperative period leads to increased ROM after TKRev for arthrofibrosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted from 2008-2015 on 26 patients who underwent TKRev for treating chronic arthrofibrosis. Fifteen patients (XRT group) received 800 cGy radiation within 48 hours after TKRev and 11 patients (CTL group) did not. Measurements of extension, flexion, and total arc of ROM were performed preoperatively and at one, six, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

ROM improved from 14.3° extension, 69.0° flexion, and 54.7° total ROM preoperatively, to 3.3° extension, 94.0° flexion, and 90.7° total ROM postoperatively in the XRT group. ROM improved from 18.6° extension, 85.9° flexion, and 67.3° total ROM preoperatively to 4.1° extension, 102.5° flexion, and 98.5° total ROM postoperatively in the CTL group. The 1-year overall improvement in extension (12.5°), flexion (21.4°), and total ROM (33.9°) vs preoperative ROM was significant for all measurements (p < 0.001). The 8.4° improvement in flexion (25.0° vs 16.6°, p = 0.10) in the XRT group vs the CTL group approached, but did not reach significance.

CONCLUSIONS

TKRev for arthrofibrosis showed significant improvement in extension, flexion, and total ROM at one year. The use of low dose irradiation showed promise with improved flexion, but the result did not reach statistical significance in this small sample of patients.

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF THE KNEE JOINT CONTRACTURES AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHOPLASTY

Background: The development of contractures after total knee replacement is most often associated with arthrofibrosis and makes up 1.3% - 5.7% of the total number of cases of joint replacement. Conservative treatment is ineffective. Arthrolysis is pathogenetically substantiated (arthroscopic or open). Aims: assessment of the effectiveness of arthrolysis as a method of treating knee joint contractures after arthroplasty, comparison of the results of arthroscopic and open arthrolysis, analysis of complications. Materials and methods: Compare two groups. In group 1, 57 patients underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis. In group 2, 54 patients underwent open arthrolysis. The operations were performed from 2015 to 2019, the observation period ranged from one year to three years. As criteria for the result of treatment, KSS data were used (general and functional assessment of the knee joint), as well as separately the amplitude of movements in the joint before surgery and at different times after it. Results: One of the results of this work was the optimization of arthroscopic arthrolysis technique. Improved surgical access and joint revision sequence. According to the KSS scale and range of motion, the best results were obtained in group 1. Especially important is the lesser number of complications in comparison with the 2nd group requiring repeated interventions, including revision arthroplasty. In the 1st group of such cases there were 3 (5.3%), in the 2nd group - 7 (13.0%). Conclusions: Arthroscopic arthrolysis is a less traumatic and more effective treatment for arthritis of the knee. It seems appropriate to gradually displace open arthrolysis by arthroscopic.

[Open arthrolysis for stiff knee after primary total knee arthroplasty]

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of open arthrolysis in treatment of the patient with stiff knee in late stage after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Between January 2014 and October 2017, 7 female patients (7 knees) with stiff knee in late stage after primary TKA were admitted. The patients were 57-71 years old (mean, 63 years). There were 2 left knees and 5 right knees. All patients underwent TKA because of knee osteoarthritis. The interval between TKA and open arthrolysis was 8-30 months (mean, 13.6 months). There were 4 patients with 10-20° of extension deficit before arthrolysis. The range of motion of knee was (54.3±12.1)°. The clinical score, functional score, and total score of Knee Society Score (KSS) before arthrolysis were 76.3±7.6, 67.9±11.1, and 144.1±16.1, respectively. During the arthrolysis, periarticular soft tissue scar was removed, the range of motion of knee was restored, the gap balance and well patellar tracking were maintained. Intensive rehabilitation after operation was supplemented.

Results

All wounds healed by first intention, without early stage complications. All patients were followed up 12-32 months with an average of 20.1 months. No abnormality of prosthesis was found by post-operative X-ray films. The knee movement improved significantly when compared with that before arthrolysis. The range of motion was less than 90° in 1 patient and 10° of extension deficit remained in 1 patient after operation. The range of motion was (92.9±4.9)° at last follow-up. The clinical score, functional score, and total score of KSS were 81.9±5.1, 74.3±9.8, and 156.1±13.7, respectively at last follow-up. The above indexes were superior to those before operation ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

Open arthrolysis combined with intensive rehabilitation is a significant way to improve knee function for the patient with stiff knee in late stage after primary TKA.

Low-grade infections as a possible cause of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty represents a considerable burden for the patient and a therapeutic challenge for the practitioner. One possible cause discussed in the literature is a low-grade infection. This hypothesis should be examined within the scope of this retrospective study.

Patients and methods

Nineteen patients with clinical symptoms of arthrofibrosis after primary total knee arthroplasty were examined between January, 1999 and January, 2012. Incorrect positioning was radiologically ruled out. All patients were examined clinically (score of Freeman as well as Blauth and Jäger), radiologically (component and leg alignment, patella height according to Insall and Salvati), microbiologically (culture-based procedures), molecular biologically (PCR) and histologically in the course of an open revision of the prosthesis.

Results

According to the score of Freeman et al. (1977), a highly significant improvement in pain (p = 0.007) and in the overall score (p = 0.003) was shown. The knee joint mobility did not change significantly (p = 0.795). PCR was negative in 17 patients. One patient showed a PCR-positive result of the synovial membrane for Corynebacterium spp., while Staphylococcus warneri was detected in the culture. Another patient had a positive result of synovia PCR for Enterococcus cecorum as well as Corynebacterium spp. However, this culture was sterile. In 16 patient samples, no bacterial growth was detectable. Two samples were not evaluable. The main histopathological findings were synovialitis and fibrosis.

Conclusion

The hypothesis of low-grade-infection-induced arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty could not be confirmed in this study. However, based on this small study population the conclusion needs to be confirmed by new and larger studies, ideally prospectively designed including a control group.

Treatment of post-traumatic joint contracture in a rabbit model using pulsed, high intensity laser and ultrasound

Post-traumatic joint contracture induced by scar tissues following a surgery or injury can leave patients in a permanent state of pain and disability, which is difficult to resolve by current treatments. This randomized controlled trial examines the therapeutic effect of pulsed high-intensity laser (PHIL) and pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound (PHIFU) for post-traumatic joint contracture due to arthrofibrosis. The peak power levels of both PHIL and PHIFU are much higher than that of laser or ultrasound currently used in physical therapy, while short pulses are utilized to prevent damage. To test the effectiveness of these treatments, a rabbit knee model for joint contracture was established. Twenty-one rabbits were split into four groups: untreated control (n  =  5), PHIL (n  =  5), PHIFU (n  =  5), and a PHIL  +  PHIFU group (n  =  6). Maximum extension of the surgically modified rabbit knee was compared to that of the contralateral control knee over the course of 16 weeks. The rabbits in the untreated control group maintained a relatively consistent level of joint contracture, while every rabbit in each of the treatment groups had improved range of motion, eventually leading to a restoration of normal joint extension. Average recovery time was 7.6  ±  1.5 weeks for the PHIL treatment group, 9.8  ±  3.7 weeks for the PHIFU group, and 8.0  ±  2.2 weeks for the combined treatment group. Histopathology demonstrated reduced density and accelerated resorption of scar tissues in the treated knee joints. This study provides evidence that both PHIL and PHIFU are effective in treating post-traumatic joint contracture in rabbits and warrant further investigation into the underlying mechanisms to optimize PHIL and PHIFU based treatments in a larger number of animals.

Novel rabbit model of moderate knee contracture induced by direct capsular damage

The treatment of joint contracture continues to represent a challenging problem in orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation medicine. Existing animal models of knee contracture for evaluating new treatments are mostly created by extensive joint tissue damage with Kirschner-wire immobilization which requires a second surgery to remove Kirschner-wires. This study aimed to develop a less invasive rabbit model of moderate knee contracture through a single surgery. Skeletally mature New Zealand White rabbits had their right knee operated to create surgical damage to the posterior capsule under direct visualization. Operated knees were then held in a flexed position by suturing the superficial flexion muscles with absorbable sutures. The flexion contracture (net extension loss) was determined by comparing the extension angles between the operated and non-operated knees from 8 to 24 weeks post-surgery. The flexion contracture of the operated knees was significantly greater (p < 0.01/0.001) than the non-operated knees at each weekly measurement. The mean flexion contractures were 22° at 8 weeks, 19° at 16 weeks, and 18° at 24 weeks. No significant differences in the severity of flexion contracture were observed between 8-week and each of the following weeks, suggesting that the flexion contracture was essentially stabilized by 8 weeks post-surgery. Histopathologic analyses demonstrated intra-articular and peri-articular scar formation. This less invasive rabbit model of moderate knee contracture is more quickly established through a single surgery with lower risk of surgical complications compared to the previously reported invasive models, and could be an alternative animal model for joint contracture research. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:2687-2695, 2018.

Arthrofibrosis Associated With Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis is a debilitating postoperative complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is one of the leading causes of hospital readmission and a predominant reason for TKA failure. The prevalence of arthrofibrosis will increase as the annual incidence of TKA in the United States rises into the millions.

METHODS

In a narrative review of the literature, the etiology, economic burden, treatment strategies, and future research directions of arthrofibrosis after TKA are examined.

RESULTS

Characterized by excessive proliferation of scar tissue during an impaired wound healing response, arthrofibrotic stiffness causes functional deficits in activities of daily living. Postoperative, supervised physiotherapy remains the first line of defense against the development of arthrofibrosis. Also, adjuncts to traditional physiotherapy such as splinting and augmented soft tissue mobilization can be beneficial. The effectiveness of rehabilitation on functional outcomes depends on the appropriate timing, intensity, and progression of the program, accounting for the patient's ability and level of pain. Invasive treatments such as manipulation under anesthesia, debridement, and revision arthroplasty improve range of motion, but can be traumatic and costly. Future studies investigating novel treatments, early diagnosis, and potential preoperative screening for risk of arthrofibrosis will help target those patients who will need additional attention and tailored rehabilitation to improve TKA outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Arthrofibrosis is a multi-faceted complication of TKA, and is difficult to treat without an early, tailored, comprehensive rehabilitation program. Understanding the risk factors for its development and the benefits and shortcomings of various interventions are essential to best restore mobility and function.

Revision surgery for the stiff total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

The aim of this study was to examine the results of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) undertaken for stiffness in the absence of sepsis or loosening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present the results of revision surgery for stiff TKA in 48 cases (35 (72.9%) women and 13 (27.1%) men). The mean age at revision surgery was 65.5 years (42 to 83). All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Stiffness was defined as an arc of flexion of < 70° or a flexion contracture of > 15°. The changes in the range of movement (ROM) and the Western Ontario and McMasters Osteoarthritis index scores (WOMAC) were recorded.

RESULTS

At a mean follow up of 59.9 months (12 to 272) there was a mean improvement in arc of movement of 45.0°. Mean flexion improved from 54.4° (5° to 100°) to 90° (10° to 125°) (p < 0.05) and the mean flexion contracture decreased from 12.0° (0° to 45°) to 3.5° (0° to 25°) (p < 0.05). The mean WOMAC scores improved for pain, stiffness and function. In patients with extreme stiffness we describe a novel technique, which we have called the 'sloppy' revision. This entails downsizing the polyethylene insert by 4 mm and using a more constrained liner to retain stability.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest series of revision surgeries for stiffness reported in the literature where infection and loosening have been excluded.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Whilst revision surgery is technically demanding, improvements in ROM and outcome can be achieved, particularly when the revision is within two years of the primary surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:622-7.

Manipulation under Anesthesia for Stiffness after Total Knee Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the incidence of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the degree of joint motion recovery after MUA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 4,449 TKAs (2,973 patients) were performed between March 2000 and August 2014. Cases that underwent MUA for stiffness after TKA were reviewed. TKAs were performed using the conventional procedure in 329 cases and using the minimally invasive procedure in 4,120 cases. The preoperative range of joint motion, timing of manipulation, diagnosis and the range of joint motion before and after MUA were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS

MUA was carried out in 22 cases (16 patients), resulting in the incidence of 0.5%. The incidence after the conventional procedure was 1.2% and 0.4% after the minimally invasive procedure. In the manipulated knees, the preoperative range of motion (ROM) was 102.5°±26.7°, and the preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 19 cases, rheumatoid arthritis in two, and infection sequela in one. MUA was performed 4.7±3.0 weeks after TKA. The average ROM was 64.5°±13.5° before manipulation. At an average of 64.3±41.3 months after manipulation, the ROM was recovered to 113.4°±31.2°, which was an additional 49.9° improvement in flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

The satisfactory recovery of joint movement was achieved when MUA for stiffness was performed relatively early after TKA.

The problem total knee replacement: systematic, comprehensive and efficient evaluation

There are many reasons why a total knee replacement (TKR) may fail and qualify for revision. Successful revision surgery depends as much on accurate assessment of the problem TKR as it does on revision implant design and surgical technique. Specific modes of failure require specific surgical solutions. Causes of failure are often presented as a list or catalogue, without a system or process for making a decision. In addition, strict definitions and consensus on modes of failure are lacking in published series and registry data. How we approach the problem TKR is an essential but neglected aspect of understanding knee replacement surgery. It must be carried out systematically, comprehensively and efficiently. Eight modes of failure are described: 1) sepsis; 2) extensor discontinuity; 3) stiffness; 4) tibial- femoral instability; 5) patellar tracking; 6) aseptic loosening and osteolysis; 7) periprosthetic fracture and 8) component breakage. A ninth 'category', unexplained pain is an indication for further investigation but not surgery.

Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for the stiff total knee: results after failed manipulation

Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a potentially devastating complication, resulting in loss of motion and function and residual pain. For patients in whom aggressive physical therapy and manipulation under anesthesia fail, lysis of adhesions may be the only option to rescue the stiff TKA. The purpose of this study is to report the results of arthroscopic lysis of adhesions after failed manipulation for a stiff, cruciate-substituting TKA. This retrospective study evaluated patients who had undergone arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for arthrofibrosis after TKA between 2007 and 2011. Minimum follow-up was 12 months (average, 31 months). Average total range of motion of patients in this series was 62.3°. Average preoperative flexion contracture was 16° and average flexion was 78.6°. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test. Pre- to postoperative increase in range of motion was significant (P<.001) (average, 62° preoperatively to 98° postoperatively). Average preoperative extension deficit was 16°, which was reduced to 4° at final follow-up. This value was also found to be statistically significant (P<.0001). With regard to ultimate flexion attained, average preoperative flexion was 79°, which was improved to 103° at final follow-up. This improvement in flexion was statistically significant (P<.0001). Patients can reliably expect an improvement after arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for a stiff TKA using a standardized arthroscopic approach; however, patients achieved approximately half of the improvement that was obtained at the time of surgery.

Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for stiff total knee arthroplasty

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic lysis of adhesions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in improving range of motion (ROM) and providing an improvement in knee function. The authors retrospectively examined 19 patients who underwent arthroscopic lysis of adhesions following TKA due to poor ROM. The criterion for lysis was the inability to flex to 90° at 3 months. All patients were followed for at least 2 years after lysis. Patient demographics, postoperative and follow-up ROM,number of prior surgeries, Knee Society Scores, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) functional scores were collected. Average ROM increased from 75.37° preoperatively to 98.95° postoperatively. The authors found an association between preoperative knee score and change in ROM between pre-arthroscopic lysis and ROM at final follow-up (P=.0188). When the authors examined the relationship between patient body mass index (BMI) and change in ROM,they found that patients with a BMI higher than 30 kg/m2 had a change of 26.44° compared with patients with a BMI lower than 30 kg/m2, who had a change of only 8.75°. A strong association was found between patient height and change in ROM and final ROM achieved (P=.0062 and .0032, respectively). The authors report a successful outcome among study patients. Furthermore, they found an association between patient height, BMI, and preoperative knee score and the improvement achieved after arthroscopic lysis of adhesions following TKA. The current study's results are comparable with those of published results. The authors recommend arthroscopic lysis of adhesions as a treatment option for stiff knees after TKA that fails after at least 3 months of nonoperative treatment.

Management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

AIM

The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the outcome of four main modalities of treatment for arthrofibrosis that develops subsequent to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), namely manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic debridement, open surgical release and revision TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A computerised search was conducted for relevant studies published from 1975 onwards in all the major databases and various search engines. A total of twenty-five studies were selected, representing a total of 798 patients. Studies that passed the inclusion criteria were then subjected to quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. On assessment, the 25 studies scored a total of 77 stars out of a possible 125. Two studies were prospective in design, while the remaining case series were retrospective in nature. The primary outcome measures assessed were increase in range of movement (ROM) and the Knee Society Score (KSS) at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Our results showed that manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) had a mean increase in ROM of 38.4°, arthroscopic release had a mean increase of 36.2°, open surgical release had a mean increase of 43.4° and revision TKA had a mean increase of 24.7°. No significant differences were found in the KSS of the four treatment modalities. Our analysis suggests that open surgical release would be the most beneficial option for patients who are fit to undergo secondary surgery if their lifestyle requires a higher ROM for activities of daily living. However, there were methodological limitations as majority of the papers were case series, which decreased the quality of the evidence available.

Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Stiffness complicating TKA is a complex and multifactorial problem. We suspected internally rotated components compromised motion because of pain, patellar maltracking, a tight medial flexion gap, and limited femoral rollback on a conforming lateral tibial condyle.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought to determine: (1) the incidence of internal rotation of the femoral and tibial components in stiff TKAs; (2) if revision surgery that included correction of rotational positioning improved pain, ROM, and patellar tracking; and (3) if revision altered nonrotational radiographic parameters.

METHODS

From a cohort of 52 patients with TKAs revised for stiffness, we performed CT scans of 34 before and 18 after revision to quantify rotational positioning of the femoral and tibial components using a previously validated scanning protocol.

RESULTS

All 34 patients with TKAs had internal rotation of the summed values for tibial and femoral components (mean, 14.8°; range, 2.7°-33.7°) before revision for stiffness. The incidence of internal rotation was 24 of 34 femoral (mean, 3.1°; internal) and 33 of 34 tibial components (mean, 13.7° internal). Revision arthroplasty improved Knee Society function, knee, and pain scores. Mean extension improved from a contracture of 10.1° to 0.8° and flexion from 71.5° to 100°. Postrevision CT scans confirmed correction of component rotation. Nonrotational parameters were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend CT scanning of patients with stiff TKAs before surgical intervention to identify the presence of internally rotated components.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Arthroscopic arthrolysis for arthrofibrosis of the knee after total knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis is an uncommon but potentially debilitating complication following total knee replacement which can result in chronic pain and poor recovery of range of motion. The treatment of this condition remains difficult and controversial. QUESTIONS/AIMS OF STUDY: We reviewed our results of arthroscopic arthrolysis of arthrofibrosis of the knee after total knee replacement to assess the potential for this technique to improve range of motion and provide improvement in knee function and pain as measured by the Knee Society Score (KSS).

METHODS

Eight patients were treated for arthrofibrosis after total knee replacement with arthroscopic management. The patients included five females and three males. The average age was 67.4 years. Initial rehabilitation efforts, which included manipulation under anesthesia, had failed. Arthroscopic arthrolysis was performed to release fibrous bands in the suprapatellar pouch and to reestablish the medial and lateral gutters. Lateral release of the patellar retinaculum was performed. Intensive physiotherapy and continuous passive motion began immediately post-operatively. The average follow-up was 37.4 months. The KSS was used for assessment of pain and function before arthroscopy and at the latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Six of the eight patients experienced improvement in the KSS. The average functional score showed improvement from 68 points pre-operatively to 86 at the time of final follow-up. The average pain scores improved from 30 points pre-operatively to 41 at the time of final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic management can be beneficial for patients suffering from arthrofibrosis following total knee replacement. Pain and KSS clinical scores can markedly improve.

Stiffness after TKR: how to avoid repeat surgery

Stiffness after total knee replacement (TKR) is a frustrating complication that has many possible causes. Although the definition of stiffness has changed over the years, most would agree that flexion <75° and a 15° lack of extension constitutes stiffness. The management of this potentially unsatisfying situation begins preoperatively with guidance of the patient's expectations; it is well-known that preoperative stiffness is strongly correlated with postoperative lack of motion. At the time of surgery, osteophytes must be removed and the components properly sized and aligned and rotated. Soft tissue balancing must be attained in both the flexion/extension and varus/valgus planes. One must avoid overstuffing the tibiofemoral and/or patellofemoral compartments with an inadequate bone resection. Despite these surgical measures and adequate pain control and rehabilitation, certain patients will continue to frustrate our best efforts. These patients likely have a biological predisposition for formation of scar tissue. Other potential causes for the stiff TKR include complex regional pain syndrome or joint infection. Close follow-up of a patient's progress is crucial for the success in return of range of motion. Should motion plateau early in the recovery phase, the patient should be evaluated for manipulation under anesthesia. The results of reoperations for a stiff TKR are variable due to the multiple etiologies. A clear cause of stiffness such as component malposition, malrotation, or overstuffing of the joint has a greater chance of regaining motion than arthrofibrosis without a clear cause. Although surgical treatment with open arthrolysis, isolated component, or complete revision can be used to improve TKR motion, results have been variable and additional procedures are often necessary.

Arthroscopic arthrolysis for the treatment of stiffness after total knee replacement gives moderate improvements in range of motion and functional knee scores

Twenty-two total knee replacements (TKR's) were treated for stiffness with arthroscopy and arthrolysis. The median follow-up was 38 months. No patients were lost to follow up. Extensive scarring was found and debrided in all of the knees. The mean Oxford Knee Score improved from 42.6 (+/-7.5) to 36.3 (+/-8.5) (P < 0.05) with TKR and from 36.3 (+/-8.5) to 29.3 (+/-9.0) (P < 0.05) with arthroscopic arthrolysis. The mean arc of motion improved from 8-69 degrees post-TKR to 3-105 degrees on table, but declined slightly to 4-93 degrees (P < 0.05) at most recent review. Arthroscopic arthrolysis compares well with other methods of treatment for stiffness with regard to improvements in range of motion and functional knee scores.

Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty

Stiffness is a relatively uncommon complication after total knee arthroplasty. It has been defined as a painful limitation in the range of movement (ROM). Its pathogenesis is still unclear even if some risk factors have been identified. Patient-related conditions may be difficult to treat. Preoperative ROM is the most important risk factor, but an association with diabetes, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, and general pathologies such as juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis has been demonstrated. Moreover, previous surgery may be an additional cause of an ROM limitation. Postoperative factors include infections, arthrofibrosis, heterotrophic ossifications, and incorrect rehabilitation protocol. Infections represent a challenging problem for the orthopaedic surgeon, and treatment may require long periods of antibiotics administration. However, it is widely accepted that an aggressive rehabilitation protocol is mandatory for a proper ROM recovery and to avoid the onset of arthrofibrosis and heterotrophic ossifications. Finally, surgery-related factors represent the most common cause of stiffness; they include errors in soft-tissue balancing, component malpositioning, and incorrect component sizing. Although closed manipulation, arthroscopic and open arthrolysis have been proposed, they may lead to unpredictable results and incomplete ROM recovery. Revision surgery must be proposed in the case of well-documented surgical errors. These operations are technically demanding and may be associated with high risk of complications; therefore they should be accurately planned and properly performed.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Learning Curve

Clinical experience of learning a new technique of minimally surgery for total knee arthroplasty is presented. Close monitoring of the technique, pitfalls, learning tips, and tricks are discussed. A “learning phase” is identified as approximately 10 months or 21 knee replacements using minimally invasive technique. It took 50 operations before the surgical time equaled the open technique. There was no incidence of increased complications during the learning phase. Functional results such as stair climbing, walking distance, and walking with aids was significantly better after minimally invasive technique than after standard technique.

Etiology and surgical interventions for stiff total knee replacements

Stiffness is the most prevalent early local complication of primary total knee replacement, affecting approximately 6 to 7% of patients undergoing surgery. The definition of stiffness after total knee replacement in terms of restriction of the arc of motion has evolved in the last 2 decades as patients and physicians expect better postoperative functional outcomes. Gentle manipulation under anesthesia within 3 to 4 months of surgery improves the range of motion in most patients. However, approximately 1% of patients, including those in which the window for manipulation has passed, will require further surgical interventions, which may include arthroscopy with lysis of adhesions, open debridement with exchange of the polyethylene insert, or revision of one or more components. This review will focus on describing the etiology of the problem and the results of the different surgical interventions for stiffness after total knee replacement.