EBRA-FCA for measurement of migration of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip

Migration pattern of cemented Exeter short stem in Dorr type A femurs. A prospective radiostereometry study with 2-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

The Exeter short stem (ESS) is 25 mm shorter than the standard length v40 Exeter stem (Stryker) and intended for a narrow femoral diaphysis. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the migration pattern of the cemented ESS.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

In a prospective single-center cohort study, 23 patients (21 female) mean age 78 (range 70-89) with hip osteoarthritis and Dorr Type A femurs were included. Preoperative DXA was used to group patients into normal (> - 1) and low (< - 1) T-score. Components were the collarless polished double-tapered Exeter short stem type N°1 L125. Patients were followed for 2 years with model-based RSA (stem migration), regular hip radiographs (stem position and cementation quality), Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and VAS pain.

RESULTS

At 2-year follow-up, the stems subsided 1.48 mm (CI 95% 1.69; 1.26) and retroverted 0.45° (CI 95% 0.01; 0.88). From 12 to 24 months, stem subsidence was 0.18 mm (CI 95% 0.1; 0.25) (p = 0.001) and retroversion was - 0.04° (CI 95% - 0.27; 0.18) (p = 0.70). T-score and stem subsidence correlated (rho = 0.48; p = 0.025) and patients with normal T-score (n = 7) had 0.42 mm (CI 95% - 0.01; 0.85) less subsidence as compared to patients with low T-score (n = 15) (p = 0.054). Stems in varus position (n = 9) subsided 1.7 mm (CI 95% 1.35; 2.05) compared to 1.33 mm (CI 95% 1.05; 1.60) for stems in neutral position (n = 13) (p = 0.07). Postoperative cementation quality did not influence 2-year stem migration. OHS improved to 40.7 (CI 95% 36.8; 44.7) and VAS pain at rest and activity decreased to 5 mm and 10 mm, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The 2-year migration pattern of the cemented ESS was similar to reports for the cemented standard length Exeter stem. Low preoperative T-score and varus stem-position showed a tendency for higher stem migration and should be studied as risk factors for failure in larger studies of cemented polished stems.

Hip replacement in femoral neck fractures: the role of cementation and its technical difficulties

Hip fractures in elderly patients are an arising problem due to aging of population and still represent a controversial challenge for orthopedic surgeon who should help achieve the best functional recovery in the shortest time. Cementation in hip replacement plays an important role, but it should be carefully planned considering the possible risks. According to the literature, there are still no certainties regarding the superiority of an uncemented implant compared to a cemented one. The purpose of this work is to conduct an overview of the scientific literature that can clarify the advantages and disadvantages of cemented and non-cemented implants from a biological and biomechanical point of view.

Diagnosis and Detection of Subtle Aseptic Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Aseptic loosening is a common cause of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), and with the rising number of primary THAs, revisions for aseptic loosening represent a significant burden for arthroplasty surgeons. Aseptic loosening remains a diagnostic and management challenge. Loosening can occur as a result of inadequate initial fixation, mechanical loss of fixation over time, or a biological loss of fixation over time. However, in most cases, etiology is multifactorial, involving all 3 factors. The diagnosis of aseptic loosening involves a careful history, focused clinical exam, and thorough evaluation of imaging using several diagnostic modalities. The careful evaluation of serial radiographs remains the cornerstone of diagnosis with additional input from advanced imaging modalities such as FDG-PET, DEXA, MRI, and several others, each offering unique advantages and disadvantages. In certain patients, history and physical exam might be the only initial obvious signs of loosening, and thus, unexplained continuous pain augmented by imaging findings serves as an indication for revision surgery.

Comparison of Femoral Bone Mineral Density Changes around 3 Common Designs of Cementless Stems after Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the periprosthetic BMD changes around Tri‐Lock “Bone Preserving Stem” with the other two common and longer stems (Corail and Summit) after THA.

Methods

It was a retrospective cohort study followed patients underwent the total hip arthroplasty from January 2013 to December 2015. They were selected and followed from January 2013 to Janaury 2020. Patients without osteoporosis underwent hip replacements with three aimed stems were included. Among the 138 patients included, 49 patients received the Tri‐Lock stem, 44 patients received the Corail stem, and 45 patients received the Summit stem. The periprosthetic BMD changes evaluated by the Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (iDXA) measurement according to the seven Gruen zones was the primary outcome. The Radiographic changes including spot welds, pedestal sign and grade of stress shielding was evaluated by the consecutive hip images. Einzel‐Bild‐Roentgen‐Analyze‐femoral component analysis (EBRA‐FCA) was used to measure the stem migration at 5 years postoperatively. Patient‐reported outcomes (PROMs) and adverse events were assessed and compared in three groups. Finally, the subgroups for the periprosthetic BMD changes, radiological and clinical outcomes were made based on the age, gender and length of follow‐up.

Results

A total of 138 patients were retrospectively followed for an average of 4.66 years. Excepting the different stems used in three groups, the age, gender and other characteristics of patients included were similar between groups. There was no significant difference between the three groups in periprosthetic BMD changes over postoperative 5 years. The Summit stem shown more BMD loss in Gruen zone 1 compared with the Tri‐Lock and Corail stems without significant difference (7.49%, −1.89% and −2.62%, respectively, P = 0.42). And the most prominent BMD loss was found in Gruen zone 7 for all three stems (−12.60%, −11.84%, and −9.56%, respectively, P = 0.91). The spot weld was significantly more common around the Corail stem, while there was no difference in the stem migration between three groups. Patient reported outcomes (PROMs) were significantly improved compared with the preoperative values. Regarding the rate of postoperative complications, two patients underwent the dislocation and 25 patients sometimes felt mild to moderate thigh pain. Subgroup analysis showed that female patients older than 50 years lost more BMD and had lower clinical scores, while the stem stability was not good enough in male patients.

Conclusions

The Tri‐Lock Bone Preserving Stem did not show significant difference in periprosthetic BMD changes compared with the other two conventional longer stems at 5 years after THA.

Prospective randomized study using EBRA-FCA to compare bone fixation between cementless SL-PLUS Zweymüller versus SL-PLUS MIA femoral implants in primary total hip arthroplasty with clinical assessment at a minimum 5years' follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Sometimes the slightest changes in implant design can lead to failure, even for a validated prosthesis. A minimally invasive cementless model, the SL-PLUS MIA™, in which the lateral shoulder is eliminated, was developed from the Zweymüller SL-PLUS™ implant. After satisfactory in-vitro tests, it required in-vivo assessment to ensure that bone fixation is good. We therefore conducted a prospective randomized study comparing the two versions of the Zweymüller femoral stem, with the aim of (1) comparing bone fixation up to 2 years' follow-up on EBRA-FCA radiography; and (2) assessing any difference in clinical or radiographic performance.

HYPOTHESIS

Primary stability assessed on EBRA-FCA does not significantly differ between the SL-PLUS MIA™ and SL-PLUS™ implants.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A single-center multi-surgeon prospective randomized study included 80 patients (79 were operated on) between April 2009 and October 2012, with a mean 6 years' follow-up. Radiographic assessment used the EBRA-FCA application up to 2 years' follow-up; clinical assessment, with a minimum 5 years' follow-up, was performed by a single observer, using the Harris and Oxford-12 scores. The two groups, SL-PLUS™ (n=38) and SL-PLUS MIA™ (n=41), were comparable in gender, age, indications, body-mass index and preoperative functional status.

RESULTS

At a minimum 2 years' follow-up, 24 SL-PLUS™ and 27 SL-PLUS MIA™ implants were analyzed on EBRA-FCA. Mean migration was respectively -0.3mm±0.8 [range, -1.6 to 1.3] and -0.5mm±0.7 [range, -2.2 to 0.5] (p=0.21). There was likewise no significant difference in varus tilt. The number of ectopic ossifications did not differ, despite the absence of shoulder: 7 with SL-PLUS™ (23%), and 10 with SL-PLUS MIA™ (32%), without clinical impact. Oxford score improved from 43±6.8 to 19±7 at 5 years' follow-up with SL-PLUS ™ and from 44±8.8 to 20±7.4 with SL-PLUS MIA™: i.e., no significant inter-group difference. Likewise, Harris score at 2 years' follow-up did not differ: 91.6±8.7 and 89.7±10.2, respectively. Implant survival did not differ: SL-PLUS MIA™, 41/41 (100%); SL-PLUS™, 36/38 (94.7%) (p=0.13).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in fixation quality between the SL-PLUS™ and SL-PLUS MIA™ implants. Elimination of the shoulder did not jeopardize primary or secondary fixation, but neither did it reduce the rate of ossification. The modified Zweymüller implant appeared risk-free at 6 years' follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, low-power prospective randomized study.

Development and validation of an automated and marker-free CT-based spatial analysis method (CTSA) for assessment of femoral hip implant migration: In vitro accuracy and precision comparable to that of radiostereometric analysis (RSA)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We developed a marker-free automated CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) method to detect stem-bone migration in consecutive CT datasets and assessed the accuracy and precision in vitro. Our aim was to demonstrate that in vitro accuracy and precision of CTSA is comparable to that of radiostereometric analysis (RSA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Stem and bone were segmented in 2 CT datasets and both were registered pairwise. The resulting rigid transformations were compared and transferred to an anatomically sound coordinate system, taking the stem as reference. This resulted in 3 translation parameters and 3 rotation parameters describing the relative amount of stem-bone displacement, and it allowed calculation of the point of maximal stem migration. Accuracy was evaluated in 39 comparisons by imposing known stem migration on a stem-bone model. Precision was estimated in 20 comparisons based on a zero-migration model, and in 5 patients without stem loosening.

RESULTS

Limits of the 95% tolerance intervals (TIs) for accuracy did not exceed 0.28 mm for translations and 0.20° for rotations (largest standard deviation of the signed error (SD(SE)): 0.081 mm and 0.057°). In vitro, limits of the 95% TI for precision in a clinically relevant setting (8 comparisons) were below 0.09 mm and 0.14° (largest SD(SE): 0.012 mm and 0.020°). In patients, the precision was lower, but acceptable, and dependent on CT scan resolution.

INTERPRETATION

CTSA allows detection of stem-bone migration with an accuracy and precision comparable to that of RSA. It could be valuable for evaluation of subtle stem loosening in clinical practice.

Performance of Non-Cemented, Hemispherical, Rim-Fit, Hydroxyapatite Coated Acetabular Component

The purpose of this study was to assess the durability of a non-cemented, hemispherical rim-fit, hydroxyapatite coated cup with a highly cross-linked polyethylene in 223 total hip arthroplasties. At 6-years follow-up (range, 5-9), there were no cup revisions for osteolysis or loosening. Radiologic evidence of osseointegration was based on presence of Stress Induced Reactive Cancellous Bone and radial trabeculae, seen in 47% and 93% of cups, respectively; both were most prevalent in Zone 1. There was no interference demarcation in any zones. Two cups were revised (0.9%): one for dislocation and another for infection. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship for cup revision for any failure (infection, dislocation) was 99% and for mechanical failure (osteolysis, loosening) was 100%. This design has excellent safety, efficacy and durability.

A randomised trial comparing a short and a standard-length metaphyseal engaging cementless femoral stem using radiostereometric analysis

This was a randomised controlled trial studying the safety of a new short metaphyseal fixation (SMF) stem. We hypothesised that it would have similar early clinical results and micromovement to those of a standard-length tapered Synergy metaphyseal fixation stem. Using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) we compared the two stems in 43 patients. A short metaphyseal fixation stem was used in 22 patients and a Synergy stem in 21 patients. No difference was found in the clinical outcomes pre- or post-operatively between groups. RSA showed no significant differences two years post-operatively in mean micromovement between the two stems (except for varus/valgus tilt at p = 0.05) (subsidence 0.94 mm (sd 1.71) vs 0.32 mm (sd 0.45), p = 0.66; rotation 0.96° (sd 1.49) vs 1.41° (sd 2.95), p = 0.88; and total migration 1.09 mm (sd 1.74) vs 0.73 mm (sd 0.72), p = 0.51). A few stems (four SMF and three Synergy) had initial migration > 1.0 mm but stabilised by three to six months, with the exception of one SMF stem which required revision three years post-operatively. For most stems, total micromovement was very low at two years (subsidence < 0.5 mm, rotation < 1.0°, total migration < 0.5 mm), which was consistent with osseous ingrowth. The small sample makes it difficult to confirm the universal applicability of or elucidate the potential contraindications to the use of this particular new design of stem.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:595–602.

A novel method for accurate and reproducible functional cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty

Cup positioning is an important variable for short and long term function, stability, and durability of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This novel method utilizes internal and external bony landmarks, and the transverse acetabular ligament for positioning the acetabular component. The cup is placed parallel and superior to the transverse ligament and inside the anterior wall notch of the true acetabulum, then adjusted for femoral version and pelvic tilt and obliquity based on weight bearing radiographs. In 78 consecutive THAs, the mean functional anteversion and abduction angles were 17.9° ± 4.7° and 41.7° ± 3.8°, respectively. 96% of the functional anteversion measurements and 100% of the functional abduction angles were within the safe zone. This technique is an easy, reproducible, and accurate method for functional cup placement.

The results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients under 30 years of age

Degenerative hip conditions most commonly affect older patients. However, many cases occur in younger patients. Total hip arthroplasty is the conventional approach; however, hip resurfacing is a viable option. Fifty-three metal-on-metal resurfacings in 46 patients under age 30 were performed. Patients had a variety of etiologies, and were followed clinically and radiographically with mean follow-up of 98.2 months. Clinical scores and x-rays were compared pre-operatively and post-operatively. The last follow-up SF-12 and UCLA scores significantly improved post-operatively (P<0.0001). Range of motion scores also improved (P<0.001), and the mean Harris Hip Score was 88. There were 6 revisions. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimate at 8 years was 95%. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing appears to be an effective procedure for younger patients. Longer-term data are needed for confirmation.

Results of Conserve Plus® metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for post-traumatic arthritis and osteonecrosis

The safety and efficacy of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty in post-traumatic arthritis and post-traumatic osteonecrosis (PT OA and PT ON) cases has not previously been thoroughly investigated. This study compared the outcomes of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (HR) in patients performed for an indication of OA secondary to trauma to compared to PT ON. Metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasties were performed on 62 hips, 43 with PT OA and 19 with PT ON with secondary osteoarthritis. There were 51 males and 11 females. All patients were followed up clinically and radiographically with a mean follow-up of 87.2 months. Clinical outcome scores, survivorship, and radiographs were compared between the PT OA and PT ON group. The clinical outcomes for the PT ON and PT OA groups were similar with a survival rate of 95% (95% CI 82.1% to 98.8%) for the PT OA group alone at 8 years and 91% for those with PT OA with ON at 8 years (95% CI 50.8%-98.7%). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves for the cohorts of PT OA and PT ON patients were not statistically significantly different (Log rank, p=0.6036). Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing appears to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of both post-traumatic osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis.

Migration analysis of a metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip prosthesis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip implants were designed to improve load transmission and preserve femoral bone stock. Until now, only few outcome data have been available and migration studies are one of the few ways of obtaining data that are predictive of implant survival. We therefore evaluated a metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip implant by Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

First, the EBRA-FCA method was validated for the short-stem hip implant. Then 80 of the first 100 consecutive implants were evaluated after at least 2 years. Clinical assessment was performed using the WOMAC and the UCLA score.

RESULTS

After 2.7 (2.0-4.2), years none of the implants had been revised and by that time the stems had subsided by a mean of 0.7 mm (SD 1.8) (95% CI: 0.3-1.1). Of the 80 implants, 78 were stable after 2 years, with 74 being primary stable and 4 showing secondary stabilization after initial subsidence. Continuous migration was seen in only 2 patients. The clinical outcome showed good results with a mean WOMAC of 11 (SD 13) and a mean UCLA score of 7.3 (SD 2.0).

INTERPRETATION

The metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip implant showed good functional results and a high degree of stability after 2 years. The outcome is comparable to that of clinically proven conventional hip implants and if the results are confirmed by long-term studies, short-stem hip arthroplasty might be an alternative for young patients requiring hip replacement.

High failure rates with a large-diameter hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement: clinical, radiological and retrieval analysis

This study reports the mid-term results of a large-bearing hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement in 199 hips (185 patients) with a mean follow-up of 62 months (32 to 83). Two patients died of unrelated causes and 13 were lost to follow-up. In all, 17 hips (8.5%) have undergone revision, and a further 14 are awaiting surgery. All revisions were symptomatic. Of the revision cases, 14 hips showed evidence of adverse reactions to metal debris. The patients revised or awaiting revision had significantly higher whole blood cobalt ion levels (p = 0.001), but no significant difference in acetabular component size or position compared with the unrevised patients. Wear analysis (n = 5) showed increased wear at the trunnion-head interface, normal levels of wear at the articulating surfaces and evidence of corrosion on the surface of the stem. The cumulative survival rate, with revision for any reason, was 92.4% (95% confidence interval 87.4 to 95.4) at five years. Including those awaiting surgery, the revision rate would be 15.1% with a cumulative survival at five years of 89.6% (95% confidence interval 83.9 to 93.4). This hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement series has shown an unacceptably high rate of failure, with evidence of high wear at the trunnion-head interface and passive corrosion of the stem surface. This raises concerns about the use of large heads on conventional 12/14 tapers.

Complications after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty

This article determines the incidence and cause of the complications commonly associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants and the proposed methods to prevent these complications. The literature available in PubMed was reviewed. Complication rates after hip resurfacing are low, and the procedure has shown both safety and efficacy in the hands of surgeons trained in specialized centers. Proper surgical technique can further reduce the incidence of femoral neck fracture, component loosening, and abnormal wear of the prosthesis. A more systematic detection of adverse local tissue reactions is needed to provide accurate assessments of their prevalence.

Cup anteversion in hip resurfacing: validation of EBRA and the presentation of a simple clinical grading system

The use of large metal on metal bearings has led to a reduction in the risk of dislocation post hip arthroplasty. Because of this, and also because of the technical difficulties associated with resurfacing surgery in particular, it could be argued that a less meticulous approach to acetabular cup placement has developed in comparison with conventional metal on polyethylene arthroplasty. Resurfacing cups may produce significant clinical problems when placed at the extremes of version, including increased production of metal debris and psoas tendonitis. Presented in this article is evidence that EBRA software (Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analysis, University of Innsbruck, Austria) can be used to reliably assess the version of resurfacing cups, when radiographs are of sufficient quality. The cups have characteristic appearances when placed at the extremes of version. These characteristics can allow the surgeon to identify poorly positioned cups without the use of software.

Two-year migration results of the ReCap hip resurfacing system-a radiostereometric follow-up study of 23 hips

There has been renewed interest for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing due to improved design and manufacturing of implants, better materials, and enhanced implant fixation. In contrast to conventional total hip replacements, only a few clinical hip resurfacing trials using radiostereometry (RSA) have been reported, and solely for the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The purpose of this RSA trial was to describe the migration pattern of a new hip resurfacing system (ReCap) within the first two years after primary surgery. Twenty-six patients underwent total hip replacement. The patients were followed-up for up to 24 months and were evaluated with the use of radiostereometric measurements. The prosthesis showed mean translations and rotation close to zero. Maximum translation was seen along the transverse axis in the medial direction (0.13 mm). No statistically significant translation or rotation was seen at two-years follow-up, (t-test, p <0.05, translation or rotation).

Assessment of the initial stability of the Symax femoral stem with EBRA-FCA: a multicentric study of 85 cases

We report a study of 85 Symax femoral stems that were followed at regular intervals with radiographs at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. The radiological migration of each stem was measured using the computer-assisted EBRA -FCA method. In 30 cases in which the EBRA method did not provide a complete measurement another computer-assisted method (Roman version 1.7) was employed. In all cases the distal migration of the stems was minimal, The threshold migration value used to define the stability of a stem was 1.5 mm at 24 months. The mean migration within the first two years was -0.17 mm (+/- 0.3) at 6 months, -0.31 mm (+/- 0.4) at 12 months and -0.45 mm (+/- 0.5) at 24 months. Only two cases exceeded the threshold limit of 1.5 mm at the two-year follow-up, but both values were lower than 2 mm. In the 25 cases which reached three-year follow-up the mean distal migration was -0.84 (+/-0.7). In four of them the subsidence exceeded 1.5 mm, but only one exceeded 2 mm. These data represent a positive predictive factor for the minimal risk of future aseptic loosening.

Influence of head size on the development of metallic wear and on the characteristics of carbon layers in metal-on-metal hip joints

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Particles originating from the articulating surfaces of hip endoprostheses often induce an inflammatory response, which can be related to implant failure. We therefore analyzed the metal content in capsular tissue from 44 McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal hip prostheses (with 3 different head sizes) and we also analyzed the morphological structure of layers located on articulating surfaces.

METHODS

Atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) was used to analyze the metal content in capsular tissue. Visually detectable carbon layers located on the articulating surfaces were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).

RESULTS

Metallic debris was detected in all capsular tissue samples but no statistically significant differences in metal content were found in relation to implant head size. The morphological characteristics of the different layer zones allowed an exact analysis of contact and non-contact areas. Furthermore, surface layers appear to have a protective function because they can prevent sharp-edged particles from damaging the prostheses surface.

INTERPRETATION

The implant head size does not appear to influence the amount of metallic debris. The layers obviously act like a lubricating agent because the protection function does not occur in regions without layers where the metal surface often shows numerous scratches. As layers are not generated immediately after the implantation of hip prostheses, these findings may at least partially explain the high amount of wear early after implantation.

2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing

Either excessive or insufficient cement penetration within the femoral head after hip resurfacing influences the risk of femoral failures. However, the factors controlling cement penetration are not yet fully understood. We determined the effect of femoral component design and cementation technique on cement penetration. Six retrieved femoral heads were resurfaced for each implant (BHR, ASR, Conserve Plus, DuROM, ReCAP) using the manufacturers' recommendations for implantation. In addition, the BHR was implanted using the Conserve Plus high-viscosity cementation technique, "BHR/hvt," and vice versa for the Conserve, "Conserve/lvt." The average cement penetration was highest with BHR (65.62% +/- 15.16%) compared with ASR (12.25% +/- 5.12%), Conserve Plus(R) (19.43% +/- 5.28%), DuROM (17.73% +/- 3.96%), and ReCAP (26.09% +/- 5.20%). Cement penetration in BHR/hvt remained higher than all other implants equaling 36.7% +/- 6.6%. Greater femoral component design clearance correlated with cement mantle thickness. Femoral component design in hip resurfacing plays a major role in cement penetration.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing radiographic evaluation techniques

Hip resurfacing devices require a new radiographic evaluation technique owing to femoral components with short or no stems. Fourteen US surgeons implanted 1148 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (HR) devices in a US-FDA-IDE clinical trial, which began in 2001. In this multi-center, prospective study, 337 patients (mean age, 50.1 years) were enrolled as a study group of unilateral HR arthroplasties. Radiographs of 292 HR arthroplasties at a minimum 2-year follow-up (maximum 3 years) were reviewed. There were 10 patients with radiographic evidence of femoral component instability beyond 2 years, as evidenced by subsidence > or = 5mm. Of these, 7 did not have clinical symptoms associated with femoral component instability. In the study group, 24 revisions were reported, of which 8 were due to femoral neck fractures, 4 were due to acetabular component loosening, 11 were due to femoral component loosening, and 1 due to dislocation.

Femoral head blood flow during hip resurfacing

Preserving femoral head vascularity during hip resurfacing may avoid femoral neck fractures and late femoral loosening. The posterior approach and notching of the femoral neck influence femoral head perfusion. However, it is not known if standard preparation of the femoral head during hip resurfacing can disrupt blood flow. Ten patients (10 hips) with advanced osteoarthritis having metal-on-metal hip resurfacing by means of a vascular-preserving surgical approach had femoral head blood flow measurements using laser Doppler flowmetry. Nine hips had a mean decrease of 70% in femoral head blood flow after standard reaming and preparation. The data suggest femoral head reaming during hip resurfacing substantially impacts blood flow to the femoral head and infers the extra osseous blood supply is still important in the arthritic femoral head. To avoid damaging the retinacular vessels, surgeons should direct the cylindrical reamer superolaterally staying as close as possible to the inferomedial neck.

No increased stem subsidence after arthroplasty in young patients with femoral head osteonecrosis: 41 patients followed for 1-9 years

BACKGROUND

Poor bone stock in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head may be a reason for poor outcome after hip replacement. One way of studying bone quality is to measure implant migration. We thus investigated the clinical and radiographic results of cementless THR in younger patients with femoral head osteonecrosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied hips in 41 patients (mean age 48 (25-63) years) with a cementless hip arthroplasty after late stage osteonecrosis. Clinical evaluation was by the Harris hip score, the WOMAC score and the SF-36 score. Stem subsidence was measured with the Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA) at 3, 12, 24, 60, and 72 months after operation. The average duration of follow-up was 7(1-9) years, with less than 2 years for 2 patients.

RESULTS

There was no revision of any hip. No radiographic or clinical stem loosening was seen. After 60 months, the cementless stems showed a median subsidence of -0.7 mm (95% CI: -0.9 to -0.2). No femoral osteolysis occurred. Femoral radiolucent lines, all < 1 mm, were seen in 10 hips. At the latest follow-up the Harris hip score was 83 (23-100) points.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings for porous-coated stems in patients with femoral osteonecrosis indicate no greater risk of stem subsidence and rate of osteolysis after an average of 7 years follow-up. Thus, we continue to use uncemented stems in younger patients with femoral osteonecrosis. However, continued follow-up will be necessary to evaluate the long-term outcome.

Development rationale for an articular surface replacement: a science-based evolution

Hip resurfacing has an enduring appeal because of the advantages of bone conservation and maximal joint stability. However, a far from satisfactory experience with earlier resurfacing designs led to its virtual disappearance in the 1980s. The concept was reintroduced in the late 1990s. The current generation of resurfacing devices generally consisted of a large-diameter metal-on-metal articulation, the femoral components being cemented and the acetabular components utilizing various forms of cementless fixation. The encouraging medium-term results, with a follow-up of up to 8 years using the current generation of surface replacement joints, combined with favourable reports related to long-term performance of some metal bearings have led to a rapid increase in the use of such components with these devices. This trend is most marked in younger, more active patients who have expectations of restoration of lifestyle in addition to improved mobility and pain relief and in whom failure with conventional total hip replacement is much higher than previously reported with more sedentary patients. The aim of this paper is, firstly, to highlight a number of areas of improvement and, secondly, to explain how these may be addressed by making modifications to the design of both implants and instrumentation and to the surgical technique. The areas identified for improvement were tissue preservation (thinner components, and reduced steps between sizes), acetabular cup issues (fixation, insertion, and positioning), femoral component issues (design, loading, and cementation), improved bearing surface characteristics, and simplified precise instrumentation with a low-trauma surgical technique.

Clinical correlation of femoral component migration in hip resurfacing arthroplasty analyzed by Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-analyze-femoral component analysis

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty using metal-on-metal bearings has become increasingly popular. Wear of these bearings has been imperceptible on plain radiographs. Migration analysis studies may represent the opportunity to detect early failures and evaluate long-term prosthetic survival. The authors retrospectively reviewed 29 hips in a consecutive series of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties with a long-term clinical follow-up (average 8.7 years) to analyze the femoral component migration pattern by means of Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyze-femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA). Femoral component migrations at 2 years and latest follow-up were compared with the known clinical outcomes. The authors' findings add validity to EBRA-FCA as a means to monitor femoral component migration and the clinical outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.